Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to HypoglycemiaNCT05628662
Artificial Pancreas With Carbohydrate Suggestion for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Prone to Hypoglycemia
A study testing Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to Hypoglycemia, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Achieving near-normoglycemia has been established as the main objective for most patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the so-called artificial pancreas (AP) or closed-loop systems, may represent the ideal solution, especially for patients not reaching the therapeutic goals… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to Hypoglycemia
- What is being tested?
- Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 22 Oct 2021to 6 Apr 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects aged 18 or more with Type 1 Diabetes for at least 5 years.
- Treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for at least six months.
- Trained to carbohydrate counting.
- Subjects prone to hypoglycemia, despite optimal diabetes management and hypoglycemia-specific education programs, as defined by >4 hypoglycemic episodes per week and at least one of the following:
- Occurrence of at least 2 severe hypoglycemic episodes during the last 2 years (need for third party).
- Occurrence of at least 1 severe hypoglycemic episode during the last 2 years and high glycemic variability (coefficient of variation >36%).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (Clarke test ≥4).
- Physical examination, laboratory data and EKG without alterations. Abnormalities considered clinically irrelevant by the investigator will not be exclusion criteria.
- Negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test performed at arrival.
- Subject willing to wear the SAFE-AP system continuously throughout the study.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse.
- Progressive fatal disease.
- Clinically relevant microvascular complications (macroalbuminuria, pre-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy), cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine or other systematic, apart from T1D, which may hamper the implementation of the clinical study protocol or interpretation of results study.
- Scheduled surgery during the study period.
- Mental conditions that prevent the subject to understand the nature, purpose and possible consequences of the study.
- Subjects who are unlikely to meet the clinical study protocol, eg. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, or poor probability of completing the study.
- Using an experimental drug or device during the past 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of an Artificial Pancreas With Carbohydrate Suggestion for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Prone to Hypoglycemia
Achieving near-normoglycemia has been established as the main objective for most patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the so-called artificial pancreas (AP) or closed-loop systems, may represent the ideal solution, especially for patients not reaching the therapeutic goals with multiples doses of insulin or open-loop delivery systems. Despite the advances in recent years that have proven the efficacy and safety of these devices in clinical trials and clinical practice settings, such evidence cannot be extrapolated to highly unstable patients, as problematic hypoglycemia remains an exclusion criterion in most of the trials.
The SAFE-AP system is a single-hormone hybrid closed-loop controller based on a proportional derivative with an insulin feedback controller that integrates a safety layer with insulin-on-board constraints and sliding mode reference conditioning. The hybrid closed-loop system includes a second safety feedback loop with a controller that triggers carbohydrate recommendations to the patient. Both control loops are coordinated to ensure that the counter-regulatory effect of rescue carbohydrates is not counteracted with insulin. Such system has been previously proven effective in unannounced exercise, one of the main challenges in AID systems development. Additionally, the algorithm has been recently tailored to achieve a better control in the subgroup of T1D patients prone to hypoglycemia.
In this project, a rigorous clinical testing of the SAFE-AP system will be carried out in 12 patients with T1D and problematic hypoglycemia, despite treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The safety and performance of the system will be evaluated in a 32-hour pilot study, including 4 meals, one overnight period and 2 unannounced aerobic exercise sessions. The study will be performed in a hospital setting with the on-site supervision of a specialized nurse and a diabetologist, as well as an engineer in remote control.
- Being tested
- Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP)
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Artificial Pancreas, Closed-loop, Automated insulin delivery
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Hypoglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP)Device
Each subject will undergo a 32-hour in-hospital study, including 4 meals (60 grams of carbohydrates each, except 50 grams for breakfast), one overnight period and 2 unannounced aerobic exercise sessions. Each exercise session consists of three 15-minute sets on a cycle ergometer at 70% of maximum heart rate with 5 minutes of rest between sets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) | Experimental | Sliding Mode Reference Conditioning (SMRC) Closed-loop insulin administration. Automated insulin infusion based on subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Commercially available insulin infusion systems and CGM devices will be used. However, insulin infusion will be driven by the software under investigation (SAFE-AP) based on blood glucose estimations from CGM. Receives: Device: Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during the study.
