AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone Marrow CancerNCT05690230

Improving Patient Experience: BMBA

A study testing Virtual reality and Environmental changes in people with Bone Marrow Cancer and Leukemia, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study seeks to determine if patients undergoing a bone marrow biopsy/aspiration (BMBA) procedure who receive distraction techniques have lower levels of distress and pain, and higher post-procedure satisfaction, compared to those receiving standard-of-care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bone Marrow Cancer, Leukemia, Lymphoma
What is being tested?
Virtual reality and Environmental changes
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Dec 2022to 5 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Prior history of at least 1 (one) BMBA at Jefferson outpatient oncology office within the past 2 (two) years
  • Visiting the Jefferson outpatient oncology office for a BMBA procedure during the study duration

Who cannot join

  • Inability to read questions in English
  • Inability to answer questions autonomously
  • History of vertigo
  • Legal blindness in both eyes
  • Severe or profound hearing loss, or deafness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving the Patient Experience During Bone Marrow Biopsy/Aspiration (BMBA): Do Interventions Decrease Distress and Pain

This study seeks to determine if patients undergoing a bone marrow biopsy/aspiration (BMBA) procedure who receive distraction techniques have lower levels of distress and pain, and higher post-procedure satisfaction, compared to those receiving standard-of-care. Intervention 1 is guided meditation in a virtual reality (VR) headset. Intervention 2 is comprised of environmental changes to the room (via nature-themed decals) and music.

Read the detailed description

This study seeks to determine if patients undergoing a bone marrow biopsy/aspiration (BMBA) procedure who receive distraction techniques have lower levels of distress and pain, and higher post-procedure satisfaction, compared to those receiving standard-of-care. Intervention 1 is guided meditation in a virtual reality (VR) headset. Intervention 2 is comprised of environmental changes to the room (via nature-themed decals) and music.

Being tested
Virtual reality, Environmental changes
Medical subject headings
Bone Marrow Neoplasms, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Hematologic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual realityOther

    Patients will be provided with a wireless virtual reality headset that contains a guided meditation application. The application allows users to select their preferred music, visual setting, and a topic for meditation.

  • Environmental changesOther

    A nature themed wall mural decal will be installed in the procedure room and the in-room computer will play music from Pandora. A selection of suggested stations will be provided, with the option for outside selections.

Study groups in NCT05690230
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention 1: Virtual realityExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Virtual reality
Control 1No interventionStandard of care without change, in parallel with intervention 1: Virtual reality.
Intervention 2: Environmental changesExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Environmental changes
Control 2No interventionStandard of care without change, in parallel with intervention 2: Environmental changes.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Distress score

    The primary outcome will be reported on a scale of 0-10, based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer, 0 signifying "no distress" and 10 signifying "extreme distress." This scale is standardly used with oncology patients to determine their distress levels-distress refers to "an unpleasant experience of a mental, physical, social, or spiritual nature. It can affect the way you think, feel, or act. Distress may make it harder to cope with having cancer, its symptoms, or its treatment."

    Measured: Within 10 minutes pre-procedure

  2. Distress score

    The primary outcome will be reported on a scale of 0-10, based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer, 0 signifying "no distress" and 10 signifying "extreme distress." This scale is standardly used with oncology patients to determine their distress levels-distress refers to "an unpleasant experience of a mental, physical, social, or spiritual nature. It can affect the way you think, feel, or act. Distress may make it harder to cope with having cancer, its symptoms, or its treatment."

    Measured: Within 10 minutes post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pain intensity

    To assess patient pain scores related to their BMBA procedure. This will be measured through the 0-10 Numeric Pain Intensity Scale, 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain imaginable."

    Measured: Within 10 minutes pre-procedure

  2. Pain intensity

    To assess patient pain scores related to their BMBA procedure. This will be measured through the 0-10 Numeric Pain Intensity Scale, 0 signifying "no pain" and 10 signifying "the worst pain imaginable."

