AzTrials
AzTrials

Food InsecurityNutriPouTiMounNCT05653128

Food and Nutrition Insecurity During Pregnancy in French Guiana

An observational study of Food Insecurity and Pregnancy Related, run by Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne at 3 sites in French Guiana.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of women who gave birth in the 3 maternity hospitals of French Guiana. The main objective is to estimate the prevalence of food insecurity among pregnant women admitted for delivery in one of the maternity hospitals of French Guiana. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Food Insecurity, Pregnancy Related
How many people
788 participants
Where
3 sitesFrench Guiana
Study dates
19 Jan 2023to 11 Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women admitted for delivery in one of the maternity hospitals in French Guiana

Who may be able to join

  • Women admitted for delivery in one of the maternity hospitals in French Guiana

Who cannot join

  • refusal to participate or lack of collected non-opposition
  • lack of parental consent for women under 18 years of age.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

French Guiana3 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne

    Cayenne, 97300

  • Centre Hospitalier de Kourou

    Kourou, 97380

  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Ouest Guyanais

    Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, 97320

Other trials in French Guiana

About this study

This is a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of women who gave birth in the 3 maternity hospitals of French Guiana. The main objective is to estimate the prevalence of food insecurity among pregnant women admitted for delivery in one of the maternity hospitals of French Guiana. A biological assay of deficiencies and toxic metals as well as the completion of a questionnaire will answer the research question

Read the detailed description

According to the FAO, the gender gap in the prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity widened in the year of the pandemic, with the prevalence of food insecurity among women 10% higher than among men. Scientific projections have estimated that the increased prevalence of wasting with the pandemic in low- and middle-income countries would result in 18-23% more deaths among children. Worst-case scenarios predict an increase of 8.3 to 38.6% in maternal deaths per month in low- and middle-income countries.

The systemic nature of food insecurity among pregnant women underlines the need to address it in a comprehensive and cross-cutting manner. It seems relevant to consider it as a major determinant of the health of populations that closely follows and feeds other health determinants (precariousness, low standard of living, housing conditions, etc.) or other health consequences (pregnancy monitoring, quality of life, deficiencies, body weight, etc.).

The quality of life would be affected with an increase in stress, anxiety and depression. The link between malnutrition and household food insecurity has already been suggested. Iron deficiency anaemia was significantly associated with food insecurity in the pregnant woman's household; it also predisposes to the risk of anaemia in children under 5. According to the WHO, anaemia is a major public health problem worldwide. It affects 40% of pregnant women, with a risk of irreversible effects on the child's brain development. According to longitudinal studies, the risk of premature delivery seemed to be more frequent when the pregnant woman was in a situation of food insecurity. A diet deficient in essential micronutrients is also thought to increase the risk of low birth weight, according to studies conducted on the African continent.

In Guiana between 2019 and 2020, the CARMA study measured micronutrient deficiencies (Iodine, Iron, Zinc, Vitamin A, folic acid, Vitamin 12) in women at the time of their delivery in Cayenne. This study revealed a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies with 81% of parturients having at least 1 deficiency and 46% having at least 2 deficiencies. The authors suggest that the negative impact of heavy metal impregnation is a factor that aggravates deficiencies.

This research takes a global approach to the problem of food security and does not focus on one type of nutritional deficiency or on a pregnancy-related pathology. The idea is to study the links, aggravating effects and interactions between access to food, situations of precariousness, deficiencies, lead or mercury intoxication and the impact with pathologies. This strategy is based on the hypothesis that there are permanent interactions between minerals, vitamins and heavy metals and that their impact on the health of the pregnant woman and the newborn is conditioned by these interactions and by the maternal and family background.

