Parastomal HerniaNCT05514600
Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair
A study testing closure of parastomal hernia fascial defect in people with Parastomal Hernia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Fascial closure was not originally a routine component of minimally invasive parastomal hernia repairs, but several recent advancements have made fascial closure more common in this context. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parastomal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- closure of parastomal hernia fascial defect
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Sep 2022to 20 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years or older
- End or loop-end stoma with a parastomal defect - candidate for minimally invasive Sugarbaker repair at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
- Anticipated parastomal fascial defect should not exceed 7cm in any direction
- Patient able to tolerate a minimally invasive repair, the surgeon can achieve minimally invasive access and complete a minimally invasive adhesiolysis.
- Bowel able to be lateralized at least 4cm beyond the edge of the parastomal fascial defect
Who cannot join
- Loop stoma
- Parastomal fascial defect >7cm
- Concomitant ventral defect or complexity of the repair warrants open repair at the discretion of the staff surgeon
- Minimally invasive Sugarbaker repair with intraperitoneal mesh cannot be achieved.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Impact of Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair
Fascial closure was not originally a routine component of minimally invasive parastomal hernia repairs, but several recent advancements have made fascial closure more common in this context. These include barbed self-locking sutures that aid intracorporeal fascial closure under tension, and wristed instrumentation offered by the robotic platform when available. The investigator aims to characterize the clinical significance of closing the fascia adjacent to the stoma during a MIS parastomal hernia repair.
The investigator hypothesizes that fascial closure will not have a significant impact on postoperative stoma specific quality of life but will reduce long-term recurrence.
Read the detailed description
This trial will follow the same methodology of data collection employed in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed by the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health. The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry will serve as the main platform for data collection. This will be a single-institution study, performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) hospital in Ohio. Enrollment and surgeries are anticipated to occur at Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health located at Main Campus.
After minimally invasive access and completion of adhesiolysis the surgeon will determine if a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker repair can be achieved. Those patients who cannot be repaired by a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker technique or who convert to an open procedure will be considered screen failures. For those able to be repaired with a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker technique, patients will be randomized to parastomal fascial closure with a running #1 Stratafix symmetric or not. Management of concomitant non-stoma defects that will also be covered with intraperitoneal mesh will be managed at the surgeon's discretion. Surgeons should achieve at least 4cm of mesh overlap from the edge of the parastomal fascial edge before closure. The edge of the mesh can be secured with sutures or tacks at the surgeon's discretion and details will be collected per standard of care in the ACHQC.
Baseline patient demographic information, medical co-morbidities, hernia characteristics, operative details, and 30-day outcomes are already captured within the ACHQC database, allowing for follow-up, and data capture with decreased effort outside of routine care. Baseline patient eligibility criteria will be obtained at initial patient recruitment, and baseline ACHQC questionnaires will be completed following patient consent. Standard of care questionnaires include information on baseline opioid consumption, the PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument, and Hernia Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQles). Patients will be required to complete these forms at each clinic visit, or via telephone contact, as this is standard procedure for all patients in our hernia practice. Follow-up will be targeted at 30 +/- 15 days, 1 year ± 4 months, and 2 years ± 6 months with CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis done at the 1 and 2 year time points which is the standard of care for Cleveland Clinic.
Non-standard of care outcome measures, operative time, parastomal defect dimensions (can be separate and distinct in the presence of a concomitant ventral hernia) and randomization will be stored in RedCAP®. Additional tools include the Colostomy Impact Score, which assesses stoma-specific quality of life and will be attained at baseline, 30-days, 1 year, and 2 years. Finally, decision regret using the decision regret scale will be assessed at 30-days, 1 year, and 2 years.
