AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerEMERHITNCT05710861

Cost-utility of Focal HIFU vs Prostatectomy

A study testing F-HIFU and Radical Prostatectomy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 20 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Medico-Economic Randomized Trial comparing Focal HIFU Treatment to Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 75 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
F-HIFU and Radical Prostatectomy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
346 participants
Where
20 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
6 Mar 2023to 22 Jun 2029
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 75 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 45-75 yo male harboring a non-treated localized prostatic adenocarcinoma of maximum Gleason score 3+4, ISUP 2 unilateral on at most maximum 2 contiguous sextants (favorable intermediate risk),with or without ipsilateral or contralateral focus of score 3+3 (ISUP1).
  • Tumor visible on MRI and proven by systematic and/or targeted biopsies according to the center's practices, regardless of the route used (transrectal or transpirenal)
  • Or patients under active surveillance whose follow-up prostate biopsies reveal unilateral ISUP2 on at most 2 contiguous sextants (favorable intermediate risk), with or without ipsilateral or contralateral Gleason 3+3 focus (ISUP1)
  • Patients with several suspicious foci on MRI may be be included if only one of these foci is confirmed by targeted biopsies with an ISUP2 score. If more than one suspected site on MRI is confirmed by targeted biopsies, these should be unilateral ISUP2 on a maximum of 2 contiguous sextants (favourable intermediate risk), with or without an ipsilateral or contralateral site with a Gleason score of 3+3 (ISUP1).
  • stage T1c-T2,
  • with PSA <20 ng/ml,
Show all 9Show fewer
  • with prostate volume less than 150 ml,
  • patient clearly informed of the study and having agreed, with sufficient time for reflection to participate by signing the study's informed consent form,
  • patient affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme

Who cannot join

  • Metastatic prostate cancer.
  • Gleason score > 3+4 (ISUP>2).
  • Adenoma prostate carcinoma Cribriform or intraductal.
  • Previous treatment anterior for the same cancer, whatever modality.
  • Contra-indication to pelvic MRI with gadolinium injection.
  • Contra-indication to surgery or general anesthesia.
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Patient who refuse the one-year follow-up control biopsy after F-HIFU.
  • Presence of implant (stent, catheter) less than 1 cm from the treatment area.
  • Urinary or rectal fistula.
  • Anal or rectal stenosis or any other abnormality that may interfere with the Focal One® endorectal probe introduction.
  • Anatomic abnormality of the rectum or rectal mucosa.
  • Presence of a urinary artificial sphincter, a penile prosthesis or intraprostatic implant, i.e. urethral prosthesis.
  • Bladder neck and/or urethral stenosis or sclerosis.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (colon or rectum).
  • Ongoing UTI (should be treated before the F-HIFU or the RP).
  • Previous anal or rectal surgery that may interfere with the anal probe introduction.
  • Latex allergy.
  • Rectal wall thickness > 10 mm.
  • Tumor not accessible to a F-HIFU treatment (tumors located in the fibro-muscular anterior zone).
  • Previous not controlled cancer and/or treated since less than 5 years (except basocellular skin cancer).
  • Patient not able to understand the trial objectives or refusing to adhere to the trial instructions.
  • Patients under law-protection.
  • Patient in an ongoing research trial.
  • Patient with a severe health or psychologic problem that could impair the protocol pathway.

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

20 sites in 2 countries

France19 sites, 18 recruiting
  • Clinique Saint Vincent

    Besançon, 25000

    Vincent BAILY, MD, +33 3 81 47 21 44, docteur.bailly.urologie@gmail.com

    Vincent BAILY, MD

    Recruiting
  • Clinique Tivoli

    Bordeaux, 33000

    Gilles PASTICIER, MD, +33 5 56 90 91 16

    Gilles PASTICIER, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33076

    Franck Bladou, 05 57 82 03 40, franck.bladou@chu-bordeaux.fr

    Franck BLADOU, Pr

    Recruiting
  • Hopitaux civil de Colmar

    Colmar, 68024

    Withdrawn
  • CHU Grenoble Alpes

    Grenoble

    FIARD Gaelle, Pr, GFiard@chu-grenoble.fr

    Gaelle FIARD, Pr

    Recruiting
  • Hopital prive drome ardeche

    Guilherand-Granges, 07500

    Ibrahim BAH-CLOZEL, MD, +33 4 75 75 23 52

    Ibrahim BAH-CLOZEL, MD

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Claude HURIEZ

    Lille, 59000

    Jonathan OLIVIER, Dr, +33 3 20 44 43 98, jonathan.olivier@chu-lille.fr

    Jonathan OLIVIER, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Privé La Louviere

