Anesthesia, GeneralPhase 3NCT05615025
Influence of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Maximum Muscular Strength, Speed of Contraction and Relaxation
A Phase 3 study testing Sevoflurane and Propofol in people with Anesthesia, General and Neuromuscular Transmission Disorders, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Many drugs have an influence on neuromuscular transmission. In clinical practice, neuromuscular blocking agents are commonly used, but even in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents, anesthetic drugs can influence neuromuscular transmission. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, General, Neuromuscular Transmission Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Sevoflurane and Propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2023to 7 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients (male or female) from 18 - 80 years
- Scheduled for surgery without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents
- Health care insurance in Belgium
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Any pathology involving neuromuscular transmission
- Confirmed neuropathy of any origin
- Expected anesthesia duration < 30 min
- Renal insufficiency defined as a glomerular filtration rate < 40 mL/min/m2
- Hepatic insufficiency defined as an increase > 1.5 * normal value of hepatic enzymes
- Confirmed or suspected pregnancy
Show all 9Show fewer
- Language barrier
- Any patient which will receive unplanned neuromuscular blocking agents during surgery
- Any history of personal or familial suspected malignant hyperthermia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Influence of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Maximum Muscular Strength, Speed of Contraction and Relaxation, in Humans: A Pilot Study
Many drugs have an influence on neuromuscular transmission. In clinical practice, neuromuscular blocking agents are commonly used, but even in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents, anesthetic drugs can influence neuromuscular transmission. Especially volatile anesthetic agents have a clinical impact on neuromuscular transmission, they have been shown to prolong and deepen the effect of neuromuscular blocking agents. But even in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents, volatile anesthetics can impair neuromuscular transmission. One mechanism of action is the desensitization of the acetylcholine receptors by shifting them from a normal to a desensitized state. This effect can weaken neuromuscular transmission by reducing the margin of safety that normally exists at the neuromuscular junction, or can cause an apparent increase in the capacity of neuromuscular blocking agents to block transmission.
In this study, the influence of sevoflurane and propofol on the maximum force, maximum speed of contraction and relaxation will be measured at the adductor pollicis in patients having general anesthesia without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Maximum force and speed of contraction and relaxation will be measured before and after anesthesia by either sevoflurane or propofol. Primary outcome is the influence of either anesthetic agent on maximum muscular force and speed of contraction - relaxation, and if this influence is greater for volatile anesthetic agents than for intravenous anesthetic agents.
- Being tested
- Sevoflurane, Propofol
- Medical subject headings
- Neuromuscular Junction Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SevofluraneDrug
Anesthesia will be maintained by sevoflurane.
PropofolDrug
Anesthesia will be maintained by propofol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sevoflurane arm | Experimental | In this arm, anesthesia will be maintained by sevoflurane. Receives: Drug: Sevoflurane |
| Propofol arm | Experimental | In this arm, anesthesia will be maintained by propofol. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum force at the adductor pollicis
Maximum force developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum force developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton) will be measured.
Measured: 3 hours
Maximum speed of contraction at the adductor pollicis
Maximum speed of contraction developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum speed of contraction developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton/seconds) will be measured.
Measured: 3 hours
Maximum speed of relaxation at the adductor pollicis
Maximum speed of relaxation developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum speed of relaxation developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton/seconds) will be measured.
Measured: 3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2022
- Study start20 Jan 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023
- Study completion7 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, GeneralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Denis SCHMARTZ, Université Libre de Bruxelles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05615025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUB-ITF sevo-propofol
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Baurain MJ, Hoton F, D'Hollander AA, Cantraine FR. Is recovery of neuromuscular transmission complete after the use of neostigmine to antagonize block produced by rocuronium, vecuronium, atracurium and pancuronium? Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):496-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.496.
PubMed 8942335Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):500-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00130-a.
