Parkinson DiseaseNCT05607862
Home Physiotherapy in Frailty in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
A study testing Home Physiotherapy Group in people with Parkinson Disease and Physical Therapy Modalities, run by University of Oviedo at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The aim of this protocol is to evaluate the effects of a home-based therapeutic exercise program applied in patients with PD to reverse frailty. The design of this study is experimental, prospective, randomized and single blind. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease, Physical Therapy Modalities, Frailty
- What is being tested?
- Home Physiotherapy Group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 15 Oct 2022to 1 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women, aged 60 years or older, with a diagnosis of PD
- Having frailty or prefrailty according to the Fried scale (1 or 2 prefrailty criteria, 3 or more frailty criteria).
- Stage 1-3 of the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
- Patients who have been referred to the Home Rehabilitation Service of the Instituto de Rehabilitación Astur S.A.
- Obtaining a score higher than 24 points in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
- Signing the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Parkinsonisms secondary, plus or atypical (progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, Lewy body disease).
- Acute disease causing clinical instability.
- Stage 4 and 5 of the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
- Receiving individualized outpatient or home physiotherapy treatment for Parkinson's disease or secondary parkinsonism.
- Patients unable to speak.
- Patients in terminal phase.
- Patient with dementia.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Home-based Therapeutic Exercise Program on Frailty in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
The aim of this protocol is to evaluate the effects of a home-based therapeutic exercise program applied in patients with PD to reverse frailty. The design of this study is experimental, prospective, randomized and single blind. The study population that will be part of this study will be men and women with a diagnosis of PD belonging to the Health Area V of the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias, Spain.
Read the detailed description
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the association of tremor, rigidity, akinesia-bradykinesia and loss of postural reflexes. Non-motor symptoms such as cognitive impairment may also develop. Frailty is a syndrome characterized by a decrease in physiological reserve that results in an individual's increased vulnerability, which can lead to a variety of adverse factors when exposed to stressors. There are three prominent theoretical frameworks for the study of frailty, the physical model developed by Fried et al., the deficit accumulation model by Rockwood et al. and the biopsychosocial model by Gobbens et al. PD and frailty are highly prevalent in older people and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Frailty is a reversible condition, especially during the early stages, so early detection is important. Previous studies have been carried out with the application of exercise programs to reverse frailty in older adults, obtaining good results at a physical level.
General objective:
- Evaluate the effects of a therapeutic home exercise program applied in patients with PD to reverse frailty.
Specific objectives:
- Evaluate the effects of a home therapeutic exercise program on motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as on quality of life, balance and gait.
- Identify the characteristics of the patients who obtain the greatest improvement.
- Evaluate the effects of a home therapeutic exercise program after a period of time of three months after the intervention.
Study design: experimental, prospective, randomized and single-blinded.
Study population: The subjects that will be part of this study will be men and women with a diagnosis of PD belonging to the Health Area V of the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias, Spain.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Physical Therapy Modalities, Frailty
- Being tested
- Home Physiotherapy Group, Control Group
- Keywords
- Home physiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Home Physiotherapy GroupOther
The intervention group will receive 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks supervised and assisted by a physiotherapist at the patient's home. Muscle strengthening exercises of the lower and upper limbs, stretching, coordination and balance exercises, gait re-education with the relevant technical aids, a pattern of exercises to be performed daily by the patient and health education guidelines will be carried out.
Control GroupOther
The control group will be given health education guidelines and will continue with their usual medical-pharmacological treatment. All patients included in this study will receive physiotherapy treatment, and those in the control group will be treated once the intervention and the post-intervention assessment have been completed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | The intervention group will continue with its usual medical-pharmacological treatment, and will also receive a multi-component exercise program and health education guidelines. Receives: Other: Home Physiotherapy Group |
| Control Group | Other | The control group will be given health education guidelines and will continue with their usual medical-pharmacological treatment. Receives: Other: Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frailty: Fried's Frailty Phenotype:
Fried's Frailty Phenotype proposed in the Cardiovascular Health Study (Fried et al., 2001) consists of 5 criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, reduced grip strength, and reduced gait speed. It has a total score ranging from 0 to 5. A frail person is who scores 3 to 5; prefrail when scores 1 to 2, and robust when scores 0.
Measured: Change in frailty of individuals at baseline up to the 8th and 12th week after interventions.
Frailty: Clinical Frailty Scale.
The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was proposed in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) (Rockwood et al., 2005). It is a hierarchical scale of 9 levels ranging from 1, the best state of health, to 9, the worst situation: fit, well, well managed, vulnerable, mildly frail, moderately frail, severely frail, very severely frail, terminally ill.
Measured: Change in frailty of individuals at baseline up to the 8th and 12th week after interventions.
Secondary outcomes (9)
Comorbidities Charlson Index
It is evaluated according to the Charlson comorbidity index (Charlson et al., 1987). This scale consists of 19 items. Absence of comorbidity between 0 and 1 points, low comorbidity 2 points, high comorbidity between 3 and 5 points and severe comorbidity more than 5 points is considered.