    Lille, 59800

    Pierre COLIN, MD, +33 3 20 12 12 90, docpierrecolin@gmail.com

    Pierre COLIN, MD

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Edouard Herriot Pavillon V

    Lyon, 69437

    Marc COLOMBEL, PROF, +33 4 72 11 62 89, marc.colombel@chu-lyon.fr

    Marc COLOMBEL, PROF

    Recruiting
  • APHM Nord Marseille

    Marseille, 13015

    Harry TOLEDANO, MD, +33 4 91 96 88 48, harry.toledano@ap-hm.fr

    Harry TOLEDANO, MD

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Cochin

    Paris, 75014

    Nicolas BARY DELONGCHAMPS, PROF, +33 1 58 41 27 83, nicolas.barrydelongchamps@aphp.fr

    Nicolas BARY DELONGCHAMPS, PROF

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Privé francheville

    Périgueux, 204004

    Richard Mallet, Dr, richard@mallet@gmail.com

    Richard MALLET, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Hopital Lyon Sud HCL Bat 3C Centre

    Pierre-Bénite, 69310

    Alain RUFFION, PROF, +33 4 72 67 88 37, alain.ruffion@chu-lyon.fr

    Alain RUFFION, PROF

    Recruiting
  • Clinique La Croix du Sud

    Quint-Fonsegrives, 31130

    Guillaume PLOUSSARD, MD

    Guillaume PLOUSSARD, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU de Rennes

    Rennes

    Romain MATHIEU, Pr, romain.mathieu@chu-rennes.fr

    romain MATHIEU, Pr

    Recruiting
  • CH Saintonge

    Saint-Jean-d'Angély

    EMERIAU Damien, Dr, d.emeriau@ch-saintonge.fr

    Damien EMERIAU, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Clinique Saint Michel

    Toulon, 83100

    Stephane MALLIK, MD, +33 4 98 00 18 69

    Stephane MALLIK, MD

    Recruiting
  • CHU Toulouse rangueil

    Toulouse, 31400

    Florian LACLERGERIE, Dr, 05 61 32 39 39, LACLERGERIE.F@chu-toulouse.fr

    Florian LACLERGERIE, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Clinique Oceane

    Vannes, 56000

    Cyril GERARD, MD, +33 2 97 63 44 70, drcgerard@aim.com

    Cyril GERARD, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

Guadeloupe1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU Pointe à Pitre

    Pointe-à-Pitre

    BRUREAU Laurent, Dr

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Guadeloupe

About this study

Official title: Randomized Medical-Economic Trial Comparing Focal HIFU Treatment to Total Prostatectomy in Patients With Intermediate Prognosis Prostate Cancer

Medico-Economic Randomized Trial comparing Focal HIFU Treatment to Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Read the detailed description

Standard treatment option of intermediate risk (ISUP2) prostate cancer (PC) is either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). An attractive option for selected patients and for the health care system would be to spare the preserved gland to decrease urinary, sexual and digestive side effects of whole-gland treatments keeping with a good cancer control. For these reasons, focal treatments have been developed in localized PC. The principal objective of the EMERHIT study is to estimate, from the health system point of view, the efficiency (cost/utility study) of focal HIFU (F-HIFU) for intermediate risk PC compared to RP (either by open, laparoscopic or robotic surgical approach) at 24 months. It will be a multicentric pragmatic clinical trial, comparative, with no insu, randomized in two parallel groups :

  • (1) F-HIFU treatment
  • (2) RP Randomization will be equal (ratio 1:1), stratified on the centers and performed maximum at 2 months before the procedure. The comparison to the SNDS data will use the NIR of the patients selected for the study. The use of the SNDS data will allow, on top of the estimation of the care cost, to increase the patient's follow-up (with no supplemental visit) and measure, at 48 months, costs, mortality rate and cancer control measures From version 4.0 of the protocol, randomisation will be adjusted to a 2:1 ratio and stratified by centre.
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
F-HIFU, Radical Prostatectomy
Keywords
Localized Prostate cancer, Prostatectomy, Focal HIFU, Quality of life, Cost, ISUP 2
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • F-HIFUDevice

    A F-HIFU treatment will be performed with the Focal-One® machine according to the predefined treatment area for each patient using the standard procedure in place in each therapeutic center and according to the user's manual edited by the company, under locoregional or general anaesthesia.

