Pregnancy RelatedOFCNCT05622968
Outpatient Induction of Labour Using Intracervical Foley Catheter
A study testing Foley catheter and Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 in people with Pregnancy Related and Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, run by Hospital Kemaman at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
Prospective quasi-experimental study between a study population who will receive outpatient induction of labour using intracervical Foley catheter, followed by the inpatient induction using intravaginal prostaglandin and a control group of women with similar characteristics undergoing inpatient labour induction with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Related, Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
- What is being tested?
- Foley catheter and Intravaginal prostaglandin E2
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 1 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 year old
- Singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Multiparous women in their 2nd to 5th pregnancy (Para 1 to 4)
- Gestational age between 37+0 and 41+0 weeks.
- No previous uterine surgery (lower segment caesarean section, upper segment caesarean section, myomectomy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Resides within 30 minutes drive from Hospital Kemaman
- Has access to a telephone
- Has reliable transportation (i.e. able to get to the hospital immediately without the need of ambulance)
- Acceptance of participation by the signing of a written consent.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy with non-cephalic presentation
- Prior cesarean delivery
- Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia on 2 or more medications
- Diabetes in pregnancy on high dose medication(s); insulin of more than 60 units per day or combination of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agent
- Low lying placenta or placenta praevia
- Rupture of amniotic membrane
Show all 17Show fewer
- Primiparae and grandmultiparae (para 5 or more)
- Multiple pregnancy
- Fetal death
- Fetal anomalies: defined as the presence of a major fetal anomaly of any organ system
- Fetal growth restriction: defined as an ultrasound derived estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age
- Suspected macrosomia: defined as an ultrasound derived estimated fetal weight of more than 90th centile for gestational age
- Oligohydramnios: ultrasound measured amniotic fluid index (AFI) less than the 10th percentile for gestational age
- Polyhydramnios: defined as an AFI of 24 cm or greater or a single deepest vertical pocket of 8 cm or greater
- Latex allergy
- Contraindication to induction of labor
- Evidence of active phase of labor
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Low Risk Women: a Quasi-experimental Study (OFC Study)
Prospective quasi-experimental study between a study population who will receive outpatient induction of labour using intracervical Foley catheter, followed by the inpatient induction using intravaginal prostaglandin and a control group of women with similar characteristics undergoing inpatient labour induction with intravaginal prostaglandin (standard management)
Read the detailed description
The study will be conducted among pregnant women in 2 to 5th pregnancy who have no significant risk factors and planned for induction of labour. The eliiable women will be recruited from 4 health clinics within the district (of Kemaman, Malaysia) and located within 20 km from the hospital.
Willing participants will be seen in the hospital at the planned induction date and reassessed. Should they be suitable for induction of labour using Foley catheter on outpatient basis, a 18G Foley catheter will be inserted into the cervical canal and the balloon inflated with sterile water (60 mls). The fetal well being will be assessed and the women allowed to go home with instruction related to the induction and the study.
Those who do not enter the active phase of labour will be admitted to the ward 24 hours later and will undergo inpatient induction of labour using intravaginal prostaglandin (Dinoprostone) according to the local protocol.
These women will be compared with a control group comprising of women with similar characteristics and undergo inpatient induction of labour with intravaginal Dinoprostone.
