AzTrials
AzTrials

TendinopathyPhase 3UnchAINNCT05569174

Study of Efficacy and Safety of AIN457/Secukinumab in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab in people with Tendinopathy, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 19 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab subcutaneously (s.c.) compared to placebo in adult patients with moderate to severe rotator cuff tendinopathy and failure to conventional therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tendinopathy
What is being tested?
Secukinumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
62 participants
Where
19 sitesGermany
Study dates
2 Dec 2022to 18 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent had to be obtained prior to participation in the study.
  • Males and non-pregnant, non-nursing females were between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Rotator cuff tendinopathy (unilateral) was present with a positive "Painful Arc Test" on examination.
  • Symptoms had been present for at least 6 weeks but not more than 6 months at Baseline.
  • Moderate to severe rotator cuff tendinopathy was demonstrated by all of the following criteria:
  • WORC score was ≤ 40 at Baseline.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • NRS pain score was ≥ 5 at Baseline and for at least 3 days of the 7 days prior to Baseline.
  • Nocturnal pain occurred at least 4 out of the 7 days in the week prior to Baseline.
  • Patients had failed at least 8 weeks of conventional therapy prior to Baseline: inadequate response to NSAIDs and/or paracetamol and physiotherapy; or intolerance to NSAIDs and/or paracetamol.

Who cannot join

  • Greater than 50% partial thickness tear had been established by MRI or ultrasound during assessment in the Run-in phase.
  • Patients were expected to require glucocorticoid treatment throughout the trial duration at Baseline (e.g., systemic, intramuscular, local injections in shoulder).
  • Previous surgery, or plans for surgery, during the study period, in the affected shoulder.
  • Rheumatologic and chronic inflammatory diseases, including but not limited to inflammatory bowel disease, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), PsA, axSpA and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fibromyalgia or - severe pain disorder unrelated to the target shoulder.
  • Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies were positive at Screening.
  • History of adhesive capsulitis/frozen shoulder or calcification in the tendon (in affected or contralateral shoulder) had been confirmed clinically or by medical imaging.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular) in affected or contralateral shoulder had been confirmed by medical imaging.
  • Patients had traumatic rupture that would have been considered eligible for surgery for repair of cuff tear.
  • Neurological conditions including but not limited to cervical radiculopathy, which in the opinion of the investigator could have explained the patient's symptoms.
  • Any intra-articular/subacromial glucocorticoid treatment had occurred within 12 weeks prior to Baseline or more than 2 injections for the current tendinopathy.
  • Any oral, intramuscular or i.v. glucocorticoid treatment had occurred 12 weeks prior to Baseline or during the current tendinopathy, whichever was longer.
  • Previous platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections or fluoroquinolone/quinolone antibiotics had occurred within 12 weeks prior to Baseline or during the current tendinopathy, whichever was longer.
  • Neuromuscular or primary/secondary muscular deficiency had limited the ability to perform functional measurement (e.g., shoulder strength test).
  • Previous hyaluronic injections had occurred within 12 weeks prior to Baseline or during the current tendinopathy, whichever was longer.

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

Germany19 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bad Doberan, 18209

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 10787

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 12627

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cottbus, 03042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01069

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt am Main, 60313

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gladbeck, 45968

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, 06120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 20095

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 20149

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 22415

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30159

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heinsberg, 52525

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herne, 44649

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, 76133

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 80809

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Schönebeck, 39218

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter, 24-week Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab Compared to Placebo in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and Failure to Conventional Therapy

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab subcutaneously (s.c.) compared to placebo in adult patients with moderate to severe rotator cuff tendinopathy and failure to conventional therapy.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase IIIb, 24-week study to investigate the superior efficacy of secukinumab and safety in participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Secukinumab 300 mg s.c. was compared to placebo (both arms in combination with patient individualized conventional therapy) in relieving clinical symptoms at Week 24.

