AzTrials
AzTrials

Stroke, AcuteAI-STROKENCT05652933

Optimizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Diagnostics Using Artificial Intelligence

An observational study of Stroke, Acute, run by Oslo University Hospital at 3 sites in Norway.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective observational multi-center study with the aim to organise and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Acute
What is being tested?
Software for identifying vessel occlusion, infarct volume and penumbra
How many people
300 participants
Where
3 sitesNorway
Study dates
10 Dec 2021to 31 Dec 2025
How long will I take part?
3 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke at participating hospitals

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with ischemic stroke.
  • All stroke severities and vascular distributions are eligible.
  • Informed written consent signed by the patient, verbal consent from the patient as witnessed by a non-participating health care person or consent by the signature of the patient's family must be provided before inclusion. Patients for whom no informed consent can be obtained will not be included in the study but will be treated according to standard guidelines.

Who cannot join

  • Patients not available for follow-up assessments (e.g. non-resident).

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Norway3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

    Drammen

    Bjørn Anton Graff, +47 32 80 30 00, bjgraf@vestreviken.no

    Recruiting
  • Oslo University Hospital

    Oslo

    Anne Hege Aamodt, MD PhD Prof, +47 23 07 00 00, anhaam@ous-hf.no

    Brian Enriquez, MD, +47 23 07 00 00, brienr@ous-hf.no

    Recruiting
  • Østfold Hospital Trust

    Sarpsborg

    Linn Heitmann, +47 69 86 00 00, Linn.Aarbakke.Heitmann@so-hf.no

    Jostein Gleditsch, +47 69 86 00 00, Jostein.Gleditsch@so-hf.no

    Recruiting

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Prospective observational multi-center study with the aim to organise and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

Read the detailed description

Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke is highly effective and cost-effective. As of today, too few patients have access to thrombectomy. There is an urgent need to improve the diagnostics so that all eligible stroke patients have their occlusion detected fast enough and are offered thrombectomy when indicated. Machine learning based imaging techniques have recently been shown to provide improved diagnostic with automated methods for detection of vessel occlusion and ischemic lesions by use of artificial intelligence. We will perform a prospective interventional study in acute ischemic stroke patients with the aim to organize and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence. By using multiphase CT angiography and software at two primary stroke centres the utility of automatically evaluation of images will be compared to standard care. All images will in parallell be assessed by neuroradiologists at the comprehensive stroke centre.

The main objective is to organize and simplify the care pathway to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

The secondary objectives are to assess: 1) the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of vessel occlusion in ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared gold standard of MRI, 2) the percentage of eligible patients who receive EVT using AI-based analysis compared to standard care diagnostics 3) time from onset to recanalization, and 4) functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

Hypotheses: Novel AI-based image analysis tools applied to already available standard CT based imaging techniques can a) improve acute stroke diagnostics and b) increase the number of patients treated by EVT.

The main aim of the project is to organise and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

Secondary aims:

  1. To assess if the use of AI-based image analysis tools in radiological diagnostics in primary stroke centres can reduce the time from onset to recanalization in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT.
  2. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of medium and large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared to assessment by the gold standard of MRI (DWI and MR Angiography) assessed by neuroradiologists.
  3. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of medium and large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared to assessment by standard care.
  4. To assess if the use of available AI-based analysis tools applied to mCTA can increase the number of stroke patients eligible for and offered EVT.
  5. To compare functional outcome and patient related outcome measures 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoints:

  • Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to radiological diagnosis in acute stroke patients with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.
  • Time from symptom onset to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to assessment by neuroradiologists.
  • Proportion of patients treated with thrombectomy in MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Functional outcome 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.
  • Patient related outcome measures 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

The present study is part of a prospective observational study of the thrombectomy service with collaboration between stroke units and radiological departments at primary and comprehensive stroke centres - the Oslo Acute Revascularization Stroke Study (OSCAR) (REK 2015/1844, EudraCT number 2018-004691-36). Data has already been collected since January 2017 in patients treated with EVT at Oslo University Hospital and by nearly 1100 patients treated with EVT have been included. The database contains detailed information on logistics, transport, clinical, radiological data, and treatment including rehabilitation from baseline to 3-month follow-up is registered prospectively.

The study will start with a 12-month period with registration before the implementation of the AI software. Data from this period and from the OSCAR study will be compared to the data collected after the implementation of the AI software. We will start the study at Drammen Hospital and will consecutively implement it at the other hospitals in Vestre Viken Hospital Trust and Østfold Hospital Trust. Data will be registered for at least 18 months after the implementation of the AI software. The length of the inclusion phase will be adjusted according to the inclusion rate.

Conditions
Stroke, Acute
Being tested
Software for identifying vessel occlusion, infarct volume and penumbra
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Software for identifying vessel occlusion, infarct volume and penumbraDiagnostic test

    Assessment of the AI tool software

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to radiological diagnosis in acute stroke patients with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.

    Minutes

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.

    Minutes

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Time from symptom onset to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.

    Minutes

    Measured: Day 0

  3. Proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion diagnosed by standard care.

    Number of patients

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Proportion of patients treated with thrombectomy in large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion diagnosed by standard care.

    Number of patients

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Functional outcome at 90 days after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

    Number of participants with independent functioning on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS 0 to 6), as defined by a score of 0-2. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a valid and reliable clinician-reported measure of global disability that has been widely applied for evaluating recovery from stroke. It is a scale used to measure functional recovery (the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities) of people who have suffered a stroke. mRS scores range from 0 (best outcome) to 6 (worst outcome), with 0 indicating no residual symptoms; 5 indicating bedbound, requiring constant care; and 6 indicating death.

    Measured: 90 days

  6. Health-related quality of life at 90 days after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

    Health-related quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L at Day 90. The EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimensional 5-Level) is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. It is based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has five response categories corresponding to: no problems, slight, moderate, severe and extreme problems. The respondents will also rate their overall health on the day of the interview on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS, higher scores mean better outcomes).

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Dec 2022
  2. Study start10 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
Target duration
3 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05652933
Sponsor's protocol ID
282961
Acronym
AI-STROKE
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
22 Feb 2022
Last updated
17 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke, Acute, run by Oslo University Hospital at 3 sites in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to radiological diagnosis in acute stroke patients with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care. (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in