- Being tested
- Foley catheter, Intravaginal prostaglandin E2
- Keywords
- outpatient induction, Foley catheter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Foley catheterDevice
Also called urinary catheter
Insertion of 18G Foley catheter into the cervical canal and inflating the balloon to 60 mls using sterile water
Intravaginal prostaglandin E2Drug
Also called Dinoprostone
Insertion of intravaginal Dinoprostone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | Women who are planned for elective delivery for obstetric indication(s) and undergo outpatient induction of labour using Foley catheter Receives: Device: Foley catheter; Drug: Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Women who are planned for elective delivery for obstetric indication(s) and undergo inpatient induction of labour using intravaginal prostaglandin Receives: Drug: Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induction of labour-delivery interval
The mean interval between the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery (from the start of cervical ripening with Dinoprostone to the delivery of the baby)
Measured: Induction of labour (intravaginal prostaglandin) to delivery
Secondary outcomes (13)
Success rate of induction of labour within 12 hours
The percentage of vaginal delivery within 12 hours of inpatient cervical ripening
Measured: From the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery
Success rate of induction of labour within 24 hours
The percentage of vaginal delivery within 24 hours of inpatient cervical ripening
Measured: From the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery
Delivery outcome
Percentage of caesarean section and instrumental delivery
Measured: Induction to delivery
Adverse event
Incidence of uterine tachysystole and hyperstimulation
Measured: Induction to delivery
Labour augmentation
Duration and maximum oxytocin dose used for labour augmentation
Measured: Induction to delivery
Maximum pain recorded
Maximum recorded contraction pain during cervical ripening (using Visual Analogue Scale of 10)
Measured: Induction to delivery
Incidence of chorioamnionitis
maternal temperature is greater than or equal to 39.0°C or when the maternal temperature is 38.0-38.9°C and one additional clinical risk factor is present
Measured: Induction to 24 hours after delivery
Analgesia requirement
Prevalence of analgesia required during induction of labour
Measured: Induction to delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage
Primary postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of more than 500mls within 24 hours of delivery)
Measured: Delivery to 24 hours after delivery
Neonatal Apgar score
Incidence of low Apgar score (less than 7) at 5 minutes after delivery
Measured: Delivery to 10 minutes after birth
Neonatal intubation
Incidence of neonates requiring intubation
Measured: Delivery to 30 minutes after birth
Neonatal seizure
Incidence of neonate with seizure
Measured: Delivery to 24 hours after birth
Neonatal complication
Admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Measured: Delivery to 24 hours after birth
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Sep 2024
- Study completion1 Sep 2024
Why it stopped: Poor recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnancy RelatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Kemaman
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zahar Azuar Zakaria, Hospital Kemaman
- Investigators
- Zahar Zakaria, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Kemaman
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05622968
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMRR ID-22-00349-EQQ
- Acronym
- OFC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share for now
Publications
Sharp AN, Stock SJ, Alfirevic Z. Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
PubMed 27513897Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 9. Induction of labour
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
PubMed 19623003Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J; CLINICAL PRACTICE OBSTETRICS COMMITTEE; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Sep;35(9):840-857. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30842-2. English, French.
PubMed 24099451Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;(8):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub2.
PubMed 20687092Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3.
PubMed 28901007Dong S, Khan M, Hashimi F, Chamy C, D'Souza R. Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03060-1.
PubMed 32605542Croll DMR, Hoge PC, Verhoeven CJM, de Boer MA, Bloemenkamp KWM, de Heus R. Changes in local protocols on inpatient cervical priming and introduction of outpatient priming: A nationwide survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:148-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
PubMed 34214801Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Outpatient cervical ripening. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):488-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
PubMed 26365009Kruit H, Heikinheimo O, Ulander VM, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Nupponen I, Paavonen J, Rahkonen L. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure. J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):618-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.62. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PubMed 27078202Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
PubMed 11704164Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
PubMed 29211328Stephenson E, Borakati A, Simpson I, Eedarapalli P. Foley catheter for induction of labour: a UK observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;40(8):1064-1068. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1676213. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PubMed 31793372Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, Bryce R, Fereday J, Wilkinson C. Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor. Birth. 2013 Jun;40(2):75-80. doi: 10.1111/birt.12035. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
PubMed 24635460
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Low Risk Women: a Quasi-experimental Study (OFC Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05622968
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OFC / NMRR ID-22-00349-EQQ
- Keywords
- outpatient induction, Foley catheter
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Poor recruitment
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital KemamanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective quasi-experimental study between a study population who will receive outpatient induction of labour using intracervical Foley catheter, followed by the inpatient induction using intravaginal prostaglandin and a control group of women with similar characteristics undergoing inpatient labour induction with intravaginal prostaglandin (standard management)
Detailed description
The study will be conducted among pregnant women in 2 to 5th pregnancy who have no significant risk factors and planned for induction of labour. The eliiable women will be recruited from 4 health clinics within the district (of Kemaman, Malaysia) and located within 20 km from the hospital.
