AzTrials
AzTrials

Financial StressNCT05541653

The IGNITE Study on Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods

A study testing Financial Well-being Interventions and Place-based Interventions in people with Financial Stress and Economic Problems, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Black Americans in the US fare worse across nearly every health indicator compared to White individuals. In Philadelphia, the location of this study, these health disparities culminate in a stark longevity gap, with average life expectancies in poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods being 20 years lower than in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Financial Well-being Interventions and Place-based Interventions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
571 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Sep 2022to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Have the ability to communicate via text messaging
  • Individuals comfortable communicating in English
  • A permanent resident of the home where they are to be enrolled
  • Have knowledge of their household finances

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who plan to move out of the study microcluster within 6 months
  • Individuals who are unable to fully consent and participate based on recruitment team assessment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Philadelphia Neighborhoods

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 00000

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods to Address Structural Racism as a Fundamental Cause of Poor Health

Black Americans in the US fare worse across nearly every health indicator compared to White individuals. In Philadelphia, the location of this study, these health disparities culminate in a stark longevity gap, with average life expectancies in poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods being 20 years lower than in nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhoods. The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a suite of place-based and financial-wellbeing interventions at the community, organization, and individual/household levels that address the social determinants of racial health disparities. At the community level, the investigators address underinvestment in Black neighborhoods by implementing vacant lot greening, abandoned house remediation, tree planting, and trash cleanup. At the organization level, the investigators partner with community-based financial empowerment providers to develop cross-organizational infrastructure to increase reach and maximize efficiency. At the individual/household levels, the investigators increase access to public benefits, financial counseling and tax preparation services, and emergency cash assistance. The investigators will test this "big push" intervention in 60 Black neighborhood microclusters, with a total of 720 adults. The investigators hypothesize that this "big push" intervention will have significant impact on overall health and wellbeing.

Read the detailed description

Black individuals in the United States fare worse than White individuals across almost every social, economic, and health indicator. The Black health disadvantage starts at birth, reflecting the cumulative toll of racialized social stressors and healthcare discrimination on maternal health and resulting in higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight. Black youth are disproportionately exposed to environmental toxins such as lead and adverse childhood events such as financial hardship and neighborhood violence. Black adults have higher rates of chronic disease, including diabetes, hypertension, as well as many cancers. These and other forces culminate in a stark racial longevity gap: in Philadelphia, the location of this study, life expectancy for people living in a poor, predominantly Black neighborhood is 20 years lower than for people living in a nearby affluent, predominantly White neighborhood.

The fundamental cause of these striking and pervasive disparities is structural racism - the confluence of deep historical, institutional, cultural, and ideological forces that unequally distribute resources and risks across racialized groups. Structural racism patterns health by affecting a range of interconnected, mutually reinforcing social determinants of health at the national, neighborhood, household, and individual levels. Most notably, longstanding, systematic disinvestment has resulted in highly segregated Black neighborhoods with dilapidated environmental conditions and severe economic insecurity within Black households, leading to a "feedback loop of concentrated racial disadvantage," all of which have been strongly tied to poor health.

Most interventions seeking to address racial health disparities focus on individual-level behaviors and outcomes, or individual channels by which structural racism harms health. However, by failing to address upstream social determinants, these interventions have had limited population level impact. A multi-level, multi-component intervention package focused on a range of social determinants of health is necessary to meaningfully address structural racism as a fundamental cause of racial health disparities.

Being tested
Financial Well-being Interventions, Place-based Interventions
Medical subject headings
Financial Stress, Health Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Financial Well-being InterventionsOther

    Tax preparation; access to public benefits; financial counseling and microgrants

  • Place-based InterventionsOther

    Vacant lot greening; abandoned house remediation; trash cleanup; and tree planting.

Study groups in NCT05541653
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalAt the individual level, participants in the intervention arm receive place-based and financial well-being interventions. These include, at the individual level: * Tax preparation * Access to public benefits * Financial counseling and microgrants At the neighborhood level: * Abandoned house remediation * Trash cleanup * Vacant lot greening * Tree planting
Receives: Other: Financial Well-being Interventions; Other: Place-based Interventions
ControlNo interventionParticipants in the control arm will not receive any of the listed interventions.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Health Index

    Composite index using method of Anderson (2008) based on three questions: rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent); rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse); and number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation); (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Psychological Distress

    Kessler-6 (answers scored 0-24 with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological distress)

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Overall health

    Rating of overall health (5-pt Likert ranging from poor to excellent) (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Poor health

    Whether individual reported either poor or fair health to overall health question (Oregon Health Insurance Experiment)

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Change in overall health

    Rating of how health has changed in last 6 months (better, same, worse)