Keywords
French Guiana, Pregnancy, Food security, Cross-section study, Nutrition, Social inequality in health

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Household food insecurity

    The primary measure of household food security was conducted using the Household Food Security Scale (HFSSM) validated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) at inclusion

    Measured: At inclusion

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Evaluation of coping strategies

    Description of the coping strategies using the Coping Strategies Index (CSI) in the past 3 months The Coping Strategy Index (CSI) is an indicator of a household's food security assessing the extent to which households use harmful coping strategies when they do not have enough food or enough money to buy food. The result is reported by a numeric score

    Measured: At inclusion

  2. Evaluation of the Food Insecurity Experience

    Description of the food insecurity experience using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) in the past 3 months The FIES-SM questions refer to the experiences of the individual respondent or of the respondent's household as a whole. The questions focus on self-reported food-related behaviors and experiences associated with increasing difficulties in accessing food due to resource constraints

    Measured: At inclusion

  3. Evaluation of the food consumption frequencies in the past 3 months

    Description of the food consumption frequencies in the past 3 months using a face-to-face questionnaire

    Measured: At inclusion

  4. Evaluation of the socio-demographic profile of the household

    Description of the socio-demographic profile of the household at inclusion according to food insecurity level, by face-to-face questionnaire

    Measured: At inclusion

  5. Evaluation of the economic profile of the household

    Description of the economic profile of the household at inclusion according to food insecurity level, by face-to-face questionnaire

    Measured: At inclusion

  6. Evaluation of the micronutrient deficiencies

    Evaluation of the micronutrient deficiencies by measuring biomarkers of nutritional status : vitamins and mineral levels, toxic metals in blood and urine

    Measured: At inclusion

  7. Evaluation of the self esteem

    Description of the self esteem using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale by a face-to-face questionnaire The scale ranges from 0-30, with 30 indicating the highest score possible Scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem

    Measured: At inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2022
  2. Study start19 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion11 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion11 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
788 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05653128
Sponsor's protocol ID
NutriPouTi'moun
Acronym
NutriPouTiMoun
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
18 Nov 2022
Last updated
26 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Roberton T, Carter ED, Chou VB, Stegmuller AR, Jackson BD, Tam Y, Sawadogo-Lewis T, Walker N. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901-e908. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30229-1. Epub 2020 May 12.

    PubMed 32405459
  • Pena-Rosas JP, De-Regil LM, Garcia-Casal MN, Dowswell T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 22;2015(7):CD004736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5.

    PubMed 26198451
  • Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O'Beirne M, Rabi DM. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2013 Mar 26;346:f1169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1169.

    PubMed 23533188
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA, Atallah AN, Torloni MR. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 1;10(10):CD001059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001059.pub5.

    PubMed 30277579
  • Wu G, Bazer FW, Cudd TA, Meininger CJ, Spencer TE. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J Nutr. 2004 Sep;134(9):2169-72. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2169.

    PubMed 15333699
  • Richterman A, Raymonville M, Hossain A, Millien C, Joseph JP, Jerome G, Franke MF, Ivers LC. Food insecurity as a risk factor for preterm birth: a prospective facility-based cohort study in rural Haiti. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e002341. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002341.

    PubMed 32611679
  • Moafi F, Kazemi F, Samiei Siboni F, Alimoradi Z. The relationship between food security and quality of life among pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1947-2.

    PubMed 30081856
  • Augusto ALP, de Abreu Rodrigues AV, Domingos TB, Salles-Costa R. Household food insecurity associated with gestacional and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02917-9.

    PubMed 32303221
  • Khoshgoo M, Eslami O, Khadem Al-Hosseini M, Shidfar F. The Relationship between Household Food Insecurity and Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Women: A Cross Sectional Study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;15(2):126-133.

    PubMed 32426008
  • Perez-Escamilla R, Cunningham K, Moran VH. COVID-19 and maternal and child food and nutrition insecurity: a complex syndemic. Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Jul;16(3):e13036. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13036.

    PubMed 32458574
  • Jones AD, Ngure FM, Pelto G, Young SL. What are we assessing when we measure food security? A compendium and review of current metrics. Adv Nutr. 2013 Sep 1;4(5):481-505. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004119.

    PubMed 24038241

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Food Insecurity and Pregnancy Related, run by Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne at 3 sites in French Guiana.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in French Guiana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Household food insecurity (time frame: At inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05653128, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in