Ischemic Heart DiseaseAAMS2NCT05632432
Atrial Appendage Micrograft Transplants to Assist Heart Repair After Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Epicardial AAMs-patch transplantation, RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling and Plasma sampling in people with Ischemic Heart Disease and Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, run by Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) leads the global mortality statistics. Atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries hallmark IHD, drive hypoxia, and may rupture to result in myocardial infarction (MI) and death of contractile cardiac muscle, which is eventually replaced by a scar. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure, Systolic
- What is being tested?
- Epicardial AAMs-patch transplantation, RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling and Plasma sampling
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2024to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent obtained
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between ≥ 15% and ≤ 40% at recruitment (transthoracic echocardiography)
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV heart failure symptoms
Who cannot join
- Heart failure due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within last 30 days
- History of life-threatening and possibly repeating ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitation, or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Stroke or other disabling condition within 3 months before screening
- Severe valve disease or scheduled valve surgery
- Renal dysfunction (GFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Other disease limiting life expectancy
- Contraindications for coronary angiogram or LGE-CMRI
- Participation in some other clinical trial
- Screening Failure:
- After optimization of medications, no visible scar or LVEF ≥ 50% in preoperative LGE-CMRI
- Preoperative LGE-CMRI has not been performed prior scheduled CABG
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Finland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki University Hospital, Heart and Lung Center & Cardiac Unit
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00029
Antti Nykänen, Docent, 050 427 0625 ext. +358, antti.nykanen@hus.fi
About this study
Official title: Autologous Atrial Appendage Micrografts Transplanted During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: the AAMS2 Randomized, Double-blinded, and Placebo-controlled Trial
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) leads the global mortality statistics. Atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries hallmark IHD, drive hypoxia, and may rupture to result in myocardial infarction (MI) and death of contractile cardiac muscle, which is eventually replaced by a scar. Depending on the extent of the damage, dysbalanced cardiac workload often leads to emergence of heart failure (HF).
The atrial appendages, enriched with active endocrine and paracrine cardiac cells, has been characterized to contain cells promising in stimulating cardiac regenerative healing.
Read more
In this AAMS2 randomized controlled and double-blinded trial, the patient's own tissue from the right atrial appendage (RAA) is for therapy. A piece from the RAA can be safely harvested upon the set-up of the heart and lung machine at the beginning of coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery. In the AAMS2 trial, a piece of the RAA tissue is processed and utilized as epicardially transplanted atrial appendage micrografts (AAMs) for CABG-support therapy.
In our preclinical evaluation, epicardial AAMs transplantation after MI attenuated scarring and improved cardiac function. Proteomics suggested an AAMs-induced glycolytic metabolism, a process associated with an increased regenerative capacity of myocardium. Recently, the safety and feasibility of AAMs therapy was demonstrated in an open-label clinical study. Moreover, as this study suggested increased thickness of the viable myocardium in the scarred area, it also provided the first indication of therapeutic benefit.
Based on randomization with estimated enrolment of a total of 50 patients with 1:1 group allocation ratio, the piece of RAA tissue is either perioperatively processed to AAMs or cryostored. The AAMs, embedded in a fibrin matrix gel, are placed on a collaged-based matrix sheet, which is then epicardially sutured in place at the end of CABG surgery. The location is determined by preoperative late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI) to pinpoint the ischemic scar. The controls receive the collagen-based patch, but without the AAMs. Study blood samples, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and LGE-CMRI are performed before and at 6-month follow-up after the surgery.
The trial's primary endpoints focus on changes in cardiac fibrosis as evaluated by LGE-CMRI and circulating levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Secondary endpoints center on other efficacy parameters, as well as both safety and feasibility of the therapy.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE
Globally, each year 17.9 million people die of cardiovascular diseases. Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the cause in half of these cases, thus making it the global leading single cause of death. While 126.5 million patients suffer from IHD worldwide, in Europe 30.3 million patients are afflicted.