Willing participants will be seen in the hospital at the planned induction date and reassessed. Should they be suitable for induction of labour using Foley catheter on outpatient basis, a 18G Foley catheter will be inserted into the cervical canal and the balloon inflated with sterile water (60 mls). The fetal well being will be assessed and the women allowed to go home with instruction related to the induction and the study.
Those who do not enter the active phase of labour will be admitted to the ward 24 hours later and will undergo inpatient induction of labour using intravaginal prostaglandin (Dinoprostone) according to the local protocol.
These women will be compared with a control group comprising of women with similar characteristics and undergo inpatient induction of labour with intravaginal Dinoprostone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | Device: Foley catheter, Drug: Intravaginal prostaglandin E2Women who are planned for elective delivery for obstetric indication(s) and undergo outpatient induction of labour using Foley catheter |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: Intravaginal prostaglandin E2Women who are planned for elective delivery for obstetric indication(s) and undergo inpatient induction of labour using intravaginal prostaglandin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age > 18 year old
- Singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Multiparous women in their 2nd to 5th pregnancy (Para 1 to 4)
- Gestational age between 37+0 and 41+0 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Pregnancy with non-cephalic presentation
- Prior cesarean delivery
- Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia on 2 or more medications
- Diabetes in pregnancy on high dose medication(s); insulin of more than 60 units per day or combination of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agent
- Low lying placenta or placenta praevia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Foley catheterAlso: urinary catheterInsertion of 18G Foley catheter into the cervical canal and inflating the balloon to 60 mls using sterile water | Device | Intervention |
| Intravaginal prostaglandin E2Also: DinoprostoneInsertion of intravaginal Dinoprostone | Drug | Control, Intervention |
Primary outcome
Induction of labour-delivery interval
Time frame: Induction of labour (intravaginal prostaglandin) to delivery
The mean interval between the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery (from the start of cervical ripening with Dinoprostone to the delivery of the baby)
13 secondary outcomes
Success rate of induction of labour within 12 hours
Time frame: From the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery
Success rate of induction of labour within 24 hours
Time frame: From the start of inpatient cervical ripening and delivery
Delivery outcome
Time frame: Induction to delivery
Adverse event
Time frame: Induction to delivery
Labour augmentation
Time frame: Induction to delivery
Maximum pain recorded
Time frame: Induction to delivery
Incidence of chorioamnionitis
Time frame: Induction to 24 hours after delivery
Analgesia requirement
Time frame: Induction to delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage
Time frame: Delivery to 24 hours after delivery
Neonatal Apgar score
Time frame: Delivery to 10 minutes after birth
Neonatal intubation
Time frame: Delivery to 30 minutes after birth
Neonatal seizure
Time frame: Delivery to 24 hours after birth
Neonatal complication
Time frame: Delivery to 24 hours after birth
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 27513897Sharp AN, Stock SJ, Alfirevic Z. Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
- Results publicationRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 9. Induction of labour
- Results publication: PubMed 19623003ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 24099451Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J; CLINICAL PRACTICE OBSTETRICS COMMITTEE; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Sep;35(9):840-857. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30842-2. English, French.
- Results publication: PubMed 20687092Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;(8):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 28901007Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, Livio S, Norman JE, Alfirevic Z. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 32605542Dong S, Khan M, Hashimi F, Chamy C, D'Souza R. Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03060-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 34214801Croll DMR, Hoge PC, Verhoeven CJM, de Boer MA, Bloemenkamp KWM, de Heus R. Changes in local protocols on inpatient cervical priming and introduction of outpatient priming: A nationwide survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:148-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 26365009Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Outpatient cervical ripening. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):488-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 27078202Kruit H, Heikinheimo O, Ulander VM, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Nupponen I, Paavonen J, Rahkonen L. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure. J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):618-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.62. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 11704164Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 29211328Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share for now
Related trials for Pregnancy Related
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Obesity-Related Indices and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Albuminuria
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Methamphetamine Use Disorder During Pregnancy
Methamphetamine Use Disorder, Pregnancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zahar Zakaria, MD principal investigator
Hospital Kemaman
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Foley catheter and Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 in people with Pregnancy Related and Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, run by Hospital Kemaman at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Poor recruitment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induction of labour-delivery interval (time frame: Induction of labour (intravaginal prostaglandin) to delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05622968, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.