AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2DamaskNCT05656911

A Study to Learn How Well the Study Treatment Zabedosertib (BAY1834845) Works and How Safe it is Compared to Placebo in Adult Participants With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 study testing Zabedosertib (BAY1834845) in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Bayer at 22 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Researchers are looking for a better way to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), an often long-lasting inflammation of the skin. Atopic dermatitis, also called eczema, is causing patches of skin to become swollen, red, cracked, and itchy. The immune system helps protect the body from diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Zabedosertib (BAY1834845)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
77 participants
Where
22 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
21 Dec 2022to 31 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) for ≥ 1 year at the screening visit.
  • Moderate-to-severe AD at randomization visit as defined by
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16,
  • Body surface area (BSA) affected by AD ≥ 10%,
  • Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) score ≥ 3, and
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Peak Pruritus 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 (average score of the daily scores of the 7 days before randomization, with ≥ 4 scores required).
  • Documented history (within 6 months prior to the first screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS), or if TCS are medically not advisable (e.g., due to important side effects or safety risks).
  • Stable amount of emollient applied to skin over the whole body twice daily for at least the 7 consecutive days before the randomization visit
  • Body mass index (BMI) within the range of 18.5 to 35.0 kg/m^2 (inclusive) at screening (Visit 1) and randomization visits.
  • Women of childbearing potential and male subjects able to father children must agree to use adequate contraception when sexually active.

Who cannot join

  • History of any major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or scheduled (elective) surgery, planned hospitalization and/or planned dental treatment during the study that could constitute a risk when participating in a study.
  • Severe invasive infections in medical history and/or active clinically significant viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection (systemic or severe skin infection) ≤ 3 months prior to the randomization visit.
  • A presence of uncontrolled condition including cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic renal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other unstable illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, could constitute a risk when taking investigational product, study conduct or could interfere with the interpretation of data.
  • Known immunodeficiency disorder or immunocompromised state or, in the opinion of the investigator, unacceptable risk for participating in the study.
  • Use of topical treatments for AD within 7 days before the randomization visit.
  • Systemic immunosuppressive/ immunomodulating therapy or phototherapy within 4 weeks before the randomization visit.
  • Therapy with biologic drugs within 5 half-lives of the biologic drug
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drug

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 7 countries.

22 sites in 7 countries

United States4 sites
  • Arlington Research Center, Inc. | Arlington, TX

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Dermatology

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine - Dermatology

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • NorthShore University HealthSystem | Skokie Hospital - Dermatology Department

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

Other trials in United States

Italy4 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco Di Catania

    Catania, Sicily, 95123

  • A.O.U. di Ferrara

    Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, 44124

  • Humanitas Research Hospital | Cardio Center - Clinical, Interventional Cardiology and Coronary Care

    Milan, Lombardy, 20089

  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan, Lombardy, 20122

Other trials in Italy

Poland4 sites
  • Dermal NZOZ Sp Osrodek Dermatologiczny Bialystok-Podlasie

    Bialystok, 15-453

  • Centrum Nowoczesnych Terapii Dobry Lekarz

    Krakow, 31-011

  • Santa Sp. z o.o.

    Lodz, 90-302

  • Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka

    Warsaw, 02-962

Other trials in Poland

Czechia3 sites
  • Dermamedica s.r.o.

    Náchod, Hradec Králové Region, 547 01

  • Clintrial s.r.o.

    Prague, 100 00

  • Praglandia

    Prague, 150 00

Other trials in Czechia

France3 sites
  • Clinique Bezannes

    Bezannes, 51430

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nice | L'Archet Hospital - Dermatology Department

    Nice, 6202

  • Hôpital Saint Louis

    Paris, 75010

Other trials in France

Germany2 sites
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Hautarztpraxis Prof. Dr. med. Christian Termeer

    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70499

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Whipps Cross University Hospital - Clinical Research Unit

    Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR

  • Medicines Evaluation Unit

    Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9QZ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicenter Phase 2a Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Zabedosertib (BAY 1834845) for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis

Researchers are looking for a better way to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), an often long-lasting inflammation of the skin. Atopic dermatitis, also called eczema, is causing patches of skin to become swollen, red, cracked, and itchy.

