Acute Gastrointestinal BleedingNCT05550649
Safety and Efficacy of Prophylactic Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Angiography-negative Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
A study testing embolization in people with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Guided by clinical problems, this study focused on the problems encountered in clinical practice, with the interventional treatment of emergency gastrointestinal bleeding as the breakthrough point, and focused on the dilemma of treatment selection for patients with negative angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- What is being tested?
- embolization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2022to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 18~75 years old (including 18 years old and 75 years old);
- Bleeding of gastric or duodenal ulcers that have failed endoscopic therapy;
- Anastomotic bleeding after gastrointestinal anastomosis;
- Anastomotic bleeding after cholangioenterostomy;
- Bleeding after ERCP;
- There were no indirect signs of contrast agent spillage and bleeding in angiography.
Who cannot join
- Age: <18 years old or >75 years old;
- Rupture and bleeding of gastric fundus esophageal varices;
- Active bleeding can be seen on angiography;
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by other causes other than the inclusion criteria;
- Unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding;
- Those who have undergone interventional therapy in the past;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents;
- Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction and uncontrolled systemic infection;
- There is functional failure of important organs (heart, liver, kidney, etc.);
- History of gastrointestinal radiotherapy in the past 1 year;
- Those who are not expected to complete the follow-up;
- Expected survival shorter than 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
Shanghai
Long Pan, 189 1768 5712
About this study
Guided by clinical problems, this study focused on the problems encountered in clinical practice, with the interventional treatment of emergency gastrointestinal bleeding as the breakthrough point, and focused on the dilemma of treatment selection for patients with negative angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding. At present, there is no report on relevant clinical and basic research on the selection of treatment strategies for patients with negative ANVUGIB angiography. Whether prophylactic arterial embolization can benefit patients and whether it can reduce mortality is an urgent clinical problem to be solved.
Read the detailed description
- Research subjects Patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 and underwent interventional therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and were negative on angiography were selected. Once the subjects signed the informed consent and participated in the screening, the subjects who met all the following inclusion criteria according to the experimental protocol and did not meet any of the exclusion criteria were eligible for screening.
- Study endpoints 1) The primary endpoint: postoperative rebleeding rate. 2) Secondary endpoints: hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood transfusion volume, complication rate, mortality, surgical intervention rate.
- In/Out Criteria 1) Inclusion criteria: (1) Age: 18~75 years old (including 18 years old and 75 years old); (2) Bleeding of gastric or duodenal ulcers that have failed endoscopic therapy; (3) Anastomotic bleeding after gastrointestinal anastomosis; (4) Anastomotic bleeding after cholangioenterostomy; (5) Bleeding after ERCP; (6) There were no indirect signs of contrast agent spillage and bleeding in angiography.
- Exclusion criteria: (1) Age: <18 years old or >75 years old; (2) Rupture and bleeding of gastric fundus esophageal varices; (3) Active bleeding can be seen on angiography; (4) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by other causes other than the inclusion criteria; (5) Unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding; (6) Those who have undergone interventional therapy in the past; (7) Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents; (8) Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction and uncontrolled systemic infection; (9) There is functional failure of important organs (heart, liver, kidney, etc.); (10) History of gastrointestinal radiotherapy in the past 1 year; (11) Those who are not expected to complete the follow-up; (12) Expected survival shorter than 6 months. 3) Elimination criteria
- After enrollment, it is found that the subjects do not meet the inclusion criteria or meet the exclusion criteria;
- Other diseases or conditions occurred during the trial, which, as judged by the investigator, significantly affected the evaluation of clinical status and research endpoints;
- Those whose treatment was interrupted due to various reasons or whose case records were incomplete, were determined by the investigators to be unevaluable.
- Exit/Abort:
- The subject himself or his legal representative requests to withdraw from the research;
- Lost to follow-up;
- DEATH. For all cases of rejection, withdrawal/discontinuation, the reason for rejection, withdrawal/discontinuation must be recorded on the case report form and subject medical records.
- Interventional treatment process
- Preoperative preparation: perfect electrocardiogram, gastroscope (optional), chest X-ray/chest CT (optional), enhanced abdominal CT (optional), blood routine, biochemistry, coagulation function, stool routine + occult blood, eight items before surgery etc.; signed informed consent for interventional therapy.
