AzTrials
AzTrials

Extrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaNCT05519319

Safety and Efficacy of PDT vs RFA vs PDT+RFA for the Treatment of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

A study testing RFA, PDT and RFA combined with PDT in people with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Bile Duct Cancer, run by First People's Hospital of Hangzhou at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

A median survival period of 3 to 6 months is the prognosis for patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable EHCC, effective management of tumor growth is the only option to increase stent patency and survival time. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
RFA, PDT and RFA combined with PDT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma;
  • unresectable cholangiocarcinoma due to local infiltration of major vessels according to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or endoscopic ultrasound(EUS);
  • No previous treatment;
  • Adequate bone marrow and organ function (white blood cells>4.0×109/L, hemoglobin>90 g/L, and platelets>75×109/L, serum creatinine<2.0 mg/dl);
  • A Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score ≥ 50;
  • Signed written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Imaging examination (CT, MRCP, EUS) showed distant metastasis of liver, lung and other organs;
  • Coexistent with other malignant tumors;
  • Pregnant or nursing women;
  • Previous gastrointestinal diversion;
  • Participation in another study during the month before enrollment in this study;
  • Alcohol and/or substance abuse or potentially poor compliance per a doctor's judgment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hangzhou First People's Hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006

    Jianfeng Yang, 13454132186

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Clinical Effect and Safety of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Photodynamic Therapy Plus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

A median survival period of 3 to 6 months is the prognosis for patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable EHCC, effective management of tumor growth is the only option to increase stent patency and survival time. In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is therapy that has been shown to improve stent patency and overall survival (OS). Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been demonstrated in numerous studies to prolong the life spans of individuals with malignant biliary obstruction . In the literature, comparing the clinical efficacy and adverse outcomes of these two endoscopic procedures is rare.

Read the detailed description

The lower common bile duct and the hepatic hilar area are the origin of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). Patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC have a relatively poor prognosis, with a median survival time of 3 to 6 months. The only way to prolong stent patency and survival for patients with unresectable locally advanced EHCC is by active control of tumor development. The only treatment that has consistently demonstrated an improvement in stent patency and overall survival (OS) in cholangiocarcinoma patients is photodynamic therapy (PDT). The popularity of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has grown recently in an effort to increase stent patency and survival time for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.RFA for biliary cholangiocarcinoma has demonstrated safety and effectiveness. Endoscopic RFA has been shown in various studies to prolong stent patency and the survival of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. The clinical effectiveness and adverse events of these two endoscopic treatments have not been compared in many papers.

Being tested
RFA, PDT, RFA combined with PDT
Keywords
Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Photodynamic therapy, Radiofrequency ablation
Medical subject headings
Cholangiocarcinoma, Bile Duct Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RFAProcedure or surgery

    Also called ERCP guided

    RFA will be performed

  • PDTProcedure or surgery

    Also called ERCP guided

    PDT will be performed

  • RFA combined with PDTProcedure or surgery

    Also called ERCP guided

    RFA and PDT will be performed

Study groups in NCT05519319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Photodynamic therapy(PDT)Active comparatorThe PDT optical fiber was inserted through the dilation catheterand advanced toward the bile duct stenosis point under visual-radiography. The dilation catheter was then withdrawn to leave the PDT optical fiber directly across the stricture. Photoactivation was performed at 640 nm using a diode laser at a light dose of 180 J/cm2at power density of300 mW/cm2 and irradiation time of 600 s.
Receives: Procedure: PDT
Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)Active comparatorAn RFA electrode (Habib EndoHPB, EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was advanced along the guide wire into the bile duct and to the biliary stricture under X-ray fluoroscopic guidance. A 400 kHz RF generator (RITA 1500X, Angio Dynamics, USA) was connected for RFA at 7-10 W for 90 seconds.
Receives: Procedure: RFA
RFA+PDTActive comparatorThe PDT optical fiber was inserted through the dilation catheterand advanced toward the bile duct stenosis point under visual-radiography. The dilation catheter was then withdrawn to leave the PDT optical fiber directly across the stricture. Photoactivation was performed at 640 nm using a diode laser at a light dose of 180 J/cm2at power density of300 mW/cm2 and irradiation time of 600 s. After that An RFA electrode (Habib EndoHPB, EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was advanced along the guide wire into the bile duct and to the biliary stricture under X-ray fluoroscopic guidance. A 400 kHz RF generator (RITA 1500X, Angio Dynamics, USA) was connected for RFA at 7-10 W for 90 seconds.
Receives: Procedure: RFA combined with PDT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from initial RFA or PDT to death or the end of the study.

    Measured: Three years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Adverse events

    Number of patients with adverse events

    Measured: Three years

  2. Progression-free survival(PFS)

    PFS was measured from therapy until the date of disease progression or death

    Measured: Three years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Aug 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Three parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05519319
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-01
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
24 Aug 2022
Last updated
21 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Yet not decided

Publications

  • Gao DJ, Yang JF, Ma SR, Wu J, Wang TT, Jin HB, Xia MX, Zhang YC, Shen HZ, Ye X, Zhang XF, Hu B. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jul;94(1):91-100.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

    PubMed 33359435
  • Chen P, Yang T, Shi P, Shen J, Feng Q, Su J. Benefits and safety of photodynamic therapy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102712. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102712. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

    PubMed 34995788
  • Li Z, Jiang X, Xiao H, Chen S, Zhu W, Lu H, Cao L, Xue P, Li H, Zhang D. Long-term results of ERCP- or PTCS-directed photodynamic therapy for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5655-5664. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08095-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

    PubMed 33104917
  • Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Jin H, Lou Q, Zhang X. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):751-760. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124870. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

    PubMed 29342492

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in