Cardiac ArrestMETAPHORENCT05486884
Mean Arterial Pressure After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
A study testing Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg and Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg in people with Cardiac Arrest and Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), run by Centre Hospitalier le Mans at 31 sites in France.
Trial summary
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a public health problem for which overall survival is below 10%. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome is the principal cause of death in intensive care units (ICU), due to refractory shock or brain injuries secondary to anoxia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest, Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
- What is being tested?
- Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg and Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,380 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2024to 28 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Admission to ICU following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initially shockable or non-shockable rhythm ;
- Sustained ROSC defined as 20 minutes with signs of circulation without the need for chest compressions;
- Under invasive mechanical ventilation for coma, defined as a Glasgow score ≤ 8/15;
- Consent from a relative or of a procedure for emergency inclusion.
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years ;
- In-hospital cardiac arrest (first cardiac arrest);
- Unwitnessed CA with initial rhythm of asystole
- Delay between ROSC and attempting randomisation > 6 hours ;
- Cardiac arrest in a context of multiple trauma ;
- Cardiac arrest in a context of hemorrhagic shock or severe hemorrhage necessitating hemostasis (surgery or radiological or endoscopic hemostasis) ;
Show all 19Show fewer
- Cardiac arrest secondary to an acute brain disease (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, severe traumatic brain injury) ;
- Refractory shock :
- Defined as a MAP < 65 mmHg for more than one hour on norepinephrine or epinephrine at a dose > 1 µg/kg/min despite adequate fluid resuscitation ;
- Extracorporeal circulatory support prior to inclusion;
- Known allergy to norepinephrine or to any of its excipients;
- Decision to limit care before inclusion ;
- Modified Rankin score of 4 or 5 before cardiac arrest ;
- Inclusion in another interventional study in which the principal endpoint is neurological prognosis ;
- Pregnancy or breast feeding ;
- Adult patient deprived of freedom or under legal protection (patients under guardianship or curatorship) (article L1121-6 of the French Health Code) ;
- Non-French speaking;
- Patient already included in this trial ;
- Absence of social security cover.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
31 sites in 1 country
France31 sites, 31 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Brest - Hôpital de La Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29609
Pierre BAILLY, MD, +332 98 34 71 84, pierre.bailly@chu-brest.fr
Pierre BAILLY, MD
- Recruiting
CH Brive
Brive-la-Gaillarde, 19100
Nicolas PICHON, MD, +335 55 92 64 79, nicolas.pichon@ch-brive.fr
Nicolas PICHON, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Caen
Caen, 14000
Damien DU CHEYRON, PhD, +332 31 06 47 16, ducheyron-d@chu-caen.fr
Damien DU CHEYRON, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital de Cannes - Simone Veil
Cannes, 06400
Pierre ALFONSI BERTRAND, MD, +33492186708, p.alfonsibertrand@ch-cannes.fr
Pierre ALFONSI BERTRAND
- Recruiting
CH Cholet
Cholet, 49300
Fabien JAROUSSEAU, MD, +332 41 49 60 87, fabien.jarousseau@ch-lemans.fr
Fabien JAROUSSEAU, MD
- Recruiting
CH Dieppe
Dieppe, 76200
Antoine MARCHALOT, MD, +332 32 14 72 53, amarchalot@ch-dieppe.fr
Antoine MARCHALOT, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Dijon - Hôpital F. Mitterrand
Dijon, 21079
