AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic RhinitisNCT05648565

Effects of Radiofrequency Ablation of Posterior Nasal Nerves on Inflammatory Cytokines, Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow, and Nasal Blood Flow in Patients With Chronic Rhinitis

A study testing Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in people with Chronic Rhinitis, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) in chronic rhinitis (CR) patients by comparing patient reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) and nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) , peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) , and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Jan 2023to 20 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic rhinitis symptoms for at least 6 months (rhinorrhea, congestion, post-nasal drip)
  • poor response to medical management that was attempted for at least 4 weeks
  • a rTNSS score ≥6, as well as ≥2 for rhinorrhea, and ≥1 for congestion.

Who cannot join

  • active sinusitis
  • rhinitis medicamentosa
  • recurrent and ongoing epistaxis
  • immunodeficiency as defined by an illness or a history of sinus surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) in chronic rhinitis (CR) patients by comparing patient reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) and nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) , peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) , and levels of Type 2 cytokines pre- and post-procedure.

Being tested
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Keywords
radiofrequency ablation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)Device

    The NEUROMARK device is an in-office, disposable bipolar RFA device with a treatment tip consisting of micro electrodes which delivers RF energy while monitoring appropriate tissue contact to maximize delivery to posterior nasal nerve and its variable branching. After topical anesthesia consisting of oxymetazoline and 1% lido followed by 4% lidocaine, the device will be placed in the posterior inferior turbinate under endoscopic visualization. The device will be activated per manufacturer's instructions

Study groups in NCT05648565
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)

    PNIF is used to assess nasal air flow during maximal inspiration, and is reported in liters per minute.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)

    PNIF is used to assess nasal air flow during maximal inspiration, and is reported in liters per minute

    Measured: 4 weeks post intervention

  3. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)

    PNIF is used to assess nasal air flow during maximal inspiration, and is reported in liters per minute

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

  4. Interleukin-10 (IL-10)

    cytokine

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Interleukin-22 (IL-22)

    cytokine

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Interleukin-10 (IL-10)

    cytokine

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

  7. Interleukin-22 (IL-22)

    cytokine

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(none) to 3(severe). The sum of the 4 times were added to generate a scale from 0 to 12, a higher number indicating more congestion

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(none) to 3(severe). The sum of the 4 times were added to generate a scale from 0 to 12, a higher number indicating more congestion

    Measured: 4 weeks post intervention

  3. Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(none) to 3(severe). The sum of the 4 times were added to generate a scale from 0 to 12, a higher number indicating more congestion

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

  4. Nasal Obstruction as Assessed by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Survey (NOSE)

    This is a 5 item self reported questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not a problem) - 4(severe problem). The sum of the 5 items were multiplied by 5, to generate a scale from 0 to 100, a higher score indicated more obstruction.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Nasal Obstruction as Assessed by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Survey (NOSE)

    This is a 5 item self reported questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not a problem) - 4(severe problem). The sum of the 5 items were multiplied by 5, to generate a scale from 0 to 100, a higher score indicated more obstruction.

    Measured: 4 weeks post intervention

  6. Nasal Obstruction as Assessed by the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Survey (NOSE)

    This is a 5 item self reported questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not a problem) - 4(severe problem). The sum of the 5 items were multiplied by 5, to generate a scale from 0 to 100, a higher score indicated more obstruction.

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2022
  2. Study start10 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion20 Feb 2024
  4. Study completion20 Feb 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05648565
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-22-0899
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
5 Dec 2022
Last updated
3 Apr 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in people with Chronic Rhinitis, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nasal Congestion as Assessed by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in