AzTrials
AzTrials

Rotator Cuff TendinosisEFFECTNCT05478902

Effectiveness of Non-surgical Management in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinopathy (THE EFFECT TRIAL)

A study testing Exercise Therapy, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation in people with Rotator Cuff Tendinosis and Rotator Cuff Injuries, run by University of Valencia at 2 sites in Spain.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study will be to compare the effectiveness of an exercise therapy program with extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation and a wait and see approach in people with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Exercise Therapy, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
116 participants
Where
2 sitesSpain
Study dates
1 Jan 2028to 1 Dec 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • calcification deposit in the rotator cuff confirmed by diagnostic imaging (ultrasound, MRI or X-ray);
  • pain and loss of function in the shoulder;
  • not currently receiving physiotherapy or ESWT.

Who cannot join

  • previous treatments on last year (e.g., injections, ESWT, US-PICT, surgery, etc.);
  • other shoulder disorders or trauma (e.g., fractures, dislocations, rotator cuff tears, frozen shoulder or shoulder instability);
  • known allergy to any of the pharmacological products used in the study;
  • taking oral anticoagulants
  • taking oral steroid within the six months prior to participation in the study;
  • cancer, systemic disease, pregnancy or infection;
  • neck pain.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Spain2 sites
  • Universitat de Valencia

    Valencia, Valencia, 46020

  • Lluis Alcanyis Hospital

    Xàtiva, Valencia, 46800

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Non-surgical Management in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinopathy: a Randomised Clinical Trial (THE EFFECT TRIAL)

The aim of this study will be to compare the effectiveness of an exercise therapy program with extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation and a wait and see approach in people with rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy.

Read the detailed description

Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (RCCT) is a common musculoskeletal disorder caused by the presence of calcific deposits in the rotator cuff with an important impact in the quality of life of those who are suffering it. Conservative interventions such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) or ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation of calcific tendinopathy (US-PICT) have been commonly recommended as part of the early management for this clinical condition. Exercise therapy (ET) has shown to be an effective intervention for people with rotator cuff tendinopathy, but it has not been tested in people with RCCT yet. A randomised, single-blinded four parallel group clinical trial will be conducted. Participants (n=116) will be randomised in four groups: (1) ET; (2) ESWT; (3) US-PICT or (4) control.

Being tested
Exercise Therapy, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation
Keywords
exercise therapy, lavage, rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy, shoulder calcification, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation, shoulder pain, shape up my shoulders, sums
Medical subject headings
Rotator Cuff Injuries, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy, Shoulder Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exercise TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Shape Up My Shoulders Protocol

    Exercise protocol for rotator cuff related shoulder pain

  • Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyProcedure or surgery

    High Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

  • Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous IrrigationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Lavage

    Two sessions of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation

Study groups in NCT05478902
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exercise TherapyExperimentalThis group will receive the Shape Up My Shoulders (SUMS) protocol and it will be led by a physiotherapist trained in therapeutic exercise. It will last 12 weeks and it will be divided in 3 stages. Stage I- Early-stage rehabilitation exercises (i.e., breathing and relaxation exercises, ball rolling exercises, hand gripping exercises, mental imagery and contralateral side exercises) and Shoulder Symptom Modification Procedure (SSMP). This stage typically lasts 1 to 2 weeks. Stage II - Isometric, eccentric and heavy slow resistance exercises. The final part of Stage II is a progression from eccentric only to eccentric and concentric contractions. Stage III - Functional program. This stage starts in week 5 or 6 and progressed to week 12. Involves pushing, pulling, throwing, lifting, carrying, and precision (sensory-motor control) exercises.
Receives: Procedure: Exercise Therapy
Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyActive comparatorThis group will receive high energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) applied by an experienced physiotherapist. ESWT will be applied on the most tender point of the shoulder, located by palpation. The dose will be 1500 impulses per session without anaesthesia and an intensity between 0.15 and 0.30 mJ/mm2 depending on patient tolerance. A total of 4 treatment sessions (1 session per week) with 1 week of rest between sessions will be implemented. Patient's position during the treatment will be seated in supine position with shoulder hyperextension and internal rotation with the hand placed below the contralateral glute with the palm touching the table.
Receives: Procedure: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous IrrigationActive comparatorThis intervention will be performed by an experienced interventionist radiologist in two sessions. The shoulder position will be with hyperextension and internal rotation with the hand behind the back. One 20 mL syringe with saline solution, one with an anaesthetic with 20 mg/mL of mepivacaine 2% and another syringe with a corticoid injection with 40 mg/mL of triamcinolone acetonide will be prepared before the intervention. Firstly, the anaesthetic will be injected directed to the calcification. Then, the procedure will consist of injecting saline solution and aspiring the calcific deposits until it is neither possible to aspire more inside the syringe nor to detect any calcifications with ultrasound imaging. After that, a corticoid will be injected to the bursa to prevent the appearance of subacromial bursitis. Finally, an anaesthetic will be injected during the extraction of the needle.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation
Wait and Watch groupNo interventionThe wait and see group will not receive any intervention and will serve as a control group to determine the natural history of RCCT. If one treatment proves to be more effective then participants in the other groups will be offered that treatment after 12 months, or before, if the investigation finishes early due to an obvious group difference and a need to break randomisation codes.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI)

