Pelvic Floor DisordersNCT05440539
Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy
A study testing Written Handouts and Interactive Workshop in people with Pelvic Floor Disorders and Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the increase in knowledge of pregnant patients regarding pelvic floor disorders when comparing two educational interventions: written handouts vs interactive workshops. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pelvic Floor Disorders, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- What is being tested?
- Written Handouts and Interactive Workshop
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2020to 10 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant (prior to 27 weeks gestation)
- English speaking
- Greater than 18 years old
Who cannot join
- Non-english speaking
- unable to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the 1st to the "4th Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess the increase in knowledge of pregnant patients regarding pelvic floor disorders when comparing two educational interventions: written handouts vs interactive workshops.
Read the detailed description
Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) are common and significantly affect the quality of life of many women as they age. Pregnancy has been identified as a major risk factor for developing PFDs later in life. Educating women about PFDs is essential to ensuring that they present to care in a timely manner. No study has investigated different education tools during pregnancy. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial in pregnant patients comparing two educational tools: written materials about PFDs versus an educational workshops led by pelvic floor physical therapists (PFPTs). Pregnant patients will be recruited in the first and second trimester and randomized at that time. Knowledge will be assessed at baseline and again 6 weeks postpartum using the validated Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be evaluating referral patterns to urogynecology and to PFPTs from general OBGYNs and assessing any pelvic floor symptoms with the pelvic floor disability index (PFDI-20) at baseline and at 6 weeks postpartum.
- Being tested
- Written Handouts, Interactive Workshop
- Keywords
- pregnancy, education, prolapse, incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Floor Disorders, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Prolapse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Written HandoutsOther
The written materials were generated using the collaboration of healthcare communication specialists to generate content that is tailored to a younger age demographic of childbearing age regarding their risk of developing a pelvic floor disorder and what can be done to prevent or treat them in the future.
Interactive WorkshopOther
Participants logged onto a virtual meeting platform and listened to a live 20 minute presentation by a pelvic floor physical therapist followed by time for questions, which were answered live. Participants anonymity was maintained by not allowing participants to view each other's name and disabling sharing of video feeds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Written Group | Experimental | Participants received only written handouts with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive these handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery. Receives: Other: Written Handouts |
| Workshop Group | Experimental | Participants received written handouts and attend a virtual interactive workshop with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive the handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery. The workshop is conducted prior to completion of pregnancy. Receives: Other: Written Handouts; Other: Interactive Workshop |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
Validated 24 question questionnaire with two sections to test knowledge on pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Scored out of 24 with higher scores indicating an increase in knowledge. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 24. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.
Measured: < 5 minutes
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)
Validated questionnaire measuring presence and degree of both of pelvic floor disorder symptoms. Three sub sections with a possible score of 100 for each sub section. Scaled score is a combination of the 3 sub section scores for a total possible score of 300. Higher scores indicates increased symptom bother. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 300. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.
Measured: < 5 minutes
Phone Interview
One-on-one phone interviews conducted with participants in the workshop education group who experienced both educational tools. A research team member called them after completion of the study and conducted a brief 3 question interview to understand their opinion of the educational tools.
Measured: < 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2020
- Primary completion5 May 2021
- Study completion10 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pelvic Floor DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05440539
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PFD Education in Pregnancy
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Durnea UA, Dornan JC, O'Sullivan SM, O'Reilly BA. What is to blame for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women-Pre-pregnancy or intrapartum risk factors? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul;214:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
PubMed 28525825McLennan MT, Melick CF, Alten B, Young J, Hoehn MR. Patients' knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jan;17(1):22-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
PubMed 16003482Koury H, Corral J, Bastow BD, Sheeder J, Muffly TM. A 3-Dimensional Anatomical Education Model in Postpartum Perineal Laceration Care: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):e23-e27. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000698.
PubMed 30807431Gagnon LH, Boucher J, Robert M. Impact of pelvic floor muscle training in the postpartum period. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2822-6. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
PubMed 26282094Shah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Braaten KP, Hoyte L. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0631-x. Epub 2008 May 15.
PubMed 18480958Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
PubMed 16021067Haller J, Keller Z, Barr S, Hadden K, Oliphant SS. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000653.
PubMed 30807416Rutledge E, Spiers A, Vardeman J, Griffin N, Nisar T, Muir T, Antosh DD. Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the First to the "Fourth Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Sep 1;29(9):770-776. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001341.