    Measured: Within 10 minutes post-procedure

  3. Patient satisfaction

    To assess patient satisfaction with their procedure. This will be assessed through a patient satisfaction survey including Likert-type questions.

    Measured: Within 10 minutes post-procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2023
  2. Study start5 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion5 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two interventions will be trialed, each in parallel with a control group. The two phases will be done in sequence.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05690230
Sponsor's protocol ID
21G.1035
Other IDs
JT 18448
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
21 Dec 2022
Last updated
24 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schweitzer M, Gilpin L, Frampton S. Healing spaces: elements of environmental design that make an impact on health. J Altern Complement Med. 2004;10 Suppl 1:S71-83. doi: 10.1089/1075553042245953.

    PubMed 15630824
  • Watts G, Khan A, Pheasant R. Influence of soundscape and interior design on anxiety and perceived tranquillity of patients in a healthcare setting. Applied Acoustics. 2016 Mar; 104:135-41.

  • Ulrich RS. Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. J Health Care Inter Des. 1991;3:97-109.

    PubMed 10123973
  • Laursen J, Danielsen A, Rosenberg J. Effects of environmental design on patient outcome: a systematic review. HERD. 2014 Summer;7(4):108-19. doi: 10.1177/193758671400700410.

    PubMed 25303431
  • Diette GB, Lechtzin N, Haponik E, Devrotes A, Rubin HR. Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy: a complementary approach to routine analgesia. Chest. 2003 Mar;123(3):941-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.941.

    PubMed 12628899
  • Iyendo TO, Uwajeh PC, Ikenna ES. The therapeutic impacts of environmental design interventions on wellness in clinical settings: A narrative review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;24:174-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

    PubMed 27502819
  • Tsai HF, Chen YR, Chung MH, Liao YM, Chi MJ, Chang CC, Chou KR. Effectiveness of music intervention in ameliorating cancer patients' anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):E35-50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000116.

    PubMed 24662723
  • Danhauer SC, Vishnevsky T, Campbell CR, McCoy TP, Tooze JA, Kanipe KN, Arrington SA, Holland EK, Lynch MB, Hurd DD, Cruz J. Music for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing bone marrow biopsy: a randomized controlled study of anxiety, perceived pain, and patient satisfaction. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2010;8(4):140-147.

    PubMed 24619452
  • Thoma MV, Zemp M, Kreienbuhl L, Hofer D, Schmidlin PR, Attin T, Ehlert U, Nater UM. Effects of Music Listening on Pre-treatment Anxiety and Stress Levels in a Dental Hygiene Recall Population. Int J Behav Med. 2015 Aug;22(4):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s12529-014-9439-x.

    PubMed 25200448
  • Daniel E. Music used as anti-anxiety intervention for patients during outpatient procedures: A review of the literature. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22:21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

    PubMed 26850800
  • Speca M, Carlson LE, Goodey E, Angen M. A randomized, wait-list controlled clinical trial: the effect of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients. Psychosom Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;62(5):613-22. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200009000-00004.

    PubMed 11020090
  • Deng G, Cassileth BR. Integrative oncology: complementary therapies for pain, anxiety, and mood disturbance. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):109-16. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.109.

    PubMed 15761079
  • Sander Wint S, Eshelman D, Steele J, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction using virtual reality glasses during lumbar punctures in adolescents with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Jan-Feb;29(1):E8-E15. doi: 10.1188/02.ONF.E8-E15.

    PubMed 11845217
  • Espinoza M, Banos RM, Garcia-Palacios A, Cervera JM, Esquerdo G, Barrajon E, Botella C. Promotion of emotional wellbeing in oncology inpatients using VR. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;181:53-7.

    PubMed 22954828
  • Wiederhold BK, Gao K, Sulea C, Wiederhold MD. Virtual reality as a distraction technique in chronic pain patients. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):346-52. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0207.

    PubMed 24892196

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual reality and Environmental changes in people with Bone Marrow Cancer and Leukemia, run by Thomas Jefferson University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Distress score (time frame: Within 10 minutes pre-procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05690230, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in