- Conditions
- Parastomal Hernia
- Being tested
- closure of parastomal hernia fascial defect
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
closure of parastomal hernia fascial defectProcedure or surgery
For subjects randomized to the fascial closure arm, the parastomal defect will be closed using barbed, running suture prior to placement of the mesh.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fascial closure | Active comparator | This arm will have the parastomal fascial defect closed with a running barbed suture prior to mesh placement. Receives: Procedure: closure of parastomal hernia fascial defect |
| No fascial closure | No intervention | This arm will undergo mesh placement +/- fixation without the fascial defect being closed prior. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Stoma specific quality of life score (1 year)
The investigators will compare stoma-specific quality of life score using the Colostomy Impact Score (a patient reported survey with 7 questions with a range of 0-38 and higher scores indicating more negative impact on quality of life) at 1 year +/-4 months after minimally invasive Sugarbaker parastomal repair with and without parastomal fascial closure.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (10)
Stoma specific quality of life score (30 days)
The investigators will compare stoma-specific quality of life using the Colostomy Impact Score at 30+/-15 days after surgery in both groups. Colostomy Impact score is a patient reported survey with 7 questions with a range of 0-38 and higher scores indicating more negative impact on quality of life.
Measured: 30 days
Stoma specific quality of life score (2 years)
The investigators will compare stoma-specific quality of life using the Colostomy Impact Score at 2 years +/-6 months after surgery in both groups. Colostomy Impact score is a patient reported survey with 7 questions with a range of 0-38 and higher scores indicating more negative impact on quality of life.
Measured: 2 years
Recurrence
The investigators will compare composite parastomal hernia recurrence at 1 year +/- 4 months and 2 years +/- 6 months including patient reported bulge, clinical examination, and CT scan.
Measured: 2 years
Pain Intensity
The investigators will compare Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Pain Intensity) 3a scores at baseline, 30+/-15 days, 1 year +/- 4 months, and 2 years +/- 6 months. PROMIS is a scale from 30.7- 71.8 with higher numbers indicating higher pain.
Measured: 2 years
Abdominal Wall Specific Quality of Life
The investigators will compare Hernia Related Quality of Life Survey (HerQLes) score at baseline, 30+/-15 days, 1 year +/- 4 months and 2 years +/- 6 months. HerQLes is a 12 question survey with a score that is converted to a numeric score between 0-100, where a higher score indicates better quality of life.
Measured: 2 years
Length of stay
The investigators will compare length of stay in days during the index admission between the two groups.
Measured: 30 days
Ileus
The investigators will compare incidence of ileus, defined as nasogastric tube placement, between the two groups within the first 30+/-15 days after surgery.
Measured: 30 days
Opioid consumption
The investigators will compare opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents between the two groups at 30+/-15 days after surgery.
Measured: 30 days
Wound morbidity
The investigators will compare incidence of wound morbidity (including surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention, and reoperation) between the two groups at 30+/-15 days.
Measured: 30 days
Decision Regret
The investigators will compare patient decision regret between the two groups using the Decision Regret Scale (a five question patient reported survey that is scored from 0-100, with lower scores indicate less regret) at 30+/-15 days, 1 year +/-4 months, and 2 years +/- 6 months.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2022
- Study start8 Sep 2022
- Primary completion20 May 2023
- Study completion20 May 2023
Why it stopped: Slower than expected enrollment and early hernia recurrence
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parastomal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Clayton Petro, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05514600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-634
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05514600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22-634
- Conditions
- Parastomal Hernia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slower than expected enrollment and early hernia recurrence
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fascial closure was not originally a routine component of minimally invasive parastomal hernia repairs, but several recent advancements have made fascial closure more common in this context. These include barbed self-locking sutures that aid intracorporeal fascial closure under tension, and wristed instrumentation offered by the robotic platform when available. The investigator aims to characterize the clinical significance of closing the fascia adjacent to the stoma during a MIS parastomal hernia repair.
The investigator hypothesizes that fascial closure will not have a significant impact on postoperative stoma specific quality of life but will reduce long-term recurrence.
Detailed description
This trial will follow the same methodology of data collection employed in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed by the Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health. The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry will serve as the main platform for data collection. This will be a single-institution study, performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) hospital in Ohio. Enrollment and surgeries are anticipated to occur at Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health located at Main Campus.
After minimally invasive access and completion of adhesiolysis the surgeon will determine if a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker repair can be achieved. Those patients who cannot be repaired by a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker technique or who convert to an open procedure will be considered screen failures. For those able to be repaired with a minimally invasive intraperitoneal Sugarbaker technique, patients will be randomized to parastomal fascial closure with a running #1 Stratafix symmetric or not. Management of concomitant non-stoma defects that will also be covered with intraperitoneal mesh will be managed at the surgeon's discretion. Surgeons should achieve at least 4cm of mesh overlap from the edge of the parastomal fascial edge before closure. The edge of the mesh can be secured with sutures or tacks at the surgeon's discretion and details will be collected per standard of care in the ACHQC.
