Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic ZoneNCT05475249
Aesthetic Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant-supported Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla With Either White Zirconia or Fluorescent White Zirconia Abutments
A study testing Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment in people with Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic Zone, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study aims to answer the question whether the use of a fluorescent layer over white zirconia abutments will improve the aesthetic outcomes of implant borne single-tooth restorations when compared to the use of non-layered white zirconia abutments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic Zone
- What is being tested?
- Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2018to 20 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- In patients with a history of periodontitis, if periodontitis re-occurred (clinical attachment loss ≥ 2 mm), they will be excluded from the study and receive periodontal therapy.
- During implant placement, the selected subject will be excluded if implants were not positioned in appropriate prosthetic guided positions. Implants needing any hard tissue augmentation will be excluded before the surgery, however if during the surgery any of this procedure is needed due to unforeseen, the patient will also be excluded from the study "a posteriori".
- Pregnant women at any time of the study will be excluded.
- Inadequate vestibular depth to place the Spectrophotometer device
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Aesthetic Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant-supported Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla With Either White Zirconia or Fluorescent White Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
This study aims to answer the question whether the use of a fluorescent layer over white zirconia abutments will improve the aesthetic outcomes of implant borne single-tooth restorations when compared to the use of non-layered white zirconia abutments. The study is designed as a parallel, single-centre and double blind clinical trial. Patients in need of a single tooth implant in the maxilla (from right second premolar to left second premolar, both included) with the presence of adjacent natural teeth will be randomly divided into two treatment groups: using white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) with immersion in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy)(test group) or white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) without immersion in fluorescent liquid (control group). 1 and 12 months after crown placement, patients will be recalled and subjected to aesthetic, clinical, radiographic and patient centered outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Dental implants (Tapered internal implants; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) will be placed in healed residual ridges (minimum of 4 months after tooth extraction) following the manufacturer's recommendations. After connecting healing abutments, the flaps will be sutured around the abutments for non-submerged healing. A standard postoperative protocol will be followed (antibiotics, anti-inflammatory medication and topical application of 0.12% clorhexidine) and fixed or removable provisional restorations will be provided without immediate occlusal function.
After a 3-months of healing, subjects will be allocated to either test or control group. An abutment composed of white yttrium oxide stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) previously immersed in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy) will be placed in the test group, whether in the control group the same abutment will be used but without fluorescent layer. The selected abutment is machined and designed for use with cemented restorations.
A single experienced restorative dentist using one dental laboratory will carry out all the prosthetic procedures. Single crowns full ceramic will be performed and cemented with RelyX™ Luting Cement.
The subjects will then be advised to comply with their regular dental hygiene and maintenance protocol and committed to return for one month and one-year examinations in order to register all the outcome variables of the study.
- Being tested
- Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment
- Keywords
- implants AND periodontology AND color OR zirconia AND periimplant mucosa color OR spectrophotometer AND periimplant color
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutmentOther
Dental implants (Tapered internal implants; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) will be placed in healed residual ridges (minimum of 4 months after tooth extraction). After connecting healing abutments, the flaps will be sutured around the abutments for non-submerged healing. An abutment composed of white yttrium oxide stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) previously immersed in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy) will be placed in the test group, whether in the control group the same abutment will be used but without fluorescent layer. The selected abutment is machined and designed for use with cemented restorations. A single experienced restorative dentist using one dental laboratory carried out all the prosthetic procedures. Single crowns full ceramic will be performed and cemented with RelyX™ Luting Cement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment | Placebo comparator | white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) without immersion in fluorescent liquid Receives: Other: Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment |
| fluorescence white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment | Experimental | white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) with immersion in fluorescent liquid Receives: Other: Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The spectrophotometric outcome ΔE is the primary outcome of this study
Spectrophotometry (Spectroshade, MTH, Niederhasli, Switzerland) will be used for the color evaluation of the buccal mucosa
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
The spectrophotometric outcome ΔE is the primary outcome of this study
Spectrophotometry (Spectroshade, MTH, Niederhasli, Switzerland) will be used for the color evaluation of the buccal mucosa
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Secondary outcomes (20)
Subjective aesthetic outcomes
The esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations (CEI) (Juodzbalys et al. 2010) has been selected as visual complex aesthetic index
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Subjective aesthetic outcomes
The esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations (CEI) (Juodzbalys et al. 2010) has been selected as visual complex aesthetic index
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Biological complications
Biological complications are considered where there is presence of bleeding on probing (BOP) (peri-implant mucositis) or when BOP is present together with peri-implant bone loss (peri-implantitis)(Lang \& Berglund 2011).
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Biological Complications
Biological complications are considered where there is presence of bleeding on probing (BOP) (peri-implant mucositis) or when BOP is present together with peri-implant bone loss (peri-implantitis)(Lang \& Berglund 2011).