PubMed 8534468Debaene B, Frasca D, Moreillon F, D'Hollander AA. 100 Hz-5 s tetanic stimulation to illustrate the presence of "residual paralysis" co-existing with accelerometric 0.90 train-of-four ratio-A proof-of-concept study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100903. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100903. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PubMed 34147687Dubois PE, Mitchell J, Regnier M, Passeraub PA, Moreillon F, d'Hollander AA. The interest of 100 versus 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to quantify low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade with mechanomyography: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00745-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
PubMed 34302578Feldman S, Karalliedde L. Drug interactions with neuromuscular blockers. Drug Saf. 1996 Oct;15(4):261-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615040-00004.
PubMed 8905251Gage PW. Ion channels and postsynaptic potentials. Biophys Chem. 1988 Feb;29(1-2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(88)87028-5.
PubMed 2451942Karis JH, Gissen AJ, Nastuk WL. The effect of volatile anesthetic agents on neuromuscular transmission. Anesthesiology. 1967 Jan-Feb;28(1):128-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196701000-00014. No abstract available.
PubMed 6017421Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK. Effects of varying concentrations of halothane on the activity of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in cats: an electromyographic study. Anesthesiology. 1989 May;70(5):812-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198905000-00018.
PubMed 2719316Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK. Differential sensitivity to halothane anesthesia of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in kittens. Anesth Analg. 1992 Mar;74(3):338-44. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199203000-00004.
PubMed 1539811Pereda AE, Faber DS. Activity-dependent short-term enhancement of intercellular coupling. J Neurosci. 1996 Feb 1;16(3):983-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00983.1996.
PubMed 8558267Raines DE. Anesthetic and nonanesthetic halogenated volatile compounds have dissimilar activities on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization kinetics. Anesthesiology. 1996 Mar;84(3):663-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199603000-00022.
PubMed 8659795Silverman DG, Brull SJ. The effect of a tetanic stimulus on the response to subsequent tetanic stimulation. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1284-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199376060-00017.
PubMed 8098919Simons JC, Pierce E, Diaz-Gil D, Malviya SA, Meyer MJ, Timm FP, Stokholm JB, Rosow CE, Kacmarek RM, Eikermann M. Effects of Depth of Propofol and Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Upper Airway Collapsibility, Respiratory Genioglossus Activation, and Breathing in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2016 Sep;125(3):525-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001225.
PubMed 27404221Stauble CG, Stauble RB, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, Fink H, Blobner M. Effects of single-shot and steady-state propofol anaesthesia on rocuronium dose-response relationship: a randomised trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):902-11. doi: 10.1111/aas.12523. Epub 2015 May 12.
PubMed 25962311Tassonyi E, Charpantier E, Muller D, Dumont L, Bertrand D. The role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the mechanisms of anesthesia. Brain Res Bull. 2002 Jan 15;57(2):133-50. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00740-7.
PubMed 11849819
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Maximum Muscular Strength, Speed of Contraction and Relaxation, in Humans: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05615025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHUB-ITF sevo-propofol
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many drugs have an influence on neuromuscular transmission. In clinical practice, neuromuscular blocking agents are commonly used, but even in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents, anesthetic drugs can influence neuromuscular transmission. Especially volatile anesthetic agents have a clinical impact on neuromuscular transmission, they have been shown to prolong and deepen the effect of neuromuscular blocking agents. But even in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents, volatile anesthetics can impair neuromuscular transmission. One mechanism of action is the desensitization of the acetylcholine receptors by shifting them from a normal to a desensitized state. This effect can weaken neuromuscular transmission by reducing the margin of safety that normally exists at the neuromuscular junction, or can cause an apparent increase in the capacity of neuromuscular blocking agents to block transmission.