Measured: From 12 AM of the first day of study until 4 PM of the second day of study
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during nighttime
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during exercise and recovery
Measured: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during postprandial period
Measured: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during the study
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during nighttime
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during exercise and recovery
Measured: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during postprandial period
Measured: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during the study
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during nighttime
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during exercise and recovery
Measured: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during postprandial period
Measured: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Glucose coefficient of variation during the study
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of hypoglycemic events
Defined as sensor glucose <70 mg/dL during 15 minutes or symptomatic hypoglycemia confirmed with plasma glucose
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of carbohydrate rescue events during the study
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of acute metabolic events during the study
Defined as severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis
Measured: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2022
- Study start22 Oct 2021
- Primary completion6 Apr 2022
- Study completion6 Apr 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to HypoglycemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitat Politècnica de València, Universitat de Girona
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ignacio Conget, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Investigators
- Jorge Bondia, PhD, Study director, Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaJosep Vehí, PhD, Study director, Universitat de GironaIgnacio Conget, MD PhD, Study director, Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaMarga Giménez, MD PhD, Study chair, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05628662
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HEAP
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vinals C, Beneyto A, Martin-SanJose JF, Furio-Novejarque C, Bertachi A, Bondia J, Vehi J, Conget I, Gimenez M. Artificial Pancreas With Carbohydrate Suggestion Performance for Unannounced and Announced Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):55-63. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa562.
PubMed 32852548Rossetti P, Quiros C, Moscardo V, Comas A, Gimenez M, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Leon F, Montaser E, Conget I, Bondia J, Vehi J. Closed-Loop Control of Postprandial Glycemia Using an Insulin-on-Board Limitation Through Continuous Action on Glucose Target. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(6):355-362. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0443. Epub 2017 May 1.
PubMed 28459603Quiros C, Bertachi A, Gimenez M, Biagi L, Viaplana J, Vinals C, Vehi J, Conget I, Bondia J. Blood glucose monitoring during aerobic and anaerobic physical exercise using a new artificial pancreas system. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 Jun-Jul;65(6):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Feb 23. English, Spanish.
PubMed 29483036
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of an Artificial Pancreas With Carbohydrate Suggestion for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Prone to Hypoglycemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05628662
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HEAP
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Artificial Pancreas, Closed-loop, Automated insulin delivery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitat Politècnica de València, Universitat de Girona
- Study start
- 22 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Apr 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Achieving near-normoglycemia has been established as the main objective for most patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the so-called artificial pancreas (AP) or closed-loop systems, may represent the ideal solution, especially for patients not reaching the therapeutic goals with multiples doses of insulin or open-loop delivery systems. Despite the advances in recent years that have proven the efficacy and safety of these devices in clinical trials and clinical practice settings, such evidence cannot be extrapolated to highly unstable patients, as problematic hypoglycemia remains an exclusion criterion in most of the trials.
The SAFE-AP system is a single-hormone hybrid closed-loop controller based on a proportional derivative with an insulin feedback controller that integrates a safety layer with insulin-on-board constraints and sliding mode reference conditioning. The hybrid closed-loop system includes a second safety feedback loop with a controller that triggers carbohydrate recommendations to the patient. Both control loops are coordinated to ensure that the counter-regulatory effect of rescue carbohydrates is not counteracted with insulin. Such system has been previously proven effective in unannounced exercise, one of the main challenges in AID systems development. Additionally, the algorithm has been recently tailored to achieve a better control in the subgroup of T1D patients prone to hypoglycemia.