IHD is hallmarked by progressively enlarging atherosclerotic coronary plaques. These disease hotspots not only drive myocardial hypoxia, cardiomyocyte hibernation, apoptosis and interstitial fibrosis but are prone for erosion and rupture. Plaque rupture forcefully activates the hemostatic system resulting in thrombotic coronary occlusion, myocardial infarction (MI), and death of cardiac tissue. Due to improved acute care, the patients increasingly survive the acute phase, and the site of injury eventually gets replaced by a scar that typically restricts the filling and pumping of the heart. Depending on the extent of injury and the resulting scar, eventually the increased workload leads to adverse remodeling and emergence of heart failure (HF), an irreversible and incapacitating clinical syndrome with poor prognosis. HF due to an ischemic etiology has been reported to vary from 29% to 45%. For instance, a recent meta-analysis suggests the "all-type" HF prevalence, including the previously unrecognized cases via population-based echocardiographic screening, to be as high as 11.8% among general population aged above 65 years.
CABG surgery is the preferred revascularization method for patients with severe progressed IHD. In Europe, more than 245,000 CABG surgeries were carried out in 2016. Regardless of age, CABG surgery has been shown to have an overall beneficial effect on ischemic symptoms and mortality.
Cardiac healing by regeneration rather than scarring could tilt the IHD with its complications towards an increasingly manageable, even curable, disease. While the hearts of some vertebrates heal by regeneration throughout their lifespan, in rodents this capacity is limited to the first week of life. Very early in life, also the human heart seems to possess capacity to regenerate after ischemia.
It has proved complex to activate cardiac regenerative repair in adult human heart. Many stem, progenitor and differentiated cells have been tested in this regard. While these investigations have provided promising results, the therapies remain complex and costly, highlighting the need for more clinically straightforward approaches. Cells derived from atrial appendages have been shown to be capable of stimulating regenerative cardiac healing in the context of ischemic cardiac damage. As positioned by the European Society of Cardiology, many tissue-engineered approaches, including epicardial extracellular matrix (ECM) patch transplantation, are highlighted as promising future therapies for ischemic HF. These approaches could improve the local persistence and viability of the co-transplanted cells-a major obstacle identified in previous studies.
GENERAL CONCEPT
In this trial, the patient's own heart tissue from the right atrial appendage is used for therapy. Neither the left nor the right atrial appendage (LAA and RAA, respectively) directly contribute to the heart's pumping function. A piece of the RAA can be safely harvested upon insertion of the right atrial cannula during the set-up of the heart and lung machine at the beginning of CABG. In the AAMS2 trial, a piece of the RAA tissue is used as epicardially transplanted, patch-encased, and mechanically expanded atrial appendage micrografts (AAMs). This therapy can be administered during single CABG surgery.
PREVIOUS RESULTS
In a preclinical mouse model of MI and HF, the effects of epicardial AAMs-patches were compared to acellular ECM patches. The results demonstrated myocardial tissue protection, attenuated scarring, and retained cardiac function. Further, mass-spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics demonstrated widespread regenerative and cardioprotective effects in the myocardium, including decreased oxidative stress and AAMs-mediated induction of myocardial glycolytic metabolism, a process associated with an increased regenerative capacity of myocardium. The AAMs-patch therapy has proceeded to clinical use. Following the first-in-man application of AAMs, the safety and feasibility of the epicardial AAMs transplantation during CABG was recently confirmed. Moreover, as this study suggested increased thickness of the viable myocardium in the scar zone, it provided the first indication of therapeutic benefit.
OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEW
This AAMS2 randomized double-blinded and controlled trial evaluates the effect of epicardially transplanted AAMs as an adjuvant therapy to CABG surgery. The trial's primary endpoints are changes in cardiac function and structure as evaluated using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI) at 6-month follow-up after surgery as compared to preoperative LGE-CMRI. The trial enrolls 50 patients in a 1:1 group allocation ratio to the two study groups: 1.) collagen-based patch + AAMs + CABG (treatment arm) and 2.) collagen-based patch + CABG (control arm). Autologous RAA tissue is harvested from the RAA during CABG from all participants and based on randomization, the piece of RAA tissue is either processed to AAMs perioperatively or cryostored for biochemical analyses. The AAMs, embedded in fibrin matrix gel, are placed on a collaged-based patch, which is then epicardially sutured in place. To pinpoint the ischemic scar area as the epicardial transplantation site, LGE-CMRI is done preoperatively. Study blood samples are collected preoperatively as well as at 3- and 6-month follow-up after surgery. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), LGE-CMRI, symptom-scaling measures, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) are performed preoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up.
