Pyelonephritis AcutePhase 4PYELOCOURTNCT05544565
3-day IV Antibiotic Treatment Versus 3-day IV Followed by 7-day Oral Antibiotic Treatment for AP in Children
A Phase 4 study testing IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab in people with Pyelonephritis Acute, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 15 sites in France.
Trial summary
Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 3 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pyelonephritis Acute
- What is being tested?
- IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 480 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2023to Jan 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 3 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 1 month and < 3 years
- For children younger than 3 months, gestational age > 34 WA
- First episode of urinary tract infection
- AP defined by temperature ≥ 38°C on day of diagnosis AND positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram- negative bacillus ≥ 104 UFC/mL. The child temperature will have to be measured with a thermometer according to the French national recommendations [Health Insurance website (AMELI ;see: - https://www.ameli. fr/assure/sante/bons-gestes/soins/prendre-temperature); HAS (see: https://www.has-sante. fr/jcms/c_2674284/fr/prise-en-charge-de-la-fievre-chez-l-enfant)].
- Initial treatment by either ceftriaxone AND/OR amikacin
- Outpatient or hospitalised
Show all 32Show fewer
- Non-inclusion Criteria:
- Urine collected by bag
- Urine culture growing more than one dominant bacterium (cf section 6.2 of the protocol)
- Catheter-associated acute pyelonephritis
- Known congenital anomalies of the kidney and genitourinary tract (other than vesicoureteral reflux and pyelocaliceal dilatation < 10 mm)
- Previous surgery of the genitourinary tract (except circumcision in male children)
- Abnormal renal function for age and weight (defined by a serum creatinine >40µmol/L before 1 year and >75µmol between 1 year et 3 years)
- Known immunocompromising condition (e.g., HIV, primary immunodeficiency, sickle cell disease, use of chronic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents)
- Antibiotic prophylaxis for any reason OR antibiotic treatment in the last 7 days (except treatment administered for the AP)
- Known hypersensitivity to at least one of the active substances /excipients: ceftriaxone (including other cephalosporins and other beta-lactams) and amikacin (including other aminoglycosids).
- Known hypersensitivity to at least one of the active substances /excipients: cotrimoxazole (=sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) (including other drugs containing sulfonamides) and cefixime (including other cephalosporins)
- Known blood dyscrasias (megaloblastic haematopoiesis)
- Known severe hepatic insufficiency
- Known G6PD deficiency
- No written consent from holders of parental authority
- Non-affiliation to a social security system (as beneficiary or entitled person)
- Children whose follow-up is not carried out in the centre
- Participation in another interventional or minimal risk trial
- Randomization criteria :
- Three days of taking antibiotics (IV or IM) (no interruption or discontinuation)
- Positive urine culture with Gram negative bacillus ≥ 10^4 UFC/mL
- Favorable clinical outcome at day of randomization (D2 or D3) defined by temperature < 38°C at day of randomization and absence of fever measured > 38°C for at least 12 hours AND no abdominal pain AND no feeding problem AND investigator agreement
- No renal abscess AND congenital anomalies of the kidney and genitourinary tract (other than vesicoureteral reflux and pyelocaliceal dilatation < 10 mm) on the renal ultrasound performed between D0 and day of randomization
- No more than 1 type of dominant bacteria on the urine culture
- Sensitivity to the initial antibiotic treatment
- Sensitivity to cefixime OR cotrimoxazole
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
15 sites in 1 country
France15 sites, 15 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Jean Verdier Hospital
Bondy, Seine St Denis, 93140
Aurelien Galerne, Dr, aurelien.galerne@aphp.fr
- Recruiting
Ambroise Paré hospital
Boulogne, Hauts de Seine, 92100
Bilade Cherqaoui, Dr, bilade.cherqaoui2@aphp.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Antoine Beclère Hospital
Clamart, Haut de Seine, 92140
Etienne Bizot, Dr, etienne.bizot@aphp.fr
- Not yet recruiting
CH Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, Essonne, 91100
Sébastien Rouget, Dr, sebastien.rouget@chsf.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Intercomunal Créteil Hospital
Créteil, Val de Marne, 94000
Juliette Daire, Dr, Juliette.Daire@chicreteil.fr
- Not yet recruiting
GHEF Site Marne la vallée
Jossigny
Nathalie Garrec, Dr, ngarrec@ghef.fr
- Recruiting
Andre mignot hospital
Le Chesnay, Yvelines, 78150