Jean-Pierre QUENOT, PhD, +333 80 29 36 85, jean-pierre.quenot@chu-dijon.fr
Jean-Pierre QUENOT, PhD
- Recruiting
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Gwenhael COLIN, MD, +332 51 44 60 35, gwenhael.colin@ght85.fr
Gwenhael COLIN, MD
- Recruiting
CH Versailles
Le Chesnay, 78150
Marine PAUL, MD, +331 39 63 83 59, mpaul@ch-versailles.fr
Marine PAUL, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Du Mans
Le Mans, 72000
Christelle JADEAU, +33244710781, cjadeau@ch-lemans.fr
Nicolas CHUDEAU, MD
- Recruiting
CH Dr Schaffner
Lens, 62300
Olivier NIGEON, MD, +332 21 69 10 88, onigeon@ch-lens.fr
Olivier NIGEON, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Lille
Lille, 59037
Patrick GIRARDIE, MD, +333 20 44 64 44, patrick.girardie@chu-lille.fr
Patrick GIRARDIE, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Marine GOUDELIN, MD, +335 55 05 62 74, Marine.goudelin@chu-limoges.fr
Marine GOUDELIN, MD
- Recruiting
APHM - Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, 13005
Jérémy BOURENNE, MD, +334 13 42 95 66, Jeremy.BOURENNE@ap-hm.fr
Jérémy BOURENNE, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Jacques Cartier
Massy, 91300
Wulfran BOUGOUIN, PhD, +336 48 03 74 39, wulfran.bougouin@gmail.com
Wulfran BOUGOUIN, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Hopital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, Sarthe, 34295
Boris JUNG, PhD, +33467337736, b-jung@chu-montpellier.fr
Boris Jung, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU Nantes
Nantes, 44093
Jean-Baptiste LASCARROU, MD, +332 40 08 73 76, jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr
Jean-Baptiste LASCARROU, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Nice - Hôpital Pasteur
Nice, 06001
Denis DOYEN, PhD, +334 92 03 55 10, doyen.d@chu-nice.fr
Denis DOYEN, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU Nice - Hôpital Archet
Nice, 06202
Mathieu JOSWIAK, MD, +334 92 03 55 10, joswiak.m@chu-nice.fr
Mathieu JOSWIAK, MD
- Recruiting
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029
Saber Davide BARBAR, MD, +334 66 68 33 20, saber.barbar@chu-nimes.fr
Saber Davide BARBAR, MD
- Recruiting
CHR Orléans
Orléans, 45067
Grégoire MULLER, MD, +332 38 51 44 46, gregoire.muller@chr-orleans.fr
Grégoire MULLER, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014
Alain CARIOU, PhD, +331 58 41 25 17, alain.cariou@aphp.fr
Alain CARIOU, PhD
- Recruiting
APHP - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP)
Paris, 75015
Nicolas BRECHOT, PhD, +331 56 09 23 42, nicolas.brechot@aphp.fr
Nicolas BRECHOT, PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtriere Charles Foix
Paris, 75651
Martin DRES, PhD, +33142167797, martin.dres@aphp.fr
Martin DRES, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021
Arnaud THILLE, PhD, +335 49 44 43 67, arnaud.THILLE@chu-poitiers.fr
Arnaud THILLE, PhD
- Recruiting
CHU Rennes
Rennes, 35000
Benoit PAINVIN, MD, +332 99 28 43 21, benoit.painvin@chu-rennes.fr
Benoit PAINVIN, MD
- Recruiting
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, 93207
Tristan MORICHAU-BEAUCHANT, MD, +331 49 33 48 91, t.morichau-beauchant@ccn.fr
Tristan MORICHAU-BEAUCHANT, MD
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier Saint Nazaire
Saint-Nazaire, 44600
Julien LORBER, +33272278739, j.lorber@ch-saintnazaire.fr
Julien LORBER
- Recruiting
CHRU Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil
Strasbourg, 67091
Hamid MERDJI, MD, +333 69 55 11 23, hamid.merdji@chru-strasbourg.fr
Hamid MERDJI, MD
- Recruiting
CHRU Tours - Hôpital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Charlotte SALMON GANDONNIERE, MD, +332 47 47 38 55, charlotte.salmon@univ-tours.fr
Charlotte SALMON GANDONNIERE, MD
- Recruiting
CH Bretagne Atlantique
Vannes, 56000
Agathe DELBOVE, MD, +332 97 01 43 06, agathe.delbove@ch-bretagne-atlantique.fr
Agathe DELBOVE, MD
About this study
Official title: Mean Arterial Pressure After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: the METAPHORE Randomized Trial