The study consisted of a screening period up to 6 weeks, a 2-week run-in period, a 12-week treatment period and a 12-week follow-up period. Treatment and follow-up periods were blinded. Participants who met the eligibility criteria at screening continued to the run-in period and were randomized. In the run-in period, participants performed 2 weeks of home-based standardized physiotherapy.

Conditions
Tendinopathy
Being tested
Secukinumab, Placebo
Keywords
shoulder, rotator cuff, IL-17A-Ab, AIN457X, Impingement syndrome
Medical subject headings
Tendinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SecukinumabDrug

    Also called AIN457

    Secukinumab 300 mg s.c for 12 weeks in a pre-filled syringe (PFS)

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo to match secukinumab s.c. for 12 weeks in a PFS

Study groups in NCT05569174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SecukinumabExperimentalParticipants received 300 mg of secukinumab s.c. for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Secukinumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo s.c. for 12 weeks
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Percentage Score at Week 24

    The WORC Index consisted of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). Each of the 21 items in the WORC was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 100 (worst possible impact). Thus, the total score ranged from 0 to 2100 points. The score was reported as a percentage of normal by subtracting the total score from 2100, dividing by 2100, and multiplying by 100. Total final WORC percentage scores ranged from 0%, the lowest functional status level, to 100%, the highest functional status level.

    Change from baseline in the WORC percentage total score was assessed at Week 24. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change From Baseline in the WORC Percentage Sub-scores at Week 24

    The WORC Index consisted of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). Each of the 21 items in the WORC was rated using a VAS ranging from 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 100 (worst possible impact).

    Each subdomain score was calculated as a percentage of normal function, ranging from 0% (worst condition) to 100% (best condition).

    Change from baseline in the WORC Index percentage sub-domain score was assessed at Week 24. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Week 24

    The participant's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0="no activity" to 100= "most active", after the question " Please indicate with a vertical mark ( | ) through the horizontal line the global activity of your disease in the last 24 hours".

    Change from baseline in the participant's global assessment of disease activity score was assessed at Week 24. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36v2) Score at Week 24

    The SF-36 Health Survey was a validated questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life. Participants completed the survey throughout the study, reflecting their health status over the previous 4 weeks. It consisted of eight subscales that were scored individually; and two overall summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Component summary scores (PCS and MCS) were derived from weighted combinations of the eight subscales. Each domain and component summary score ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Change from baseline to Week 24 in all subscale and summary scores was assessed, where a positive change indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire Score at Week 24

    The QuickDASH was an abbreviated form of the DASH. The QuickDASH Index was self-administered and used 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in participants with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. It had a recall period of 1 week. Each item of the QuickDASH had five response options. The raw score was calculated as the sum of responses, converted to an average, and rescaled to a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) Change from baseline to Week 24 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score at Week 24

    The score for pain was assessed by using an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 "no pain at all" to 10 "worst possible pain", after the question "On a numeric scale of 0-10 where would you rate your pain at this time".

    Change from baseline to Wek 24 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 24- Total Score

    The EQ-5D-5L was a standardized instrument used to evaluate patients' overall health-related quality of life (QoL). It consisted of two components: the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The descriptive system assessed five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension was rated on five levels, from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). These ratings were combined to generate a composite health index, which could be converted into a single summary health utility score using published value sets. Total scores ranged from 0 to 1, with lower scores indicating greater health impairment.

    Changes in total scores from baseline to Week 24 were analyzed, with positive changes indicating improvement in health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 24- EQ VAS

    The EQ-5D-5L was a standardized instrument used to evaluate patients' overall health-related quality of life (QoL). It consisted of two components: the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

    The EQ VAS captured the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Changes in EQ VAS scores from baseline to Week 24 were analyzed, with positive changes indicating improvement in health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2022
  2. Study start2 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion18 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05569174
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAIN457FDE05
Other IDs
2022-001516-26
Acronym
UnchAIN
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
4 Oct 2022
Last updated
23 Jan 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab in people with Tendinopathy, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 19 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Percentage Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline, Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in