Baseline patient demographic information, medical co-morbidities, hernia characteristics, operative details, and 30-day outcomes are already captured within the ACHQC database, allowing for follow-up, and data capture with decreased effort outside of routine care. Baseline patient eligibility criteria will be obtained at initial patient recruitment, and baseline ACHQC questionnaires will be completed following patient consent. Standard of care questionnaires include information on baseline opioid consumption, the PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument, and Hernia Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQles). Patients will be required to complete these forms at each clinic visit, or via telephone contact, as this is standard procedure for all patients in our hernia practice. Follow-up will be targeted at 30 +/- 15 days, 1 year ± 4 months, and 2 years ± 6 months with CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis done at the 1 and 2 year time points which is the standard of care for Cleveland Clinic.
Non-standard of care outcome measures, operative time, parastomal defect dimensions (can be separate and distinct in the presence of a concomitant ventral hernia) and randomization will be stored in RedCAP®. Additional tools include the Colostomy Impact Score, which assesses stoma-specific quality of life and will be attained at baseline, 30-days, 1 year, and 2 years. Finally, decision regret using the decision regret scale will be assessed at 30-days, 1 year, and 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fascial closure | Active comparator | Procedure: closure of parastomal hernia fascial defectThis arm will have the parastomal fascial defect closed with a running barbed suture prior to mesh placement. |
| No fascial closure | No intervention | –This arm will undergo mesh placement +/- fixation without the fascial defect being closed prior. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients 18 years or older
- End or loop-end stoma with a parastomal defect - candidate for minimally invasive Sugarbaker repair at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
- Anticipated parastomal fascial defect should not exceed 7cm in any direction
- Patient able to tolerate a minimally invasive repair, the surgeon can achieve minimally invasive access and complete a minimally invasive adhesiolysis.
- Bowel able to be lateralized at least 4cm beyond the edge of the parastomal fascial defect
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Loop stoma
- Parastomal fascial defect >7cm
- Concomitant ventral defect or complexity of the repair warrants open repair at the discretion of the staff surgeon
- Minimally invasive Sugarbaker repair with intraperitoneal mesh cannot be achieved.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| closure of parastomal hernia fascial defectFor subjects randomized to the fascial closure arm, the parastomal defect will be closed using barbed, running suture prior to placement of the mesh. | Procedure or surgery | Fascial closure |
Primary outcome
Stoma specific quality of life score (1 year)
Time frame: 1 year
The investigators will compare stoma-specific quality of life score using the Colostomy Impact Score (a patient reported survey with 7 questions with a range of 0-38 and higher scores indicating more negative impact on quality of life) at 1 year +/-4 months after minimally invasive Sugarbaker parastomal repair with and without parastomal fascial closure.
10 secondary outcomes
Stoma specific quality of life score (30 days)
Time frame: 30 days
Stoma specific quality of life score (2 years)
Time frame: 2 years
Recurrence
Time frame: 2 years
Pain Intensity
Time frame: 2 years
Abdominal Wall Specific Quality of Life
Time frame: 2 years
Length of stay
Time frame: 30 days
Ileus
Time frame: 30 days
Opioid consumption
Time frame: 30 days
Wound morbidity
Time frame: 30 days
Decision Regret
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Slower than expected enrollment and early hernia recurrence). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Parastomal Hernia
RecruitingObservational study
Parastomal Hernia at 1 and 3 Years: Radiological Incidence, Progression, and Impact on Quality of Life
Parastomal Hernia, Colorectal Cancer (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Improving Decisions and Outcomes in Parastomal Hernia Surgery
Parastomal Hernia
RecruitingObservational study
Risk Factors for Mesh Infection After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Incisional Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Recruiting
Comparing the Incidence of Parastomal Hernia After Mesenteric Molding Suturing and Non-molding Suturing in Colostomy Surgery
Parastomal Hernia
Recruiting
Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Plasty as a Modification of Sugabecker's Operation
Parastomal Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing closure of parastomal hernia fascial defect in people with Parastomal Hernia, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Slower than expected enrollment and early hernia recurrence). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Stoma specific quality of life score (1 year) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2023.