METHODS
- Patient selection, enrolment, ethics, and timeline-The patients meeting the both eligibility, inclusion as well as exclusion criteria, as evaluated by either a cardiologist or a cardiac surgeon, are selected from the hospital's list of elective cardiac surgeries. The patients' medication is optimised according to the current guidelines by the treating cardiologist. The usual waiting time on the list ranges between 2 and 8 weeks. This time allows medication changes to take effect before surgery. Later, the recruited patients are called for a clinical control visit (denoted as the 3-month follow-up) and a dedicated trial visit (at 6-8 months postoperatively, denoted as the 6-month follow-up). All patients are provided with information describing the trial. Before a subject undergoes any study procedure, an informed consent discussion will be conducted and written informed consent to participate is required. The trial will be conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS; Dnr. HUS/12322/2022), and the Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea (FIMEA; Dnr. FIMEA/2023/004090). The estimated start of the patient recruitment is March 2024 with an estimated full study completion date on January 2027. The participant is excluded from the trial (screening failure), if, after optimisation of medication, a visible scar cannot be identified or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is ≥50% in the preoperative LGE-CMRI. This applies also if the LGE-CMRI has not been performed prior to CABG.
- Endpoints-The trial endpoints are listed in a separate section. The primary endpoints focus on changes in cardiac fibrosis as evaluated by LGE-CMRI and circulating levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The secondary endpoints center on other efficacy parameters as well as both safety and feasibility of the therapy.
- Randomization and blinding-Patients are randomized into CABG or AAMs groups using sex-stratified block randomization via the openly available online tool at www.sealedenvelope.com with block sizes 2 and 4, and stratification according to sex (female, male). Randomization is carried out by the study nurse. 50 participants that are treated during CABG either with Hemopatch® or the AAMs-patch are randomized. The research nurse texts the Sealed Envelope service phone number 'AAMS2' (the trial abbreviation) with and command 'randomise', and the participant pseudonym. The research nurse receives then the allocation by a text message. This is done on a previous day of patient's CABG to allow adequate time to setup practicalities required for the perioperative AAMs-patch assembly. The study nurse oversees the allocation in a double-blinded manner, where the patient and the evaluating cardiologist and radiologists remain blinded to the study group allocation. Given the nature of the treatment (transplant vs. no transplant) it is impossible to blind the operating surgeon or the study nurse to the allocations intraoperatively. However, the cardiac surgeon is blinded when planning the anastomoses prior CABG. All LGE-CMRI and TTE measurements as well as laboratory analyses are done by researchers blinded to the group allocations. In this trial, if considered acutely mandatory to remove the epicardial patch material, it is done without consideration of the randomization. Hence, no emergency unblinding is required in this trial.
- Preparation and administration of atrial appendage micrografts-A piece of the RAA is harvested at the beginning of cardiac surgery upon right atrial cannulation. The RAA tissue is weighed and mechanically processed into micrografts as previously described by using the Rigeneracon blade (Rigenera-system, HBW s.r.l., Turin, Italy). Dedicated CE-marked instrumentation kits to support tissue processing in the operating room are obtained from EpiHeart Oy (Helsinki, Finland). After RAA grinding, the cold cardioplegia supernatant is removed and the AAMs pellet is collected with 0,4mL of the Tisseel (Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) fibrinogen solution diluted with 0.9% NaCl (1:1 relation). Then, the AAMs-fibrinogen mixture is spread onto a cooled sterile metallic dish to be mixed in situ with 0,2mL of thrombin solution diluted in 1:30 relation with 0.9% NaCl. The AAMs-fibrinogen-thrombin mixture then undergoes spontaneous gelling for at least 10-15 minutes. Then, the gelled AAMs-fibrin gel is maintained cooled (+6 - +8oC), covered, and sterile waiting for transplantation. When all the anastomoses are ready, the AAMs-fibrin gel is lifted onto a collagen-based matrix (HEMOPATCH Sealing Hemostat [45 mm × 45 mm; catalog ref. 1506256; Baxter International Inc., Illinois, USA). Next, the edges of the Hemopatch® are moistened with sodium bicarbonate (4.2-8.4%), which activates the polyethylene glycol-coating of the patch. Immediately after, to achieve proper epicardial adherence, the AAMs-patch with the moistened patch edges is transplanted onto the epicardium of the scarred border zone of the myocardium by using a dry gauze with uniform pressure for 2 minutes. The transplantation site is assessed prior CABG with LGE-CMRI to the ischemia-induced scar. In this trial, the AAMs patch shall wait, at maximum, 6 hours prior transplantation.
