Evidence-Based PracticeNCT05475457
Oregon Supplement: Supporting Sustainable Positive Interactions in the Child Welfare System: The R3 Supervisor Strategy
An observational study of Evidence-Based Practice, run by Oregon Social Learning Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This administrative supplement capitalized on the preliminary positive outcomes from the primary parent grant award (R01DA040416), and lessons learned from the implementation of the R3 Supervisor Strategy (R3) throughout the participating four regions (12 counties) in Tennessee. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Evidence-Based Practice
- What is being tested?
- R3
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 404 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2019to 16 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study participants include casework supervisors in the child welfare system (CWS) from two counties most heavily impacted by the opioid and methamphetamine crisis (Lane and Douglas county).
Who may be able to join
- Oregon Child welfare workforce employee in a participating county.
Who cannot join
- Contract Workers
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This administrative supplement capitalized on the preliminary positive outcomes from the primary parent grant award (R01DA040416), and lessons learned from the implementation of the R3 Supervisor Strategy (R3) throughout the participating four regions (12 counties) in Tennessee. This project aimed to pilot the implementation of R3 with a new sample, a cohort of counties in Oregon particularly affected by the current opioid epidemic, for potential scale-up.
Read the detailed description
Oregon currently is experiencing a crisis within its Child Welfare System (CWS), with combined challenges within the workforce and departmental support, and a staggering rise in referrals for parental substance abuse. The R3 Supervisor Strategy (R3) provides training, consultation, and fidelity-monitoring to supervisors in the CWS, who are centrally positioned between caseworkers (who have daily interactions with CWS-involved families) and leadership (who make decisions that affect the organization in which families receive services). Supervisors are trained to implement key reinforcement strategies that make up the three Rs including reinforcement of (1) effort, (2) relationships and roles, and (3) small steps toward goal achievement. R3 is relatively easy to learn and sustain and has demonstrated promise in improving CWS outcomes in the parent grant award (R01DA040416). Because many of the counties most impacted by the opioid crisis are rural and under-resourced, an approach like R3 provides the opportunity to introduce evidence-based strategies to these regions where it otherwise is not feasible to adopt more intensive services. This study utilized the same Hybrid Type II design as its parent grant in which supervisors and caseworkers from two Oregon counties particularly affected by the substance abuse crisis were recruited to to provide a pilot assessment of the effectiveness of R3 with an emphasis on referrals for opioid and methamphetamine use (Aim 1). In doing so, the study also sought to modify the R3 training materials to emphasize examples of working with families referred for parental substance abuse (Aim 2) and replicate the preliminary findings from the parent grant, providing pilot data for a larger state scale-up of R3. This administrative supplement allowed an initial assessment to identify if R3's strategies are profound enough to impact the most challenging systems, faced with the most challenging public health crisis presented currently-the impact of the opioid epidemic on families.
- Conditions
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Being tested
- R3
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
R3Behavioural
Training, consultation, and fidelity-monitoring to supervisors in the child welfare system to reinforce (1) effort, (2) relationships and roles, and (3) small steps toward goal achievement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon County 1 | First cohort to be trained and monitored with coaching in the R3 model. Receives: Behavioral: R3 | |
| Oregon County 2 | Second cohort to be trained and monitored with coaching in the R3 model. Receives: Behavioral: R3 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Changes in Organizational Support of Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in overall organizational support of evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Assistance Implementing Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization helping others implement Evidence-Based Practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) "Helping Other's" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organization Keeping Others Informed of Evidence-Based Practices Changes and Needs from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization keeping others informed of changes and needs in evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) "Keeping Informed" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organizational Climate for Implementing Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in organizational climate for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organizational Focus on Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in organizational focus on evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Focus on Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organization's Educational Support for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's educational support for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Educational Support for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Recognition for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's recognition for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Recognition for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Rewards for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's rewards for using evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Rewards for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organization's Selection for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's selection for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Selection for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in the Organization's Selection for Openness to New Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's selection for openness to implement new practices as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Selection for Openness" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Leadership Abilities for Implementation from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported leadership abilities for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Proactive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide proactive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Proactive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Knowledgeable Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide knowledgeable leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Knowledgeable Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Supportive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide supportive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Supportive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Perseverant Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide perseverant leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Perseverant Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Leadership Ability for Implementation from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' leadership abilities for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Proactive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide proactive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Proactive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Knowledgeable Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide knowledgeable leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Knowledgeable Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Supportive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide supportive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Supportive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Perseverant Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide perseverant leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Perseverant Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Commitment to Implementing Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's commitment to implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) "Change Commitment" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Effectiveness in Implementing Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's effectiveness in implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) "Change Efficacy" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Mean Changes in Organizational Readiness to Implement Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's overall readiness in implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2022
- Study start8 Apr 2019
- Primary completion16 Jul 2021
- Study completion16 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Evidence-Based PracticeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 404 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Social Learning Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisa Saldana, PhD, Principal investigator, OSLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05475457
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01DA040416-S1
- Other IDs
- R01DA040416
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Oregon Supplement: Supporting Sustainable Positive Interactions in the Child Welfare System: The R3 Supervisor Strategy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05475457
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R01DA040416-S1
- Conditions
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 404 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Social Learning CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This administrative supplement capitalized on the preliminary positive outcomes from the primary parent grant award (R01DA040416), and lessons learned from the implementation of the R3 Supervisor Strategy (R3) throughout the participating four regions (12 counties) in Tennessee. This project aimed to pilot the implementation of R3 with a new sample, a cohort of counties in Oregon particularly affected by the current opioid epidemic, for potential scale-up.