    Pain and function shoulder scale. Patients are told to circle the number that best describes their pain where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. The means of the two subscales are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI)

    Pain and function shoulder scale. Patients are told to circle the number that best describes their pain where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. The means of the two subscales are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI)

    Pain and function shoulder scale. Patients are told to circle the number that best describes their pain where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. The means of the two subscales are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI)

    Pain and function shoulder scale. Patients are told to circle the number that best describes their pain where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. The means of the two subscales are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI)

    Pain and function shoulder scale. Patients are told to circle the number that best describes their pain where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. The means of the two subscales are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (37)
  1. Pain Intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity reported by the patient will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=minimum score, 100=maximum score). Higher values represent a better outcome (less pain). Flexion, abduction, external rotation and hand behind the back

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Pain Intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity reported by the patient will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=minimum score, 100=maximum score). Higher values represent a better outcome (less pain). Flexion, abduction, external rotation and hand behind the back

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. Pain Intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity reported by the patient will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=minimum score, 100=maximum score). Higher values represent a better outcome (less pain). Flexion, abduction, external rotation and hand behind the back

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Pain Intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity reported by the patient will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=minimum score, 100=maximum score). Higher values represent a better outcome (less pain). Flexion, abduction, external rotation and hand behind the back

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Pain Intensity

    Shoulder pain intensity reported by the patient will be assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=minimum score, 100=maximum score). Higher values represent a better outcome (less pain). Flexion, abduction, external rotation and hand behind the back

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Range of motion

    Flexion, abduction and hand behind the back measured with a questionnaire with different stages. Degrees measured in different stages ranged from 0-30º, 30-60º, 60-90º, 90-120º, 120-150º and above 150º for flexion and abduction. For hand behind the back: hand to the hip, to the buttock, low back, mid back or between scapulas.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Range of motion

    Flexion, abduction and hand behind the back measured with a questionnaire with different stages. Degrees measured in different stages ranged from 0-30º, 30-60º, 60-90º, 90-120º, 120-150º and above 150º for flexion and abduction. For hand behind the back: hand to the hip, to the buttock, low back, mid back or between scapulas.

    Measured: 4 months

  8. Range of motion

    Flexion, abduction and hand behind the back measured with a questionnaire with different stages. Degrees measured in different stages ranged from 0-30º, 30-60º, 60-90º, 90-120º, 120-150º and above 150º for flexion and abduction. For hand behind the back: hand to the hip, to the buttock, low back, mid back or between scapulas.

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Type of calcification

    according to the Gartner classification assessed with x-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Type of calcification

    according to the Gartner classification assessed with x-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 4 months

  11. Type of calcification

    according to the Gartner classification assessed with x-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 12 months

  12. Size of the calcification

    Measured in millimeters. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Size of the calcification

    Measured in millimeters. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 4 months

  14. Size of the calcification

    Measured in millimeters. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 12 months

  15. Location of the calcification

    Which tendon is affected. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Location of the calcification

    Which tendon is affected. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 4 months

  17. Location of the calcification

    Which tendon is affected. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 12 months

  18. Morphology of the calcification

    Isolated- fragmented - multiple. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: Baseline

  19. Morphology of the calcification

    Isolated-fragmented- multiple. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 4 months

  20. Morphology of the calcification

    Isolated-fragmented- multiple. Assessed with X-ray by an experienced radiologist

    Measured: 12 months

  21. Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)

    Patient-reported instrument to identify when patient's symptoms may be related to central sensitization

    Measured: Baseline

  22. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Self-reported questionnaire for measuring the subjective perception of sleep quality

    Measured: Baseline

  23. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Patient-reported instrument for measuring fear avoidance and beliefs. The score range is 0 to 96, with a higher value reflecting a higher degree of fear avoidance beliefs.