Sylvie Nathanson, Dr, snathanson@ch-versailles.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Kremlin Bicêtre Hospital
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val de Marne, 94270
Cécile Thivent, Dr, cecile.thivent@aphp.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Jeanne Flandre Hospital
Lille, Nord, 59000
François Dubos, Pr, francois.dubos@chu-lille.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Meaux Hospital
Meaux, Seine et Marne, 77100
Olivier Vignaud, Dr
- Not yet recruiting
Children-Teenager hospital
Nantes, Loire Atlantique, 44000
Justine Franco, Pr, justine.franco@chu-nantes.fr
- Recruiting
Paris-Saclay hospital
Orsay, Essonne, 91400
Jean Gaschignard, PhD, J.GASCHIGNARD@gh-nord-essonne.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Robert Debré Hospital
Paris, Paris, 75019
Jeanne Truong, Dr, jeanne.truong@aphp.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Robert Debré Hospital
Paris, Paris, 75019
Claire Ferrua, Dr, Claire.ferrua@aphp.fr
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse
Benjamin Hallak, Dr, hallak.b@chu-toulouse.fr
About this study
Official title: 3-day Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment Versus 3-day Intravenous Followed by 7-day Oral Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Pyelonephritis in Children 1 Month to 3 Years Old: a Non-inferiority Open Randomized Multicentric Clinical Trial
Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).
In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.
Read more
The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral to treat AP in children.
The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.
Read the detailed description
1.0 Hypothesis for the study
Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).
In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.
The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy to prevent long-term renal scarring.
The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and microbiological success, and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.
2.0 Description of knowledge relating to the condition in question
Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is the most common proven bacterial infection in pediatric clinical practice. It can lead to sepsis or renal abscess and induce long-term complications such as renal scarring. Renal scarring during childhood can lead to hypertension or chronic renal disease at adult age, although the link between AP and chronic renal disease has not been firmly established.
AP is most frequently due to Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) now account for 5% of AP in France and represent a serious threat to public health, owing to limited therapeutic options.
The overall clinical success rate in children treated for AP is around 95% and is not significantly different when ESBL-E are implicated. In children with no prior urological malformation, recurrence in the following 3 months occurs in less than 5% of cases. Antibiotic treatment decreases the risk of renal scarring, which remains important, around 15% (95% CI: 11-18) in the largest meta-analysis. Moreover, delay in treatment of AP is associated with permanent renal scarring.
In children without prior urological malformation, acute complications are exceptional, even in the presence of bacteraemia. Short courses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy have proved to be as efficient as longer courses (7-14 days) of IV treatment. For children aged ≥ 1 month, oral treatment alone for 10 to 14 days has proved non inferior to initial IV antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy (total 10 to 14 days).
French Paediatric guidelines recommend a short course (up to 4 days) of IV amikacin and/or ceftriaxone followed by oral therapy (total 10 days), with the possibility, for children aged > 3 months of a 10-day course of oral cefixime [12]. In children initially treated IV, the oral relay occurs once the urine culture and antibiogram are available. The American Association of Pediatrics that focused on children aged 2 to 24 months recommends either an oral or a sequential IV/oral treatment for a total of 7 to 14 days, while the British NICE guidelines recommend an exclusively oral route only for children aged ≥ 3 months
In practice, most centers initiate an IV treatment in a large subset of patients (ongoing practice analysis on the management of AP in children in France, personal data, to be published in 2021). An initial IV treatment is particularly used in young children, with an age cut-off varying between 3 months and 3 years according to the center. It is also used to secure the absorption of the treatment if the child vomits, is unable to take oral antibiotics or is severely unwell.
The excellent short-term and the good long-term clinical outcomes in children treated for AP questions the need for a 10-day course of antibiotics.