- Angiography: (1) Prepare the skin at the puncture site, sterilize and lay down sheets; (2) Determine the puncture point: routinely choose the right femoral artery, or the left femoral artery or radial artery, (3) Lidocaine Anesthetize the puncture point, puncture and introduce the 4-5F arterial sheath; (4) Conventional angiography: celiac artery (5-7ml/s, total amount of contrast agent 25-35ml, 300 psi), superior mesenteric artery (5-7ml/s, Total volume of contrast agent 25-35ml, 300 psi). (5) Superselective angiography: superselective angiography of the blood supply artery in the lesion area is performed according to the cause of bleeding, the lesion site determined by endoscopic or enhanced CT, and the flow rate of contrast agent, the duration of angiography and the pressure are determined according to the diameter of the blood vessel.
- Group processing: (1) Control group: After angiography, no embolization was given, the catheter was withdrawn, the vascular sheath was removed, and symptomatic and supportive treatments such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. (2) Observation group: Prophylactic arterial embolization was performed for the artery in the blood supply area of the lesion. Embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; postoperatively, according to the condition, symptomatic acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. and supportive care.
Indications for blood transfusion: (1) systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or a decrease of > 30 mmHg from baseline systolic blood pressure; (2) hemoglobin < 70 g/L, hematocrit < 25%; (3) increased heart rate (> 120 times/min).
- Postoperative treatment: (1) Monitoring vital signs; (2) On the 1st, 7th, and 14th days after operation, and in January and March respectively, test blood routine, coagulation function, liver and kidney function, stool routine + occult blood, etc.; ( 3) Observe the bleeding situation; (4) Observe and record adverse reactions.
- Angiographic findings
- Positive signs of bleeding: contrast agent spillage, pseudoaneurysm, irregular arterial stenosis/truncation.
- Negative signs of bleeding: the shape of blood vessels is obviously abnormal, and the above positive signs are not present on angiography.
- Efficacy evaluation Technical success: Successful embolization of the target arterial vessel. Technical failure: The target artery was not successfully embolized. Clinical success: no more active bleeding within 1 month after surgery, or significant reduction in bleeding volume, no need for blood transfusion therapy Bleeding stopped: (1) bleeding from gastric tube or abdominal drainage tube stopped; (2) the patient's symptoms improved, heart rate and blood pressure were stable; (3) urine output > 0.5 ml/kg/h. Active bleeding: (1) bleeding from gastric tube or abdominal drainage tube; (2) increased frequency of hematemesis or melena, bright red vomit or dark red blood in stool, or active bowel sounds; (3) rapid infusion Blood transfusion, the performance of peripheral circulatory failure did not improve significantly, or although it temporarily improved and then deteriorated, the central venous pressure still fluctuated, stabilized and then decreased again; (4) red blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit continued to decline, reticulum The red blood cell count continued to increase; (5) the blood urea nitrogen continued or increased again when the fluid and urine volume were sufficient.
- Safety evaluation:
- Serious complications: require surgical treatment or prolong hospital stay for ≥2 weeks.
- Mild complications: no surgical treatment or prolonged hospital stay is required for less than 2 weeks.
Recording of complications: from the time the subjects signed the informed consent, until the subjects completed or withdrew from the trial. All adverse events that occurred during the trial must be recorded on a case report form. The contents of the records should include: the occurrence time, severity, duration, measures taken and outcomes of adverse events.
Technical difficulties: For the judgment of negative angiography, it is generally accepted that when the bleeding rate is lower than 15ml/min, the bleeding point cannot be found by DSA angiography, but it is also related to the pressure of the high-pressure syringe, the diameter of the blood vessel and the experience of the operator.
- Conditions
- Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- Being tested
- embolization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
embolizationProcedure or surgery
Prophylactic arterial embolization is performed for the artery in the diseased blood supply area. The embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; after operation, symptomatic and supportive treatment such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement are given according to the condition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylic Embolization | Experimental | Prophylactic arterial embolization is performed for the artery in the diseased blood supply area. The embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; after operation, symptomatic and supportive treatment such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement are given according to the condition. Receives: Procedure: embolization |
| Sham Embolization | Sham comparator | After the angiography was completed, no embolization was performed, the catheter was withdrawn, the vascular sheath was removed, and symptomatic and supportive treatments such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. Receives: Procedure: embolization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
postoperative rebleeding rate
No more active bleeding within 1 month after surgery, or the bleeding volume is significantly reduced, and no blood transfusion is required
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Hemoglobin
Hemoglobin count
Measured: 1 month
blood transfusion volume
how much blood the patients need
Measured: 1 month
complication rate
if there are any complications
Measured: 1 month
mortality
number of patients dead within one month
Measured: 1 month
surgical intervention rate.
patients need surgery
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2022
- Study start30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Gastrointestinal BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shilong Han, MD, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05550649
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHSY-IEC-5.0/22K8/P01
- Other IDs
- 20204Y0167
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Prophylactic Arterial Embolization in the Treatment of Angiography-negative Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05550649
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHSY-IEC-5.0/22K8/P01
- Conditions
- Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai 10th People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Guided by clinical problems, this study focused on the problems encountered in clinical practice, with the interventional treatment of emergency gastrointestinal bleeding as the breakthrough point, and focused on the dilemma of treatment selection for patients with negative angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding. At present, there is no report on relevant clinical and basic research on the selection of treatment strategies for patients with negative ANVUGIB angiography. Whether prophylactic arterial embolization can benefit patients and whether it can reduce mortality is an urgent clinical problem to be solved.
