Functional StatusNCT05688163
Effects of a Daily Cognition Training in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment
A study testing programme based on everyday cognition and traditional cognitive stimulation in people with Functional Status and Cognitive Impairment, run by University of Salamanca at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in cognitively unimpaired older adults on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Functional Status, Cognitive Impairment, Occupational Therapy
- What is being tested?
- programme based on everyday cognition and traditional cognitive stimulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 99 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be aged 60 years or older.
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form about the project, authorising their participation.
- Carry out the initial assessment.
- Be admitted to the programme from the start of the programme.
Who cannot join
- No literacy skills or significant deficits in language comprehension.
- Institutionalised person.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
- Participate in another cognitive stimulation programme during the intervention process.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Daily Cognition Training Programme on Cognitive Function, Emotional State, Frailty and Functionality in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment
To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in cognitively unimpaired older adults on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality.
Read the detailed description
The present study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of programmes that use everyday cognition for the assessment and intervention of healthy elderly people with the aim of maintaining or improving autonomy, compared to other programmes based on traditional cognitive stimulation, whose benefits do not generalise to significant improvements in everyday life. In addition, the investigators seek to relate how the presence of depression in older people impacts on everyday cognition, and therefore on the functionality of IADLs.
- WORKING HYPOTHESIS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED
- WORKING HYPOTHESES
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): Everyday cognition training programmes are more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment.
- Null hypothesis (Ho): Everyday cognition training programmes are not more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment. In order to validate or disprove the main hypothesis, the following objectives have been developed:
- OBJECTIVES:
- MAIN OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in older adults without cognitive impairment, for cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality. ii. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the differences in the emotional state of older adults without cognitive impairment between the everyday cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To contrast the differences in the cognitive function of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To analyse the differences in the frailty index of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To identify the differences in the functionality of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- Being tested
- programme based on everyday cognition, traditional cognitive stimulation
- Keywords
- Functional Status, Cognition Therapy, Cognitive Impairment, Occupational therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
programme based on everyday cognitionOther
Will carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above. Each day one of these tasks will be worked on.
traditional cognitive stimulationOther
Individual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| traditional cognitive stimulation | Active comparator | The control group will carry out the programme based on traditional cognitive stimulation. Individual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants. Receives: Other: traditional cognitive stimulation |
| programme based on everyday cognition | Experimental | The experimental group, on the other hand, will carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, i.e. the use of cognitive functions to solve real everyday problems that occur in our daily lives and that allow us to be autonomous in our homes, such as preparing food, taking care of the house, using transport, shopping, using the telephone, medication, financial management and access to information and current affairs. As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above. Receives: Other: programme based on everyday cognition |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Everyday cognition.
The Test for the Assessment of Everyday Cognition measures the ability of older people to solve everyday problems through performance tasks whose resolution depends on their cognitive capacity. The abilities tested are planning ability and cognitive flexibility, verbal working memory, reasoning, episodic memory, episodic memory and crystallised intelligence. The result is a direct estimation of the person's functional capacity by means of 12 real situations grouped into 6 areas: medication, administrative management, financial management, meal preparation, transport and shopping. The administration time is about 35 minutes.
Measured: 35 minutes
Secondary outcomes (5)
Cognitive function.
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT TEST (MoCA test) Versión 8.3. :It is a cognitive assessment tool created to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It evaluates executive functions, attention, abstraction, memory, language, visual-constructive abilities, calculation and orientation. It takes approximately 10 minutes to administer. The maximum score is 30 points, below 26 points being the cut-off for MCI (in developed countries).
Measured: 10 minutes
Emotional state.
Yesavage: It is a screening questionnaire for depression in people over 65 years of age. The 15-item version was selected for this study. It expresses the degree of satisfaction, quality of life and feelings. Of the 15 items, 10 indicate the presence of depression if answered positively, while the remaining 5 items answered negatively indicate depression. The administration time is 5 minutes. A score above 5 shows moderate depression and above 10 severe depression.
Measured: 10minutes
Instrumental activities of daily living
LAWTON AND BRODY SCALE: This is an assessment designed to evaluate autonomy in IADLs in the elderly population. It consists of eight items: use of the telephone, shopping, meal preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transport, medication management, use of transport and money. It takes 4 minutes to administer and is scored 0 or 1 for each item, making a total score of 8. At present, it is influenced by a gender bias as it is more sensitive to women than men (many of the activities have been performed only by women throughout history).
Measured: 5 minutes
Functionality.
FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM): This is a tool created to measure the level of functionality and assistance given by the caregiver. It assesses the activities of daily living subdivided into two dimensions: the motor dimension; which assesses self-care (feeding, personal grooming, bathing, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, perineal grooming), sphincter control (bladder and bowel), transfers (to and from the chair or wheelchair, transfer in the bathroom, bath or shower) and locomotion (walking or moving around in a wheelchair, going up or down stairs). And cognitive; which assesses communication (comprehension, expression) and social knowledge (social interaction, problem solving and memory). Each of the 18 items has a maximum score of 7 and a minimum score of 1, making a total of 126.
Measured: 15 minutes
Fragility.
FRAILTY SCALE: This is an assessment designed to quantitatively measure frailty in geriatric patients. It consists of 5 questions on real-life situations in which some frailty may affect quality of life. The maximum score is 5 points.
