Lumbosacral RadiculopathyPhase 3SERENITY CMNCT05614648
Sciatica Epidural Radiculopathy Experimental New Interventional TherapY Clonidine Micropellet
A Phase 3 study testing Clonidine Micropellets and Tuohy epidural needle in people with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, run by Sollis Therapeutics, Inc. at 30 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new pain medication in development, clonidine micropellet. Participants will receive a single injection of either clonidine micropellet or sham injection for the treatment of low back and leg pain from sciatica. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Clonidine Micropellets and Tuohy epidural needle
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Jun 2023to 30 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be between 18 and 70 years of age (inclusive) at time the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed.
- Must have a primary diagnosis of unilateral lumbar and/or lumbosacral radiculopathy defined by all of the following: supported by history, physical examination, and radiologic pathology consistent with a disc protrusion, non-sequestered extrusion, or sequestered fragment, as evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is consistent with the clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy.
- Subject's pain must have a radicular component (radiation into the leg along the L3-S1 [inclusive] dermatomal pattern) and may or may not be associated with additional neuropathic features such as reduced sensory, motor, or deep tendon reflexes.
- Worst radicular pain symptoms should be confined to a single dermatomal level as confirmed on physical examination (to allow determination of injection level).
- The NRS leg pain must be ≥4, must extend below the knee and be consistent with one of the dermatomal distributions noted above.
- Radicular pain symptoms in the current episode must have been present for at least 8 weeks, but not longer than 9 months at the time of Screening.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Subjects must not have had a significant reduction in the pain in the 1 to 2 weeks before Screening (i.e., pain must not be improving significantly based on the discretion of the Investigator).
- Baseline 0-10 NRS average pain score localized to at least 1 target location must be ≥6 and ≤9.
- Subjects must be able to separately distinguish and characterize the contribution of back and leg pain to their overall pain to independently assess the response of each to intervention. Investigators must confirm that subjects can do so based upon pain diagrams and direct questioning.
- Subjects must have had no significant improvement following a minimum of 8 weeks of the following categories prior to Screening:
- Mechanical intervention (eg, physical therapy, home exercise program, heat compresses/massage, chiropractic treatment), and
- Over-the-counter analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical patches/creams/gels/ointments).
- Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative (serum) pregnancy test at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours before the injection procedure and must commit to either abstain continuously from sexual intercourse or to use, at the Investigator's discretion, highly effective birth control during the study period.
- Must sign an ICF indicating that they understand the purpose and any risks associated with the procedure required for the study and is willing to participate in the study to completion.
- Must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in the protocol.
- Must be able to read, write, understand, and complete study-related tasks, and adequately communicate regularly with the site.
- Must have an email address and access to the internet from an electronic device in order to complete daily EDQ information.
Who cannot join
- Subject has significant pain unrelated to the lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy (eg, knee pain, hip pain, or rib pain) that, in the Investigator's opinion, could require chronic analgesic treatment and interfere with the assessment of IP therapeutic effect.
- Subject has radiological findings or presenting features such as severe motor weakness (with or without reduced deep tendon reflexes) and is a candidate for surgical referral (i.e., progressive neurologic deficit or cauda equina syndrome).
- Subject has evidence of pathology on MRI (obtained during the current episode of pain) that may result in pain unlikely to be addressed by the IP, including but not limited to the following:
- Symptomatic (eg, neurogenic claudication) radiographically confirmed central stenosis at any level or diffuse spine pathology.
- Non-inflammatory or bony lateral recess or foraminal stenosis such as that caused by facet hypertrophy or osteophytes that is a significant contributor to the current episode of pain.
- Spondylolisthesis > 3 mm at the level of the involved dermatome.
Show all 42Show fewer
- Evidence of a lumbar vertebral compression fracture, synovial cyst, lumbar epidural lipomatosis, or extraforaminal pathology.
- Subject has a history of, or current diagnosis of, fibromyalgia.
- Subject has a history of lumbar surgery and/or intradiscal interventions (including discography).
