AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT05700019

Effects of 'Pinkwashed' Alcohol Ads in an Online RCT

A study testing Pinkwashed Advertisements in people with Breast Cancer and Cancer, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to examine how exposure to "pinkwashed" alcohol advertisements (i.e., ads that associate the company with breast cancer awareness or charities) affects consumers' perceptions that alcohol increases the risk of breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Cancer
What is being tested?
Pinkwashed Advertisements
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
602 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Jan 2023to 19 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years old or older

Who cannot join

  • Less than 18 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UNC - Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary objective of this study is to examine how exposure to "pinkwashed" alcohol advertisements (i.e., ads that associate the company with breast cancer awareness or charities) affects consumers' perceptions that alcohol increases the risk of breast cancer. The investigators will randomize participants to view 3 'pinkwashed' social media advertisements for alcohol or 3 control advertisements for alcohol (i.e., 'de-pinked' standard alcohol advertisements that match the intervention advertisements on overall design but do not mention breast cancer). Each participant will view the 3 advertisements for their arm (presented in random order) and respond to survey questions programmed in Qualtrics.

Being tested
Pinkwashed Advertisements, Control - Standard Advertisements
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pinkwashed AdvertisementsBehavioural

    Real advertisements from alcoholic beverage companies' social media accounts that contain messaging or other features that associate the alcohol company with breast cancer awareness or research.

  • Control - Standard AdvertisementsBehavioural

    Real advertisements from the same alcoholic beverage companies' social media accounts that do not contain messaging or other features associated with breast cancer awareness or research.

Study groups in NCT05700019
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control - Standard AdvertisementsOtherIn the control condition, participants will view 3 advertisements for alcohol (shown in random order) that do not mention breast cancer awareness or charities. Advertisements will be real social media posts used by alcohol companies, modified only to remove dates, likes/comments, and references to specific geographic locations.
Receives: Behavioral: Control - Standard Advertisements
Pinkwashed AdvertisementsExperimentalIn the pinkwashed condition, participants will view 3 advertisements for alcohol (shown in random order) that associate the alcohol company with breast cancer awareness or research (e.g., indicate that a portion of sales will be directed to a breast cancer-related foundation). Advertisements will be real social media posts used by alcohol companies, modified only to remove dates, likes/comments, and references to specific geographic locations.
Receives: Behavioral: Pinkwashed Advertisements

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Breast cancer risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes... Breast cancer." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Perceived product healthfulness

    This outcome will be measured with one item adapted from Bollard et al (2016). The question will read: "How healthy or unhealthy do you think it is to drink this product?" and will be measured with a 5-point likert-type response scale ranging from "Very unhealthy" (1) to "Very healthy"(5). Higher scores indicate greater healthfulness perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  2. Perceived social responsibility of brand

    This outcome will be measured with one item adapted from Nan \& Heo (2017). The question will read: "How socially responsible do you think the company that makes this product is?" and will be measured with a 5-point likert-type response scale ranging from "Very socially irresponsible" (1) to "Very socially responsible" (5). Higher scores indicate perceptions of social responsibility.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  3. Favorable attitudes toward brand

    This outcome will be measured with one item adapted from Nan \& Heo (2017). The question will read: "How do you feel about the company that makes this product?" and will be measured with a 5-point likert-type response scale ranging from "Dislike it a lot" (1) to "Like it a lot" (5). Higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  4. Purchase intentions

    This outcome will be measured with one item adapted from Hall et al (2020). The question will display all three advertisements that the participant was exposed to (either pinkwashed or control). It will then query: "How likely would you be to buy any of these products in the next 4 weeks, if they were available?" and will be measured with a 5-point likert-type response scale ranging from "Not at all likely" (1) to "Extremely likely" (5). Higher scores indicate greater purchase intentions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  5. Perceived misleadingness of ads

    Measure of how misleading a participant perceives the advertisement. Assessed with 1 item adapted from Hall et al. 2020

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  6. Support for breast cancer warnings

    Measure of participant support of including breast cancer warning labels on alcoholic beverage products. Assessed with 1 item adapted from Hall et al. 2018

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  7. Stomach cancer risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes... Stomach cancer." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  8. Mouth and throat cancer risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes... Mouth and throat cancer." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  9. Liver cancer risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes... Liver cancer." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  10. Liver disease risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes... Liver disease." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

  11. Hypertension risk perceptions

    This outcome will be measured with an adapted item from the HINTS (2020) survey. The question is worded " In your opinion, how much does drinking [wine/beer/liquor] affect the risk of developing each of the following outcomes...Hypertension." Response options are on a five point likert-type scale ranging from "Decreases risk a lot" (=1) to "Increases risk a lot " (=5). Participants will be asked to respond to this item three times, once for each type of alcoholic beverage presented (wine, beer, liquor). Scores from the three items will then be averaged for analyses. Higher scores indicate higher risk perceptions.

    Measured: During ~20 minute online survey

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2023
  2. Study start11 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion19 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion19 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
602 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05700019
Sponsor's protocol ID
20-2338
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
17 Jan 2023
Last updated
13 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The investigators will share our deidentified individual participant data, as well as our statistical analysis plan and analytic code on Open Science Framework (OSF), a publicly available data repository.

Publications

  • Nan X, Heo K. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Advertising. 2007;36(2):63-74. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367360204

  • Hall MG, Lazard AJ, Grummon AH, Mendel JR, Taillie LS. The impact of front-of-package claims, fruit images, and health warnings on consumers' perceptions of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks: Three randomized experiments. Prev Med. 2020 Mar;132:105998. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105998. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

    PubMed 31982477
  • Bollard T, Maubach N, Walker N, Ni Mhurchu C. Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 1;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7.

    PubMed 27580589
  • Hall MG, Marteau TM, Sunstein CR, Ribisl KM, Noar SM, Orlan EN, Brewer NT. Public support for pictorial warnings on cigarette packs: an experimental study of US smokers. J Behav Med. 2018 Jun;41(3):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9910-2. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

    PubMed 29411272

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pinkwashed Advertisements in people with Breast Cancer and Cancer, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Breast cancer risk perceptions (time frame: During ~20 minute online survey). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05700019, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in