Measured: 5 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Functional StatusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Salamanca
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dr. Eduardo J Fernández Rodríguez, University of Salamanca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05688163
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- University of Salamanca
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All data will be made available upon request by contacting the following e-mail address: edujfr@usal.es.
Publications
Saez-Gutierrez S, Fernandez-Rodriguez EJ, Sanchez-Gomez C, Garcia-Martin A, Barbero-Iglesias FJ, Sanchez Aguadero N. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Effect of an everyday cognition training program on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functioning in older adults without cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0300898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300898. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 38551981
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Daily Cognition Training Programme on Cognitive Function, Emotional State, Frailty and Functionality in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05688163
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- University of Salamanca
- Keywords
- Functional Status, Cognition Therapy, Cognitive Impairment, Occupational therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SalamancaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in cognitively unimpaired older adults on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality.
Detailed description
The present study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of programmes that use everyday cognition for the assessment and intervention of healthy elderly people with the aim of maintaining or improving autonomy, compared to other programmes based on traditional cognitive stimulation, whose benefits do not generalise to significant improvements in everyday life. In addition, the investigators seek to relate how the presence of depression in older people impacts on everyday cognition, and therefore on the functionality of IADLs.
- WORKING HYPOTHESIS AND MAIN OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED
- WORKING HYPOTHESES
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): Everyday cognition training programmes are more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment.
- Null hypothesis (Ho): Everyday cognition training programmes are not more effective than traditional cognitive stimulation on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality in older adults without cognitive impairment. In order to validate or disprove the main hypothesis, the following objectives have been developed:
- OBJECTIVES:
- MAIN OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a daily cognition training programme versus a traditional cognitive stimulation programme in older adults without cognitive impairment, for cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functionality. ii. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the differences in the emotional state of older adults without cognitive impairment between the everyday cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To contrast the differences in the cognitive function of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To analyse the differences in the frailty index of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
- To identify the differences in the functionality of older adults without cognitive impairment between the daily cognition training programme and traditional cognitive stimulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| traditional cognitive stimulation | Active comparator | Other: traditional cognitive stimulationThe control group will carry out the programme based on traditional cognitive stimulation. Individual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants. |
| programme based on everyday cognition | Experimental | Other: programme based on everyday cognitionThe experimental group, on the other hand, will carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, i.e. the use of cognitive functions to solve real everyday problems that occur in our daily lives and that allow us to be autonomous in our homes, such as preparing food, taking care of the house, using transport, shopping, using the telephone, medication, financial management and access to information and current affairs. As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Be aged 60 years or older.
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form about the project, authorising their participation.
- Carry out the initial assessment.
- Be admitted to the programme from the start of the programme.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- No literacy skills or significant deficits in language comprehension.
- Institutionalised person.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment.
- Participate in another cognitive stimulation programme during the intervention process.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| programme based on everyday cognitionWill carry out a programme based on everyday cognition, As material for use as for the traditional cognitive stimulation sessions, a training booklet on everyday cognition has been created which includes all the sessions mentioned above. Each day one of these tasks will be worked on. | Other | programme based on everyday cognition |
| traditional cognitive stimulationIndividual cognitive skills such as attention, memory, executive functions, orientation, praxis, calculation, visual perception and reasoning will be trained. The materials and media used will be a cognitive stimulation notebook created for the study which includes cards in printed paper format to be completed by the participants. | Other | traditional cognitive stimulation |
Primary outcome
Everyday cognition.
Time frame: 35 minutes
The Test for the Assessment of Everyday Cognition measures the ability of older people to solve everyday problems through performance tasks whose resolution depends on their cognitive capacity. The abilities tested are planning ability and cognitive flexibility, verbal working memory, reasoning, episodic memory, episodic memory and crystallised intelligence. The result is a direct estimation of the person's functional capacity by means of 12 real situations grouped into 6 areas: medication, administrative management, financial management, meal preparation, transport and shopping. The administration time is about 35 minutes.
5 secondary outcomes
Cognitive function.
Time frame: 10 minutes
Emotional state.
Time frame: 10minutes
Instrumental activities of daily living
Time frame: 5 minutes
Functionality.
Time frame: 15 minutes
Fragility.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38551981Saez-Gutierrez S, Fernandez-Rodriguez EJ, Sanchez-Gomez C, Garcia-Martin A, Barbero-Iglesias FJ, Sanchez Aguadero N. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Effect of an everyday cognition training program on cognitive function, emotional state, frailty and functioning in older adults without cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0300898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300898. eCollection 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All data will be made available upon request by contacting the following e-mail address: edujfr@usal.es.
Related trials for Functional Status
Active, not recruiting
AI-Supported Mobile High-Impact and Strengthening Exercise Program in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
Osteopenia
Recruiting
Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain
Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy
Active, not recruiting
Prehabilitation in Pancreatic Surgery
Pancreatic Cancer, Periampullary Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Individuals With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Healthy Controls
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD)
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing programme based on everyday cognition and traditional cognitive stimulation in people with Functional Status and Cognitive Impairment, run by University of Salamanca at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Everyday cognition. (time frame: 35 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05688163, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2023.