In adults, shorter treatments, such as amikacin for 5 days, have been validated for the treatment of uncomplicated AP.
Recently published studies (Zaoutis 2023, Montini 2024) have compared a 5-day oral treatment vs 10-day oral treatment for AP in children. However, the first study (Zaoutis 2023) mainly included (63%) children with a non-febrile urinary tract infection (ie not an AP). The second only included children aged > 3 month. A practice survey conducted prior to our protocol had shown that many departments were already reluctant to treat infants under 1 year old, and particularly those under 3 months old, by oral route, warranting clinical trials including children < 3 month old.
Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), such as ceftriaxone, rapidly reduce the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota and also select subpopulations of resistant bacteria, particularly by acquisition of extended spectrum beta-lactamases, a major public health issue.
There is no data on the impact of antibiotic relays on the gut microbiota. Since each antibiotic has its own anti-bacterial spectrum, a sequence of treatments could have an additive or even synergistic deleterious effect on the gut microbiota. This may in particular be the case in children treated with IV ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by cotrimoxazole for 7 days, as recommended in France in first intention.
3.0 Summary of relevant pre-clinical experiments and clinical trials
1999 Hoberman et al. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 14 days and intravenous ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. One of the outcomes was the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 24 months. A total of 306 children were included. Renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously. The study conclude that oral treatment was safe.
The main limit of the study was the lower rate of renal scar in both arms compared to other studies, probably linked to a female/male sex ratio of 9:1 (with a median age of 8 months), when the sex ratio is in favour of boys before 1-year-old.
2007, Montini et al. Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial This was a multicentre, randomised controlled, open labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial comparing oral co-amoxiclav for 10 days to parenteral ceftriaxone for three days, followed by oral co-amoxiclav for 7 days. Primary outcome was the rate of renal scarring after 12 months. A total of 502 children aged 1 month to <7 years with clinical pyelonephritis were included. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant differences between oral (n=244) and parenteral (n=258) treatment, both in the primary outcome (scarring scintigraphy at 12 months 27/197 (13.7%) v 36/203 (17.7%), and secondary outcomes: time to defervescence, white cell count at day 3, and percentage with sterile urine at day 3 (99.5% n both arms). The results were similar in the subgroups of children older and younger than 2 years (data not shown in the paper).
2012, Boquet et al. Randomized trial of oral versus sequential IV/oral antibiotic for acute pyelonephritis in children PHRC AOM 04 105; NCT00136656 This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 10 days and IV ceftriaxone for 4 days followed by oral cefixime for 6 days on the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 36 mont with a first proven urinary tract infection and procalcitonin concentration ≥ 0.5 ng/mL s. The primary endpoint was the proportion of renal scar measured by 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy 6 to 8 months after treatment. The study included a total 171 children of the 698 expected. The incidence of renal scarring was 30.8% in the oral treatment group and 27.3% for children who received the sequential treatment. The trial could not demonstrate statistically the non-inferiority due to insufficient enrolment.
2023, Zaoutis et al. Short-Course Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Children: The SCOUT Randomized Clinical Trial PMID: 37358858 ; NCT01595529, This was a randomized clinical noninferiority trial at 2 children's hospitals. Participants included children aged 2 months to 10 years with UTI exhibiting clinical improvement after 5 days of antimicrobials. The study compared another 5 days of antimicrobials (standard-course therapy) or 5 days of placebo (short-course therapy).
The primary outcome, treatment failure, was defined as symptomatic UTI at or before the first follow-up visit (day 11 to 14 A total of 664 children were randomized (639 female [96%]; median age, 4 years): 2 of 328 assigned to standard-course (0.6%) and 14 of 336 assigned to short-course (4.2%) had a treatment failure. There were no differences between groups in rates of UTI after the first follow-up visit, incidence of adverse events, or incidence of gastrointestinal colonization with resistant organisms.
2024, Montini et al. Short Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric febrile Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Trial. [25] PMID: 38146260 This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned children aged 3 months to 5 years with a noncomplicated fUTI to receive amoxicillin-clavulanate for 5 or 10 days.