Detailed description
- Research subjects Patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 and underwent interventional therapy for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and were negative on angiography were selected. Once the subjects signed the informed consent and participated in the screening, the subjects who met all the following inclusion criteria according to the experimental protocol and did not meet any of the exclusion criteria were eligible for screening.
- Study endpoints 1) The primary endpoint: postoperative rebleeding rate. 2) Secondary endpoints: hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood transfusion volume, complication rate, mortality, surgical intervention rate.
- In/Out Criteria 1) Inclusion criteria: (1) Age: 18~75 years old (including 18 years old and 75 years old); (2) Bleeding of gastric or duodenal ulcers that have failed endoscopic therapy; (3) Anastomotic bleeding after gastrointestinal anastomosis; (4) Anastomotic bleeding after cholangioenterostomy; (5) Bleeding after ERCP; (6) There were no indirect signs of contrast agent spillage and bleeding in angiography.
- Exclusion criteria: (1) Age: <18 years old or >75 years old; (2) Rupture and bleeding of gastric fundus esophageal varices; (3) Active bleeding can be seen on angiography; (4) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by other causes other than the inclusion criteria; (5) Unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding; (6) Those who have undergone interventional therapy in the past; (7) Allergy to iodine-containing contrast agents; (8) Uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction and uncontrolled systemic infection; (9) There is functional failure of important organs (heart, liver, kidney, etc.); (10) History of gastrointestinal radiotherapy in the past 1 year; (11) Those who are not expected to complete the follow-up; (12) Expected survival shorter than 6 months. 3) Elimination criteria
- After enrollment, it is found that the subjects do not meet the inclusion criteria or meet the exclusion criteria;
- Other diseases or conditions occurred during the trial, which, as judged by the investigator, significantly affected the evaluation of clinical status and research endpoints;
- Those whose treatment was interrupted due to various reasons or whose case records were incomplete, were determined by the investigators to be unevaluable.
- Exit/Abort:
- The subject himself or his legal representative requests to withdraw from the research;
- Lost to follow-up;
- DEATH. For all cases of rejection, withdrawal/discontinuation, the reason for rejection, withdrawal/discontinuation must be recorded on the case report form and subject medical records.
- Interventional treatment process
- Preoperative preparation: perfect electrocardiogram, gastroscope (optional), chest X-ray/chest CT (optional), enhanced abdominal CT (optional), blood routine, biochemistry, coagulation function, stool routine + occult blood, eight items before surgery etc.; signed informed consent for interventional therapy.
- Angiography: (1) Prepare the skin at the puncture site, sterilize and lay down sheets; (2) Determine the puncture point: routinely choose the right femoral artery, or the left femoral artery or radial artery, (3) Lidocaine Anesthetize the puncture point, puncture and introduce the 4-5F arterial sheath; (4) Conventional angiography: celiac artery (5-7ml/s, total amount of contrast agent 25-35ml, 300 psi), superior mesenteric artery (5-7ml/s, Total volume of contrast agent 25-35ml, 300 psi). (5) Superselective angiography: superselective angiography of the blood supply artery in the lesion area is performed according to the cause of bleeding, the lesion site determined by endoscopic or enhanced CT, and the flow rate of contrast agent, the duration of angiography and the pressure are determined according to the diameter of the blood vessel.
- Group processing: (1) Control group: After angiography, no embolization was given, the catheter was withdrawn, the vascular sheath was removed, and symptomatic and supportive treatments such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. (2) Observation group: Prophylactic arterial embolization was performed for the artery in the blood supply area of the lesion. Embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; postoperatively, according to the condition, symptomatic acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. and supportive care.
Indications for blood transfusion: (1) systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or a decrease of > 30 mmHg from baseline systolic blood pressure; (2) hemoglobin < 70 g/L, hematocrit < 25%; (3) increased heart rate (> 120 times/min).
