AzTrials
AzTrials

Pyelonephritis AcutePhase 4PYELOCOURTNCT05544565

3-day IV Antibiotic Treatment Versus 3-day IV Followed by 7-day Oral Antibiotic Treatment for AP in Children

A Phase 4 study testing IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab in people with Pyelonephritis Acute, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 15 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 3 years
Conditions the study is for
Pyelonephritis Acute
What is being tested?
IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
480 participants
Where
15 sitesFrance
Study dates
22 Mar 2023to Jan 2028
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 3 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 1 month and < 3 years
  • For children younger than 3 months, gestational age > 34 WA
  • First episode of urinary tract infection
  • AP defined by temperature ≥ 38°C on day of diagnosis AND positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram- negative bacillus ≥ 104 UFC/mL. The child temperature will have to be measured with a thermometer according to the French national recommendations [Health Insurance website (AMELI ;see: - https://www.ameli. fr/assure/sante/bons-gestes/soins/prendre-temperature); HAS (see: https://www.has-sante. fr/jcms/c_2674284/fr/prise-en-charge-de-la-fievre-chez-l-enfant)].
  • Initial treatment by either ceftriaxone AND/OR amikacin
  • Outpatient or hospitalised
Show all 32Show fewer
  • Non-inclusion Criteria:
  • Urine collected by bag
  • Urine culture growing more than one dominant bacterium (cf section 6.2 of the protocol)
  • Catheter-associated acute pyelonephritis
  • Known congenital anomalies of the kidney and genitourinary tract (other than vesicoureteral reflux and pyelocaliceal dilatation < 10 mm)
  • Previous surgery of the genitourinary tract (except circumcision in male children)
  • Abnormal renal function for age and weight (defined by a serum creatinine >40µmol/L before 1 year and >75µmol between 1 year et 3 years)
  • Known immunocompromising condition (e.g., HIV, primary immunodeficiency, sickle cell disease, use of chronic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents)
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis for any reason OR antibiotic treatment in the last 7 days (except treatment administered for the AP)
  • Known hypersensitivity to at least one of the active substances /excipients: ceftriaxone (including other cephalosporins and other beta-lactams) and amikacin (including other aminoglycosids).
  • Known hypersensitivity to at least one of the active substances /excipients: cotrimoxazole (=sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) (including other drugs containing sulfonamides) and cefixime (including other cephalosporins)
  • Known blood dyscrasias (megaloblastic haematopoiesis)
  • Known severe hepatic insufficiency
  • Known G6PD deficiency
  • No written consent from holders of parental authority
  • Non-affiliation to a social security system (as beneficiary or entitled person)
  • Children whose follow-up is not carried out in the centre
  • Participation in another interventional or minimal risk trial
  • Randomization criteria :
  • Three days of taking antibiotics (IV or IM) (no interruption or discontinuation)
  • Positive urine culture with Gram negative bacillus ≥ 10^4 UFC/mL
  • Favorable clinical outcome at day of randomization (D2 or D3) defined by temperature < 38°C at day of randomization and absence of fever measured > 38°C for at least 12 hours AND no abdominal pain AND no feeding problem AND investigator agreement
  • No renal abscess AND congenital anomalies of the kidney and genitourinary tract (other than vesicoureteral reflux and pyelocaliceal dilatation < 10 mm) on the renal ultrasound performed between D0 and day of randomization
  • No more than 1 type of dominant bacteria on the urine culture
  • Sensitivity to the initial antibiotic treatment
  • Sensitivity to cefixime OR cotrimoxazole

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jean GASCHIGNARD, PhD contact

+33 1 69 15 96 00

j.gaschignard@ghne.fr

Romain BASMACI, PhD contact

+33 1 47 60 63 58

romain.basmaci@aphp.fr

15 sites in 1 country

France15 sites, 15 recruiting
  • Jean Verdier Hospital

    Bondy, Seine St Denis, 93140

    Aurelien Galerne, Dr, aurelien.galerne@aphp.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Ambroise Paré hospital