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Technical complications
Technical complications will be considered as (1) major (requiring replacement of the restoration); such as, implant fracture, abutment tooth fracture, loss of supra-structures, (2) medium; such as abutment fracture, veneer or framework fractures, phonetic complications and (3) minor such as abutment and screw loosening, loss of retention, de-bonding, loss of screw hole sealing or veneer chipping (Lang \& Zitzmann 2012).
Measured: 1 month after final prothesis
Technical complications
Technical complications will be considered as (1) major (requiring replacement of the restoration); such as, implant fracture, abutment tooth fracture, loss of supra-structures, (2) medium; such as abutment fracture, veneer or framework fractures, phonetic complications and (3) minor such as abutment and screw loosening, loss of retention, de-bonding, loss of screw hole sealing or veneer chipping (Lang \& Zitzmann 2012).
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
the mesial and distal adjacent teeth were measured to the nearest 1 mm using a CPC-15 manual periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany) at 6 six sites per tooth for probing pocket depths (PPD).
Measured: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
Full mouth plaque index was recorded.
Measured: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
bleeding on probing was recorded.
Measured: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
The implant probing depth was measured to the nearest 1 mm using a CPC-15 manual periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany) at 6 six sites per tooth for probing pocket depths (PPD).
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
The implant probing depth was measured to the nearest 1 mm using a CPC-15 manual periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Leinmen, Germany) at 6 six sites per tooth for probing pocket depths (PPD).
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical Outcomes
Full mouth plaque index were also be recorded.
Measured: 1 month after final prothesis
Clinical Outcomes
Full mouth plaque index were also be recorded.
Measured: 1 year after final prothesis
Clinical outcomes
mucosal recession at the implant (REC) was also recorded
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
mucosal recession at the implant (REC) was also recorded
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
mucosal recession in the adjacent teeth (REC) was also recorded
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
mucosal recession in the adjacent teeth (REC) was also recorded
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Radiographic outcomes
Standardized intra-oral radiographs were taken using a long-cone paralleling technique and an individualized tooth positioner made of auto-polymerising silicon key (Dentsply Rinn; Elgin, United States). The radiographs were taken immediately after crown placement and at the 12 months follow up. The radiographs were scanned and calibrated using the implant diameter as the fixed reference and the following linear measurements were carried out using image analysis software (NIS-elements software; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).- Vertical distance (parallel to the implant long axis) from the contact point to the bone crest at mesial and distal sides.
- Vertical distance from the implant shoulder (placed 1 mm supracrestally) to the most coronal bone in contact with the implant at mesial and distal sites.
- Horizontal distance from the implant shoulder to the adjacent teeth at mesial and distal sides.
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Patient centred outcomes
The participating subjects were asked to fill in a written questionnaire for evaluating their satisfaction with regards to the aesthetic appearance, the phonetic ability and their overall satisfaction with the treatment (Pjetursson et al. 2005).
Measured: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Patient centred outcomes
The participating subjects were asked to fill in a written questionnaire for evaluating their satisfaction with regards to the aesthetic appearance, the phonetic ability and their overall satisfaction with the treatment (Pjetursson et al. 2005).
Measured: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2022
- Study start8 Jan 2018
- Primary completion22 Jan 2019
- Study completion20 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic ZoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universidad Complutense de MadridThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ana Carrillo de Albornoz, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05475249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC14/2017
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
PubMed 19228100Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstrom JL, Andersson B. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):335-41.
PubMed 10635203Dierens M, de Bruecker E, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, de Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Alterations in soft tissue levels and aesthetics over a 16-22 year period following single implant treatment in periodontally-healthy patients: a retrospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Mar;40(3):311-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
PubMed 23297745Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
PubMed 16307569Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations. J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):34-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090385.
PubMed 20059415Lang NP, Zitzmann NU; Working Group 3 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01842.x.
PubMed 22533953Park SE, Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part I. Spectrophotometric assessment of natural tooth gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):569-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01391.x. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
PubMed 17655713Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:139-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01828.x.
PubMed 22533954Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x.
PubMed 15777328Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x.
PubMed 19397632Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Den Hartog L, Stellingsma K, Meijer HJ. Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant crowns with different implant platform designs in the aesthetic zone: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01638.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PubMed 21062337Zembic A, Bosch A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Apr;24(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12044. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PubMed 23025514
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aesthetic Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant-supported Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla With Either White Zirconia or Fluorescent White Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05475249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EC14/2017
- Keywords
- implants AND periodontology AND color OR zirconia AND periimplant mucosa color OR spectrophotometer AND periimplant color
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to answer the question whether the use of a fluorescent layer over white zirconia abutments will improve the aesthetic outcomes of implant borne single-tooth restorations when compared to the use of non-layered white zirconia abutments. The study is designed as a parallel, single-centre and double blind clinical trial. Patients in need of a single tooth implant in the maxilla (from right second premolar to left second premolar, both included) with the presence of adjacent natural teeth will be randomly divided into two treatment groups: using white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) with immersion in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy)(test group) or white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) without immersion in fluorescent liquid (control group). 1 and 12 months after crown placement, patients will be recalled and subjected to aesthetic, clinical, radiographic and patient centered outcomes.
