Arthritis, RheumatoidNCT05487703
A Study To Describe The Use Of Tofacitinib After Use Of Rituximab In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis In A Real-World Setting
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Morocco.
Trial summary
This study is to characterize the use of tofacitinib after use of rituximab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a real-world setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- How many people
- 318 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMorocco
- Study dates
- 14 Nov 2022to 23 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This will be a retrospective analysis of participants data using the CorEvitas RA Registry
Who may be able to join
- Enrolled in the CorEvitas RA Registry and initiated tofacitinib on or after November 2012.
- Initiate tofacitinib (defined as first ever use of tofacitinib) at Registry enrollment visit or at a Registry follow-up visit after November 2012
- Have prior use of rituximab
- Have CDAI measured at baseline and appropriate follow-up visit.
Who cannot join
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Tofacitinib Use in Rituximab-Experienced RA Patients
This study is to characterize the use of tofacitinib after use of rituximab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a real-world setting.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | clinical characteristics of adult patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) initiating tofacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance Plan
Number of participants according to type of health insurance plan was reported in this outcome measure. The health insurance plan included private, Medicare, Medicaid and no insurance. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one type of insurance.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants With College Graduation or Higher Education
Number of participants who were college graduate or had higher education were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Smoking Status
Number of participants according to smoking status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Work Status
Number of participants according to work status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Alcohol Use
Number of participants according to alcohol use were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to History of Comorbidities
Number of participants according to history of comorbidities were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one history of comorbidities.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis in participants at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Age at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date
Participants age at onset of rheumatoid arthritis at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to CDAI Categories
Number of participants according to CDAI category were reported in this outcome measures. CDAI was simplified index for assessing disease activity comprising of SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher score indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher score indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher score indicated worse condition. Score range-Remission: CDAI less than or equal to (<=) 2.8. Low Disease Activity: CDAI greater than (>) 2.8 and <= 10. Moderate Disease Activity: CDAI > 10 and <= 22. High Disease Activity: CDAI > 22. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Tender Joint Count
Tender joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints, based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Swollen Joint Count
Swollen joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) VAS
PGA-VAS was used to assess disease activity; assessed on 0-100 millimeter (mm) VAS; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)
mHAQ is the modified version of HAQ which simplifies it from 20 questions to 8 questions, which assessed the ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions on 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week before specified time point. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicated worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Pain VAS
Pain VAS was assessed using 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Fatigue VAS
Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or Higher
EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire used to assess quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rated 5 aspects of health (walking, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The mean of the summed score ranged from 1 to 3 with "1" corresponding to no problems and "3" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions, where higher score indicated more severe problems. In this outcome measure number of participants with a domain score of 2 or higher in each individual domain are reported. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)
Number of participants according to previous drug therapies with csDMARD were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation
Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Tofacitinib was initiated and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Concomitant Therapies
Number of participants classified according to concomitant therapies were reported in this outcome measure. One participant might have received more than one concomitant therapy. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before Tofacitinib
Percentage of participants who used rituximab directly before tofacitinib were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Duration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) Use
Duration of prior RTX use (in months) was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation
Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Rituximab was initiated were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations
Number of participants were classified according to year of rituximab discontinuations and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Rituximab
Percentage of participants who discontinued rituximab were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of Rituximab
Number of participants were classified according to reasons for discontinuation of rituximab and were reported in this outcome measure. Reasons for discontinuation of rituximab included safety, effectiveness, insurance, participant doing well and other reasons. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year
Number of participants were classified according to year of tofacitinib initiation and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Change From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-up
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 6 Month Follow Up
MCID improvement was assessed based on health assessment questionnaire (HAQ). HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0= without any difficulty, 1= with some difficulty, 2= with much difficulty, and 3= unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0= least difficulty and 3= extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Achievement of MCID for HAQ was defined as decrease in minimum of 0.22 units from baseline. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-up
HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. The 20-question instrument assessed ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 functional areas: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, griping, and conducting daily activities. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicating worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-up
Pain VAS was assessed using 100 mm horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-up
Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2022
- Study start14 Nov 2022
- Primary completion23 Dec 2022
- Study completion23 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 318 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05487703
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921420
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tofacitinib Use in Rituximab-Experienced RA Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05487703
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921420
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 318 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to characterize the use of tofacitinib after use of rituximab in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a real-world setting.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | – | –clinical characteristics of adult patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) initiating tofacitinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This will be a retrospective analysis of participants data using the CorEvitas RA Registry
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Enrolled in the CorEvitas RA Registry and initiated tofacitinib on or after November 2012.
