Educational ProblemsNCT05695326
Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program
A study testing 3D printing technology learning program in people with Educational Problems, run by Gunma PAZ College at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
3D printing technology helps rehabilitation professionals make an order-made assistive device (AD). However, most have not learned how to use the technology for clinical practice. The study is aimed to evaluate a 3D printing technology learning program for rehabilitation professionals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Educational Problems
- What is being tested?
- 3D printing technology learning program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible participants who have a licence for physical, occupational or speech-language therapy
Who cannot join
- Participants who have experienced learning any 3D printing technology.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Japan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
shonan keiiku Hospital
Fujisawa, Kanayama
Sho Maruyama, phD
About this study
Official title: Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program for Rehabilitation Professionals: a Randomized Control Trial
3D printing technology helps rehabilitation professionals make an order-made assistive device (AD). However, most have not learned how to use the technology for clinical practice. The study is aimed to evaluate a 3D printing technology learning program for rehabilitation professionals. Eligible participants who have a licence for physical, occupational or speech-language therapy and have not experienced learning any 3D printing technology. The learning program was conducted in accordance with Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (Morris TH, 2020). The program was conducted over eight weeks. The outcome measure included the Japanese version of the modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire (TAM-J). It consists of 13 items and four scales; Perception of usefulness (28 points total), Perception of ease of use (35 points total), Attitude toward use (14 points total) and Intention to use (14 points total). Within-group analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the TAM-J between different time points.
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Being tested
- 3D printing technology learning program
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D printing technology learning programBehavioural
The study is aimed to evaluate a 3D printing technology learning program for rehabilitation professionals
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: 3D printing technology learning program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire
A higher score means the strong acceptance of 3D printing technology(score range is 13 to 91 points)
Measured: Change from Baseline a score of the Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire at 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Educational ProblemsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gunma PAZ College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ken Kondo, Gunma PAZ College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05695326
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAZ22-2-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program for Rehabilitation Professionals: a Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05695326
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAZ22-2-1
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gunma PAZ CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
3D printing technology helps rehabilitation professionals make an order-made assistive device (AD). However, most have not learned how to use the technology for clinical practice. The study is aimed to evaluate a 3D printing technology learning program for rehabilitation professionals. Eligible participants who have a licence for physical, occupational or speech-language therapy and have not experienced learning any 3D printing technology. The learning program was conducted in accordance with Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (Morris TH, 2020). The program was conducted over eight weeks. The outcome measure included the Japanese version of the modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire (TAM-J). It consists of 13 items and four scales; Perception of usefulness (28 points total), Perception of ease of use (35 points total), Attitude toward use (14 points total) and Intention to use (14 points total). Within-group analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the TAM-J between different time points.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program | Experimental | Behavioral: 3D printing technology learning program |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Eligible participants who have a licence for physical, occupational or speech-language therapy
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants who have experienced learning any 3D printing technology.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D printing technology learning programThe study is aimed to evaluate a 3D printing technology learning program for rehabilitation professionals | Behavioural | Effects of a 3D Printing Technology Learning Program |
Primary outcome
The Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire
Time frame: Change from Baseline a score of the Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire at 2 months
A higher score means the strong acceptance of 3D printing technology(score range is 13 to 91 points)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Standardized Educational Videos of Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries
Educational Problems, Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Surgical Coaching on Resident ObGyn Laparoscopic Skills
Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Couple-based Psycho-socio-educational Intervention Using WeChat/WhatsApp on Dyadic Psychological and Sleep Outcomes
Sleep Problems, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
Child Abuse, Child Neglect
Recruiting
Health Equity and Rural Education (HERE!) Clinical Trial
Behavioral Symptoms, Community Health Workers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3D printing technology learning program in people with Educational Problems, run by Gunma PAZ College at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ken Kondo, PhD (0273653366, kenkondoot@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire (time frame: Change from Baseline a score of the Japanese version of modified Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire at 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2023.