The primary end point was the recurrence of a urinary tract infection within 30 days after the completion of therapy. Secondary end points were the difference in prevalence of clinical recovery, adverse drug-related events, and resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and/or to other antibiotics when a recurrent infection occurred.
The study included a total of,175 children and 142 underwent randomization. The recurrence rate of UTI within 30 days of the end of therapy was 2.8% (2/72) in the short group and 14.3% (10/70) in the standard group. The recurrence rate of fUTI within 30 days from the end of therapy was 1.4% (1/72) in the short group and 5.7% (4/70) in the standard group.
- Conditions
- Pyelonephritis Acute
- Being tested
- IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents, Fecal/Rectal Swab, PCT assay
- Keywords
- Pyelonephritis acute, Antibiotic therapies, Renal scar, Paediatric
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IV Antibacterial AgentsDrug
Ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) AND/OR Amikacin (20 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) during 3 days. .
Orally antibacterial agentsDrug
Cotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprime) 30mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) OR Cefixime 8mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) during 7 days
Fecal/Rectal SwabProcedure or surgery
Collected by the nurse or the physician (D0,D3,D10 or 17 and D31 or D38), either by a rectal swab, either by fecal swab (dip of the swab in fresh stools < 4 hours, which will occur frequently in our population of children aged 1 month to 3 years, and will in particular be possible for hospitalized children) using a FecalSwabTM, that contains a transport medium.
PCT assayProcedure or surgery
Dosage of procalcitonin (if not performed in standard care) at D0
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatment | Experimental | For patients randomized in the experimental group, the patient receives 3-day IV therapy and the treatment is interrupted. Receives: Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents; Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab; Procedure: PCT assay |
| Control group: Usual practice | Other | For patients randomized in the control group, the treatment for acute pyelonephritis is based on the attending clinician's practice and according to the usual practice: 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy. Receives: Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents; Drug: Orally antibacterial agents; Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab; Procedure: PCT assay |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy versus a 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of AP in children in term of the is recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection within a 28 -days period after the completion of antibiotic treatment respectively at D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group..
The recurrence will be defined as:
fever ≥ 38°C associated with a positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram-negative bacillus ≥ 10^4 UFC/mL
Measured: 28 days (± 3 days) after the completion of antibiotic treatment.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clinical cure
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day IV antibiotic treatment versus a 3-day IV followed by 7-day oral antibiotic treatment for AP in children 1 month to 3 years old in terms of clinical cure, defined by apyrexia AND absence of signs suggestive or urinary infection (abdominal pain, urinary function signs) AND no feeding problem collecting during a medical visit. .
Measured: D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.
Recurrence of AP
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day IV antibiotic treatment versus a 3-day IV/IM followed by 7-day oral antibiotic treatment for AP in children 1 month to 3 years old in terms of recurrence of AP collecting during a phone call.
Measured: 90 days after the beginning of therapy
Colonization with antimicriobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Compare between the two treament arms the rate of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the gastrointestinal tract
Measured: days of randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group
Bacterial diversity of the intestinal microbiota
Compare between the two treament arms the bacterial diversity of the intestinal microbiota : alpha-diversity measured by Shannon's index.
Measured: Inclusion, randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) and D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group, and D17 (+/- 3 days) and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2022
- Study start22 Mar 2023
- Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pyelonephritis AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Open, multicentric, parallel group non-inferiority clinical trial with 1:1 randomization
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean GASCHIGNARD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Paris-Saclay
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05544565
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP211043
- Other IDs
- 2021-005627-21
- Acronym
- PYELOCOURT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 3-day Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment Versus 3-day Intravenous Followed by 7-day Oral Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Pyelonephritis in Children 1 Month to 3 Years Old: a Non-inferiority Open Randomized Multicentric Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05544565
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PYELOCOURT / APHP211043
- Conditions
- Pyelonephritis Acute
- Keywords
- Pyelonephritis acute, Antibiotic therapies, Renal scar, Paediatric
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 480 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).
In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.
The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral to treat AP in children.
The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.
