AzTrials
AzTrials

Peri-operative InjuryVERVENCT05561608

Validation of Heart Rate Recovery as a Peri-operative Risk Measure

An observational study of Peri-operative Injury, run by University of Glasgow at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Is heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise (i.e. not to exhaustion) a valid risk measure for post-operative outcomes? Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peri-operative Injury
How many people
84 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
10 Feb 2022to 1 Aug 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 95 patients 50 years or over undergoing intermediate/high risk surgery in the West of Scotland. Patients will be recruited from the Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, University Hospital Hairmyres or University Hospital Crosshouse.

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of informed consent
  • Age 50 years or over
  • Able to walk unaided
  • Planned elective intermediate/high risk surgery as defined by the ESC/ESA guidelines (i.e. >1% risk of mortality)

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Ongoing participation in any investigational research which could undermine the scientific basis of the study
  • Presence of any of the American Thoracic Society's contraindications to exercise testing
  • Previous intermediate/high risk surgery within three months prior to recruitment
  • Previous participation in the VERVE study at any time

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    Clydebank

  • University Hospital Hairmyres

    East Kilbride, G75 8RG

  • University Hospital, Crosshouse

    Kilmarnock, KA2 0BE

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Validation of Heart Rate Recovery as a Peri-operative Risk Measure (VERVE)

Is heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise (i.e. not to exhaustion) a valid risk measure for post-operative outcomes?

Read the detailed description

There are approximately 1.5 million major operations carried out in the NHS every year. As the population ages, and surgical technique becomes more advanced, more patients are undergoing operations which carry a high risk of complications. Currently, doctors predict this risk by asking patients about medical problems and their level of physical fitness. If an operation is very high risk, a patient may undergo cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) where the patient rides an exercise bike to maximum effort (exhaustion) whilst their heart and lung function is measured. This gives the doctor specific numbers which can be discussed with the patient about the risk of complications after surgery. However, CPET is expensive and not all patients are able to do it, for example due to joint or circulation problems. Patients can also find attempting to reach maximal effort demanding and uncomfortable.

Heart rate recovery (HRR) after maximal exercise has been shown to indicate post-operative risk of complications, and is also related to life-expectancy in people with heart failure. The utility of HRR after submaximal exercise however has not been investigated as extensively. One group demonstrated that submaximal HRR predicts post-operative complications after lung surgery, and submaximal HRR also predicts life-expectancy in healthy individuals. There is less information about submaximal HRR as the methods of measuring it are not standardised. Previous work by our group has confirmed the reproducibility of submaximal HRR in a healthy population, and demonstrated different ways in which to measure it. The investigators believe that submaximal HRR provides a "middle-ground" method of assessing how fit a patient is for surgery.

With informed consent, 95 patients across four hospitals in the West of Scotland will perform a step test pre-operatively. The step test will involve non-invasive measurement of the heart rate. Patients will exercise until approximately two-thirds of their predicted maximum heart rate is reached and then recover sitting, whilst the rate of their heart rate recovery is recorded. Patients will have pre- and post-operative troponin values measured (blood marker of strain/injury to the heart). Alongside the blood tests, patients will also answer questionnaires related to their quality of life, and information regarding other post-operative complications will be recorded.

The study aims to demonstrate that submaximal HRR is predictive of post-operative myocardial injury (stress/injury to the heart wall due to the body's response to the operation) and that is it a valid measure when compared to the scores, blood tests and exercise tests that are currently in use in the NHS. In the future, submaximal exercise testing with HRR measurement may be offered to patients unable to perform CPET and will guide shared decision-making between patient, surgeon and anaesthetist to ensure the best outcome for the patient regarding their surgical options.

Keywords
Heart rate recovery, Submaximal exercise testing, Post-operative myocardial injury, Validation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-operative myocardial injury

    Post-operative troponin over the 99th centile upper reference limit plus a 20% change (increase or decrease)

    Measured: 48 hours post-operatively

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Acute Kidney Injury

    As defined by KDIGO consensus

    Measured: 1 week post-operatively

  2. Major adverse kidney events

    Composite of renal mortality, renal replacement therapy, over 30% decline in eGFR from baseline

    Measured: 30 days post-operatively

  3. Cardiovascular complications

    Incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, non-fatal cardiac arrest, coronary revascularisation, pulmonary embolus, deep-veined thrombosis, or new onset atrial fibrillation

    Measured: 7 days post-operatively

  4. Major adverse cardiac events

    Composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, non-fatal cardiac arrest, and coronary revascularisation

    Measured: 30 days post-operatively

  5. Infective complications

    Presence of fever <38.5 and clinical suspicion of infection

    Measured: 7 days post-operatively

  6. Neurological complications

    Delirium or stroke

    Measured: 7 days post-operatively

  7. Pulmonary complications

    Atelectasis, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary aspiration

    Measured: 7 days post-operatively

  8. Quality of recovery scale - 15

    Measured: 2 days post-operatively

  9. EQ-5D-5L

    Patient reported quality of life score

    Measured: 30 days and 1 year post-operatively

  10. Days alive and out of hospital

    Measured: 30 days post-operatively

  11. Length of hospital stay (with/without hospital mortality)

    Measured: Up to 1 year post-operatively

  12. Readmission to hospital

    Measured: Within 30 days post-operatively

  13. Admission/re-admission to Intensive Care

    Measured: 14 days post-operatively

  14. Mortality

    Measured: Day 30, day 90 and 1 year post-operatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2022
  2. Study start10 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05561608
Sponsor's protocol ID
21/WA/0207
Acronym
VERVE
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
27 Sep 2022
Last updated
4 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: We are keen to provide opportunities for data sharing. All requests for data sharing will be assessed individually and requests complying with the data governance regulations of the Sponsor and NHS R\&D will be honoured.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peri-operative Injury, run by University of Glasgow at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-operative myocardial injury (time frame: 48 hours post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in