  • Radical ProstatectomyProcedure or surgery

    A Radical Prostatectomy will be performed according to the standard procedure in place in each center, under general anaesthesia, through an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic approach

Study groups in NCT05710861
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
F-HIFU GroupExperimental50 to 75 years old patients fit for a Radical Prostatectomy when active surveillance is not recommended and who do not want a radiation therapy: harboring a non-treated localized PC, with a maximum Gleason score of 3+4 , ISUP 2 and less than 50% of positive prostate biopsy (favorable intermediate risk), with or without contralateral microfocus score 3+3 (ISUP 1) of less than 3 mm, with a tumor visible on MRI and biopsy-proven with systematic and targeted biopsy with at least 2 biopsies per target and 12 systematic biopsies, Tumor involving maximum 2 biopsy-proven contiguous sextants. Patients with multiple MRI targets may be included if only one target is biopsy-proven, T1c-T2 stage, PSA <20 ng/ml, prostate volume less than 100 ml, fully informed patient accepting, after a decent reflexion time, to participate to the study by signing a consent form, affiliated or beneficiary patient to the French social security system
Receives: Device: F-HIFU
Prostatectomy GroupActive comparator50 to 75 years old patients fit for a Radical Prostatectomy when active surveillance is not recommended and who do not want a radiation therapy: harboring a non-treated localized PC, with a maximum Gleason score of 3+4 , ISUP 2 and less than 50% of positive prostate biopsy (favorable intermediate risk), with or without contralateral microfocus score 3+3 (ISUP 1) of less than 3 mm, with a tumor visible on MRI and biopsy-proven with systematic and targeted biopsy with at least 2 biopsies per target and 12 systematic biopsies, Tumor involving maximum 2 biopsy-proven contiguous sextants. Patients with multiple MRI targets may be included if only one target is biopsy-proven, T1c-T2 stage, PSA <20 ng/ml, prostate volume less than 100 ml, fully informed patient accepting, after a decent reflexion time, to participate to the study by signing a consent form, affiliated or beneficiary patient to the French social security system
Receives: Procedure: Radical Prostatectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The cost/utility ratio expressed as differential cost per QALY in favor of F-HIFU compared to RP (open, lap or robot) at 24 months.

    Utility will be measured at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 months using the EQ-5D-5L self-administered questionnaire.

    Costs will be estimated from the perspective of the French health system. They will be collected by probabilistic matching with data from the SNDS using data from the inclusion hospitalization of each patient included in the the trial.

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. The per-year of preserved life differential cost between F-HIFU and RP

    The per-year of preserved life differential cost at 48 months between F-HIFU and RP from the SNDS database evaluated by micro-costing

    Measured: 48 months

  2. Differential cost between F-HIFU and open, lap or robotic RP

    Differential cost of per-QALY improved at 24 months between F-HIFU and open, lap or robotic RP evaluated by micro-costing

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Real production cost (€) of F-HIFU and RP

    Real production cost (€) of F-HIFU and RP evaluated by micro-costing

    Measured: 48 months

  4. Net benefit (€) for the Health Insurance

    Net benefit (€) for the Health Insurance of a diffusion of F-HIFU into the French Health System for patients with favorable intermediate risk PC evaluated by micro-costing

    Measured: 48 months

  5. Survival with no salvage treatmente.

    Survival with no salvage treatment at 12, 24 and 48 months, evaluated in part from the SNDS database. Optional salvage treatments possibly being: a second F-HIFU, RP or radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation. All salvage treatments, except the F-HIFU, are already reimbursed by the French Health System and available in the SNDS database.

    Measured: 12, 24 and 48 months

  6. Overall survival

    Overall survival at 12, 24 and 48 months measured from the inclusion date to the date of death, all causes of death being included or the date of the last visit or at 48 months

    Measured: 12, 24 and 48 months

  7. Cancer specific survival

    Cancer specific survival at 12, 24 and 48 month measured from the date of inclusion to the date of death due to the progression of PC or the date of the last visit. Causes of death are available in the SNDS database since it is implemented by the CEpiDC

    Measured: 12, 24 and 48 months

  8. Androgen deprivation-free survival

    Androgen deprivation-free survival (equivalent to metastasis-free survival) at 12, 24 and 48 month measured from the inclusion date to the first prescription of androgen deprivation therapy or the date of the last visit

    Measured: 12, 24 and 48 months

  9. Urinary and sexual functions

    Urinary and sexual functions will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and, 24 month using auto-questionnaires EPIC-26

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

  10. Patient's quality of life

    Patient's quality of life will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and 24 month using the auto-questionnaires EORTC QLQ C30

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

  11. Urinary and sexual functions

    Urinary and sexual functions will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and, 24 month using auto-questionnars IPSS

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

  12. Urinary and sexual functions

    Urinary and sexual functions will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and, 24 month using auto-questionnaires IIEF-5

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

  13. Patient's quality of life

    Patient's quality of life will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and 24 month using the auto-questionnaires QLQ PR25

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

  14. Patient's quality of life

    Patient's quality of life will be evaluated at inclusion then at 6, 12 and 24 month using the auto-questionnaires EQ-5D-5L

    Measured: Inclusion and 1, 6, 12 and 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2023
  2. Study start6 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion22 Jun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicentric pragmatic clinical trial, comparative, with no insu, randomized in two parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
346 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05710861
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX 2019/67
Acronym
EMERHIT
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
16 Jan 2023
Last updated
9 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in