    Measured: 24 months

  4. Healthy days

    Number of days in the last 30 where physical or mental health precluded engagement in usual activities (self-care, work, recreation)

    Measured: 24 months

  5. Sleep duration

    Number of hours of usual sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

    Measured: 24 months

  6. Short sleep

    Less than seven hours of usual night sleep (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

    Measured: 24 months

  7. Healthcare access

    Received all needed care in the last 6 months (Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)

    Measured: 24 months

  8. Financial well-being

    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Abbreviated Financial Well-being Survey

    Measured: 24 months

  9. Food insecurity

    Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement Screener

    Measured: 24 months

  10. Income tax filing

    Whether or not individual (or someone in household on behalf of individual) filed previous years income tax (yes, planning to file late, no) (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  11. Home ownership

    Whether or not individual owns house, condo, or mobile home (Add Health)

    Measured: 24 months

  12. Owing on mortgage

    Whether or not individual has remaining mortgage payments (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  13. Total debt

    Amount of debt added altogether, not including mortgage (Add Health)

    Measured: 24 months

  14. Participation in public medical benefit programs

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare savings, LIS, CHIP, Qualified Health Plans, SelectPlan, other, or none (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  15. Participation in public food benefit programs

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in SNAP, WIC, Senior Food Box, other, or none (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  16. Participation in public income support or cash benefit programs

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in TANF, LIHEAP, SSI/SSDI, UI, PA General Assistance, PA Emergency Rental Assistance, EITC, CTC Refugee Cash Assistance, CCIS, PA Child Care Tax Credit, other, or none (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  17. Participation in public home ownership benefit programs

    Participation of a household member (including respondent) in PTRR, Homestead Exemption, LOOP, Basic Systems Repair Program, PA Homeowner Assistance, Philly First Home Program, Philadelphia Home Repair Assistance, other or none (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  18. Frequency of greenspace engagment

    Frequency with which individual visits a greenspace (such as a park, garden, greened vacant lot, trail, or any other outdoor space with vegetation) (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)

    Measured: 24 months

  19. Time spent in greenspace

    Time spent in a greenspace on a typical day (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior))

    Measured: 24 months

  20. Reasons for not spending time in greenspace

    Things that stop an individual from spending time in greenspace (adapted from Evenson et al 2013 Environment and Behavior)

    Measured: 24 months

  21. Perception of tree cover

    Beliefs about number of trees in the neighborhood (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  22. Tree planting concerns

    Whether or not individual has concerns about planting more trees in neighborhood (internally developed)

    Measured: 24 months

  23. Perceived tree health benefits

    Whether or not individual believes trees confer health benefits (e.g., safety, mental health benefits, physical health benefits, social benefits, environmental benefits, aesthetic benefits)

    Measured: 24 months

  24. Perceived stress

    Perceived Stress Scale (responses scored 0-16 with higher scores correlated to higher stress)

    Measured: 24 months

  25. Time spent in neighborhood

    Frequency with which individual endorses spending time relaxing, socializing, or hanging out in porches, stoops, and front yards of neighborhoods (adapted from Kahneman et al 2004 Science)

    Measured: 24 months

  26. Neighborhood social capital

    Neighborhood Social Cohesion \& Exchange and Social \& Physical Disorder Scale (two domains: Social Cohesion and Physical Disorder. Higher scores for social cohesion indicate higher levels of social cohesion and higher scores for physical disorder indicate higher levels of physical disorder).

    Measured: 24 months

  27. Physical disorder

    Whether or not participant reports a lot of abandoned buildings in their neighborhood (Ross and Mirowksi)

    Measured: 24 months

  28. Neighborhood crime rates

    Overall number of crimes, number of violent crimes, serious crimes, and gun related incidents

    Measured: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) post study completion

  29. Nuisance calls

    Number of 311 calls and number of 311 calls for neighborhood cleanup and remediation-related issues

    Measured: Quarterly data from 24 months (8 quarters) prior to enrollment and 12 months (4 quarters) post study completion

  30. Hospitalizations

    Number of Hospitalizations

    Measured: Quarterly/monthly data from 8 quarters/24 months prior to enrollment and at the completion of enrollment

  31. Emergency department (ED) visits

    Number of ED visits

    Measured: Quarterly/monthly data from 8 quarters/24 months prior to enrollment and at the completion of enrollment

  32. Ambulatory visits

    Number of ambulatory visits

    Measured: Quarterly/monthly data from 8 quarters/24 months prior to enrollment and at the completion of enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2022
  2. Study start29 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
571 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05541653
Sponsor's protocol ID
850178
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
2 Sep 2022
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Financial Well-being Interventions and Place-based Interventions in people with Financial Stress and Economic Problems, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Health Index (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in