    Boulogne, Hauts de Seine, 92100

    Bilade Cherqaoui, Dr, bilade.cherqaoui2@aphp.fr

    Recruiting
  • Antoine Beclère Hospital

    Clamart, Haut de Seine, 92140

    Etienne Bizot, Dr, etienne.bizot@aphp.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CH Sud Francilien

    Corbeil-Essonnes, Essonne, 91100

    Sébastien Rouget, Dr, sebastien.rouget@chsf.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intercomunal Créteil Hospital

    Créteil, Val de Marne, 94000

    Juliette Daire, Dr, Juliette.Daire@chicreteil.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • GHEF Site Marne la vallée

    Jossigny

    Nathalie Garrec, Dr, ngarrec@ghef.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Andre mignot hospital

    Le Chesnay, Yvelines, 78150

    Sylvie Nathanson, Dr, snathanson@ch-versailles.fr

    Recruiting
  • Kremlin Bicêtre Hospital

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val de Marne, 94270

    Cécile Thivent, Dr, cecile.thivent@aphp.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Jeanne Flandre Hospital

    Lille, Nord, 59000

    François Dubos, Pr, francois.dubos@chu-lille.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Meaux Hospital

    Meaux, Seine et Marne, 77100

    Olivier Vignaud, Dr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Children-Teenager hospital

    Nantes, Loire Atlantique, 44000

    Justine Franco, Pr, justine.franco@chu-nantes.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Paris-Saclay hospital

    Orsay, Essonne, 91400

    Jean Gaschignard, PhD, J.GASCHIGNARD@gh-nord-essonne.fr

    Recruiting
  • Robert Debré Hospital

    Paris, Paris, 75019

    Jeanne Truong, Dr, jeanne.truong@aphp.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • Robert Debré Hospital

    Paris, Paris, 75019

    Claire Ferrua, Dr, Claire.ferrua@aphp.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • CHU Toulouse

    Toulouse

    Benjamin Hallak, Dr, hallak.b@chu-toulouse.fr

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: 3-day Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment Versus 3-day Intravenous Followed by 7-day Oral Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Pyelonephritis in Children 1 Month to 3 Years Old: a Non-inferiority Open Randomized Multicentric Clinical Trial

Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).

In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.

Read more

The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral to treat AP in children.

The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.

Read the detailed description

1.0 Hypothesis for the study

Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).

In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.

The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy to prevent long-term renal scarring.

The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and microbiological success, and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.

2.0 Description of knowledge relating to the condition in question

Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is the most common proven bacterial infection in pediatric clinical practice. It can lead to sepsis or renal abscess and induce long-term complications such as renal scarring. Renal scarring during childhood can lead to hypertension or chronic renal disease at adult age, although the link between AP and chronic renal disease has not been firmly established.

AP is most frequently due to Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) now account for 5% of AP in France and represent a serious threat to public health, owing to limited therapeutic options.

The overall clinical success rate in children treated for AP is around 95% and is not significantly different when ESBL-E are implicated. In children with no prior urological malformation, recurrence in the following 3 months occurs in less than 5% of cases. Antibiotic treatment decreases the risk of renal scarring, which remains important, around 15% (95% CI: 11-18) in the largest meta-analysis. Moreover, delay in treatment of AP is associated with permanent renal scarring.

In children without prior urological malformation, acute complications are exceptional, even in the presence of bacteraemia. Short courses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy have proved to be as efficient as longer courses (7-14 days) of IV treatment. For children aged ≥ 1 month, oral treatment alone for 10 to 14 days has proved non inferior to initial IV antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy (total 10 to 14 days).

French Paediatric guidelines recommend a short course (up to 4 days) of IV amikacin and/or ceftriaxone followed by oral therapy (total 10 days), with the possibility, for children aged > 3 months of a 10-day course of oral cefixime [12]. In children initially treated IV, the oral relay occurs once the urine culture and antibiogram are available. The American Association of Pediatrics that focused on children aged 2 to 24 months recommends either an oral or a sequential IV/oral treatment for a total of 7 to 14 days, while the British NICE guidelines recommend an exclusively oral route only for children aged ≥ 3 months

In practice, most centers initiate an IV treatment in a large subset of patients (ongoing practice analysis on the management of AP in children in France, personal data, to be published in 2021). An initial IV treatment is particularly used in young children, with an age cut-off varying between 3 months and 3 years according to the center. It is also used to secure the absorption of the treatment if the child vomits, is unable to take oral antibiotics or is severely unwell.