- Subject has an active infection (eg, fever or other objective evidence of an infection within 7 days of the planned injection) or any skin condition visible at the injection site at time of Screening.
- Subject has evidence of a coagulation abnormality or history of abnormal bleeding or is on anticoagulation therapy at time of Screening.
- Subject has current untreated or clinically significant anxiety and/or depression as defined by the following:
- Beck Anxiety Inventory® (BAI®) score ≥29 or,
- Beck Depression Inventory-2® (BDI®) score ≥31.
- Changes in medications administered for treatment of depression or anxiety within the 30 days before Screening. Note: If a subject is taking antidepressant or anti-anxiety medication, either for the treatment of depression/anxiety or as an analgesic adjunct, the subject must agree to maintain a stable dose (no change in dosage) for the first 3 months of the study.
- Subject is planning to receive a spinal injection or spine procedure while participating in this study, unless this procedure can be postponed until study completion.
- Subject has received an ESI, nerve block, or other similar procedure in the lumbosacral area performed during the 8 weeks prior to Screening.
- Subject is receiving or has received the following medications prohibited in this study:
- Short-acting opioids taken as needed (PRN) less than 4 days a week (hydrocodone, oxycodone, tramadol, etc.) within 14 days prior to Screening.
- Long-acting opioids or short-acting opioids taken regularly, i.e., more than 4 days a week within 30 days prior to Screening.
- Anticonvulsants for treatment of radicular leg pain if the dose has changed in the 30 days prior to Screening or the subject is unable to maintain a stable dose for the first 3 months of the study.
- Systemic corticosteroids within the 30 days prior to Screening.
- Central alpha-agents, including clonidine-containing medication or dexmedetomidine within 30 days before Screening.
- Subject has a history of treatment, or has been recommended for treatment, of alcohol or drug use disorder treatment within the year prior to Screening.
- Subject has a known or suspected allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to any of the following:
- Clonidine/clonidine hydrochloride.
- Polylactic acid (found in products such as Lupron Depot®, Atridox®, some types of dermal fillers, and some types of sutures).
- Radiographic contrast agents or any other medications to be used during the procedure.
- Subject has recent (within previous 8 weeks) symptomatic hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, or bradycardia.
- Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) or a body habitus that, in the Investigator's judgment, would require a needle longer than a 3.5-inch Tuohy needle.
- Subject has participated in a clinical trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of Screening.
- Subject has previously participated in a clinical trial sponsored by Sollis Therapeutics (including Protocol Number STX-015-18-01 and Protocol Number STX-015-18-02).
- Subject has any medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, could adversely impact study participation or safety, require chronic analgesic treatment, or interfere with the pain assessments (eg, painful neuropathy, rheumatologic disorder, etc.).
- Subject has worker's compensation benefits and/or is involved in any litigation related to his/her radicular pain.
- Subject is currently pregnant or breast feeding, planning to become pregnant or, if of childbearing potential, is unwilling to have a pregnancy test administered or use appropriate, highly effective contraception.
- Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo MRI examinations.
- Subject is unable to adequately rate his/her pain in the EDQ.
- Presence of active kidney disease, as evidenced by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 utilizing the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
- Subjects will be excluded from randomization if they have any of the following during the 7-day Baseline Period:
- Two or more ratings of NRS Average Leg Pain and/or Back Pain > 9 (showing severe pain),
- Two or more ratings of NRS Average Leg Pain and/or Back Pain ≥ 9 AND ≤ 3 (showing inconsistent pain).
- Employees of Sollis Therapeutics, Novotech Health Holdings, or study site personnel directly affiliated with this study, and their immediate family members. Immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted.
