AzTrials
AzTrials

Tobacco UseNCT05499377

The Abuse Liability of a Novel Heated Tobacco Product (IQOS) and Its Feasibility as a Menthol Cigarette Substitute

A study testing Tobacco product administration and assessment in people with Tobacco Use, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project examines the influence of flavor availability on switching to an MRTP known as IQOS, part of the Heated Tobacco Product (HTP) class, among menthol smokers using clinical lab and naturalistic evaluations of abuse liability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tobacco Use
What is being tested?
Tobacco product administration and assessment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Nov 2022to 22 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy adults (aged 21 and older)
  • Daily menthol cigarette smokers
  • Exhaled Carbon Monoxide (CO) reading of > 5 PPM at in-person screening (to confirm smoking status)
  • A 'positive' cotinine cassette result to verify nicotine use at the in-person screening.
  • Participants must be willing to provide informed consent and abstain from nicotine/tobacco for ≥8 hours prior to each lab session.
  • Participants must have access to a computer/smartphone and be willing to receive and respond to daily surveys
  • Able to read and write in English

Who cannot join

  • Daily use of any tobacco products other than cigarettes
  • Self-reported history of chronic medical or psychiatric conditions
  • Women will be excluded if they test positive for pregnancy (by urinalysis) or self-report breastfeeding.
  • Some details of the study inclusion and exclusion criteria are omitted at this time, to preserve scientific integrity. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria will be posted following study completion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of Heated Tobacco Product Flavor on Tobacco Use Behavior and Abuse Liability Among Menthol Cigarette Smokers

This project examines the influence of flavor availability on switching to an MRTP known as IQOS, part of the Heated Tobacco Product (HTP) class, among menthol smokers using clinical lab and naturalistic evaluations of abuse liability. Results will help federal regulators predict the public health impact on menthol cigarette smokers of policies restricting access to menthol-flavored HTPs.

Read the detailed description

The public health success of FDA's proposed ban on menthol cigarettes hinges upon whether menthol smokers who are unable to quit smoking switch to non-menthol cigarettes (no public health gain) or to potentially lower harm alternatives like heated tobacco products (HTP). In 2019, FDA authorized an HTP called "IQOS" and its tobacco- and menthol-flavored "HeatSticks" (HS) as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP). One issue relevant to FDA's future action regarding IQOS will be "whether and how certain flavors may help adult cigarette smokers reduce cigarette use and switch to potentially less harmful products" (FDA, 2018). Understanding the potential for HTPs like IQOS to reduce the health burden of cigarettes requires targeted research investigating the extent to which flavor availability is important for menthol smokers to switch to HTPs. For one tobacco product to substitute for another, their abuse liabilities should be congruent. Validated clinical lab methods exist for comparing tobacco product abuse liability by characterizing their nicotine delivery profiles (via plasma nicotine and puff topography) and reinforcing efficacy (via subjective and behavioral measures). Naturalistic assessment can validate clinical lab results regarding use patterns and product substitution.

The current study involves a two-arm, two-week, parallel group trial. The first week is an own brand (OB) menthol cigarette baseline, during which tobacco use will be assessed daily using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). On Monday and Friday, participants will complete clinical lab sessions that involve using OB cigarettes and responding to subjective measures and an Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM) task that assesses willingness to substitute menthol cigarettes with an array of tobacco products including IQOS. During the next week, participants will be randomized to receive IQOS-menthol (n=25) or IQOS-tobacco (n=25); EMA and clinical lab visits will be repeated. Aim 1 assesses IQOS' abuse liability in a clinical lab setting. Outcomes include plasma nicotine levels, puffing behavior, responses about subjective effects, and product substitution from the ETM task. Aim 2 measures tobacco use patterns in naturalistic settings where participants will report daily OB and IQOS use outcomes via EMA. The overarching hypothesis is that, relative to OB, IQOS-menthol's abuse liability profile will differ less than IQOS-tobacco's, suggesting that menthol smokers will be more likely to substitute an HTP for combustible menthol cigarettes when a menthol-flavored HTP is available. Results will deepen our understanding of the public health impact of HTPs and policies that might restrict access to menthol-flavored MRTPs.

Conditions
Tobacco Use
Being tested
Tobacco product administration and assessment
Keywords
Heated Tobacco Products, Flavor, Abuse Liability, Tobacco, Cigarettes, Menthol, Experimental Tobacco Marketplace, Nicotine Delivery, Puff Topography, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Modified Risk Tobacco Product, IQOS, Heated Tobacco Products Flavors
Medical subject headings
Tobacco Use

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tobacco product administration and assessmentDevice

    Participants are first instructed to smoke their usual brand of menthol cigarettes normally for the next 7 days and avoid using any other tobacco products. After this baseline week, participants are randomized to 1 of 2 HTP flavor conditions (tobacco-flavored HeatSticks or Fresh Menthol-flavored HeatSticks), with equal probability and provided with a supply of their condition specific HTP and asked to use it in place of their usual menthol cigarettes for the next week. Participants use their own brand menthol cigarettes and assigned HTP both at home (naturalistic use) and in the clinical laboratory (two visits/week).