Detailed description
Dental implants (Tapered internal implants; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) will be placed in healed residual ridges (minimum of 4 months after tooth extraction) following the manufacturer's recommendations. After connecting healing abutments, the flaps will be sutured around the abutments for non-submerged healing. A standard postoperative protocol will be followed (antibiotics, anti-inflammatory medication and topical application of 0.12% clorhexidine) and fixed or removable provisional restorations will be provided without immediate occlusal function.
After a 3-months of healing, subjects will be allocated to either test or control group. An abutment composed of white yttrium oxide stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) previously immersed in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy) will be placed in the test group, whether in the control group the same abutment will be used but without fluorescent layer. The selected abutment is machined and designed for use with cemented restorations.
A single experienced restorative dentist using one dental laboratory will carry out all the prosthetic procedures. Single crowns full ceramic will be performed and cemented with RelyX™ Luting Cement.
The subjects will then be advised to comply with their regular dental hygiene and maintenance protocol and committed to return for one month and one-year examinations in order to register all the outcome variables of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment | Placebo comparator | Other: Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutmentwhite yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) without immersion in fluorescent liquid |
| fluorescence white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment | Experimental | Other: Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutmentwhite yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) with immersion in fluorescent liquid |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- In patients with a history of periodontitis, if periodontitis re-occurred (clinical attachment loss ≥ 2 mm), they will be excluded from the study and receive periodontal therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutmentDental implants (Tapered internal implants; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) will be placed in healed residual ridges (minimum of 4 months after tooth extraction). After connecting healing abutments, the flaps will be sutured around the abutments for non-submerged healing. An abutment composed of white yttrium oxide stabilized zirconia abutment (PYRCA; BioHorizons, Birmingham, EEUU) previously immersed in fluorescent liquid (Zirkonzahn, South Tirol, Italy) will be placed in the test group, whether in the control group the same abutment will be used but without fluorescent layer. The selected abutment is machined and designed for use with cemented restorations. A single experienced restorative dentist using one dental laboratory carried out all the prosthetic procedures. Single crowns full ceramic will be performed and cemented with RelyX™ Luting Cement. | Other | fluorescence white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment, white yttria-stabilized zirconia abutment |
Primary outcome
The spectrophotometric outcome ΔE is the primary outcome of this study
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Spectrophotometry (Spectroshade, MTH, Niederhasli, Switzerland) will be used for the color evaluation of the buccal mucosa
The spectrophotometric outcome ΔE is the primary outcome of this study
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Spectrophotometry (Spectroshade, MTH, Niederhasli, Switzerland) will be used for the color evaluation of the buccal mucosa
20 secondary outcomes
Subjective aesthetic outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Subjective aesthetic outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Biological complications
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Biological Complications
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Technical complications
Time frame: 1 month after final prothesis
Technical complications
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: Preoperatively
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical Outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after final prothesis
Clinical Outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after final prothesis
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Clinical outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Radiographic outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Patient centred outcomes
Time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration
Patient centred outcomes
Time frame: 1 year after prothesis restoration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 19228100Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
- Background: PubMed 10635203Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstrom JL, Andersson B. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):335-41.
- Background: PubMed 23297745Dierens M, de Bruecker E, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, de Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Alterations in soft tissue levels and aesthetics over a 16-22 year period following single implant treatment in periodontally-healthy patients: a retrospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Mar;40(3):311-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
- Background: PubMed 16307569Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
- Background: PubMed 20059415Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations. J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):34-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090385.
- Background: PubMed 22533953Lang NP, Zitzmann NU; Working Group 3 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01842.x.
- Background: PubMed 17655713Park SE, Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part I. Spectrophotometric assessment of natural tooth gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):569-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01391.x. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
- Background: PubMed 22533954Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:139-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01828.x.
- Background: PubMed 15777328Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x.
- Background: PubMed 19397632Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x.
- Background: PubMed 21062337Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Den Hartog L, Stellingsma K, Meijer HJ. Treatment outcome of two adjacent implant crowns with different implant platform designs in the aesthetic zone: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):74-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01638.x. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 23025514Zembic A, Bosch A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Apr;24(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12044. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic Zone
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Active, not recruiting
Dimensional Changes in Single Crowns Supported by Short Transmucosal Implants With Diverging or Converging Neck Profiles in the Esthetic Zone
Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant placement and prothesis made with different types of abutment in people with Edentulous Alveolar Ridge in the Aesthetic Zone, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The spectrophotometric outcome ΔE is the primary outcome of this study (time frame: 1 month after prothesis restoration). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05475249, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2022.