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
United States30 sites
Injury Care Research (site 130)
Boise, Idaho, 83713
Clinical Trials of South Carolina (site 114)
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
St. Louis Pain Consultants (site 134)
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
Brigham and Women's Hospital (site 129)
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467
Wake Forest Pain & Spine Specialists (site 112)
Clemmons, North Carolina, 27012
Cleveland Clinic (site 121)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
University Hospitals (site 131)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
HRMD Research (site 102)
Dallas, Texas, 75240
UT Southwestern (site 140)
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Physicians' Research Options (site 122)
Draper, Utah, 84020
Clinical Investigations LLC (site 103)
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73013
Pacific Sports and Spine, LLC (site 133)
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
NCP Clinical Research (site 141)
Houston, Texas, 77008
University of Kansas Medical Center (site 137)
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
UCSD (site 124)
La Jolla, California, 92037
Mocasa Wellness Center (site 119)
Miami, Florida, 33135
AMPM Research Clinic (site 106)
Miami, Florida, 33169
Nurovations/Napa Pain Institute (site 107)
Napa, California, 94558
Neuroscience Research Center (site 105)
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
CenExel JBR Clinical Research (site 113)
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Texas Pain Consultant Associates (site 110)
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Florida Pain Relief Group (site 126)
Tampa, Florida, 33603
ARH Research, LLC (site 108)
The Woodlands, Texas, 77382
Pima Pain Center (site 125)
Tucson, Arizona, 85711
University of Arizona/Banner (site 116)
Tucson, Arizona, 85711
Quality of Life Medical & Research Centers, LLC (site 127)
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
International Spine, Pain & Performance Center (site 118)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 22205
Space City Pain (site 135)
Webster, Texas, 77598
The Center for Clinical Research (site 101)
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Conquest Research (site 142)
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of STX-015 in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new pain medication in development, clonidine micropellet. Participants will receive a single injection of either clonidine micropellet or sham injection for the treatment of low back and leg pain from sciatica.
- Conditions
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- Being tested
- Clonidine Micropellets, Tuohy epidural needle
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clonidine MicropelletsDrug
0.975 mg clonidine hydrochloride as 3 micropellets administered in one injection
Tuohy epidural needleDevice
18-gauge Tuohy epidural needle using a custom-built injector
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Micropellets Injection | Active comparator | Clonidine Micropellets single dose injection into the lumbar epidural space Receives: Drug: Clonidine Micropellets; Device: Tuohy epidural needle |
| Sham Insertion | Sham comparator | Sham Control non-epidural needle placement Receives: Device: Tuohy epidural needle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary efficacy: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) for the average pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to D90 in lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Difference in average pain score, using a scale of 0-10 with 0 no pain and 10 worst possible pain, from baseline to day 90.
Measured: Baseline to day 90
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events.
Difference in incidence of adverse events and treatment due to radicular leg pain from Baseline to day 90 post injection based on physical examination findings and vital signs measurements.
Measured: Baseline to day 90
Incidence of symptomatic hypotension as an adverse event of special interest.
Difference in incidence defined as low blood pressure associated with subject-reported symptoms of dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, blurred vision, or nausea.
Measured: Baseline to day 90
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
6 categories of 10 question, each question is scored from 0-5 (minimum to maximum). The scores range from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability.
Measured: Baseline to month12
Difference in Rescue medication consumption.
Consumption from baseline through day 30
Measured: Baseline to month12
Change in Average and Worst NRS from Day 90 post injection to 12 months post injection.
Difference in NRS pain scores from Day 90 to month 12 post injection.
Measured: from Day 90 to month 12 post injection
Percent of subjects with significant improvement in pain.
30 percent improvement in pain from baseline to day 90.
Measured: Baseline to day 90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2022
- Study start19 Jun 2023
- Primary completion18 Mar 2024
- Study completion30 Mar 2024
Why it stopped: Loss of funding- Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lumbosacral RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Clonidine Micropellet vs Sham-Control
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sollis Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05614648
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STX-015-23-01
- Acronym
- SERENITY CM
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of STX-015 in the Treatment of Pain Associated With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05614648
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SERENITY CM / STX-015-23-01
- Conditions
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Loss of funding- Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention.
