AzTrials
AzTrials

AnalgesiaNCT05572164

Comparison Of Epidural Analgesia Techniques In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Surgical Pleth Index

A study testing TRADITIONAL EPIDURAL and DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL in people with Analgesia, run by Ataturk University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary aim of this study is to evaluate affect of SPI guided antinociception on total intraoperative consumption of local aneshesics during analgesia. Secondary aims are defining time interval between LA administration and SPI value dropping under 50 and hemodynamy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Analgesia
What is being tested?
TRADITIONAL EPIDURAL and DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Oct 2022to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • aged 18-60
  • ASA I-III
  • grade I unilateral PNL

Who cannot join

  • BMI > 40 kg/m2
  • drug or alcohol abuse history in the last 6 mounts
  • chronic opoid usage or had chronic pain longer than 6 weeks
  • peripheral and central neurological disorders
  • preoperative hemodynamic disorders
  • irregular sinus rhythm and pace makers
Show all 12Show fewer
  • diabetes, severe lung and major liver diseases with increasing biluribin
  • use of anti-muscarinics, α2-adrenergic agonists, β1-adrenergic agonists, anti arrhythmic; who used chronic psychoactive drugs in last 90 days
  • who are pregnant and breast feeding
  • not willing to participate
  • allergic or intolerant to any of the drugs in the study
  • procedures that take less than 2 hours

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Ayşenur Dostbil contact

+905333677796

adostbil@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparison On Efficiency Of Surgical Pleth Index-Guided Traditional Epidural And Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia Techniques In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomised Double Blind Study

Primary aim of this study is to evaluate affect of SPI guided antinociception on total intraoperative consumption of local aneshesics during analgesia. Secondary aims are defining time interval between LA administration and SPI value dropping under 50 and hemodynamy. Tertiary results are total mean local anesthesic consumption per hour, mean LA bolus number, total norepinephrine, ephedrine and atrophine consumption, mean intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, BIS and minimal alveolar concentration, percentage of intraoperative surgery time during which SPI>50, time passed until first post operative analgesia need, time needed to be discharged from PACU after operation (evaluated via Aldrte score) and post operative side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedatition and piruritis)

Conditions
Analgesia
Being tested
TRADITIONAL EPIDURAL, DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TRADITIONAL EPIDURALProcedure or surgery

    epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia (the EPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via epidural catheter guided by SPI to provide intraoperative analgesia)

  • DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURALProcedure or surgery

    group on whom dural puncture epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia ( the DPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via an epidural catheter placed after a dural pucture performed with the SPI guidance to provide intraoperative analgesia)

Study groups in NCT05572164
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TRADITIONAL EPIDURALActive comparatorstandard epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia (the EPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via epidural catheter guided by SPI to provide intraoperative analgesia
Receives: Procedure: TRADITIONAL EPIDURAL
DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURALActive comparatorgroup on whom dural puncture epidural technique used for intraoperative analgesia ( the DPL group; local anesthetics will be delivered via an epidural catheter placed after a dural pucture performed with the SPI guidance to provide intraoperative analgesia)
Receives: Procedure: DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. consumption of local aneshesics

    to evaluate affect of SPI guided antinociception on total intraoperative consumption of local aneshesics during analgesia

    Measured: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. time interval and SPI value dropping

    defining time interval between LA administration and SPI value dropping under 50 and hemodynamy

    Measured: intraoperative

  2. local anesthesic consumption

    total mean local anesthesic consumption per hour, mean LA bolus number, total norepinephrine, ephedrine and atrophine consumption, mean intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, BIS and minimal alveolar concentration, percentage of intraoperative surgery time during which SPI>50, time passed until first post operative analgesia need, time needed to be discharged from PACU after operation (evaluated via Aldrte score) and post operative side effects (nausea, vomiting, sedatition and piruritis)

    Measured: during the procedure/surgery and during 30 minutes of PACU stay

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2022
  2. Study start1 Oct 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05572164
Sponsor's protocol ID
B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/576
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
13 Sep 2022
Last updated
7 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TRADITIONAL EPIDURAL and DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL in people with Analgesia, run by Ataturk University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ayşenur Dostbil (+905333677796, adostbil@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

consumption of local aneshesics (time frame: intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in