    Measured: Baseline

  24. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)

    Self-reported questionnaire for measuring fear of movement or fear of (re)injury

    Measured: Baseline

  25. painDETECT Scale

    Self-administered questionnaire, developed to quickly detect neuropathic pain, asking the patient about the pain experienced at the moment and with- in the last 4 weeks

    Measured: Baseline

  26. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    Patient-reported outcome to measure catastrophization

    Measured: Baseline

  27. EuroQoL-5D

    Patient-reported outcome to measure quality of life

    Measured: Baseline

  28. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Patient-reported outcome to measure psychological factors

    Measured: Baseline

  29. Patient Satisfaction

    Global impression of change

    Measured: 2 weeks

  30. Patient Satisfaction

    Global impression of change

    Measured: 4 months

  31. Patient Satisfaction

    Global impression of change

    Measured: 6 months

  32. Patient Satisfaction

    Global impression of change

    Measured: 12 months

  33. Night Pain

    How much has the pain affected the patient at night in the last 4 weeks. From 1 to 5. 5 means worst. 1: No pain. 2: Pain 1 or 2 nights in the last 4 weeks. 3: 1 or 2 nights a week. 4: Pain almost every night. 5: Pain every night.

    Measured: Baseline

  34. Night Pain

    How much has the pain affected the patient at night in the last 4 weeks. From 1 to 5. 5 means worst. 1: No pain. 2: Pain 1 or 2 nights in the last 4 weeks. 3: 1 or 2 nights a week. 4: Pain almost every night. 5: Pain every night.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  35. Night Pain

    How much has the pain affected the patient at night in the last 4 weeks. From 1 to 5. 5 means worst. 1: No pain. 2: Pain 1 or 2 nights in the last 4 weeks. 3: 1 or 2 nights a week. 4: Pain almost every night. 5: Pain every night.

    Measured: 4 months

  36. Night Pain

    How much has the pain affected the patient at night in the last 4 weeks. From 1 to 5. 5 means worst. 1: No pain. 2: Pain 1 or 2 nights in the last 4 weeks. 3: 1 or 2 nights a week. 4: Pain almost every night. 5: Pain every night.

    Measured: 6 months

  37. Night Pain

    How much has the pain affected the patient at night in the last 4 weeks. From 1 to 5. 5 means worst. 1: No pain. 2: Pain 1 or 2 nights in the last 4 weeks. 3: 1 or 2 nights a week. 4: Pain almost every night. 5: Pain every night.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The doctoral student conducting the study has discontinued their thesis. Recruitment is temporarily suspended until a new researcher is assigned to resume the project.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
116 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05478902
Sponsor's protocol ID
1718862
Acronym
EFFECT
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
21 Jul 2022
Last updated
26 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sansone V, Maiorano E, Galluzzo A, Pascale V. Calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder: clinical perspectives into the mechanisms, pathogenesis, and treatment. Orthop Res Rev. 2018 Oct 3;10:63-72. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S138225. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30774461
  • Simpson M, Pizzari T, Cook T, Wildman S, Lewis J. Effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2020 Oct 31;52(10):jrm00119. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2725.

    PubMed 32830280
  • Harvie P, Pollard TC, Carr AJ. Calcific tendinitis: natural history and association with endocrine disorders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Dec 22.

    PubMed 17188907
  • Louwerens JK, Sierevelt IN, van Hove RP, van den Bekerom MP, van Noort A. Prevalence of calcific deposits within the rotator cuff tendons in adults with and without subacromial pain syndrome: clinical and radiologic analysis of 1219 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Oct;24(10):1588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

    PubMed 25870115
  • Uhthoff HK, Loehr JW. Calcific Tendinopathy of the Rotator Cuff: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997 Jul;5(4):183-191. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199707000-00001.

    PubMed 10797220
  • Ioppolo F, Tattoli M, Di Sante L, Attanasi C, Venditto T, Servidio M, Cacchio A, Santilli V. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for supraspinatus calcifying tendinitis: a randomized clinical trial comparing two different energy levels. Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;92(11):1376-85. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110252. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

    PubMed 22745199
  • Lafrance S, Doiron-Cadrin P, Saulnier M, Lamontagne M, Bureau NJ, Dyer JO, Roy JS, Desmeules F. Is ultrasound-guided lavage an effective intervention for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy? A systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Mar 9;5(1):e000506. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000506. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31191964
  • Caballero I, Duenas L, Balasch-Bernat M, Fernandez-Matias R, Breso-Parra L, Gallego-Terres C, Aroca Navarro JE, Navarro-Bosch M, Lewis J, Lluch Girbes E. Effectiveness of non-surgical management in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (the effect trial): protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):e074949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074949.

    PubMed 38176875

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise Therapy, Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Irrigation in people with Rotator Cuff Tendinosis and Rotator Cuff Injuries, run by University of Valencia at 2 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05478902, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in