AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric Outlet ObstructionEATINGNCT05605327

EUS-guided Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

A study testing EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy in people with Gastric Outlet Obstruction, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to develop the classical manifestations of GOO… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Outlet Obstruction
What is being tested?
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2022to 1 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-C must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Endoscopic or radiological confirmation of a gastric outlet obstruction due to an obstructive malignant neoplastic lesion extending from the distal one third of the stomach or the duodenum
  • GOOSS score(8) < 2 (no oral intake or liquids only)
  • Performance status justifying palliative treatment for mGOO
Show all 12Show fewer
  • No contra-indications to undergo deep conscious sedation or general anesthesia All participants that are considered for Trial participation, per the above criteria will be documented on the Screening Log, including Screen Failures.
  • Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-RCT must meet all of the following criteria:
  • EATING-C inclusion criteria
  • Endoscopic and surgical creation of a gastrojejunostomy are deemed both technically feasible by the treating physician.
  • Expected survival exceeds 2 months.
  • ECOG Performance Status ≤2

Who cannot join

  • Participants eligible for the EATING-C Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
  • Patients with benign GOO
  • Patients who are candidates for curative surgical resection of the primary disease
  • Patients whose mGOO is likely to resolve very quickly (within days or weeks) under anti-tumoral treatment (such as lymphoproliferative diseases).
  • Participants eligible for the EATING-RCT Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
  • ECOG Performance status > 2
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Expected survival of less than 2 months according to disease extent and comorbidities, as assessed by an oncologist or a treating physician. If unclear, the Coordinating Investigator is to be contacted, after which in- or exclusion will be decided upon by means of consensus.
  • Peritoneal carcinomatosis with signs of obstruction on cross-sectional imaging (on either small or large bowel level).
  • In case these parameters leads to ambiguity in individual patients at participating sites, the Coordinating Investigator will be contacted and a final conjoint decision for in/exclusion will be made after revision of radiological findings.
  • Grade II and III ascites OR ascites interfering with the EUS-GJ trajectory, complicating successful creation of an EUS-GJ.
  • Previous surgical procedures or reconstructions impeding EUS-GJ.
  • Diffuse tumor involvement of the gastric wall impeding EUS-GJ
  • Participation in other interventional procedures which may be of influence on primary or secondary outcome parameters
  • Presence of other strictures in gastrointestinal tract leading to radiological or clinical signs of obstruction or patency issues.
  • Participants who meet one or more of the above exclusion criteria must not proceed to be enrolled/randomized in the Trial and will be identified on the Screening Log as Screen Failure.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Michiel Bronswijk, MD contact

+3215505159

mjh.bronswijk@gmail.com

Natalie Vandenende contact

natalie.vandenende@uzleuven.be

About this study

Official title: A Multicentre Cohort Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial of EUS-guided Versus LaparOscopic GAsTrojejunostomY for malIgNant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: EATING Trial

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to develop the classical manifestations of GOO including vomiting, weight loss, electrolyte disturbances loss of quality of life as well as a reduced life expectancy. Until recently these patients were managed using either endoscopic stenting or surgery. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard in the management of GOO. However surgery is invasive and may lead to peri-operative complications and longer hospitalization which further greatly impacts on the quality of life of these patients in which survival is already greatly impaired by their oncological problem. Recently it has been shown that a special stent can be utilized to circumvent the tumour obstruction without the need for surgery. This technique utilizes endoscopic ultrasound to connect the stomach to the jejunum at a site distal to the tumour obstruction. This techniques is minimally invasive compared to surgery. In a large retrospective propensity matched study we recently compared endoscopic ultrasound placement of an AXIOS stent to laparoscopic surgery and could show that the EUS-guided approach led to less complications (2.6 vs 26%) and shorter hospital stay compared to surgery.1 Our study and that of other groups, has led the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) to recommend that EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) can be considered for patients with malignant GOO as an alternative for surgery and endoscopic stenting, acknowledging that further randomized controlled trials comparing the EUS-GJ approach to surgery, are necessary.2 Based on the above clinical need we set out to design a multicentre international trial with the main aim of comparing EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy to laparoscopic gastroenterostomy. The planned study has two components: 1. Randomized study (EATING RCT)- patients that meet the strict inclusion criteria for the (EATING-RCT) will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. 2. Patients in whom inclusion criteria for the RCT are not met, will be invited to participate in the observational arm of the study (EATING-C) comparing EUS-GJ, enteral stenting and surgical gastrojenostomy in a "real world scenario" setting. With this combined design we aim to include all patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction undergoing treatment. This will be an international multicentre effort, with expert centers in Belgium and other countries in Europe, including UZ Brussel (BE), UCL (BE), Hôpital Erasme (BE), UCL Namur (BE), UZ Gent (BE), Alicante (Spain), Gemelli Rome (Italy), San-Rafaelle Milan (Italy) and G.B. Rossi University Hospital Verona (Italy) as participating centres (total n=11).