In this study, the influence of sevoflurane and propofol on the maximum force, maximum speed of contraction and relaxation will be measured at the adductor pollicis in patients having general anesthesia without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Maximum force and speed of contraction and relaxation will be measured before and after anesthesia by either sevoflurane or propofol. Primary outcome is the influence of either anesthetic agent on maximum muscular force and speed of contraction - relaxation, and if this influence is greater for volatile anesthetic agents than for intravenous anesthetic agents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sevoflurane arm | Experimental | Drug: SevofluraneIn this arm, anesthesia will be maintained by sevoflurane. |
| Propofol arm | Experimental | Drug: PropofolIn this arm, anesthesia will be maintained by propofol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients (male or female) from 18 - 80 years
- Scheduled for surgery without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents
- Health care insurance in Belgium
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any pathology involving neuromuscular transmission
- Confirmed neuropathy of any origin
- Expected anesthesia duration < 30 min
- Renal insufficiency defined as a glomerular filtration rate < 40 mL/min/m2
- Hepatic insufficiency defined as an increase > 1.5 * normal value of hepatic enzymes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SevofluraneAnesthesia will be maintained by sevoflurane. | Drug | Sevoflurane arm |
| PropofolAnesthesia will be maintained by propofol. | Drug | Propofol arm |
Primary outcome
Maximum force at the adductor pollicis
Time frame: 3 hours
Maximum force developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum force developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton) will be measured.
Maximum speed of contraction at the adductor pollicis
Time frame: 3 hours
Maximum speed of contraction developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum speed of contraction developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton/seconds) will be measured.
Maximum speed of relaxation at the adductor pollicis
Time frame: 3 hours
Maximum speed of relaxation developed by a voluntary contraction of the adductor pollicis will be measured during isometric contraction. Maximum speed of relaxation developped before and after anesthesia will be compared. The difference in force (Newton/seconds) will be measured.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2023.
- Background: PubMed 8942335Baurain MJ, Hoton F, D'Hollander AA, Cantraine FR. Is recovery of neuromuscular transmission complete after the use of neostigmine to antagonize block produced by rocuronium, vecuronium, atracurium and pancuronium? Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):496-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.496.
- Background: PubMed 8534468Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):500-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00130-a.
- Background: PubMed 34147687Debaene B, Frasca D, Moreillon F, D'Hollander AA. 100 Hz-5 s tetanic stimulation to illustrate the presence of "residual paralysis" co-existing with accelerometric 0.90 train-of-four ratio-A proof-of-concept study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Aug;40(4):100903. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100903. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 34302578Dubois PE, Mitchell J, Regnier M, Passeraub PA, Moreillon F, d'Hollander AA. The interest of 100 versus 200 Hz tetanic stimulations to quantify low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade with mechanomyography: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00745-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 8905251Feldman S, Karalliedde L. Drug interactions with neuromuscular blockers. Drug Saf. 1996 Oct;15(4):261-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615040-00004.
- Background: PubMed 2451942Gage PW. Ion channels and postsynaptic potentials. Biophys Chem. 1988 Feb;29(1-2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(88)87028-5.
- Background: PubMed 6017421Karis JH, Gissen AJ, Nastuk WL. The effect of volatile anesthetic agents on neuromuscular transmission. Anesthesiology. 1967 Jan-Feb;28(1):128-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196701000-00014. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2719316Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK. Effects of varying concentrations of halothane on the activity of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in cats: an electromyographic study. Anesthesiology. 1989 May;70(5):812-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198905000-00018.
- Background: PubMed 1539811Ochiai R, Guthrie RD, Motoyama EK. Differential sensitivity to halothane anesthesia of the genioglossus, intercostals, and diaphragm in kittens. Anesth Analg. 1992 Mar;74(3):338-44. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199203000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 8558267Pereda AE, Faber DS. Activity-dependent short-term enhancement of intercellular coupling. J Neurosci. 1996 Feb 1;16(3):983-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00983.1996.
- Background: PubMed 8659795Raines DE. Anesthetic and nonanesthetic halogenated volatile compounds have dissimilar activities on nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization kinetics. Anesthesiology. 1996 Mar;84(3):663-71. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199603000-00022.
- Background: PubMed 8098919Silverman DG, Brull SJ. The effect of a tetanic stimulus on the response to subsequent tetanic stimulation. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1284-7. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199376060-00017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sevoflurane and Propofol in people with Anesthesia, General and Neuromuscular Transmission Disorders, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum force at the adductor pollicis (time frame: 3 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05615025, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2023.