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a public health problem for which overall survival is below 10%. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome is the principal cause of death in intensive care units (ICU), due to refractory shock or brain injuries secondary to anoxia. Brain anoxia is responsible for severe neurological sequelae that may be aggravated by cerebral hypoperfusion during the first few hours after the return of spontaneous circulation. Current recommendations are to ensure that arterial blood pressure is sufficient for the perfusion of organs, but no minimum threshold mean arterial pressure (MAP) has been defined. In practice, most teams target a MAP of at least 65 mmHg. Several observational studies have shown a correlation between MAP and neurological prognosis, patients with a higher initial MAP having a better outcome. Recent pilot studies have demonstrated the feasibility of increasing the target MAP after cardiac arrest, but conflicting results have been obtained concerning patient prognosis. These findings may be explained by changes to the autoregulation of the brain after cardiac arrest, with a shift of the curve towards the right, or its abolition. Cerebral blood flow is dependent on MAP, and a target MAP of 65 mmHg for these patients may result in insufficient brain perfusion. Conversely, a too high MAP might cause brain lesions due to vasogenic edema, hemorrhagic complications or excess perfusion in conditions of diminished brain metabolism. An interventional study is required to evaluate the effect of increasing MAP on neurofunctional outcome after cardiac arrest. Given the data available for brain autoregulation, the correlation between MAP and prognosis, and the risks theoretically associated with a higher MAP, investigator plans to compare a standard threshold of MAP (≥ 65 mmHg) with a high threshold of MAP (≥ 90 mmHg). Investigator hypothesizes that a high MAP within the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest will improve neurofunctional outcome.
- Being tested
- Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg, Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, outcome, cerebral blood flow, mean arterial pressure
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHgProcedure or surgery
Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg for the 24 hours following inclusion by perfusion of norepinephrine
Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHgProcedure or surgery
Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg for 24 hours after randomization through the perfusion of norepinephrine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| high MAP threshold | Experimental | Norepinephrine will be titrated to maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg. This threshold will be maintained for the 24 hours following inclusion by the perfusion of norepinephrine at an appropriate dose.
From 24 hours after inclusion until ICU discharge, a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg will be targeted Receives: Procedure: Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg |
| standard MAP threshold | Active comparator | Norepinephrine will be titrated to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg. This target MAP will be maintained for 24 hours after randomization through the perfusion of norepinephrine at an appropriate flow rate.
From 24 hours after inclusion until ICU discharge, a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg will be targeted Receives: Procedure: Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients with a good neurofunctional outcome 180 days after inclusion
Good neurofunctional outcome will be defined by a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0 to 3.This score is a global evaluation scale for disability, with seven levels (0 = no symptoms; 6 = patient dead).This score will be measured by psychologist who will be blinded to the randomization arm.