This envisaged investigator driven study will be performed using an AXIOS stent produced by the company BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. This stent is registered in Europe and CE approved for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the gall bladder and bile ducts. As described above we and other groups have used this product off-label to succesfully perform EUS-guided GJ. High-quality randomized controlled data are however required that will be generated in the proposed EATING RCT study. It is expected that the data, generated by the EATING RCT trial will contribute significantly to resolve the current question regarding the best management of patients with GOO. Ultimately the objective should be to provide high quality affordable care that is minimally invasive to cancer patients with GOO. Such high quality data will also be crucial when applying for registration and CE approval of this product for use in the management of GOO .

Read the detailed description

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common disease manifestation amongst patients with various types of malignancy. Until now, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard for these specific patients, although recent (low-quality) evidence suggests that off-label EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with the Hot-AXIOS stent might provide a safer alternative with similar effectiveness and shorter hospital stay. The available comparative studies are unfortunately mainly of retrospective design, include low numbers of EUS-GJ procedures and therefore prone to bias.

Currently, EUS-GJ is performed in the participating centres with the off-label use of the Hot-AXIOS stent outside study context continuously. Moreover, whilst awaiting randomized confirmation, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has suggested EUS-GJ as an alternative to L-GJ and enteral stenting in centers with expertise.

Study hypothesis: In patients with malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction we hypothesize that endoscopic ultrasound guided placement of a lumen apposing stent, to create a gastrojejunostomy, will result in reduced procedure related morbidity, shorter time-to-tolerate oral intake, shorter hospital stay and a higher quality of life compared to surgery, while reducing procedure related and overall costs. Primary endpoint is the overall rate of procedure-related adverse events happening within 90 days of the endoscopic or surgical procedure. Key secondary endpoints are time to oral intake and post-procedural hospital stay.

The EATING study will utilize a combined design. In the EATING-C prospective, multicentre, real-life, cohort study all patients with mGOO will be enrolled irrespective of their performance status, their disease stage and treatment (i.e. EUS-GJ, OR surgical [laparoscopic or not] GJ OR enteral stenting).

The subgroup of patients with expected survival over 2 months and without radiographic signs of significantly obstructive peritoneal disease will be included in the EATING-RCT, an international, open-label, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see 4.2 inclusion criteria) and give written informed consent will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. The same outcomes will be prospectively evaluated in the EATING-C and EATING-RCT up to 12 months or death of the patient, whichever comes first.

During the assessment of eligibility, patients will receive explanation of the treatment possibilities for mGOO. If they fall within criteria for EATING-RCT they will be asked informed consent for a randomization to L-GJ versus EUS-GJ. If they meet EATING-C, but not EATING-RCT criteria or if they are willing to receive one specific procedure only, these patients will not be randomized and thus be included in the EATING-C.

Expected full trial duration: 12 months after inclusion of last patient (target n=120).

Individual trial duration for patient: 12 months after treatment or time until death (whichever comes first).

In previous published experiences, surgical Gastro-Jejunostomy has been associated with a 20 to 40% rate of adverse events (10.1055/s-0043-101695, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887). Previous experiences of EUS-guided Gastro-Jejunostomy have found a 10 to 15% rate of adverse events (10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021). We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of consecutive EUS-GJ and L-GJ procedures in 3 European centres In this study we observed a 2.7% vs. 27.0% rate of overall adverse events in EUS-GJ vs. L-GJ respectively.

Being tested
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy, Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Medical subject headings
Gastric Outlet Obstruction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EUS-guided gastroenterostomyDevice

    EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using the Hot-Axios and the WEST approach.

  • Laparoscopic gastroenterostomyOther

    Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy

Study groups in NCT05605327
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EUS-guided gastroenterostomyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomyActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure related adverse event

    ASGE lexicon

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Time to oral intake

    during admission

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Hospital stay

    during admission

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Technical success

    Succesfull creation of a gastroenterostomy with the selected technique

    Measured: with time from EUS-GE placement to discharge (up to 1 week)

  4. Clinical success

    GOOS score >2

    Measured: during admission

  5. Treatment cost

    Overall

    Measured: within 12 months

  6. Chemotherapy (re)initiation

    Y/N, can chemotherapy be started/reinitiated

    Measured: within 12 months

  7. mGOO recurrence

    Y/N

    Measured: within 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Nov 2022
  2. Study start1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05605327
Sponsor's protocol ID
s65286
Acronym
EATING
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
16 Sep 2022
Last updated
4 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy in people with Gastric Outlet Obstruction, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michiel Bronswijk, MD (+3215505159, mjh.bronswijk@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure related adverse event (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in