Detailed description
1.0 Hypothesis for the study
Antibiotic therapies currently recommended for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis (AP) in children, whether fully by the oral route or initially intravenous (IV, 3 days) followed by the oral route, have a duration of 7 to 14 days (10 days in France).
In children with no prior urological malformation, the global clinical and microbiological cure rate after antibiotic treatment completion is around 95%. Recurrence occurs in less than 5% of cases in the 3 months following AP. Renal scarring, when documented, concerns 15% of children 6 months after treatment. Renal scarring can be associated with chronic renal disease.
The investigators hypothesize that 3 days of IV treatment is equivalent to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy to prevent long-term renal scarring.
The investigators also hypothesize that while achieving equivalent clinical and microbiological success, and prevention of re-infections in the following 3 months, 3 days of IV treatment reduces the risk of acquisition of resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae and increases the gut microbotia diversity compared to extending to 10 days with an oral therapy.
2.0 Description of knowledge relating to the condition in question
Acute pyelonephritis (AP) is the most common proven bacterial infection in pediatric clinical practice. It can lead to sepsis or renal abscess and induce long-term complications such as renal scarring. Renal scarring during childhood can lead to hypertension or chronic renal disease at adult age, although the link between AP and chronic renal disease has not been firmly established.
AP is most frequently due to Enterobacteriaceae, mainly Escherichia coli. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) now account for 5% of AP in France and represent a serious threat to public health, owing to limited therapeutic options.
The overall clinical success rate in children treated for AP is around 95% and is not significantly different when ESBL-E are implicated. In children with no prior urological malformation, recurrence in the following 3 months occurs in less than 5% of cases. Antibiotic treatment decreases the risk of renal scarring, which remains important, around 15% (95% CI: 11-18) in the largest meta-analysis. Moreover, delay in treatment of AP is associated with permanent renal scarring.
In children without prior urological malformation, acute complications are exceptional, even in the presence of bacteraemia. Short courses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy have proved to be as efficient as longer courses (7-14 days) of IV treatment. For children aged ≥ 1 month, oral treatment alone for 10 to 14 days has proved non inferior to initial IV antibiotics (2-4 days) followed by oral therapy (total 10 to 14 days).
French Paediatric guidelines recommend a short course (up to 4 days) of IV amikacin and/or ceftriaxone followed by oral therapy (total 10 days), with the possibility, for children aged > 3 months of a 10-day course of oral cefixime [12]. In children initially treated IV, the oral relay occurs once the urine culture and antibiogram are available. The American Association of Pediatrics that focused on children aged 2 to 24 months recommends either an oral or a sequential IV/oral treatment for a total of 7 to 14 days, while the British NICE guidelines recommend an exclusively oral route only for children aged ≥ 3 months
In practice, most centers initiate an IV treatment in a large subset of patients (ongoing practice analysis on the management of AP in children in France, personal data, to be published in 2021). An initial IV treatment is particularly used in young children, with an age cut-off varying between 3 months and 3 years according to the center. It is also used to secure the absorption of the treatment if the child vomits, is unable to take oral antibiotics or is severely unwell.
The excellent short-term and the good long-term clinical outcomes in children treated for AP questions the need for a 10-day course of antibiotics.
In adults, shorter treatments, such as amikacin for 5 days, have been validated for the treatment of uncomplicated AP.
Recently published studies (Zaoutis 2023, Montini 2024) have compared a 5-day oral treatment vs 10-day oral treatment for AP in children. However, the first study (Zaoutis 2023) mainly included (63%) children with a non-febrile urinary tract infection (ie not an AP). The second only included children aged > 3 month. A practice survey conducted prior to our protocol had shown that many departments were already reluctant to treat infants under 1 year old, and particularly those under 3 months old, by oral route, warranting clinical trials including children < 3 month old.
Third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), such as ceftriaxone, rapidly reduce the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota and also select subpopulations of resistant bacteria, particularly by acquisition of extended spectrum beta-lactamases, a major public health issue.