Measured: 180 days after inclusion
Secondary outcomes (7)
Proportion of patients alive at Intensive Care Unit discharge, at hospital discharge, at day 28 (D28) and six months (D180) after inclusion
Proportion of patients alive at Intensive Care Unit discharge, at hospital discharge, at day 28 (D28) and six months (D180) after inclusion
Measured: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks), from hospital admission to hospital discharge (up to 12 weeks), 28 days and 180 days after inclusion
Proportion of patients alive at Intensive Care Unit discharge with good neurofunctionnal outcome
Good neurofunctional outcome will be defined by a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0 to 3.This score is a global evaluation scale for disability, with seven levels (0 = no symptoms; 6 = patient dead
Measured: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks)
Quality of life six months after inclusion
Quality of life is measured by EuroQol-5D-5L. It's a measure of health-related quality of life and comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). EuroQol-5D-5L could be administered by telephone
Measured: 6 months after inclusion
Evaluation of Clinical Frailty at six months after inclusion
Clinical Frailty is measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). It summarizes the overall level of fitness or frailty of a patient with a score from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill)
Measured: Six months after inclusion
Number of ICU-free days at Day 28
Number of ICU-free days is calculated from the number of days alive outside the ICU by Day 28
Measured: Day 28
Number of ventilator-free days, number of catecholamine-free days and number of renal replacement therapy-free days at day 28
Number of ventilator-free days, number of catecholamine-free days and number of renal replacement therapy-free days is calculated from the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation, catecholamine infusion or renal replacement therapy by Day 28
Measured: 28 days after inclusion
Proportion of patients with acute kidney injury stage 3 and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) within Intensive Care Unit stay and persistant need for RRT at Intensive Care Unit discharge
Acute kidney injury stage 3 is defined by at least one of the following criteria: serum creatinine concentration of more than 4 mg/dl (354 µmol/liter) or greater than 3 times the baseline creatinine level, anuria (urine output of 100 ml/day or less) for more than 12 hours, oliguria (urine output below 0.3 ml/kg/h or below 500 ml/day) for more than 24 hours;
Measured: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2022
- Study start28 Sep 2024
- Primary completion28 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,380 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier le Mans
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05486884
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHM-2022/S03/07
- Acronym
- METAPHORE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After publication of the main results, the anonymized data necessary for carrying out additional analyses may be made available upon request addressed to the coordinating investigator and the scientific committee
Publications
Chudeau N, Saulnier P, Parot-Schinkel E, Lascarrou JB, Colin G, Barbar SD, Painvin B, Pichon N, Du Cheyron D, Marchalot A, Jarousseau F, Delbove A, Morichau-Beauchant T, Girardie P, Salmon Gandonniere C, Thille AW, Quenot JP, Bailly P, Goudelin M, Martino F, Nigeon O, Merdji H, Brechot N, Bourenne J, Bougouin W, Muller G, Jozwiak M, Doyen D, Rouanet E, Cariou A, Guitton C; AfterROSC Network; CRICS TRIGGERSep F-CRIN Network. Mean arterial pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (METAPHORE): study protocol for a multicentre controlled trial with blinded primary outcome assessor. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e096997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096997.
PubMed 40280607
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mean Arterial Pressure After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: the METAPHORE Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05486884
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- METAPHORE / CHM-2022/S03/07
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, outcome, cerebral blood flow, mean arterial pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,380 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier le MansUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a public health problem for which overall survival is below 10%. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome is the principal cause of death in intensive care units (ICU), due to refractory shock or brain injuries secondary to anoxia. Brain anoxia is responsible for severe neurological sequelae that may be aggravated by cerebral hypoperfusion during the first few hours after the return of spontaneous circulation. Current recommendations are to ensure that arterial blood pressure is sufficient for the perfusion of organs, but no minimum threshold mean arterial pressure (MAP) has been defined. In practice, most teams target a MAP of at least 65 mmHg. Several observational studies have shown a correlation between MAP and neurological prognosis, patients with a higher initial MAP having a better outcome. Recent pilot studies have demonstrated the feasibility of increasing the target MAP after cardiac arrest, but conflicting results have been obtained concerning patient prognosis. These findings may be explained by changes to the autoregulation of the brain after cardiac arrest, with a shift of the curve towards the right, or its abolition. Cerebral blood flow is dependent on MAP, and a target MAP of 65 mmHg for these patients may result in insufficient brain perfusion. Conversely, a too high MAP might cause brain lesions due to vasogenic edema, hemorrhagic complications or excess perfusion in conditions of diminished brain metabolism. An interventional