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS).
This tool allows to study the symptoms and the evolution of the disease (Goetz et al., 2008). It is a scale that is subdivided into 4 parts. Part I: non-motor experiences of daily life, comprising 13 items; Part II: motor experiences of daily life, comprising 13 items; Part III: motor exploration, covering 18 items; and Part IV: motor complications, including 6 items. Each question is evaluated from 0 to 4, where 0 is normal and 4 the greater severity, the higher the score the greater involvement (greater impact of PD symptoms).
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Cognitive function: Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS).
Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS): It is a scale designed to detect the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction that occurs in the course of PD (Pagonabarraga J et al., 2008). It consists of nine cognitive tasks distributed in two sub-scores, with a maximum score of 134 points: fronto-subcortical (fixation verbal memory 12 points, maintained attention 10 points, working memory 10 points, drawing a clock 10 points, deferred verbal memory 12 points, alternating verbal fluence 20 points, action verbal fluence 30 points) and posterior cortical (denomination by confrontation 20 points and copy of a clock 10 points).
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Quality of life, PDQ-39
The Spanish version of the questionnaire Parkinson s disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQ39) is used (Martínez Martín P, et al., 1999, Martínez-Martín P et al., 1998). It consists of 39 items with 5 possible answers. 8 dimensions are analyzed: mobility, daily life activities, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitive impairment, communication and body discomfort. The higher the score, the greater the impact on quality of life.
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Short Physical Performance Battery activity level
Physical performance is measured using the Brief Physical Performance Battery (Guralnik et al., 1994). This measure consists of walking 4 m, a balance test with 3 levels (tandem, semi-tandem and feet together) and sitting and reaching 5 times as fast as possible. Total scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores denoting higher physical performance.
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Barthel Index
Functional independence is measured using the Barthel index. It has a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 is the minimum (worst outcome) and 100 is the maximum (best outcome). (Mahoney et al. 1965, Granger et al., 1979).
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Lawton Brody Index
Functional independence is measured with the Lawton and Brody Questionnaire (Lawton and Brody, 1969, Vergara I et al., 2012). Instrumental activities of daily living assesses the ability to use the telephone, shop, use transport, cook, do household chores, take medication and manage finances. It has a total score ranging from 0 to 8, with 0 indicating total dependence and the maximum score indicating total independence.
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Walking evaluation FAC
It is measured according to the Holden Ambulation Classification (FAC) (Holden et al., 1984). It consists of 6 response categories, from the value 0 (no gear) to the value 5 (independent gear including up and down stairs).
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Assesses balance, walking difficulties and decreased strength in lower limbs (Poisadlo D and Richardson S, 1991). This test consists of asking the person to get up from a chair with armrests, walk 3 meters, back and sit again, timing the time spent. 10 seconds or less: correct time. Between 10 and 20 seconds: frail marker. Between 20 and 30 seconds risk of falling. More than 30 seconds: high risk of falls.
Measured: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2022
- Study start15 Oct 2022
- Primary completion2 Nov 2023
- Study completion1 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oviedo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, María Cruz Sousa Fraguas, University of Oviedo
- Investigators
- Maria Cruz Sousa Fraguas, Principal investigator, University of Oviedo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05607862
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-398 Parkinson´s disease.
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 8 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
PubMed 16129869Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
PubMed 20511102Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PubMed 3558716Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340.
PubMed 19025984Martinez-Martin P, Frades Payo B. Quality of life in Parkinson's disease: validation study of the PDQ-39 Spanish version. The Grupo Centro for Study of Movement Disorders. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S34-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00007737.
PubMed 9617722Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.
PubMed 8126356Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Llebaria G, Garcia-Sanchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A. Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2008 May 15;23(7):998-1005. doi: 10.1002/mds.22007.
PubMed 18381647Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Apr;60(4):145-54.
PubMed 157729Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
PubMed 5349366Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.
PubMed 6691052Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
PubMed 1991946Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, Brown R, McNamee S, Carne W. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson's disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):789-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.005.
PubMed 15827933Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PubMed 11253156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Home-based Therapeutic Exercise Program on Frailty in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05607862
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-398 Parkinson´s disease.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease, Physical Therapy Modalities, Frailty
- Keywords
- Home physiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OviedoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this protocol is to evaluate the effects of a home-based therapeutic exercise program applied in patients with PD to reverse frailty. The design of this study is experimental, prospective, randomized and single blind. The study population that will be part of this study will be men and women with a diagnosis of PD belonging to the Health Area V of the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias, Spain.
Detailed description
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the association of tremor, rigidity, akinesia-bradykinesia and loss of postural reflexes. Non-motor symptoms such as cognitive impairment may also develop. Frailty is a syndrome characterized by a decrease in physiological reserve that results in an individual's increased vulnerability, which can lead to a variety of adverse factors when exposed to stressors. There are three prominent theoretical frameworks for the study of frailty, the physical model developed by Fried et al., the deficit accumulation model by Rockwood et al. and the biopsychosocial model by Gobbens et al. PD and frailty are highly prevalent in older people and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Frailty is a reversible condition, especially during the early stages, so early detection is important. Previous studies have been carried out with the application of exercise programs to reverse frailty in older adults, obtaining good results at a physical level.