PubMed 37607311
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the 1st to the "4th Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05440539
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PFD Education in Pregnancy
- Keywords
- pregnancy, education, prolapse, incontinence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the increase in knowledge of pregnant patients regarding pelvic floor disorders when comparing two educational interventions: written handouts vs interactive workshops.
Detailed description
Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) are common and significantly affect the quality of life of many women as they age. Pregnancy has been identified as a major risk factor for developing PFDs later in life. Educating women about PFDs is essential to ensuring that they present to care in a timely manner. No study has investigated different education tools during pregnancy. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial in pregnant patients comparing two educational tools: written materials about PFDs versus an educational workshops led by pelvic floor physical therapists (PFPTs). Pregnant patients will be recruited in the first and second trimester and randomized at that time. Knowledge will be assessed at baseline and again 6 weeks postpartum using the validated Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be evaluating referral patterns to urogynecology and to PFPTs from general OBGYNs and assessing any pelvic floor symptoms with the pelvic floor disability index (PFDI-20) at baseline and at 6 weeks postpartum.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Written Group | Experimental | Other: Written HandoutsParticipants received only written handouts with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive these handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery. |
| Workshop Group | Experimental | Other: Written Handouts, Other: Interactive WorkshopParticipants received written handouts and attend a virtual interactive workshop with information about pelvic floor disorders, including risk factors, prevention strategies, and information about possible treatments. They receive the handouts at the time of recruitment during pregnancy and again after delivery. The workshop is conducted prior to completion of pregnancy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant (prior to 27 weeks gestation)
- English speaking
- Greater than 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Non-english speaking
- unable to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Written HandoutsThe written materials were generated using the collaboration of healthcare communication specialists to generate content that is tailored to a younger age demographic of childbearing age regarding their risk of developing a pelvic floor disorder and what can be done to prevent or treat them in the future. | Other | Workshop Group, Written Group |
| Interactive WorkshopParticipants logged onto a virtual meeting platform and listened to a live 20 minute presentation by a pelvic floor physical therapist followed by time for questions, which were answered live. Participants anonymity was maintained by not allowing participants to view each other's name and disabling sharing of video feeds. | Other | Workshop Group |
Primary outcome
Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
Time frame: < 5 minutes
Validated 24 question questionnaire with two sections to test knowledge on pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Scored out of 24 with higher scores indicating an increase in knowledge. Minimum value: 0, Maximum value: 24. Higher scores mean better outcome. Lower scores mean worse outcome. This was administrated at time of recruitment and again at 6 weeks postpartum.
2 secondary outcomes
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20)
Time frame: < 5 minutes
Phone Interview
Time frame: < 10 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28525825Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Durnea UA, Dornan JC, O'Sullivan SM, O'Reilly BA. What is to blame for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women-Pre-pregnancy or intrapartum risk factors? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul;214:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 16003482McLennan MT, Melick CF, Alten B, Young J, Hoehn MR. Patients' knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jan;17(1):22-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
- Background: PubMed 30807431Koury H, Corral J, Bastow BD, Sheeder J, Muffly TM. A 3-Dimensional Anatomical Education Model in Postpartum Perineal Laceration Care: A Pre-Post Intervention Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):e23-e27. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000698.
- Background: PubMed 26282094Gagnon LH, Boucher J, Robert M. Impact of pelvic floor muscle training in the postpartum period. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):255-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2822-6. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 18480958Shah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Braaten KP, Hoyte L. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0631-x. Epub 2008 May 15.
- Background: PubMed 16021067Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
- Background: PubMed 30807416Haller J, Keller Z, Barr S, Hadden K, Oliphant SS. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;25(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000653.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37607311Rutledge E, Spiers A, Vardeman J, Griffin N, Nisar T, Muir T, Antosh DD. Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the First to the "Fourth Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Sep 1;29(9):770-776. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001341.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pelvic Floor Disorders
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain
Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical, Functional, and Therapeutic Characterization of Women With Urinary Incontinence and Analysis of Factors Associated With Treatment Response
Urinary Incontinence (UI)
Not yet recruiting
Integrated Care Pathway for Hormonally Mediated Vestibulodynia: a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot
Vestibulodynia, Vulvodynia
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Written Handouts and Interactive Workshop in people with Pelvic Floor Disorders and Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) (time frame: < 5 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05440539, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2025.