study is required to evaluate the effect of increasing MAP on neurofunctional outcome after cardiac arrest. Given the data available for brain autoregulation, the correlation between MAP and prognosis, and the risks theoretically associated with a higher MAP, investigator plans to compare a standard threshold of MAP (≥ 65 mmHg) with a high threshold of MAP (≥ 90 mmHg). Investigator hypothesizes that a high MAP within the first 24 hours after cardiac arrest will improve neurofunctional outcome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| high MAP threshold | Experimental | Procedure: Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHgNorepinephrine will be titrated to maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg. This threshold will be maintained for the 24 hours following inclusion by the perfusion of norepinephrine at an appropriate dose. From 24 hours after inclusion until ICU discharge, a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg will be targeted |
| standard MAP threshold | Active comparator | Procedure: Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHgNorepinephrine will be titrated to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg. This target MAP will be maintained for 24 hours after randomization through the perfusion of norepinephrine at an appropriate flow rate. From 24 hours after inclusion until ICU discharge, a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg will be targeted |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Admission to ICU following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with an initially shockable or non-shockable rhythm ;
- Sustained ROSC defined as 20 minutes with signs of circulation without the need for chest compressions;
- Under invasive mechanical ventilation for coma, defined as a Glasgow score ≤ 8/15;
- Consent from a relative or of a procedure for emergency inclusion.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Age < 18 years ;
- In-hospital cardiac arrest (first cardiac arrest);
- Unwitnessed CA with initial rhythm of asystole
- Delay between ROSC and attempting randomisation > 6 hours ;
- Cardiac arrest in a context of multiple trauma ;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHgMaintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg for the 24 hours following inclusion by perfusion of norepinephrine | Procedure or surgery | high MAP threshold |
| Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHgMaintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg for 24 hours after randomization through the perfusion of norepinephrine | Procedure or surgery | standard MAP threshold |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients with a good neurofunctional outcome 180 days after inclusion
Time frame: 180 days after inclusion
Good neurofunctional outcome will be defined by a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0 to 3.This score is a global evaluation scale for disability, with seven levels (0 = no symptoms; 6 = patient dead).This score will be measured by psychologist who will be blinded to the randomization arm.
7 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients alive at Intensive Care Unit discharge, at hospital discharge, at day 28 (D28) and six months (D180) after inclusion
Time frame: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks), from hospital admission to hospital discharge (up to 12 weeks), 28 days and 180 days after inclusion
Proportion of patients alive at Intensive Care Unit discharge with good neurofunctionnal outcome
Time frame: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks)
Quality of life six months after inclusion
Time frame: 6 months after inclusion
Evaluation of Clinical Frailty at six months after inclusion
Time frame: Six months after inclusion
Number of ICU-free days at Day 28
Time frame: Day 28
Number of ventilator-free days, number of catecholamine-free days and number of renal replacement therapy-free days at day 28
Time frame: 28 days after inclusion
Proportion of patients with acute kidney injury stage 3 and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) within Intensive Care Unit stay and persistant need for RRT at Intensive Care Unit discharge
Time frame: From Intensive Care Unit admission to Intensive Care Unit discharge (up to 3 weeks)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40280607Chudeau N, Saulnier P, Parot-Schinkel E, Lascarrou JB, Colin G, Barbar SD, Painvin B, Pichon N, Du Cheyron D, Marchalot A, Jarousseau F, Delbove A, Morichau-Beauchant T, Girardie P, Salmon Gandonniere C, Thille AW, Quenot JP, Bailly P, Goudelin M, Martino F, Nigeon O, Merdji H, Brechot N, Bourenne J, Bougouin W, Muller G, Jozwiak M, Doyen D, Rouanet E, Cariou A, Guitton C; AfterROSC Network; CRICS TRIGGERSep F-CRIN Network. Mean arterial pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (METAPHORE): study protocol for a multicentre controlled trial with blinded primary outcome assessor. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e096997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096997.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After publication of the main results, the anonymized data necessary for carrying out additional analyses may be made available upon request addressed to the coordinating investigator and the scientific committee
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
31 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Maintain MAP ≥ 90 mmHg and Maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg in people with Cardiac Arrest and Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA), run by Centre Hospitalier le Mans at 31 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Christelle JADEAU (+33244710781, cjadeau@ch-lemans.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients with a good neurofunctional outcome 180 days after inclusion (time frame: 180 days after inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05486884, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2026.