There is no data on the impact of antibiotic relays on the gut microbiota. Since each antibiotic has its own anti-bacterial spectrum, a sequence of treatments could have an additive or even synergistic deleterious effect on the gut microbiota. This may in particular be the case in children treated with IV ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by cotrimoxazole for 7 days, as recommended in France in first intention.
3.0 Summary of relevant pre-clinical experiments and clinical trials
1999 Hoberman et al. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 14 days and intravenous ceftriaxone for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days. One of the outcomes was the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 24 months. A total of 306 children were included. Renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously. The study conclude that oral treatment was safe.
The main limit of the study was the lower rate of renal scar in both arms compared to other studies, probably linked to a female/male sex ratio of 9:1 (with a median age of 8 months), when the sex ratio is in favour of boys before 1-year-old.
2007, Montini et al. Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial This was a multicentre, randomised controlled, open labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial comparing oral co-amoxiclav for 10 days to parenteral ceftriaxone for three days, followed by oral co-amoxiclav for 7 days. Primary outcome was the rate of renal scarring after 12 months. A total of 502 children aged 1 month to <7 years with clinical pyelonephritis were included. Intention to treat analysis showed no significant differences between oral (n=244) and parenteral (n=258) treatment, both in the primary outcome (scarring scintigraphy at 12 months 27/197 (13.7%) v 36/203 (17.7%), and secondary outcomes: time to defervescence, white cell count at day 3, and percentage with sterile urine at day 3 (99.5% n both arms). The results were similar in the subgroups of children older and younger than 2 years (data not shown in the paper).
2012, Boquet et al. Randomized trial of oral versus sequential IV/oral antibiotic for acute pyelonephritis in children PHRC AOM 04 105; NCT00136656 This was a non-inferiority study between oral cefixime for 10 days and IV ceftriaxone for 4 days followed by oral cefixime for 6 days on the occurrence of renal scarring. It included children aged 1 to 36 mont with a first proven urinary tract infection and procalcitonin concentration ≥ 0.5 ng/mL s. The primary endpoint was the proportion of renal scar measured by 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy 6 to 8 months after treatment. The study included a total 171 children of the 698 expected. The incidence of renal scarring was 30.8% in the oral treatment group and 27.3% for children who received the sequential treatment. The trial could not demonstrate statistically the non-inferiority due to insufficient enrolment.
2023, Zaoutis et al. Short-Course Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Children: The SCOUT Randomized Clinical Trial PMID: 37358858 ; NCT01595529, This was a randomized clinical noninferiority trial at 2 children's hospitals. Participants included children aged 2 months to 10 years with UTI exhibiting clinical improvement after 5 days of antimicrobials. The study compared another 5 days of antimicrobials (standard-course therapy) or 5 days of placebo (short-course therapy).
The primary outcome, treatment failure, was defined as symptomatic UTI at or before the first follow-up visit (day 11 to 14 A total of 664 children were randomized (639 female [96%]; median age, 4 years): 2 of 328 assigned to standard-course (0.6%) and 14 of 336 assigned to short-course (4.2%) had a treatment failure. There were no differences between groups in rates of UTI after the first follow-up visit, incidence of adverse events, or incidence of gastrointestinal colonization with resistant organisms.
2024, Montini et al. Short Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric febrile Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Trial. [25] PMID: 38146260 This was a multicenter, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. We randomly assigned children aged 3 months to 5 years with a noncomplicated fUTI to receive amoxicillin-clavulanate for 5 or 10 days.
The primary end point was the recurrence of a urinary tract infection within 30 days after the completion of therapy. Secondary end points were the difference in prevalence of clinical recovery, adverse drug-related events, and resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and/or to other antibiotics when a recurrent infection occurred.