- Postoperative treatment: (1) Monitoring vital signs; (2) On the 1st, 7th, and 14th days after operation, and in January and March respectively, test blood routine, coagulation function, liver and kidney function, stool routine + occult blood, etc.; ( 3) Observe the bleeding situation; (4) Observe and record adverse reactions.
- Angiographic findings
- Positive signs of bleeding: contrast agent spillage, pseudoaneurysm, irregular arterial stenosis/truncation.
- Negative signs of bleeding: the shape of blood vessels is obviously abnormal, and the above positive signs are not present on angiography.
- Efficacy evaluation Technical success: Successful embolization of the target arterial vessel. Technical failure: The target artery was not successfully embolized. Clinical success: no more active bleeding within 1 month after surgery, or significant reduction in bleeding volume, no need for blood transfusion therapy Bleeding stopped: (1) bleeding from gastric tube or abdominal drainage tube stopped; (2) the patient's symptoms improved, heart rate and blood pressure were stable; (3) urine output > 0.5 ml/kg/h. Active bleeding: (1) bleeding from gastric tube or abdominal drainage tube; (2) increased frequency of hematemesis or melena, bright red vomit or dark red blood in stool, or active bowel sounds; (3) rapid infusion Blood transfusion, the performance of peripheral circulatory failure did not improve significantly, or although it temporarily improved and then deteriorated, the central venous pressure still fluctuated, stabilized and then decreased again; (4) red blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit continued to decline, reticulum The red blood cell count continued to increase; (5) the blood urea nitrogen continued or increased again when the fluid and urine volume were sufficient.
- Safety evaluation:
- Serious complications: require surgical treatment or prolong hospital stay for ≥2 weeks.
- Mild complications: no surgical treatment or prolonged hospital stay is required for less than 2 weeks.
Recording of complications: from the time the subjects signed the informed consent, until the subjects completed or withdrew from the trial. All adverse events that occurred during the trial must be recorded on a case report form. The contents of the records should include: the occurrence time, severity, duration, measures taken and outcomes of adverse events.
Technical difficulties: For the judgment of negative angiography, it is generally accepted that when the bleeding rate is lower than 15ml/min, the bleeding point cannot be found by DSA angiography, but it is also related to the pressure of the high-pressure syringe, the diameter of the blood vessel and the experience of the operator.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylic Embolization | Experimental | Procedure: embolizationProphylactic arterial embolization is performed for the artery in the diseased blood supply area. The embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; after operation, symptomatic and supportive treatment such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement are given according to the condition. |
| Sham Embolization | Sham comparator | Procedure: embolizationAfter the angiography was completed, no embolization was performed, the catheter was withdrawn, the vascular sheath was removed, and symptomatic and supportive treatments such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement were given. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age: 18~75 years old (including 18 years old and 75 years old);
- Bleeding of gastric or duodenal ulcers that have failed endoscopic therapy;
- Anastomotic bleeding after gastrointestinal anastomosis;
- Anastomotic bleeding after cholangioenterostomy;
- Bleeding after ERCP;
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age: <18 years old or >75 years old;
- Rupture and bleeding of gastric fundus esophageal varices;
- Active bleeding can be seen on angiography;
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by other causes other than the inclusion criteria;
- Unexplained upper gastrointestinal bleeding;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| embolizationProphylactic arterial embolization is performed for the artery in the diseased blood supply area. The embolization material: gelatin sponge particles are recommended, and micro-steel ring can be used as an auxiliary if necessary; after operation, symptomatic and supportive treatment such as acid suppression, hemostasis, blood transfusion, and fluid replacement are given according to the condition. | Procedure or surgery | Prophylic Embolization, Sham Embolization |
Primary outcome
postoperative rebleeding rate
Time frame: 1 month
No more active bleeding within 1 month after surgery, or the bleeding volume is significantly reduced, and no blood transfusion is required
5 secondary outcomes
Hemoglobin
Time frame: 1 month
blood transfusion volume
Time frame: 1 month
complication rate
Time frame: 1 month
mortality
Time frame: 1 month
surgical intervention rate.
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Recruiting
Fexuprazan for Prevention of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in High Bleeding Risk Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Recruiting
Detection of Blood in the GI Lumen With HemoPill Acute
Upper GI Bleeding
Active, not recruiting
Timing of Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients With Acute Variceal Bleeding
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Acute Variceal Bleeding
Active, not recruiting
HELicobacter Pylori Screening to Prevent Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction, Helicobacter Pylori Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus pROton-Pump Inhibitor for GastroproTECTion Strategies In Patients at High Gastro-Intestinal Bleeding Risk Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy
Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing embolization in people with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shilong Han, Doctor (18917683645, hanshilong86@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
postoperative rebleeding rate (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2022.