Detailed description
Oregon currently is experiencing a crisis within its Child Welfare System (CWS), with combined challenges within the workforce and departmental support, and a staggering rise in referrals for parental substance abuse. The R3 Supervisor Strategy (R3) provides training, consultation, and fidelity-monitoring to supervisors in the CWS, who are centrally positioned between caseworkers (who have daily interactions with CWS-involved families) and leadership (who make decisions that affect the organization in which families receive services). Supervisors are trained to implement key reinforcement strategies that make up the three Rs including reinforcement of (1) effort, (2) relationships and roles, and (3) small steps toward goal achievement. R3 is relatively easy to learn and sustain and has demonstrated promise in improving CWS outcomes in the parent grant award (R01DA040416). Because many of the counties most impacted by the opioid crisis are rural and under-resourced, an approach like R3 provides the opportunity to introduce evidence-based strategies to these regions where it otherwise is not feasible to adopt more intensive services. This study utilized the same Hybrid Type II design as its parent grant in which supervisors and caseworkers from two Oregon counties particularly affected by the substance abuse crisis were recruited to to provide a pilot assessment of the effectiveness of R3 with an emphasis on referrals for opioid and methamphetamine use (Aim 1). In doing so, the study also sought to modify the R3 training materials to emphasize examples of working with families referred for parental substance abuse (Aim 2) and replicate the preliminary findings from the parent grant, providing pilot data for a larger state scale-up of R3. This administrative supplement allowed an initial assessment to identify if R3's strategies are profound enough to impact the most challenging systems, faced with the most challenging public health crisis presented currently-the impact of the opioid epidemic on families.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon County 1 | – | Behavioral: R3First cohort to be trained and monitored with coaching in the R3 model. |
| Oregon County 2 | – | Behavioral: R3Second cohort to be trained and monitored with coaching in the R3 model. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study participants include casework supervisors in the child welfare system (CWS) from two counties most heavily impacted by the opioid and methamphetamine crisis (Lane and Douglas county).
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Oregon Child welfare workforce employee in a participating county.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Contract Workers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| R3Training, consultation, and fidelity-monitoring to supervisors in the child welfare system to reinforce (1) effort, (2) relationships and roles, and (3) small steps toward goal achievement. | Behavioural | Oregon County 1, Oregon County 2 |
Primary outcome
Mean Changes in Organizational Support of Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in overall organizational support of evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Assistance Implementing Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization helping others implement Evidence-Based Practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) "Helping Other's" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organization Keeping Others Informed of Evidence-Based Practices Changes and Needs from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization keeping others informed of changes and needs in evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured through the Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale's (ICBS) "Keeping Informed" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organizational Climate for Implementing Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in organizational climate for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organizational Focus on Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in organizational focus on evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Focus on Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organization's Educational Support for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's educational support for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Educational Support for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Recognition for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's recognition for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Recognition for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Rewards for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's rewards for using evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Rewards for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organization's Selection for Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's selection for evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Selection for Evidence-Based Practices" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in the Organization's Selection for Openness to New Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in the organization's selection for openness to implement new practices as measured by the Implementation Climate Scale's (ICS) "Selection for Openness" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Leadership Abilities for Implementation from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported leadership abilities for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Proactive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide proactive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Proactive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Knowledgeable Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide knowledgeable leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Knowledgeable Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Supportive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide supportive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Supportive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Self-Reported Ability to Provide Perseverant Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in supervisors' self-reported ability to provide perseverant leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Perseverant Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Leadership Ability for Implementation from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' leadership abilities for implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Proactive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide proactive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Proactive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Knowledgeable Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide knowledgeable leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Knowledgeable Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Supportive Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide supportive leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Supportive Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Supervisors' Ability to Provide Perseverant Leadership from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their supervisors' ability to provide perseverant leadership when implementing evidence-based practices (i.e., R3) as measured by the Implementation Leadership Scale's (ILS) "Perseverant Leadership" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Commitment to Implementing Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's commitment to implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) "Change Commitment" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Effectiveness in Implementing Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's effectiveness in implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) "Change Efficacy" subscale. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Mean Changes in Organizational Readiness to Implement Changes from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline
Changes in staff perceptions of their organization's overall readiness in implementing changes as measured by the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change's (ORIC) total score. Measured at Baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-months Post-Baseline.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2022.
Related trials for Evidence-Based Practice
RecruitingObservational study
Developing a Methodological Framework and a Dissemination Plan for Herb-drug Interactions-related Clinical Practice Guidelines
Herb-drug Interactions
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing Current Clinical Concepts in Dental Practice
Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Implementing Modified Practices to Leverage Evidence for Movement, Engagement, and Nutrition Topics in Early Childcare and Education
Dietary Intakes, Physical Activity
Active, not recruiting
Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work Education
Evidence-Based Practice
Recruiting
A Multi-Level Strategy for De-implementing Mammography Overuse Among Older Women
Mammography, Medical Overuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa Saldana, PhD principal investigator
OSLC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Evidence-Based Practice, run by Oregon Social Learning Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Changes in Organizational Support of Evidence-Based Practices from Baseline to 18-Months Post-Baseline (time frame: Baseline to 18-months Post-Baseline). The study lists 23 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2022.