Cerebral Palsy Spastic DiplegiaNCT05707052
Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and Bobath Therapy Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
A study testing Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapy and Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy in people with Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Physiotherapy is widely used in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy. This study is conducted to identify the most appropriate physiotherapy approach. The purpose of the study is to compare two physical rehabilitation strategies i.e., Neck-trunk stabilization exercises and Bobath therapy, to investigate their… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
- What is being tested?
- Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapy and Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 22 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy
- Children with score of GMFCS [2] [3] [4] levels(2, 16).
- Signed consent form from parents/guardians.
Who cannot join
- Children with visual impairments
- Children with major auditory impairments
- Children with previous orthopedic surgery and Botulium toxin-A injection at least for 6 months
- Children having pharmacological intervention for the inhibition of spasticity
- Contractures
- Uncontrolled seizures
- Focal spasticity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Idrees Hospital
Sialkot, Punjab Province, 51300
Ali Raza, MsPT, 03326099065, araza.frahs@riphah.edu.pk
Ayesha Zulfiqar, MsPT(NMPT)
About this study
Official title: Comparative Effects of Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and Bobath Therapy on Trunk Control and Upper Limb Function in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Physiotherapy is widely used in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy. This study is conducted to identify the most appropriate physiotherapy approach. The purpose of the study is to compare two physical rehabilitation strategies i.e., Neck-trunk stabilization exercises and Bobath therapy, to investigate their effectiveness on trunk control and upper limb function. The aims of treatment are to influence muscle tone and improve postural alignment by specific handling technique.
Read the detailed description
The study will be a Randomized Clinical Trial conducted at the physiotherapy outpatient clinic of the tertiary care hospital in Sialkot, Idrees Hospital. Following the approval of the BASR, the study will be completed within six months. The sample will be taken using a non-probability convenient sampling technique, and the sample will be randomly divided into two groups. A sample size of 44 patients will be taken in this study. There will be two groups. Both groups will receive conventional therapy consisting of stretching, strengthening, range-of-motion exercises, positioning, and electrical stimulation. Group A: This group will receive Neck-Trunk Stabilization exercises. Group B: This group will receive Bobath therapy. The total intervention protocol will be given for six weeks' duration, with three sessions per week of about 45 minutes each. Outcome measures tools will be Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy will be measured at baseline and after 6 weeks.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
- Being tested
- Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapy, Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy
- Keywords
- Bobath; Cerebral palsy; Neck-Trunk Stabilization;
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapyOther
Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises along with conventional physical therapy in which stretching, strengthening, ROMs positioning and electrical stimulation are included.
Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapyOther
Bobath based exercises along with conventional physical therapy in which stretching, strengthening, ROMs positioning and electrical stimulation are included.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neck-Trunk Stabilization exercises | Experimental | First neck and trunk exercise involved lifting the head in a modified bridge exercise position so that lower abdominal muscles contracted when the neck was bent, thereby activating the neck flexor muscle and the lower abdominal muscles simultaneously. Second exercise involved pushing the neck backward in supine position to activate the erector muscles of the neck and the upper thoracic vertebrae through the extension of the muscles of the back of the neck. Third exercise activated the deep abdominal muscles in bridge exercise positions so that the participants would experience the posterior inclined movement of the pelvis. Keep each posture for 10 seconds at a time and repeat 10 times with a rest interval of 3 seconds per each. Receives: Other: Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapy |
| Bobath Therapy | Experimental | 1. trunk-pelvic-hip neutral alignment with anterior-posterior weight shifts on the ball,
2. bilateral upper extremity abduction-traction for lateral weight shift,
3. prone extension on the ball,
4. forward weight shift for the trunk and hip extension and forward protective extension,
5. diagonal weight shifts in flexion-rotation direction,
6. lateral weight shift for simultaneous activation of flexors and extensors,
7. bilateral shoulder flexion for latissimus dorsi elongation,
8. pectoral elongation exercise for trunk extension,
9. preparatory trunk activities (with continuous and/or intermittent compression and intermittent support),
10. positioning and holding of the head-trunk Keep each posture for 10 seconds at a time with a rest interval of 3 seconds per each. Receives: Other: Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo)
Changes from baseline SATCo provides a systematic method of assessing discrete levels of trunk control in children with motor disabilities. The SATCo determines the topmost (most cephalo) segment at which control of the upright posture is poor or not demonstrated i.e. is currently being learned for each of static, active and reactive control.
Measured: 4th week
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
Changes from baseline MACS as been used to classify how children with cerebral palsy use their hands when handling objects in daily activities.it is designed to reflect the typical manual performance of child. The ability of children from 4 - 18 years old with cerebral palsy to handle objects in everyday activities can be categorized into 5 levels.
Measured: 4th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion15 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion22 Mar 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral Palsy Spastic DiplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ali Raza, MS(OMPT), Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05707052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/22/0230
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ejraei N, Ozer AY, Aydogdu O, Turkdogan D, Polat MG. The effect of neck-trunk stabilization exercises in cerebral palsy: randomized controlled trial. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2021 Sep 30. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06206-6. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 34590804Acar G, Ejraei N, Turkdogan D, Enver N, Ozturk G, Aktas G. The Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Feeding and Swallowing Activities in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):800-811. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10329-w. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
PubMed 34173063Desouzart G. Physiotherapy intervention according to the Bobath concept in a clinical case of cerebral palsy. Ortho Res Online J. 2018;3(4).