- General data protection regulation-The data collected during the trial will fulfil EU regulations for personal health data protection, including General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
- Adverse events-As a part of overall safety evaluation of the trial method, adverse events are subdivided to (1) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (2) anticipated SADE (serious adverse device effects), (3) other SAE (serious adverse events), (4) unanticipated SADE. All of these events are continuously monitored and reported to regulatory bodies. Here, the MACCE comprise i.) death (all-cause), ii.) MI, iii.) any acute coronary revascularization, or iv.) stroke. MI is defined in line to the fourth universal definition on MI as either a.) perioperative myocardial injury (i.e., type 5 MI ≤48 hours post-CABG, creatinine kinase muscle-brain isoenzymes [CK-MB] ≥ 10 times the upper reference) or b.) postoperative MI (i.e., an increase in the CK-MB or troponin concentration above the upper reference limit with ischemic symptoms or signs). Stroke is indicated by neurological deficits and confirmed by a neurologist on the basis of imaging with lesion(s) concordant to the clinical presentation. New revascularizations span any postoperative coronary intervention. Anticipated SADE are events identified by the trial investigators with, at a general level, possible causal relationship to the AAMs-patch therapy. These include: i.) mediastinitis, ii.) postoperative pericardial effusion requiring subxiphoidal drainage or resternotomy, iii.) major bleeding (BARC classes 4-5) from the RAA biopsy site, or iv.) major postoperative arrhythmia (ventricular fibrillation, or ventricular tachycardia over 30 seconds). Mediastinitis is diagnosed according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The published data in mice, pigs, and human on the method does not indicate increased risk for any of these events. Other SAE comprise any adverse event that has led to either death, life-threatening illness, (prolongation of) hospitalization, medical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness, or chronic disease. According to our risk assessment of the AAMs-patch therapy, these could include: myocarditis, pericardial effusion, HF exacerbation, resternotomy, atrial tachycardia or fibrillation, atrial flutter, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding (BARC 3-5), acute kidney injury, or other hospitalization due to ischemic cause.
- Blood samples-A blood sample for NT-pro-BNP measurement, a gold standard biomarker for HF evaluation, is collected preoperatively and at both 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. In addition, the AAMS2 trial assesses blood, plasma, and RAA tissue samples for their contained RNA transcripts with a novel focus on their post-transcriptional modifications, as previously described. However, to ensure adequate yield of native RNA, instead of collecting 3 mL x 5 of TEMPUS(TM) RNA-stabilized blood per visit, 3 mL x 8 is collected. These modifications comprise a biologic frontier in genetics that is unveiling a key contributor and regulator of many cellular functions and pathophysiologic conditions, also IHD and ischemic HF. As the information regarding blood epitranscriptomics in human IHD and HF remains scarce, the AAMS2 trial aims to provide insight into the AAMs-treatment-induced alterations in the blood epitranscriptomes. Especially, the focus is in the two most common modifications, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing.
- RAA tissue samples-The removed piece of RAA tissue from the control group is collected as a sample for biochemical analyses. The piece of RAA tissue will be divided in two and stored (RNAlater or formaldehyde-ethanol) for subsequent epitranscriptomics-targeted evaluations as previously described.
- Echocardiography-All participants are assessed with electrocardiogram and TTE preoperatively and postoperatively at hospital discharge and at 3-month follow-up. The TTE recordings are performed with designated cardiologists. These recordings include both anatomical and functional assessments of ventricles, atria and valves. An especial focus is granted during preoperative TTE, prior to the above-described RAA sample collection for AAMs, to the atrial appendages and the atria proper for anatomic characterization. Moreover, the presence or absence of pericardial effusion, thrombus and aneurysm is recorded. Perfusion anesthesiologist will perform transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room during anesthesia to evaluate both left and right atrial appendages for blood flow velocities, possible sludge and thrombus before CABG.
- Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI)-A whole body 1.5-T MRI scanner (Siemens Sola or Avanto-fit, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) is used for LGE-CMRI image acquisition. Cardiac structure and function are evaluated with a standardized LGE-CMRI protocol using electrocardiogram and respiratory gating. Short-axis cine images are used for left and right ventricular volumetric measurements. Myocardial contractility is evaluated using longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain measurements from short- and long-axis cine images. LGE is assessed to measure infarction volume and mass using 5-SD semiautomatic gain estimate, as previously suggested for semiautomatic thresholding for infarction detection. Image post-processing is performed with Medis Suite software (Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, The Netherlands) with QMass and QStrain applications.