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sollis Therapeutics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new pain medication in development, clonidine micropellet. Participants will receive a single injection of either clonidine micropellet or sham injection for the treatment of low back and leg pain from sciatica.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Clonidine Micropellet vs Sham-Control
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Micropellets Injection | Active comparator | Drug: Clonidine Micropellets, Device: Tuohy epidural needleClonidine Micropellets single dose injection into the lumbar epidural space |
| Sham Insertion | Sham comparator | Device: Tuohy epidural needleSham Control non-epidural needle placement |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Must be between 18 and 70 years of age (inclusive) at time the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed.
- Must have a primary diagnosis of unilateral lumbar and/or lumbosacral radiculopathy defined by all of the following: supported by history, physical examination, and radiologic pathology consistent with a disc protrusion, non-sequestered extrusion, or sequestered fragment, as evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is consistent with the clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy.
- Subject's pain must have a radicular component (radiation into the leg along the L3-S1 [inclusive] dermatomal pattern) and may or may not be associated with additional neuropathic features such as reduced sensory, motor, or deep tendon reflexes.
- Baseline 0-10 NRS average pain score localized to at least 1 target location must be ≥6 and ≤9.
- Subjects must be able to separately distinguish and characterize the contribution of back and leg pain to their overall pain to independently assess the response of each to intervention. Investigators must confirm that subjects can do so based upon pain diagrams and direct questioning.
Key exclusion criteria (42 listed)
- Subject has significant pain unrelated to the lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy (eg, knee pain, hip pain, or rib pain) that, in the Investigator's opinion, could require chronic analgesic treatment and interfere with the assessment of IP therapeutic effect.
- Subject has radiological findings or presenting features such as severe motor weakness (with or without reduced deep tendon reflexes) and is a candidate for surgical referral (i.e., progressive neurologic deficit or cauda equina syndrome).
- Subject has evidence of pathology on MRI (obtained during the current episode of pain) that may result in pain unlikely to be addressed by the IP, including but not limited to the following:
- Subject has a history of, or current diagnosis of, fibromyalgia.
- Subject has a history of lumbar surgery and/or intradiscal interventions (including discography).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Micropellets0.975 mg clonidine hydrochloride as 3 micropellets administered in one injection | Drug | Clonidine Micropellets Injection |
| Tuohy epidural needle18-gauge Tuohy epidural needle using a custom-built injector | Device | Clonidine Micropellets Injection, Sham Insertion |
Primary outcome
Primary efficacy: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) for the average pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to D90 in lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Time frame: Baseline to day 90
Difference in average pain score, using a scale of 0-10 with 0 no pain and 10 worst possible pain, from baseline to day 90.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events.
Time frame: Baseline to day 90
Difference in incidence of adverse events and treatment due to radicular leg pain from Baseline to day 90 post injection based on physical examination findings and vital signs measurements.
Incidence of symptomatic hypotension as an adverse event of special interest.
Time frame: Baseline to day 90
Difference in incidence defined as low blood pressure associated with subject-reported symptoms of dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, blurred vision, or nausea.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Time frame: Baseline to month12
Difference in Rescue medication consumption.
Time frame: Baseline to month12
Change in Average and Worst NRS from Day 90 post injection to 12 months post injection.
Time frame: from Day 90 to month 12 post injection
Percent of subjects with significant improvement in pain.
Time frame: Baseline to day 90
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Loss of funding- Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of VER-01 in the Treatment of Participants With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate Safety of C-1101 Versus Sterile Saline in Adults With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radicular Pain, Sciatic Radiculopathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparing Three Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches for Lumbar Radicular Pain
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Effect of Trans-spinal Electromagnetic Neuromodulation in Treatment of Patients With Discogenic Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy, Discogenic Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Recruiting
TFESI and Neuropathic Pain in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Clonidine Micropellets and Tuohy epidural needle in people with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, run by Sollis Therapeutics, Inc. at 30 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 42 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Loss of funding- Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary efficacy: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) for the average pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to D90 in lumbosacral radiculopathy. (time frame: Baseline to day 90). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.