Shin JW, Song GB, Ko J. The effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on cerebral palsy children's static and dynamic trunk balance: case series. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Apr;29(4):771-774. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.771. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
PubMed 28533628Shin JW, Song GB. The effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on upper limb and visuoperceptual function in children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Nov;28(11):3232-3235. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3232. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PubMed 27942155
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effects of Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and Bobath Therapy on Trunk Control and Upper Limb Function in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05707052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/RCR&AHS/22/0230
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
- Keywords
- Bobath; Cerebral palsy; Neck-Trunk Stabilization;
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Physiotherapy is widely used in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy. This study is conducted to identify the most appropriate physiotherapy approach. The purpose of the study is to compare two physical rehabilitation strategies i.e., Neck-trunk stabilization exercises and Bobath therapy, to investigate their effectiveness on trunk control and upper limb function. The aims of treatment are to influence muscle tone and improve postural alignment by specific handling technique.
Detailed description
The study will be a Randomized Clinical Trial conducted at the physiotherapy outpatient clinic of the tertiary care hospital in Sialkot, Idrees Hospital. Following the approval of the BASR, the study will be completed within six months. The sample will be taken using a non-probability convenient sampling technique, and the sample will be randomly divided into two groups. A sample size of 44 patients will be taken in this study. There will be two groups. Both groups will receive conventional therapy consisting of stretching, strengthening, range-of-motion exercises, positioning, and electrical stimulation. Group A: This group will receive Neck-Trunk Stabilization exercises. Group B: This group will receive Bobath therapy. The total intervention protocol will be given for six weeks' duration, with three sessions per week of about 45 minutes each. Outcome measures tools will be Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy will be measured at baseline and after 6 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neck-Trunk Stabilization exercises | Experimental | Other: Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapyFirst neck and trunk exercise involved lifting the head in a modified bridge exercise position so that lower abdominal muscles contracted when the neck was bent, thereby activating the neck flexor muscle and the lower abdominal muscles simultaneously. Second exercise involved pushing the neck backward in supine position to activate the erector muscles of the neck and the upper thoracic vertebrae through the extension of the muscles of the back of the neck. Third exercise activated the deep abdominal muscles in bridge exercise positions so that the participants would experience the posterior inclined movement of the pelvis. Keep each posture for 10 seconds at a time and repeat 10 times with a rest interval of 3 seconds per each. |
| Bobath Therapy | Experimental | Other: Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy1. trunk-pelvic-hip neutral alignment with anterior-posterior weight shifts on the ball, 2. bilateral upper extremity abduction-traction for lateral weight shift, 3. prone extension on the ball, 4. forward weight shift for the trunk and hip extension and forward protective extension, 5. diagonal weight shifts in flexion-rotation direction, 6. lateral weight shift for simultaneous activation of flexors and extensors, 7. bilateral shoulder flexion for latissimus dorsi elongation, 8. pectoral elongation exercise for trunk extension, 9. preparatory trunk activities (with continuous and/or intermittent compression and intermittent support), 10. positioning and holding of the head-trunk Keep each posture for 10 seconds at a time with a rest interval of 3 seconds per each. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy
- Children with score of GMFCS [2] [3] [4] levels(2, 16).
- Signed consent form from parents/guardians.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Children with visual impairments
- Children with major auditory impairments
- Children with previous orthopedic surgery and Botulium toxin-A injection at least for 6 months
- Children having pharmacological intervention for the inhibition of spasticity
- Contractures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapyNeck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises along with conventional physical therapy in which stretching, strengthening, ROMs positioning and electrical stimulation are included. | Other | Neck-Trunk Stabilization exercises |
| Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapyBobath based exercises along with conventional physical therapy in which stretching, strengthening, ROMs positioning and electrical stimulation are included. | Other | Bobath Therapy |
Primary outcome
Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo)
Time frame: 4th week
Changes from baseline SATCo provides a systematic method of assessing discrete levels of trunk control in children with motor disabilities. The SATCo determines the topmost (most cephalo) segment at which control of the upright posture is poor or not demonstrated i.e. is currently being learned for each of static, active and reactive control.
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
Time frame: 4th week
Changes from baseline MACS as been used to classify how children with cerebral palsy use their hands when handling objects in daily activities.it is designed to reflect the typical manual performance of child. The ability of children from 4 - 18 years old with cerebral palsy to handle objects in everyday activities can be categorized into 5 levels.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 34590804Ejraei N, Ozer AY, Aydogdu O, Turkdogan D, Polat MG. The effect of neck-trunk stabilization exercises in cerebral palsy: randomized controlled trial. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2021 Sep 30. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06206-6. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 34173063Acar G, Ejraei N, Turkdogan D, Enver N, Ozturk G, Aktas G. The Effects of Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Feeding and Swallowing Activities in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):800-811. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10329-w. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
- BackgroundDesouzart G. Physiotherapy intervention according to the Bobath concept in a clinical case of cerebral palsy. Ortho Res Online J. 2018;3(4).
- Background: PubMed 28533628Shin JW, Song GB, Ko J. The effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on cerebral palsy children's static and dynamic trunk balance: case series. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Apr;29(4):771-774. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.771. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 27942155Shin JW, Song GB. The effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on upper limb and visuoperceptual function in children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Nov;28(11):3232-3235. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3232. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
Not yet recruiting
Dual-Task Training in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Quality, Caregiver Burden, Stress, and Self-Efficacy in Parents of Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Comparison by Night Orthosis Use
Cerebral Palsy, Sleep Disorders
Recruiting
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Virtual Reality on Gait and Self-Esteem in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Virtual Reality on Balance and Executive Functions in Children With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Therapeutic Listening for Balance and Trunk Control in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy, Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ali Raza, MS(OMPT) principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neck-Trunk Stabilization Exercises and conventional physical therapy and Bobath Therapy and conventional physical therapy in people with Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Imran Amjad, Phd (03324390125, imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) (time frame: 4th week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05707052, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2023.