AzTrials
AzTrials

Frozen ShoulderHSRFSRCTNCT05466435

Heavy Slow Resistance Training in Adults With Frozen Shoulder

A study testing Heavy Slow Resistance in people with Frozen Shoulder, run by Ministry of Health, Kuwait.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Heavy Slow Resistance exercise in patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder using randomized controlled trial design Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Frozen Shoulder
What is being tested?
Heavy Slow Resistance
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2022to Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Unilateral painful, restricted active and passive range of motion of the shoulder, with loss of passive external rotation of at least 50% compared to opposite side at 0 deg of abduction
  • Symptoms present for at least 3 months
  • Normal x-rays on anteroposterior, axillary and lateral views

Who cannot join

  • Severe degeneration, or trauma involving the shoulder
  • Inflammatory joint disease affecting the shoulder.
  • Pain or disorders of the cervical spine, elbow, wrist, or hand
  • Stroke or peripheral nerve neuropathy Injection with corticosteroids in the affected shoulder in the preceding 4 weeks.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Najla Alsiri, Ph.D contact

Dr.alsiri@outllook.com

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Heavy Slow Resistance Training in Adults With Frozen Shoulder- a Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Heavy Slow Resistance exercise in patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder using randomized controlled trial design

Conditions
Frozen Shoulder
Being tested
Heavy Slow Resistance, Control group
Keywords
Frozen shoulder, Heavy slow resistance, Isometrics, Eccentric exercise, Muscle guarding
Medical subject headings
Bursitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Heavy Slow ResistanceOther

    Heavy slow resistance exercise will be given twice a week for 12 weeks along with traditional physical therapy program

  • Control groupOther

    Traditional physical therapy program only will be given twice a week for 12 weeks

Study groups in NCT05466435
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Heavy Slow Resistance groupExperimentalHeavy slow resistance exercise will be given along with traditional physical therapy program
Receives: Other: Heavy Slow Resistance; Other: Control group
Control groupPlacebo comparatorTraditional physical therapy program will be given to the control group
Receives: Other: Control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Range of motion measurement for external rotation and abduction using clinometer application at week 12

    The smart phone clinometer is a validated tool to measure range of motion

    Measured: week 12 from baseline measurement

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Quick DASH(Quick Disabilities of the of Arm Shoulder and Hand)

    Quick DASH is an 11 item questionnaire to measure physical function and symptoms in people presenting with one or more disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand. The higher the score from 0 to 100 scale the higher the disability.

    Measured: week 12 from baseline measurement

  2. 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    SF-12 is a 12 item ,self-reported outcome measure for assessing quality of life.

    Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.

    Measured: week 12 from baseline measurement

  3. The Oxford Shoulder Score(OSS)

    The Oxford Shoulder Score is validated tool for measuring pain and disability caused by shoulder pathology. It has 12 items with a score ranging from 0 to 48 with 48 being the best outcome.

    Measured: week 12 from baseline measurement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2022
  2. Study startAug 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05466435
Sponsor's protocol ID
121
Acronym
HSRFSRCT
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
4 Jul 2022
Last updated
20 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be available on request.

Publications

  • Jurgel J, Rannama L, Gapeyeva H, Ereline J, Kolts I, Paasuke M. Shoulder function in patients with frozen shoulder before and after 4-week rehabilitation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41(1):30-8.

    PubMed 15687748
  • Mao CY, Jaw WC, Cheng HC. Frozen shoulder: correlation between the response to physical therapy and follow-up shoulder arthrography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Aug;78(8):857-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90200-8.

    PubMed 9344306
  • Bulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, Dutton J, Roberts S. Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Jun;43(3):353-60. doi: 10.1136/ard.43.3.353.

    PubMed 6742895
  • Mezian K, Coffey R, Chang KV. Frozen Shoulder. 2023 Aug 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482162/

    PubMed 29489251
  • Neviaser JS. Adhesive capsulitis and the stiff and painful shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980 Apr;11(2):327-31.

    PubMed 7001312
  • Chan HBY, Pua PY, How CH. Physical therapy in the management of frozen shoulder. Singapore Med J. 2017 Dec;58(12):685-689. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017107.

    PubMed 29242941
  • Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, Johnston RV, McBain B, Chau M, Buchbinder R. Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 26;2014(8):CD011275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011275.

    PubMed 25157702
  • Johnson AJ, Godges JJ, Zimmerman GJ, Ounanian LL. The effect of anterior versus posterior glide joint mobilization on external rotation range of motion in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;37(3):88-99. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2307.

    PubMed 17416123
  • Diercks RL, Stevens M. Gentle thawing of the frozen shoulder: a prospective study of supervised neglect versus intensive physical therapy in seventy-seven patients with frozen shoulder syndrome followed up for two years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;13(5):499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.002.

    PubMed 15383804
  • Yoon SH, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Kwack KS. Optimal dose of intra-articular corticosteroids for adhesive capsulitis: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013 May;41(5):1133-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513480475. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

    PubMed 23507791
  • Celik D, Kaya Mutlu E. Does adding mobilization to stretching improve outcomes for people with frozen shoulder? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Aug;30(8):786-94. doi: 10.1177/0269215515597294. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

    PubMed 26229109
  • Maund E, Craig D, Suekarran S, Neilson A, Wright K, Brealey S, Dennis L, Goodchild L, Hanchard N, Rangan A, Richardson G, Robertson J, McDaid C. Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(11):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta16110.

    PubMed 22405512
  • Rangan A, Brealey SD, Keding A, Corbacho B, Northgraves M, Kottam L, Goodchild L, Srikesavan C, Rex S, Charalambous CP, Hanchard N, Armstrong A, Brooksbank A, Carr A, Cooper C, Dias JJ, Donnelly I, Hewitt C, Lamb SE, McDaid C, Richardson G, Rodgers S, Sharp E, Spencer S, Torgerson D, Toye F; UK FROST Study Group. Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):977-989. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31965-6.

    PubMed 33010843
  • Pruimboom L, van Dam AC. Chronic pain: a non-use disease. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68(3):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.08.036. Epub 2006 Oct 30.

    PubMed 17071012
  • Donatelli R, Ruivo RM, Thurner M, Ibrahim MI. New concepts in restoring shoulder elevation in a stiff and painful shoulder patient. Phys Ther Sport. 2014 Feb;15(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

    PubMed 24315683

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Heavy Slow Resistance in people with Frozen Shoulder, run by Ministry of Health, Kuwait.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rafi Ahmed, MPT (00965-67667808, rafithepainpt@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Range of motion measurement for external rotation and abduction using clinometer application at week 12 (time frame: week 12 from baseline measurement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05466435, which also lists 30 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in