Obstructive Sleep ApneaNCT05440279
Effects of Telemedical Support on Therapeutic Results of CPAP Patients
A study testing digital patient support in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Adherence, Treatment, run by Facharztzentrum Sonneberg-Coburg uBAG at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a type of sleep-related breathing disorders that is characterized by a sleep-related constriction (obstruction) of the upper airways. The treatment with continuous application of positive airway pressure (CPAP) via respiratory mask forms the therapeutical standard of OSA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Adherence, Treatment
- What is being tested?
- digital patient support
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2019to 31 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 18-80 years
- CPAP-naïve
- confirmed severe OSA (AHI >30/h), diagnosis based on polysomnography (PSG) (MiniScreen PRO with Software MiniscreenViewer, Dr. Fenyves \& Gut, Rangendingen, Germany)
- written informed consent to participate in the study, including a data protection statement.
Who cannot join
- presence of a contraindication to PAP therapy
- participation in another study influencing automated electronic support
- lack of possibility to receive emails or use electronic means of communication
- lack of patient consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of an Early Combination of Automated Electronic and Telemedical Support on the Therapeutic Results of CPAP and APAP Patients and as a Supplement to (Tele-) Medical Care
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a type of sleep-related breathing disorders that is characterized by a sleep-related constriction (obstruction) of the upper airways. The treatment with continuous application of positive airway pressure (CPAP) via respiratory mask forms the therapeutical standard of OSA. The autoCPAP (automatic positive airway pressure: APAP) therapy is an additional treatment option for patients with more unstable conditions (e.g. due to sleep position) which is characterized by a dynamic adaption of the applied airway pressure according to patients therapeutical needs. Device usage time and therapy adherence are crucial for treatment success.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of a digital patient support (DPS) tool, complementary to standard care on continuous and automatic positive airway pressure (CPAP, APAP) adherence and daytime sleepiness after 12 weeks in patients diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
All patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 per hour are prospectively included and randomized to receive standard care (SC) or standard care with personalized DPS via prisma APP prototype version (SC+DPS). In both arms, initiation of therapy and standardized therapy control after 12 weeks is carried out identically. Patients in the SC+DPS arm received additionally automated feedback on their therapy and motivational messages, as well as therapy recommendations.
Read the detailed description
Clinical Picture From the epidemiological view obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common type of sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD). OSA is characterized by a sleep-related constriction (obstruction) of the upper airways that in adulthood is often caused by a neuromuscular related impairment of the pharyngeal tone. OSA is linked to many negative health consequences and is associated with a large number of comorbidities.
General treatment As a rule SRBD are treated with appropriate therapy devices that transmit positive airway pressure (PAP) via respiratory masks. In the case of the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) therapeutical standard is formed by application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). CPAP therapy devices provide a stable positive airway pressure during sleep to prevent the upper airway obstructions. The determination of the essential airway pressure that keeps airways open takes place within the therapy setting night in the sleep laboratory under polysomnographic monitoring. Patients with more unstable pressure needs, e.g. based on position shifts during the night, also qualify for an autoCPAP (APAP) therapy. APAP therapy devices adapt the applied airway pressure dynamically within defined ranges according to patients' therapeutical needs. Therapy success is essentially defined by average device usage time and patients' long-term therapy adherence which in term is affected by a broad variety of factors. The identification of these factors therefore lead to the development of different treatment strategies to improve patients' therapy adherence.
Usual therapeutical process Patients with suspected OSA are surveyed according to their symptomatology and receive a sleep medical examination under polygraphical or polysomnographical observation. During the sleep medical examination numerous cardiorespiratory and somnological signals are recorded and evaluated.
As far as the evaluation of the recorded signals leads to the diagnosis of OSA and no indications for another type of PAP therapy are present, the adjustment to CPAP or APAP therapy under polysomnographical observation takes place immediately after diagnosis.
Following this, patients receive an appropriate adjusted CPAP- or APAP therapy device and get introduced in it´s handling to continue therapy by themselves in their home environment.
As part of the nightly home therapy, patients are expected to use the device according to the physicians advice. During the home therapy phase, the device is recording specific data to subsequently allow to draw conclusions about the therapeutic process and the therapy quality. In case of difficulties with therapy and dependent on their causes, patients are admonished to contact the sleep laboratory (regarding general problems with therapy) or the provider (regarding problems with the respiratory mask or device settings).
After a period of about 12 weeks, patients again appear in person in the sleep laboratory as part of the general therapy control. During the therapy control, the home usage data recorded by the therapy device are printed in reportform and the interventions which were implemented between first therapy setting and the therapy control are evaluated.
Finally, the medicating physician evaluates the therapy success within a conversation with the patients. In case of an inadequate outcome, therapy settings may have to be optimized.
Rationale of the study Literature shows that the first days of home therapy are crucial for long-term therapy adherence and that telemetrical support through automatic feedback can have a positive effect on therapy adherence.
However, there is a lack of experience how the effect on therapy outcomes caused by more individualized, automatic feedbacks combined with an appropriate supply of information and motivation over a longer period can be assessed.
This study is intended to investigate if therapy outcomes of CPAP and APAP patients can be further improved by an early intervention in the form of a combination of telemetric and electronic support.