In this project, a rigorous clinical testing of the SAFE-AP system will be carried out in 12 patients with T1D and problematic hypoglycemia, despite treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The safety and performance of the system will be evaluated in a 32-hour pilot study, including 4 meals, one overnight period and 2 unannounced aerobic exercise sessions. The study will be performed in a hospital setting with the on-site supervision of a specialized nurse and a diabetologist, as well as an engineer in remote control.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) | Experimental | Device: Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP)Sliding Mode Reference Conditioning (SMRC) Closed-loop insulin administration. Automated insulin infusion based on subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Commercially available insulin infusion systems and CGM devices will be used. However, insulin infusion will be driven by the software under investigation (SAFE-AP) based on blood glucose estimations from CGM. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subjects aged 18 or more with Type 1 Diabetes for at least 5 years.
- Treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for at least six months.
- Trained to carbohydrate counting.
- Subjects prone to hypoglycemia, despite optimal diabetes management and hypoglycemia-specific education programs, as defined by >4 hypoglycemic episodes per week and at least one of the following:
- Physical examination, laboratory data and EKG without alterations. Abnormalities considered clinically irrelevant by the investigator will not be exclusion criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse.
- Progressive fatal disease.
- Clinically relevant microvascular complications (macroalbuminuria, pre-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy), cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine or other systematic, apart from T1D, which may hamper the implementation of the clinical study protocol or interpretation of results study.
- Scheduled surgery during the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP)Each subject will undergo a 32-hour in-hospital study, including 4 meals (60 grams of carbohydrates each, except 50 grams for breakfast), one overnight period and 2 unannounced aerobic exercise sessions. Each exercise session consists of three 15-minute sets on a cycle ergometer at 70% of maximum heart rate with 5 minutes of rest between sets. | Device | Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during the study.
Time frame: From 12 AM of the first day of study until 4 PM of the second day of study
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during nighttime
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during exercise and recovery
Time frame: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during postprandial period
Time frame: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during the study
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during nighttime
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during exercise and recovery
Time frame: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL) during postprandial period
Time frame: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during the study
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during nighttime
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during exercise and recovery
Time frame: Defined as 3 hours after exercise initiation
Percentage of CGM time in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) during postprandial period
Time frame: Defined as 4 hours since mealtime
Glucose coefficient of variation during the study
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of hypoglycemic events
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of carbohydrate rescue events during the study
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Number of acute metabolic events during the study
Time frame: From 22 PM of the first day of study until 7 AM of the second day of study
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 32852548Vinals C, Beneyto A, Martin-SanJose JF, Furio-Novejarque C, Bertachi A, Bondia J, Vehi J, Conget I, Gimenez M. Artificial Pancreas With Carbohydrate Suggestion Performance for Unannounced and Announced Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):55-63. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa562.
- Background: PubMed 28459603Rossetti P, Quiros C, Moscardo V, Comas A, Gimenez M, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Leon F, Montaser E, Conget I, Bondia J, Vehi J. Closed-Loop Control of Postprandial Glycemia Using an Insulin-on-Board Limitation Through Continuous Action on Glucose Target. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(6):355-362. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0443. Epub 2017 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 29483036Quiros C, Bertachi A, Gimenez M, Biagi L, Viaplana J, Vinals C, Vehi J, Conget I, Bondia J. Blood glucose monitoring during aerobic and anaerobic physical exercise using a new artificial pancreas system. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 Jun-Jul;65(6):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Feb 23. English, Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to Hypoglycemia
Recruiting
Pilot Study Evaluating Safety of ExOlin® in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus With Hypoglycemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jorge Bondia, PhD study director
Universitat Politècnica de València
Josep Vehí, PhD study director
Universitat de Girona
Ignacio Conget, MD PhD study director
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Automated Insulin Delivery System (SAFE-AP) in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Prone to Hypoglycemia, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of CGM time in glucose range 70-180 mg/dl during the study. (time frame: From 12 AM of the first day of study until 4 PM of the second day of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05628662, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2022.