- Initiate tofacitinib (defined as first ever use of tofacitinib) at Registry enrollment visit or at a Registry follow-up visit after November 2012
- Have prior use of rituximab
- Have CDAI measured at baseline and appropriate follow-up visit.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no exclusion criteria for this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance Plan
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to type of health insurance plan was reported in this outcome measure. The health insurance plan included private, Medicare, Medicaid and no insurance. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one type of insurance.
Number of Participants With College Graduation or Higher Education
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants who were college graduate or had higher education were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Smoking Status
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to smoking status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Work Status
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to work status was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Alcohol Use
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to alcohol use were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to History of Comorbidities
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to history of comorbidities were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib. One participant might have more than one history of comorbidities.
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Duration of rheumatoid arthritis in participants at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Age at Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Index Date
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Participants age at onset of rheumatoid arthritis at the time of index date was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to CDAI Categories
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to CDAI category were reported in this outcome measures. CDAI was simplified index for assessing disease activity comprising of SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher score indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher score indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher score indicated worse condition. Score range-Remission: CDAI less than or equal to (<=) 2.8. Low Disease Activity: CDAI greater than (>) 2.8 and <= 10. Moderate Disease Activity: CDAI > 10 and <= 22. High Disease Activity: CDAI > 22. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Tender Joint Count
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Tender joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints, based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Swollen Joint Count
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Swollen joint count was used to measure the pain and inflammation in the joints. Based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) VAS
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
PGA-VAS was used to assess disease activity; assessed on 0-100 millimeter (mm) VAS; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ)
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
mHAQ is the modified version of HAQ which simplifies it from 20 questions to 8 questions, which assessed the ability to perform tasks due to rheumatoid arthritis. It comprised of 8 questions on 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; grip; walk; hygiene; reach; and common activities over past week before specified time point. Eight items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3, where 0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty, higher scores indicated worse functioning. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Pain VAS
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Pain VAS was assessed using 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal line to rate pain. Score ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm; where, 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Fatigue VAS
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 to 100 mm VAS scale, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Domain Scores of 2 or Higher
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire used to assess quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rated 5 aspects of health (walking, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The mean of the summed score ranged from 1 to 3 with "1" corresponding to no problems and "3" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions, where higher score indicated more severe problems. In this outcome measure number of participants with a domain score of 2 or higher in each individual domain are reported. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Previous Drug Therapies With Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (csDMARD)
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants according to previous drug therapies with csDMARD were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Tofacitinib Initiation
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Tofacitinib was initiated and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Concomitant Therapies
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants classified according to concomitant therapies were reported in this outcome measure. One participant might have received more than one concomitant therapy. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rituximab (RTX) Directly Before Tofacitinib
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Percentage of participants who used rituximab directly before tofacitinib were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Duration of Prior Rituximab (RTX) Use
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Duration of prior RTX use (in months) was reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Line of Therapy at Rituximab Initiation
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants were classified according to line of therapy in which Rituximab was initiated were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Year of Rituximab Discontinuations
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants were classified according to year of rituximab discontinuations and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Rituximab
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Percentage of participants who discontinued rituximab were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Reason for Discontinuation of Rituximab
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants were classified according to reasons for discontinuation of rituximab and were reported in this outcome measure. Reasons for discontinuation of rituximab included safety, effectiveness, insurance, participant doing well and other reasons. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Number of Participants According to Tofacitinib Initiation Year
Time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)
Number of participants were classified according to year of tofacitinib initiation and were reported in this outcome measure. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
Change From Baseline in CDAI at 6 Months Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
CDAI was a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment range from 0 to 28, higher scores indicated worse condition), PtGA and PGA (score range from 0 to 10, assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0 (no disease) to 76 (severe disease), higher scores indicated worse condition. Index date was defined as the date of tofacitinib initiation at or after enrollment in the registry; initiation was defined as first ever use of tofacitinib.
4 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 6 Month Follow Up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at 6 Months Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Pain VAS at 6 Months Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Change From Baseline in Fatigue VAS at 6 Months Follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 follow up visit (anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years [data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month])
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Morocco.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Morocco. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants According to Type of Health Insurance Plan (time frame: At index date, index date could be anytime during observation period from 06-Nov-2012 to 31-Oct-2022, approximately 9 years (data was observed retrospectively in this study from 14-Nov-2022 to 23-Dec-2022, for approximately 1 month)). The study lists 28 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2024.