The immune system helps protect the body from diseases. But sometimes the immune system can be too sensitive and overreact. This may then lead to allergies but also to skin conditions like atopic dermatitis.

Read more

The study treatment zabedosertib (BAY1834845) is currently under development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and other inflammatory diseases. It works by reducing the activity of a protein called IRAK4. IRAK4 promotes the production and activation of a series of proteins that trigger inflammation reactions in the immune cells. By reducing the activity of IRAK4, the inflammation reactions are expected to be reduced.

The main purpose of the study is to learn how well zabedosertib works compared to placebo. A placebo is a treatment that looks like a medicine but does not have any medicine in it. How well it works means to find out the efficacy of zabedosertib. To answer this, the researchers will compare how many participants had 75% EASI score reduction after 12 weeks treatment between participants treated with zabedosertib and those treated with placebo. EASI represents Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). It is a tool for measuring the amount and severity of atopic dermatitis that a patient has on his or her body. The score ranges from 0-72, with 0 meaning clear skin and 72 meaning severe atopic dermatitis. In addition, the itch of the study participants and other tools for measuring the severity of atopic dermatitis will be assessed.

The secondary purpose of the study is to learn how safe it is compared to placebo. To know this, study team will compare how many participants having adverse events after taking study treatment between participants treated with zabedosertib and those treated with placebo.

In the study, participants will be randomly (by chance) assigned to receive zabedosertib or placebo. The participants from both treatment groups will take zabedosertib or placebo for up to 12 weeks.

The study consists of an up to 28-day screening period (Visits 1 and 2), a 12-week treatment period consisting of 5 visits (Visits 3 to 7), and a 4-week follow-up visits (Visits 8). Thus, the total study duration per participant will be 17 to 20 weeks (approximately 140 days).

During the study, the study team will:

  • take blood and urine samples
  • take skin samples (not obligatory for all patients)
  • check the participants' disease area for assessment
  • provide participants device to record their disease status and to take pictures on their disease areas
  • have participants complete self-reported questionnaires
  • do physical examinations
  • examine heart health using ECG
  • check vital signs
  • ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what events they are having.

An adverse event is any problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.

At 28 days after the participants take their last treatment, the study team will check if participants have any events that might be related to the study treatment. This will be the last visit for the study.

Being tested
Zabedosertib (BAY1834845), Placebo to zabedosertib (BAY1834845)
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Zabedosertib (BAY1834845)Drug

    Oral administration, two times a day

  • Placebo to zabedosertib (BAY1834845)Drug

    Oral administration, two times a day

Study groups in NCT05656911
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ZabedosertibExperimentalParticipants will receive zabedosertib for up to 12 weeks (84 days).
Receives: Drug: Zabedosertib (BAY1834845)
Matching placebo to zabedosertibPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo to zabedosertib for up to 12 weeks (84 days).
Receives: Drug: Placebo to zabedosertib (BAY1834845)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Achievement of 75% Reduction From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75 Response) at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The endpoint was the composite variable defined as follows: - an EASI 75 response at Week 12 (Day 84), - no stop of study intervention for reasons related to lack of efficacy, - no rescue medication use during the 4 weeks before Day 84 and - no use of systemic atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. The main estimand was the difference in the proportion of responders between treatment groups in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis where use of topical rescue medication from Day 56 (Visit 6) onwards, use of systemic standard of care for AD and discontinuation of treatment due to lack of efficacy are handled as non-response (composite strategy). The estimand was regardless of use of rescue medication before Day 56 (Visit 6), regardless of non-compliance with emollients, and had treatment not been discontinued due to other reasons not related to lack of efficacy. Bayesian analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Week 12 (Day 84)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Percent Change From Baseline in EASI at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The EASI is a ClinRO assessing the extent of AD at four body regions by measuring the average severity of four clinical signs at each body region, each on a scale of 0 to 3. The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72, with a higher score indicating worse severity of AD. The main estimand was based on the same strategies to address intercurrent events as described above for the primary endpoint. The mean difference between the treatment arms was used as summary measure.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Day 84)

  2. Achievement of EASI 50 Response at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The EASI is a ClinRO assessing the extent of AD at four body regions by measuring the average severity of four clinical signs at each body region, each on a scale of 0 to 3. The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72, with a higher score indicating worse severity of AD. EASI 50 corresponds to the achievement of 50% reduction from baseline in EASI. The main estimand was calculated similarly as for EASI 75. Bayesian analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Week 12 (Day 84)