The excellent short-term and the good long-term clinical outcomes in children treated for AP questions the need for a 10-day course of antibiotics.

In adults, shorter treatments, such as amikacin for 5 days, have been validated for the treatment of uncomplicated AP.

Recently published studies (Zaoutis 2023, Montini 2024) have compared a 5-day oral treatment vs 10-day oral treatment for AP in children. However, the first study (Zaoutis 2023) mainly included (63%) children with a non-febrile urinary tract infection (ie not an AP). The second only included children aged > 3 month. A practice survey conducted prior to our protocol had shown that many departments were already reluctant to treat infants under 1 year old, and particularly those under 3 months old, by oral route, warranting clinical trials including children < 3 month old.

Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), such as ceftriaxone, rapidly reduce the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota and also select subpopulations of resistant bacteria, particularly by acquisition of extended spectrum beta-lactamases, a major public health issue.

There is no data on the impact of antibiotic relays on the gut microbiota. Since each antibiotic has its own anti-bacterial spectrum, a sequence of treatments could have an additive or even synergistic deleterious effect on the gut microbiota. This may in particular be the case in children treated with IV ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by cotrimoxazole for 7 days, as recommended in France in first intention.

3.0 Summary of relevant pre-clinical experiments and clinical trials

1999 Hoberman et al. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 14 days and intravenous ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. One of the outcomes was the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 24 months. A total of 306 children were included. Renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously. The study conclude that oral treatment was safe.

The main limit of the study was the lower rate of renal scar in both arms compared to other studies, probably linked to a female/male sex ratio of 9:1 (with a median age of 8 months), when the sex ratio is in favour of boys before 1-year-old.

2007, Montini et al. Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial This was a multicentre, randomised controlled, open labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial comparing oral co-amoxiclav for 10 days to parenteral ceftriaxone for three days, followed by oral co-amoxiclav for 7 days. Primary outcome was the rate of renal scarring after 12 months. A total of 502 children aged 1 month to <7 years with clinical pyelonephritis were included. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant differences between oral (n=244) and parenteral (n=258) treatment, both in the primary outcome (scarring scintigraphy at 12 months 27/197 (13.7%) v 36/203 (17.7%), and secondary outcomes: time to defervescence, white cell count at day 3, and percentage with sterile urine at day 3 (99.5% n both arms). The results were similar in the subgroups of children older and younger than 2 years (data not shown in the paper).

2012, Boquet et al. Randomized trial of oral versus sequential IV/oral antibiotic for acute pyelonephritis in children PHRC AOM 04 105; NCT00136656 This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 10 days and IV ceftriaxone for 4 days followed by oral cefixime for 6 days on the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 36 mont with a first proven urinary tract infection and procalcitonin concentration ≥ 0.5 ng/mL s. The primary endpoint was the proportion of renal scar measured by 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy 6 to 8 months after treatment. The study included a total 171 children of the 698 expected. The incidence of renal scarring was 30.8% in the oral treatment group and 27.3% for children who received the sequential treatment. The trial could not demonstrate statistically the non-inferiority due to insufficient enrolment.

2023, Zaoutis et al. Short-Course Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Children: The SCOUT Randomized Clinical Trial PMID: 37358858 ; NCT01595529, This was a randomized clinical noninferiority trial at 2 children's hospitals. Participants included children aged 2 months to 10 years with UTI exhibiting clinical improvement after 5 days of antimicrobials. The study compared another 5 days of antimicrobials (standard-course therapy) or 5 days of placebo (short-course therapy).

The primary outcome, treatment failure, was defined as symptomatic UTI at or before the first follow-up visit (day 11 to 14 A total of 664 children were randomized (639 female [96%]; median age, 4 years): 2 of 328 assigned to standard-course (0.6%) and 14 of 336 assigned to short-course (4.2%) had a treatment failure. There were no differences between groups in rates of UTI after the first follow-up visit, incidence of adverse events, or incidence of gastrointestinal colonization with resistant organisms.