- Quality of life assessment-Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is measured using the RAND36 (SF36) short form questionnaire. The questionnaire is standardized with specified mean and standard deviation values for eight dimensions that range from physical functioning and subjective feeling of vitality and health to bodily pain. The obtained scores are compared to a Finnish cohort with any chronic disease. Also, a subject's symptom-evaluation is performed for the two cardinal symptoms of IHD and HF, angina pectoris and exertional dyspnea, with standardized classification systems developed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the New York Heart Association (NYHA), respectively. Finally, a six-minute walking test (6MWT) is assessed to gain objective morbidity measures. All these parameters are assessed both preoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up visit postoperatively. NYHA and CCS classes are also recorded at 3-month clinical follow-up.
- Statistical analyses-Power analysis was carried out using SAS 9.4 TS Level 1M4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), the POWER Procedure Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test with the fixed scenario elements O'Brien-Castelloe approximation method and two-sided statistical evaluation. Power analysis sample data was derived from the previous open-label AAMs trial. With a total sample size of 50 (two groups, group size 25, distribution 1:1) these parameters yield a power greater than 80% at an α of 0.05. Comparisons between groups will be performed with the Mann Whitney U test. Ordinal variables are tested with the Chi-Square test. Multiple comparisons are corrected with the Bonferroni method, significant findings are further tested groupwise using the Mann Whitney U test. Quality of life data is presented as means and analyzed with the independent samples t-test (two-sided). Analyses are performed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 27 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) or equivalent. The data can be analyzed and published in phases during the trial.
- Data collection preoperatively and postoperatively during follow-up-Clinical, laboratory and drug treatment data are collected to the hospital electronic health records. After discharge and during follow-up patients can visit the primary healthcare. No concomitant care or interventions are prohibited. Any visit related to the operation or their cardiovascular system condition as well as drug treatment changes are collected by the study investigators. This data is stored pseudonymized with the other data from that patient. The participant adherence is monitored by updating an anonymized trial progression file. In case of deviation from the trial protocol, the participant is followed and examined according to the trial protocol as accurately as possible after the deviation. In case of participant discontinuation, the study data accumulated until the discontinuation is included in the trial datasets and reported separately.
- Data storage, management and sharing-The produced data are stored in the network hard drives of HUS and UH during analyses as well as on the servers of the CSC - IT CENTER FOR SCIENCE LTD. (Finland) specifically designed for sensitive data storage, all with automated backups. Directly identifying patient data with corresponding pseudonymization keys and randomization codes are stored in a key registry located within the safe hospital systems with automated backup and access control. The accession to the registries is controlled via role-based accession rights, and only those researchers specified in the registry description approved by the HUS Ethics Committee can access the data therein. PI-researcher docent Antti Nykänen is the responsible party for the key registry and its contents. The TTE data of participants is accessed via IntelliSpace software (Philips, Netherlands) that is ultimately stored on the Microsoft® Azure Cloud, which fulfills the HUS data security guidelines. The LGE-CMRI data and reports are stored to digital HUS picture archiving and communication system (PACS). When needed, the LGE-CMRI data are transferred internally between HUS Medical Imaging Center's servers to allow image analysis with appropriate CMR software. Case report formats are both physically stored in the HUS premises with an access control and electronically in the research registry.The accessions to the research registry are controlled via role-based accession rights and only those research team members singly specified in the registry description document, approved by the HUS Ethics Committee, can access the data therein. All workstations, network drives and servers are password protected. Prior any sharing of pseudonymized data with the academic study collaborators inside or outside European Union take place, whether performed via CSC - IT CENTER FOR SCIENCE LTD. (Finland) servers or with strong-password-protected hard drives transported by either official courier of the University of Helsinki or Helsinki University Hospital, the responsible collaborating scientist or the representative of the affiliated institution will sign Material Transfer Agreement (MTA). These MTAs will use the EU commission's Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) to protect the access, i.e. transfer, of the pseudonymized data. Also, all personnel handling pseudonymized data will be required to sign an official HUS secrecy and data security commitment. Moreover, the CSC - IT CENTER FOR SCIENCE LTD. requires its own data secrecy handling agreement for each collaborator to sign prior accessing the pseudonymized data. Principally, after the active phase of the trial, the produced data with pseudonyms will be stored on the servers of the Finnish IT Center for Science CSC (SD-Apply) for 15 years. After this, the data is anonymized via erasing all the pseudonyms and curated indefinitely. A distinct Data Access Committee will monitor the re-use of the stored data. Also, the sequencing datasets with group-level anonymized metadata can be made available upon publication via uploading into repositories such as the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI, Cambridge, UK) or the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) functional genomics database repository (National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA).