General objective:
- Evaluate the effects of a therapeutic home exercise program applied in patients with PD to reverse frailty.
Specific objectives:
- Evaluate the effects of a home therapeutic exercise program on motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as on quality of life, balance and gait.
- Identify the characteristics of the patients who obtain the greatest improvement.
- Evaluate the effects of a home therapeutic exercise program after a period of time of three months after the intervention.
Study design: experimental, prospective, randomized and single-blinded.
Study population: The subjects that will be part of this study will be men and women with a diagnosis of PD belonging to the Health Area V of the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias, Spain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Home Physiotherapy GroupThe intervention group will continue with its usual medical-pharmacological treatment, and will also receive a multi-component exercise program and health education guidelines. |
| Control Group | Other | Other: Control GroupThe control group will be given health education guidelines and will continue with their usual medical-pharmacological treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Men and women, aged 60 years or older, with a diagnosis of PD
- Having frailty or prefrailty according to the Fried scale (1 or 2 prefrailty criteria, 3 or more frailty criteria).
- Stage 1-3 of the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
- Patients who have been referred to the Home Rehabilitation Service of the Instituto de Rehabilitación Astur S.A.
- Obtaining a score higher than 24 points in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Parkinsonisms secondary, plus or atypical (progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, Lewy body disease).
- Acute disease causing clinical instability.
- Stage 4 and 5 of the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
- Receiving individualized outpatient or home physiotherapy treatment for Parkinson's disease or secondary parkinsonism.
- Patients unable to speak.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Home Physiotherapy GroupThe intervention group will receive 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks supervised and assisted by a physiotherapist at the patient's home. Muscle strengthening exercises of the lower and upper limbs, stretching, coordination and balance exercises, gait re-education with the relevant technical aids, a pattern of exercises to be performed daily by the patient and health education guidelines will be carried out. | Other | Intervention Group |
| Control GroupThe control group will be given health education guidelines and will continue with their usual medical-pharmacological treatment. All patients included in this study will receive physiotherapy treatment, and those in the control group will be treated once the intervention and the post-intervention assessment have been completed. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Frailty: Fried's Frailty Phenotype:
Time frame: Change in frailty of individuals at baseline up to the 8th and 12th week after interventions.
Fried's Frailty Phenotype proposed in the Cardiovascular Health Study (Fried et al., 2001) consists of 5 criteria: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, reduced grip strength, and reduced gait speed. It has a total score ranging from 0 to 5. A frail person is who scores 3 to 5; prefrail when scores 1 to 2, and robust when scores 0.
Frailty: Clinical Frailty Scale.
Time frame: Change in frailty of individuals at baseline up to the 8th and 12th week after interventions.
The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was proposed in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) (Rockwood et al., 2005). It is a hierarchical scale of 9 levels ranging from 1, the best state of health, to 9, the worst situation: fit, well, well managed, vulnerable, mildly frail, moderately frail, severely frail, very severely frail, terminally ill.
9 secondary outcomes
Comorbidities Charlson Index
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS).
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Cognitive function: Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Rating Scale (PD-CRS).
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Quality of life, PDQ-39
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Short Physical Performance Battery activity level
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Barthel Index
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Lawton Brody Index
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Walking evaluation FAC
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: Baseline - 8 weeks - 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 16129869Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Background: PubMed 20511102Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 3558716Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
- Background: PubMed 19025984Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340.
- Background: PubMed 9617722Martinez-Martin P, Frades Payo B. Quality of life in Parkinson's disease: validation study of the PDQ-39 Spanish version. The Grupo Centro for Study of Movement Disorders. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S34-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00007737.
- Background: PubMed 8126356Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.
- Background: PubMed 18381647Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Llebaria G, Garcia-Sanchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A. Parkinson's disease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2008 May 15;23(7):998-1005. doi: 10.1002/mds.22007.
- Background: PubMed 157729Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Apr;60(4):145-54.
- Background: PubMed 5349366Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6691052Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.
- Background: PubMed 1991946Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
- Background: PubMed 15827933Qutubuddin AA, Pegg PO, Cifu DX, Brown R, McNamee S, Carne W. Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson's disease: a key to rehabilitation evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):789-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.005.
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Belzutifan (MK-6482) and Lenvatinib (MK-7902), or Pembrolizumab/Quavonlimab (MK-1308A) in Combination With Lenvatinib, Versus Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib, for Treatment of Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-012)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Ischemic Conditioning in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Investigational Agents in Participants With Previously Treated Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (MK-3475-01H/KEYMAKER-U01)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria Cruz Sousa Fraguas principal investigator
University of Oviedo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Home Physiotherapy Group in people with Parkinson Disease and Physical Therapy Modalities, run by University of Oviedo at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frailty: Fried's Frailty Phenotype: (time frame: Change in frailty of individuals at baseline up to the 8th and 12th week after interventions.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05607862, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.