  3. Achievement of EASI 90 Response at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The EASI is a ClinRO assessing the extent of AD at four body regions by measuring the average severity of four clinical signs at each body region, each on a scale of 0 to 3. The minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72, with a higher score indicating worse severity of AD. EASI 90 corresponds to the achievement of 90% reduction from baseline in EASI. The main estimand was calculated similarly as for EASI 75. Bayesian analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Week 12 (Day 84)

  4. Achievement of a vIGA-AD Response (Score 0 or 1 and ≥ 2 Points Improvement) at Week 12 (Day 84)

    vIGA-AD stands for validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis. The vIGA-AD is a 1-item static ClinRO using a 5-point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) based on 4 clinical features of AD lesions: erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, and oozing/crusting, and takes extent of disease into account. The main estimand was calculated similarly as for EASI 75. Bayesian analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Week 12 (Day 84)

  5. Absolute Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Week 12 (Day 84)

    BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body, e.g. using the rule of nines. The possible highest score for each region is: Head and neck - 9%; Anterior trunk - 18%; Back - 18%; Upper limbs - 18%; Lower limbs - 36%; Genitals - 1%. Affected BSA was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The main estimand was based on the same strategies to address intercurrent events as described above for the primary endpoint. The mean difference between the treatment arms was used as summary measure.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Day 84)

  6. Achievement of a ≥ 4 Point-improvement (Reduction) in the Weekly Average of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS Score From Baseline to Week 12 (Day 84) for Participants With Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS Score ≥ 4 at Baseline

    NRS stands for numerical rating scale. The Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is a single patient-reported item designed to measure peak pruritus (itch), or 'worst' itch, over the previous 24 h based on the following question: 'On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?'. ≥ 4 points reduction of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is considered a clinically relevant within-person response. NRS was assessed on a daily basis and the average over the last 7 days before the visit day was used for analysis. The main estimand was calculated similarly as for EASI 75. Bayesian analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Day 84)

  7. Absolute Values of Weekly Average of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is a single patient-reported item designed to measure peak pruritus (itch), or 'worst' itch, over the previous 24 h based on the following question: 'On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?'. ≥ 4 points reduction of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is considered a clinically relevant within-person response. NRS was assessed on a daily basis and the average over the last 7 days before the visit day was used for analysis. The main estimand was based on the same strategies to address intercurrent events as described above for the primary endpoint.

    Measured: Week 12 (Day 84)

  8. Percent Change of Weekly Average of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS Score From Baseline at Week 12 (Day 84)

    The Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is a single patient-reported item designed to measure peak pruritus (itch), or 'worst' itch, over the previous 24 h based on the following question: 'On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable", how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?'. ≥ 4 points reduction of the Peak Pruritus 0-10 NRS is considered a clinically relevant within-person response. NRS was assessed on a daily basis and the average over the last 7 days before the visit day was used for analysis. The main estimand was based on the same strategies to address intercurrent events as described above for the primary endpoint. ANCOVA analysis according to estimand is presented.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12 (Day 84)

  9. Frequency and Severity of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Measured: From first treatment with the study intervention until 7 days after the last intake of study intervention (approximately up to 91 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2022
  2. Study start21 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion3 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05656911
Sponsor's protocol ID
22158
Other IDs
2022-000520-38
Acronym
Damask
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
29 Nov 2022
Last updated
18 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Availability of this study's data will later be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.vivli.org to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the member section of the portal.

Publications

  • Jodl SJ, Worm M, Friedrichs F, Heinzel-Pleines U, Wagenfeld A, Feldmuller M, Klein S, Zhang R, Shakery K, Holzmann RD, Rohde B, Perera V. Efficacy and Safety of Zabedosertib, an Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase II Randomized Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Nov;15(11):3329-3345. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01505-z. Epub 2025 Sep 4.

    PubMed 40906353

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Zabedosertib (BAY1834845) in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Bayer at 22 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States, Italy, Poland, Czechia, France and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Achievement of 75% Reduction From Baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75 Response) at Week 12 (Day 84) (time frame: Week 12 (Day 84)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05656911, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Damask Clinical Trial NCT05656911 | AzTrials