- Trial monitoring-The AAMS2 trial is monitored by the Clinical Research Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) to ensure trial subjects' rights, safety, and well-being. A detailed monitoring plan is effective. The monitor audits the trial data registries for appropriateness and completeness regularly. Also, the AAMS2 trial has a Trial Monitoring Committee with national medical professionals from the field of cardiology, cardiac surgery, and nursing to evaluate the appropriateness of the trial in a periodical manner, as each 10 patients are recruited, from a focused medical viewpoint.
- Conditions
- Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure, Systolic, Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class II, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV
- Being tested
- Epicardial AAMs-patch transplantation, RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling, Plasma sampling, Transthoracic echocardiography, Late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI)
- Keywords
- Ischemic heart failure, Ischemic heart disease, Coronary artery disease, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Atrial appendage micrografts, Tissue-engineering, Ischemic cardiomyopathy, Atrial appendage, Micrografts, Cell Therapy, Epitranscriptomics
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Ischemia, Heart Failure, Systolic, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epicardial AAMs-patch transplantationProcedure or surgery
Perioperative assembly of an AAMs-patch with epicardial transplantation onto the epicardium of the scarred myocardium at the end of CABG surgery
RNA-stabilized whole blood samplingDiagnostic test
Collection (preoperative and at 6-month-follow-up) of TEMPUS(TM) stabilizing whole blood for epitranscriptomics-oriented measurements
Plasma samplingDiagnostic test
Collection (preoperative and at 6-month follow-up) of blood-derived both RNA-stabilized and non-stabilized plasma aliquots for epitranscriptomic-oriented and other CVD biomarker oriented measurements, respectively
Transthoracic echocardiographyDiagnostic test
Also called TTE
To assess cardiac structure and function both pre- and postoperatively (at both hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up)
Late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI)Diagnostic test
To assess detailed cardiac structure (i.e. interstitial fibrosis) and function both preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up postoperatively.
Symptom-scalingOther
Standardised evaluation of IHD and HF-related angina pectoris (CCS) and dyspnea (NYHA) and life quality (RAND36) pre- and postoperatively (at both 3- and 6-month follow-up).
6-minute walking test (6MWT)Other
Standardised assessment of physcial capacity pre- and postoperatively (at 6-month follow-up)
Blood sampling (NT-proBNP)Diagnostic test
Collection of a blood sample measurement of NT-proBNP by an accredited hospital laboratory pre- and postoperatively (at both 3- and 6-month follow-up).
Transesophageal echocardiographyDiagnostic test
Also called TEE
Performed by the perfusion-anesthesiologist at the beginning of the CABG surgery to evaluate both LAA and RAA for blood flow velocities, anatomy, possible sludge and thrombus.
