AzTrials
AzTrials

Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyNCT05446948

Observation of the Efficacy of Different Vitrectomy Systems to Treat Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A study testing beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system and standard 25G+ vitrectomy system in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Vitrectomy, run by Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In recent years, vitrectomy has moved toward a minimally invasive vitrectomy surgery (MIV) system, which could effectively reduce the occurrence of operation complications, while reducing the time of post-operation recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system and standard 25G+ vitrectomy system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
11 Jul 2022to 1 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with vitreous hemorrhage and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) confirmed by fundus image and B ultrasound examination, consistent with the diagnosis of severe proliferated diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
  • Patient that could follow up postoperatively at the clinic for 6 months more.
  • All the surgeries were performed by one well-experienced retinal surgeon.

Who cannot join

  • Corneal lesions affecting operative field, such as corneal opacity or scar; History of vitreoretinal surgery;
  • External eye infections;
  • History of systemic thromboembolism;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or hyperglycemia;
  • Coagulation abnormalities or currently using anticoagulant drugs other than aspirin;
  • Unable to meet postoperative position requirements;
  • Unable to be followed up regularly.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital

    Tianjin, 300386

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy of Standard 25 Gauge (25G)+ and Beveled 27 Gauge (27G)+ Vitrectomy Systems in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

In recent years, vitrectomy has moved toward a minimally invasive vitrectomy surgery (MIV) system, which could effectively reduce the occurrence of operation complications, while reducing the time of post-operation recovery.

With an improved design of bevel tip and a high cutting rate capacity of 10000cpm, Advanced ULTRAVIT® probes potentially provide an strong technical support for the application of MIV. The new probe facilitates great control during delicate surgical maneuvers, such as separating the hyaloid from the retinal surface, dissecting fibrovascular tissue off the surface of retina.

However, there was no sufficient clinical evidence to support the benefits of Advanced ULTRAVIT ® probes in the complicated vitreoretinal surgery, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy. More importantly, there is an urgent need of clinical evidence to support 10000cpm launch and conversion which is major objective of 2021 VR growth strategies.

Read the detailed description

This exploratory study, aiming to demonstrate the beneficial of 27 Gauge probe, which can be flexibly applied as a multifunctional tool for membrane removal by reducing frequencies of switching device, reducing the traction to eyeball during device entering and leaving the eye. Moreover, the outcomes from this study would be an strong evidence to support further comparative study to comprehensively demonstrate the superior function compare to current heavily used 5K 25 gauge probe.

Being tested
beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system, standard 25G+ vitrectomy system

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • beveled 27G+ vitrectomy systemDevice

    The device is a novel 27G+ vitrectomy system, whose probe tip is beveled.

  • standard 25G+ vitrectomy systemDevice

    The device is a traditional instrument, and its probe tip is flat.

Study groups in NCT05446948
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
beveled 27G+ groupExperimentalThe group of patients underwent vitrectomy with a beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system.
Receives: Device: beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system
25G+ groupActive comparatorThe group of patients underwent vitrectomy with a standard 25G+ vitrectomy system.
Receives: Device: standard 25G+ vitrectomy system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the convenience in operating

    The convenience will be indicated by times of ancillary instrument using, which evaluated based on the recorded surgical video.

    Measured: during surgery

  2. the efficiency of stripping membrane

    It will be measured by the area of membrane removed per minute by probe.

    Measured: during surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)

    BCVA using a logMAR visual acuity chart method

    Measured: baseline to 6 months post-surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jul 2022
  2. Study start11 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05446948
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021KY-27
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
29 Jun 2022
Last updated
6 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing beveled 27G+ vitrectomy system and standard 25G+ vitrectomy system in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Vitrectomy, run by Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the convenience in operating (time frame: during surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in