The study included a total of,175 children and 142 underwent randomization. The recurrence rate of UTI within 30 days of the end of therapy was 2.8% (2/72) in the short group and 14.3% (10/70) in the standard group. The recurrence rate of fUTI within 30 days from the end of therapy was 1.4% (1/72) in the short group and 5.7% (4/70) in the standard group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Open, multicentric, parallel group non-inferiority clinical trial with 1:1 randomization
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatment | Experimental | Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents, Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab, Procedure: PCT assayFor patients randomized in the experimental group, the patient receives 3-day IV therapy and the treatment is interrupted. |
| Control group: Usual practice | Other | Drug: IV Antibacterial Agents, Drug: Orally antibacterial agents, Procedure: Fecal/Rectal Swab, Procedure: PCT assayFor patients randomized in the control group, the treatment for acute pyelonephritis is based on the attending clinician's practice and according to the usual practice: 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 3 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (32 listed)
- Age ≥ 1 month and < 3 years
- For children younger than 3 months, gestational age > 34 WA
- First episode of urinary tract infection
- AP defined by temperature ≥ 38°C on day of diagnosis AND positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram- negative bacillus ≥ 104 UFC/mL. The child temperature will have to be measured with a thermometer according to the French national recommendations [Health Insurance website (AMELI ;see: - https://www.ameli. fr/assure/sante/bons-gestes/soins/prendre-temperature); HAS (see: https://www.has-sante. fr/jcms/c_2674284/fr/prise-en-charge-de-la-fievre-chez-l-enfant)].
- Initial treatment by either ceftriaxone AND/OR amikacin
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IV Antibacterial AgentsCeftriaxone (50 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) AND/OR Amikacin (20 mg/kg once a day by intravenous/intramuscular route) during 3 days. . | Drug | Control group: Usual practice, Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatment |
| Orally antibacterial agentsCotrimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprime) 30mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) OR Cefixime 8mg/kg/day (2 divided doses) during 7 days | Drug | Control group: Usual practice |
| Fecal/Rectal SwabCollected by the nurse or the physician (D0,D3,D10 or 17 and D31 or D38), either by a rectal swab, either by fecal swab (dip of the swab in fresh stools < 4 hours, which will occur frequently in our population of children aged 1 month to 3 years, and will in particular be possible for hospitalized children) using a FecalSwabTM, that contains a transport medium. | Procedure or surgery | Control group: Usual practice, Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatment |
| PCT assayDosage of procalcitonin (if not performed in standard care) at D0 | Procedure or surgery | Control group: Usual practice, Experimental group: Discontinuation of treatment |
Primary outcome
Recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection
Time frame: 28 days (± 3 days) after the completion of antibiotic treatment.
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 3-day intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy versus a 3-day IV therapy followed by a 7-day oral antibiotic therapy for the treatment of AP in children in term of the is recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection within a 28 -days period after the completion of antibiotic treatment respectively at D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.. The recurrence will be defined as: fever ≥ 38°C associated with a positive urinalysis (white cell counts ≥ 10^4/mL) with a positive urine culture with one Gram-negative bacillus ≥ 10^4 UFC/mL
4 secondary outcomes
Clinical cure
Time frame: D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.
Recurrence of AP
Time frame: 90 days after the beginning of therapy
Colonization with antimicriobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Time frame: days of randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group and D17 (+/- 3 days) for the control group
Bacterial diversity of the intestinal microbiota
Time frame: Inclusion, randomization and at D10 (+/- 3 days) and D31 (+/- 3 days) for the experimental group, and D17 (+/- 3 days) and D38 (+/- 3 days) for the control group.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2026.
Related trials for Pyelonephritis Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
This is a Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Ertapenem-zidebactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adult Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections(cUTI), Acute Pyelonephritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-World Study of Obstructive Upper Urinary Tract Stones and Acute Pyelonephritis
Urolithiasis, Strategy Training
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem-Vaborbactam in Children With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Acute Pyelonephritis
Acute Pyelonephritis, Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Diagnosis of Abdominal Pain Using RNA Levels: The NATURAL Study
Intra Abdominal Infections, Appendicitis Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jean GASCHIGNARD, PhD principal investigator
Hôpital Paris-Saclay
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing IV Antibacterial Agents, Orally antibacterial agents and Fecal/Rectal Swab in people with Pyelonephritis Acute, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 15 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 32 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jean GASCHIGNARD, PhD (+33 1 69 15 96 00, j.gaschignard@ghne.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection (time frame: 28 days (± 3 days) after the completion of antibiotic treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.