Epicardial collagen-based patch transplantationProcedure or surgery
Epicardial transplantation of the collaged-based patch material without the AAMs onto the epicardium of the scarred myocardium at the end of CABG surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CABG + collaged-based patch arm (control) | Active comparator | In total, 25 patients are recruited to form the CABG group. During CABG, RAA tissue is removed as detailed for the AAMs-patch group. However, the tissue is collected as a cryostored sample for later analyses rather than processed to AAMs (Method 4). CABG is performed without epicardial transplantation of AAMs, yet the collagen-based patch material is transplanted onto the epicardium of the scarred myocardium according the same principles as in the AAMs-patch intervention arm. Receives: Diagnostic Test: RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling; Diagnostic Test: Plasma sampling; Diagnostic Test: Transthoracic echocardiography; Diagnostic Test: Late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI); Other: Symptom-scaling; Other: 6-minute walking test (6MWT); Diagnostic Test: Blood sampling (NT-proBNP); Diagnostic Test: Transesophageal echocardiography; Procedure: Epicardial collagen-based patch transplantation |
| CABG + collagen based patch + AAMs arm (intervention) | Experimental | In total, 25 patients are recruited to the AAMs-patch group. Here, the AAMs are prepared from the RAA tissue sample by mechanical processing in the operating room during the CABG surgery. The RAA tissue piece is removed during right atrial cannulation, a part of the routine setup of cardiopulmonary bypass and mechanically processed to AAMs, which is allowed to gel with fibrinogen and thrombin in cold, covered, and sterile metallic dish until the last stages of CABG surgery. After all the coronary anastomoses are done, to form an AAMs-patch, the AAMs in a fibrin matrix gel are placed onto a collagen based matrix sheet and then epicardially transplanted onto the scar border area identified by preoperative LGE-CMRI to have most suffered from ischemia. Receives: Procedure: Epicardial AAMs-patch transplantation; Diagnostic Test: RNA-stabilized whole blood sampling; Diagnostic Test: Plasma sampling; Diagnostic Test: Transthoracic echocardiography; Diagnostic Test: Late-gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI); Other: Symptom-scaling; Other: 6-minute walking test (6MWT); Diagnostic Test: Blood sampling (NT-proBNP); Diagnostic Test: Transesophageal echocardiography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the amount of myocardial scar tissue
Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Change in plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Measured from blood sample at preoperative visit, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (20)
Efficacy: Change in left ventricular wall thickness
Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Change in viable left ventricular myocardium
Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Change in movement, systolic or diastolic function of the left ventricle
Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class
NYHA class at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups vs NYHA peoperatively
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class
CCS class at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups vs CCS preoperatively
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
MACCE during the study period
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Deaths due to primary cardiovascular cause
Deaths (and cause of death) during the study period
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Postoperative days in hospital
Measured as the CABG (and CVD) -related postoperative days spent in hospital
Measured: 1 week, up to 10 days
Efficacy: Changes in the quality of life
Measured by RAND36 questionnaire preoperatively and at the 6-month-follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Local changes in systolic and diastolic function
- Measured by transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively and at the 3 and 6-months of follow-up
- Measured by LGE-CMRI preoperatively and at 6-months of follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Efficacy: Changes in myocardial strain and LVEF
Measured by TTE preoperatively and at the 3- and 6-months of follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Safety: telemetric monitoring of rhythm
For assessing cardiac function after the CABG operation
Measured: 4 days
Feasibility: Success in completing the delivery of the AAMs patch onto the epicardium [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
Measured in 0= success, 1= no success
Measured: The duration of CABG operation, 3-5 hours
Feasibility: Waiting time for the AAMs patch
Waiting time in minutes for the atrial appendage micrograft transplant to be placed on the myocardium (placement after completion of all the required anastomoses)
Measured: 75-90 minutes from the start of CABG operation
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the heart
Waiting time in minutes for the heart after all the anastomoses are completed and before the AAMs patch is ready for epicardial transplantation.
Measured: 75-90 minutes from the start of CABG operation
Feasibility: Closing the right atrial appendage
Closing the right atrial appendage after removing the standardized tissue piece for preparing the transplant.
According to the hospital protocol, appendage is closed with purse-string suture.
0 = no additional suturing needed, 1 = additional suturing needed
Measured: 1-5 minutes, at the decannulation phase at the end of CABG
Safety; need for vasoactive medication
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: up to 2 days after CABG
Safety; in-hospital infections
Transplant-related=1; Non-transplant-related=2; no infections=0 with details on organism, quantity, clinical and microbiological evaluation as well as harvesting site
Measured: 1 week, up to 10 days
Observational: Blood and plasma long-read RNA sequencing, proteomics, and/or metabolomics
Chronologic (preoperative vs. 6-month follow-up) and cross-sectional (AAMs patch vs. CABG group) correlation of blood epitranscriptomes, transcriptome, proteome and/or metabolome with the above outcomes.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2022
- Study start1 Apr 2024
- Primary completion31 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (35)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ischemic Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The trial enrolls 50 patients in a 1:1 group allocation ratio to the two study groups: 1.) collagen-based patch + AAMs + CABG (treatment arm) and 2.) collagen-based patch + CABG (control arm). Autologous RAA tissue is harvested from the RAA during CABG from all participants. Based on randomization, the piece of RAA tissue is either processed to AAMs perioperatively or stored for biochemical analyses. The AAMs, embedded in fibrin matrix gel, are placed on an collagen-based patch sheet, which is epicardially adhered in place. The epicardial transplantation site is pinpointed to ischemic scar area by preoperative LGE-CMRI.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Helsinki, Oulu University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Antti Nykanen, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
- Investigators
- Antti Nykänen, Docent, Principal investigator, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05632432
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAMS2
- Acronym
- AAMS2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Principally, after the active phase of the trial, the produced data with pseudonyms will be stored on the servers of the Finnish IT Center for Science CSC (SD-Apply) for 15 years. After this, the data is anonymized via erasing all the pseudonyms and curated indefinitely. A distinct Data Access Committee will monitor the re-use of the stored data. Also, the sequencing datasets with group-level anonymized metadata can be made available upon publication via uploading into repositories such as the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI, Cambridge, UK) or the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) functional genomics database repository (National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Publications
GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
PubMed 30496103Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Grobbee R, Maniadakis N, Flather M, Wilkins E, Wright L, Vos R, Bax J, Blum M, Pinto F, Vardas P; ESC Scientific Document Group. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 14;39(7):508-579. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628.
