AzTrials
AzTrials

Visceral ObesityNCT05648409

Comparison of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity in Evaluation of Visceral Adiposity

An observational study of Visceral Obesity, run by Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Visceral obesity is a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. In clinical settings and during research, "body mass index (BMI)" is usually used for assessing obesity, and when it is above 30 kg/m2, it is defined as obesity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Visceral Obesity
How many people
194 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Jan 2022to 1 Nov 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Patients aged between 20 and 50 years old who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging, including the L3-L4 level for any reason in the last month, with no detectable malignancy, pancreatitis, diseases requiring further investigation, chronic inflammatory diseases, and a pathology necessitating hospitalization for more than 24 hours in the CT evaluation, we're invited to the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Having consented to the work
  • Having a computed tomography of the abdomen taken within the last month
  • Having a biochemistry analysis including lipid levels in the last three months
  • No weight loss in the last 3 months

Who cannot join

  • Antihyperlipidemic medication usage
  • Presence of active malignancy
  • Having an anatomical structure that is not suitable for taking anthropometric measurements
  • The use medications that might affect metabolic values such as steroids
  • Chronic inflammatory diseases, acute infection and other lipodystrophic syndromes (HIV etc.)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Istanbul Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital

    Istanbul

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Body Mass Index, Visceral Adiposity Index, the Body Shape Index, and the Body Roundness Index With the Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity in the Assessment of Visceral Adiposity

Visceral obesity is a major risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. In clinical settings and during research, "body mass index (BMI)" is usually used for assessing obesity, and when it is above 30 kg/m2, it is defined as obesity. However, the risk posed by obesity is more related to body fat distribution than total body fat, and BMI only reflects the second. Individuals with a BMI below 30, even 25, may still have visceral adiposity detectable via an abdominal computerized tomography ( CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore new, practical, inexpensive parameters are needed to evaluate visceral adiposity. "Metabolic Score for Visceral Adiposity (METS-VF)", "Body Shape Index (BSI)", "Conicity Index (CI)" and "Body Roundness Index (BRI)" are a few recent indexes developed trying to fulfill these needs. The aim is to investigate the effectivity of METS-VF in comparison with BMI, BSI, CI, and BRI in reflecting visceral adiposity assessed with CT.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single-center, observational and prospective study. Patients who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) covering the L3-L4 level in the last month for any reason and who did not have any of the following situations in the participants' CT reports: malignancy, pancreatitis, diseases requiring further investigation, chronic inflammatory diseases, and a pathology requiring hospitalization for more than 24 hours, will be invited to the study. Of the patients who consent to the study, gender, age, education level, current diseases, medications, and smoking status are questioned. Anthropometric measurements, especially waist, height, and weight are taken. Patients' biochemical parameters such as lipid profiles (LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, Triglyceride), urea, creatinine, uric acid, fasting blood glucose, and C-peptide levels (after 8-12 hours of fasting), and thyroid hormones were measured in the last three months are recorded from the participants' files. The body mass index (BMI) of the patients will be calculated with the formula weight (kg) / height (m)2. Patients will be in 5 groups with BMI <25 kg/m2, 25-29.9 kg/m2, 30-34.9 kg/m2, 35-39.9 kg/m2, and >40 kg/m2, with 40 patients in each group. Visceral adipose tissue will be calculated by the radiologist by measuring with the "slicer" method at the level of L3-4 on abdominal CT. For "Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF)", the formula 4.466 + 0.011*(Ln(METS-IR))3 + 3.239*(Ln(Waist/height ratio))3 + 0.319*(Gender) + 0.594*(Ln(Age)) and for "Body Waist Circumference" the formula (BMI2/3 * height1/2) are used. Based on the visceral adipose tissue measured by CT, firstly, BMI and METS-VF will be compared, and then the other mentioned anthropometric index values will be compared statistically. The assumption is that the METS-VF index is superior to the other indexes, including the BMI. Also, as a second endpoint, it is aimed to find a cut-off value for METS-VF in Turkish individuals to reflect the increased visceral adiposity assessed with CT.

Keywords
visceral adiposity, metabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF), body mass index
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Abdominal

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Mass Index (BMI) for visceral adiposity

    The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the evaluation of visceral adiposity compared with the Body Mass Index (BMI). For METS-VF, a cut-off value will be determined. For BMI values 20-24.9 are accepted as normal, 25-29.9 as overweight and above 30 as obese (with different categories), whereas below 20 as underweight.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for visceral adiposity

    The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Shape Index (ABSI) for visceral adiposity

    The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the Body Shape Index (ABSI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Roundness Index (BRI) for visceral adiposity

    The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the Body Roundness Index (BRI) for which higher values are predicted to reflect higher adiposity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the evaluation of visceral adiposity

    The number of participants whose visceral adiposity, which was evaluated by abdominal computerized tomography, was correctly assessed by using the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and the other defined indexes, the Body Mass Index (BMI), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), the Body Shape Index (ABSI), and the Body Roundness Index (BRI) with the purpose of finding the best discriminator for visceral adiposity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Determination of a cut-off point for METS-VF score associated with increased Visceral Adiposity

    Using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis with the calculated input from the abdominal computerized tomography and the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) index. METS-VF index is a continuous index with no definite cut-off value. For different populations a new cut-off point is calculated, which it is also aimed in this study. The higher the score, the higher is the expected visceral adiposity.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2022
  2. Study start10 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
194 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05648409
Sponsor's protocol ID
METSVF-adiposity
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
15 Nov 2022
Last updated
20 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Torun C, Ankarali H, Castur L, Uzunlulu M, Erbakan AN, Akbas MM, Gunduz N, Dogan MB, Oguz A. Is Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) a Better Index Than Other Adiposity Indices for the Prediction of Visceral Adiposity. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Aug 29;16:2605-2615. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S421623. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37663201

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Visceral Obesity, run by Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Superiority of the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) on the Body Mass Index (BMI) for visceral adiposity (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05648409, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in