Study groups in NCT05499377
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tobacco-Flavored IQOSActive comparatorTobacco - where menthol smokers will only have access to tobacco-flavored HeatSticks to use in the IQOS 2.4 Tobacco Heating System
Receives: Device: Tobacco product administration and assessment
Menthol-Flavored IQOSExperimentalMenthol - where menthol smokers will only have access to menthol-flavored HeatSticks to use in the IQOS 2.4 Tobacco Heating System
Receives: Device: Tobacco product administration and assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change in Average Daily Cigarette Use Per Day From Baseline

    Average number of cigarettes consumed per day, collected via daily text/email survey, averaged overconsumption for Tues-Thurs of each week. Outcome will compare the percent change in cigarette consumption from the baseline week (OB menthol cigarette use) to the intervention week (IQOS use) between the two study arms.

    Measured: Week 1 (baseline) to Week 2 (intervention)

  2. Percent Increase in Demand as the Subject is Willing to Substitute From Cigarettes to HTPs Using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace Task

    Participants will complete the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace Task - which asks participants to allocate a hypothetical budget across a large menu of products. In each session, cigarette prices increased ($0.12, $0.25, $0.50, $1.00. and $2.00 per cigarette) while prices for alternative products remained fixed. Across three ETM sessions, either all products, all products except little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs), or all products except ENDS (JUUL e-cigarettes) were available. Linear regression is performed on individual participant data using log-transformed cigarette price to determine demand and substitution. Reported demand for tobacco products is used to determine substitution between IQOS and cigarettes. Purchasing decisions are not reinforced. Outcome will compare the cross-price elasticity (CPE) of IQOS with respect to menthol cigarettes among those with access to IQOS-menthol and IQOS-Tobacco (IQOS-M group) compared to those with access to IQOS-tobacco only (IQOS-T group).

    Measured: Week 2, Friday Clinical Lab visit

  3. Plasma Nicotine Delivery

    Change in the plasma nicotine levels from before to after a standardized 10-puff (30-sec interpuff interval) bout with IQOS in the participant's assigned flavor. Outcome will compare the average plasma nicotine boost (the change in plasma nicotine levels from before to after the standardized puffing bout) across two study arms as well as compared to own-brand menthol cigarettes.

    Measured: Week 2, Friday Clinical Lab visit (10 puff bout period)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Cigarette Craving Suppression Questionnaire

    We will compare the degree of "cigarette craving" will be assessed before and after a 10-puff use bout of IQOS. Cigarette craving will be assessed before and after a standardized puffing bout using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU), which features 7-point likert-like scales. The reduction in "urges to smoke" item from the QSU will be used in this assessment. The average cigarette craving suppression score will be compared across the two experimental IQOS groups. The Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (TCQ) is a valid and reliable 47-item self-report instrument that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions: emotionality, expectancy, compulsivity, and purposefulness. The higher your score, the more likely you are to have withdrawal symptoms if you give up smoking; also, the withdrawal symptoms are likely to be stronger

    Measured: Week 2, Friday Clinical Lab Visit (10 puff bout period)

  2. Puff Topography (Puff Duration)

    Average duration per puff during a standardized 10-puff (30-sec interpuff interval) bout with IQOS in assigned flavor. Puff duration will be measured using a validated puff topography instrument that attaches to the IQOS device. Outcome will compare the average puff duration across two study arms.

    Measured: Week 2, Friday Clinical Lab visit (10 puff bout period)

  3. Average Daily IQOS Usage

    Number of IQOS HeatSticks used each day will be assessed during the study. We will compare the number of Heatsticks used per day, on average (from Tues-Thurs of intervention week), between the two study arms.

    Measured: Week 2 (intervention week), Tuesday-Thursday

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2022
  2. Study start28 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion22 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05499377
Sponsor's protocol ID
HM20024873
Other IDs
1F30DA057047, U54DA036105
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
10 Aug 2022
Last updated
31 Jan 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • White AM, Imran R, Gaitan N, Bickel WK, Perera RA, Cobb CO, Eissenberg TE, Barnes AJ. A Pilot RCT Exploring Heated Tobacco Product Substitution for Menthol Cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2025 Nov;69(5):108029. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108029. Epub 2025 Aug 5.

    PubMed 40763831

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tobacco product administration and assessment in people with Tobacco Use, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change in Average Daily Cigarette Use Per Day From Baseline (time frame: Week 1 (baseline) to Week 2 (intervention)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05499377, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in