PubMed 29190377Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling--concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 1;35(3):569-82. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00630-0.
PubMed 10716457Taylor CJ, Ryan R, Nichols L, Gale N, Hobbs FR, Marshall T. Survival following a diagnosis of heart failure in primary care. Fam Pract. 2017 Apr 1;34(2):161-168. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw145.
PubMed 28137979Groenewegen A, Rutten FH, Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1342-1356. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
PubMed 32483830van Riet EE, Hoes AW, Wagenaar KP, Limburg A, Landman MA, Rutten FH. Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;18(3):242-52. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.483. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
PubMed 26727047Rihal CS, Raco DL, Gersh BJ, Yusuf S. Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic stable angina: review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2439-45. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000094405.21583.7C. No abstract available.
PubMed 14623791Eurostat, online material (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/health/data/database) Accessed 3.4.2022
Freitas P, Madeira M, Raposo L, Madeira S, Brito J, Brizido C, Gama F, Vale N, Ranchordas S, Magro P, Braga A, Goncalves PA, Gabriel HM, Nolasco T, Boshoff S, Marques M, Bruges L, Calquinha J, Sousa-Uva M, Abecasis M, Almeida M, Neves JP, Mendes M. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;123(5):717-724. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.052. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
PubMed 30558758Cutie S, Huang GN. Vertebrate cardiac regeneration: evolutionary and developmental perspectives. Cell Regen. 2021 Mar 1;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13619-020-00068-y.
PubMed 33644818Haubner BJ, Schneider J, Schweigmann U, Schuetz T, Dichtl W, Velik-Salchner C, Stein JI, Penninger JM. Functional Recovery of a Human Neonatal Heart After Severe Myocardial Infarction. Circ Res. 2016 Jan 22;118(2):216-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307017. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
PubMed 26659640Cambria E, Pasqualini FS, Wolint P, Gunter J, Steiger J, Bopp A, Hoerstrup SP, Emmert MY. Translational cardiac stem cell therapy: advancing from first-generation to next-generation cell types. NPJ Regen Med. 2017 Jun 13;2:17. doi: 10.1038/s41536-017-0024-1. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29302353Koninckx R, Daniels A, Windmolders S, Mees U, Macianskiene R, Mubagwa K, Steels P, Jamaer L, Dubois J, Robic B, Hendrikx M, Rummens JL, Hensen K. The cardiac atrial appendage stem cell: a new and promising candidate for myocardial repair. Cardiovasc Res. 2013 Mar 1;97(3):413-23. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs427. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
PubMed 23257022Detert S, Stamm C, Beez C, Diedrichs F, Ringe J, Van Linthout S, Seifert M, Tschope C, Sittinger M, Haag M. The atrial appendage as a suitable source to generate cardiac-derived adherent proliferating cells for regenerative cell-based therapies. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018 Mar;12(3):e1404-e1417. doi: 10.1002/term.2528. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
PubMed 28752609Evens L, Belien H, D'Haese S, Haesen S, Verboven M, Rummens JL, Bronckaers A, Hendrikx M, Deluyker D, Bito V. Combinational Therapy of Cardiac Atrial Appendage Stem Cells and Pyridoxamine: The Road to Cardiac Repair? Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 27;22(17):9266. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179266.
PubMed 34502175