2024, Montini et al. Short Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric febrile Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Trial. [25] PMID: 38146260 This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned children aged 3 months to 5 years with a noncomplicated fUTI to receive amoxicillin-clavulanate for 5 or 10 days.

The primary end point was the recurrence of a urinary tract infection within 30 days after the completion of therapy. Secondary end points were the difference in prevalence of clinical recovery, adverse drug-related events, and resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and/or to other antibiotics when a recurrent infection occurred.

The study included a total of,175 children and 142 underwent randomization. The recurrence rate of UTI within 30 days of the end of therapy was 2.8% (2/72) in the short group and 14.3% (10/70) in the standard group. The recurrence rate of fUTI within 30 days from the end of therapy was 1.4% (1/72) in the short group and 5.7% (4/70) in the standard group.

Being tested
IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents, Fecal/Rectal Swab, PCT assay
Keywords
Pyelonephritis acute, Antibiotic therapies, Renal scar, Paediatric

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IV Antibacterial AgentsDrug

    Ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) AND/OR Amikacin (20 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) during 3 days. .

  • Orally antibacterial agentsDrug

    Cotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprime) 30mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) OR Cefixime 8mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) during 7 days

  • Fecal/Rectal SwabProcedure or surgery

    Collected by the nurse or the physician (D0,D3,D10 or 17 and D31 or D38), either by a rectal swab, either by fecal swab (dip of the swab in fresh stools < 4 hours, which will occur frequently in our population of children aged 1 month to 3 years, and will in particular be possible for hospitalized children) using a FecalSwabTM, that contains a transport medium.

  • PCT assayProcedure or surgery

    Dosage of procalcitonin (if not performed in standard care) at D0

Study groups in NCT05544565
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatmentExperimentalFor patients randomized in the experimental group, the patient receives 3-day IV therapy and the treatment is interrupted.
Receives: Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents; Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab; Procedure: PCT assay
Control group: Usual practiceOtherFor patients randomized in the control group, the treatment for acute pyelonephritis is based on the attending clinician's practice and according to the usual practice: 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy.
Receives: Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents; Drug: Orally antibacterial agents; Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab; Procedure: PCT assay

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection

    Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy versus a 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of AP in children in term of the is recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection within a 28 -days period after the completion of antibiotic treatment respectively at D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group..

    The recurrence will be defined as:

    fever ≥ 38°C associated with a positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram-negative bacillus ≥ 10^4 UFC/mL

    Measured: 28 days (± 3 days) after the completion of antibiotic treatment.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Clinical cure

    Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day IV antibiotic treatment versus a 3-day IV followed by 7-day oral antibiotic treatment for AP in children 1 month to 3 years old in terms of clinical cure, defined by apyrexia AND absence of signs suggestive or urinary infection (abdominal pain, urinary function signs) AND no feeding problem collecting during a medical visit. .

    Measured: D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.

  2. Recurrence of AP

    Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day IV antibiotic treatment versus a 3-day IV/IM followed by 7-day oral antibiotic treatment for AP in children 1 month to 3 years old in terms of recurrence of AP collecting during a phone call.

    Measured: 90 days after the beginning of therapy

  3. Colonization with antimicriobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

    Compare between the two treament arms the rate of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the gastrointestinal tract

    Measured: days of randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group

  4. Bacterial diversity of the intestinal microbiota

    Compare between the two treament arms the bacterial diversity of the intestinal microbiota : alpha-diversity measured by Shannon's index.

    Measured: Inclusion, randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) and D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group, and D17 (+/- 3 days) and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2022
  2. Study start22 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Open, multicentric, parallel group non-inferiority clinical trial with 1:1 randomization
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
480 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05544565
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP211043
Other IDs
2021-005627-21
Acronym
PYELOCOURT
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
14 Sep 2022
Last updated
7 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab in people with Pyelonephritis Acute, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 15 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 32 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jean GASCHIGNARD, PhD (+33 1 69 15 96 00, j.gaschignard@ghne.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection (time frame: 28 days (± 3 days) after the completion of antibiotic treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in