Description of the applied medical device The applied medical device are the CE certified medical devices prismaSOFT/ prismaSMART (Type WM090TD) made by Löwenstein Medical Techology GmbH und Co. KG Hamburg. The applied accessories (especially breathing tubes, masks, humidifier, modems) are CE certified, too.
Devices of the WM090TD type are pressure-controlled, non-invasive, non-lifesupporting therapy devices or treating sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs) using a mask. The devices are used on persons weighing 30 kg or more. CPAP mode can be used on persons aged 3 years upwards. The device may only be used on a physician's instructions. (auto)CPAP mode provides positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea in patients who breathe spontaneously.
Devices of the WM090TD type are used in clinical facilities and in the domestic environment. In the domestic environment, the devices also ac-company the owner on trips away.
The application of the device as part of this study takes place according to it´s intended use and within it´s indication range.
Procedure and interventions
If an OSA was diagnosed, patients will be asked for study participation and get informed about the rationale of the study. In case of patients informed consent they will be randomized to one of two groups (Standard Care = control group vs. Standard Care + Digital Patient Support Tool = intervention group).
At baseline, all patients receive an education session with a respiratory therapist about OSA and its consequences, proper use and maintenance of the CPAP device and mask, and therapy and study expectations. All patients are provided with a fixed or auto CPAP device (prismaSMART/ prismaSOFT, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG), a heated humidifier (prismaAQUA, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG) if needed, and a fitting interface. The initiation of therapy with anamnesis, diagnosis night, titration night, education, etc., as well as standardized therapy control after 12 weeks is carried out identically in standard care (SC) and in standard care with personalized digital support via prototype of prisma APP (SC+DPS) group and according to clinical routine.
At the beginning and with completion of the study every participant is surveyed about his daytime sleepiness applying the standardized questionnaire "Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)".
With completion of the study, each patient furthermore assesses his satisfaction with the CPAP therapy in general and with focus on therapy instructions and support. For this purpose, they rate 8 questions on a scale of 0-4, with a 4 being the best rating (0: strongly disagree, 1: barely disagree, 2: partly agree, 3: mostly agree, 4: strongly agree).
The intervention (SC+DPS) group receives electronic therapy support in addition to standard care. The electronic therapy support consists of:
- Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire),
- electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy and subjective therapy success,
- possibility to set personal adherence goals every week,
- links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories,
- provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring.
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Adherence, Treatment
- Being tested
- digital patient support
- Keywords
- Interventional, randomized, adherence, continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP, telehealth, obstructive sleep apnea, digital patient support, prisma APP
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Treatment Adherence and Compliance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
digital patient supportDevice
Intervention takes place through a regular electronic therapy support in addition to standard care that is defined as follows:
Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire),
- electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy and subjective therapy success,
- possibility to set personal adherence goals every week,
- links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories,
- provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care (SC) | No intervention | Treatment in the control group takes place as standard care that includes an education session with a respiratory therapist about OSA and its consequences, proper use and maintenance of the CPAP device and mask, and therapy and study expectations, provision with a fixed or auto CPAP device (prismaSMART/ prismaSOFT, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG), a heated humidifier (prismaAQUA, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG) if needed, and a fitting interface, the initiation of therapy with anamnesis, diagnosis night, titration night, education, etc., as well as standardized therapy control after 12 weeks. |
| Standard Care (SC) + digital patient support (DPS) tool | Active comparator | Treatment in the intervention group takes place as standard care (please see description of arm 1 - control group) and electronic therapy support in addition. The electronic therapy support consists of:
1. Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire),
2. electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy, personal adherence goals and subjective therapy success,
3. possibility to set personal adherence goals every week,
4. links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories,
5. provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring. Receives: Device: digital patient support |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daytime sleepiness (ESS Score)
Significant change in daytime sleepiness of CPAP/ APAP patients with standard care plus support of a digital patient support (DPS) tool versus patients with standard care without support of a digital patient support (DPS) tool from baseline at therapy control after 12 weeks
Measured: Baseline and after 12 weeks (Diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Therapy adherence
evaluated by average device usage time in minutes per day and percentual amount of days with an average usage time > 4 hours
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Therapy efficacy
evaluated by Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), obstructive Apnea Hypopnea Index (oAHI), central Apnea Hypopnea Index (cAHI), snoring during diagnosis, polygrahpic therapy control and therapy data stored by therapy device, as well as mask leakage and deep sleep according to therapy data stored by therapy device
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
type and frequency of usage of device comfort features
evaluated by number of types and frequency of device comfort features usage
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
satisfaction with therapy and care according to standardized survey
evaluated by survey scores
Measured: up to 12 weeks
Investigation of progress of therapy adherence, therapy efficacy and side effects in the intervention group
evaluated by observation of the corresponding parameters during duration of study per patient
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Investigation of frequency of usage of the DPS (Digital Patient Support) tool in the intervention group
evaluated by frequency of DPS tool usage
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Investigation of type of usage of the DPS (Digital Patient Support) tool in the intervention group
evaluated by number of types of DPS tool usage
Measured: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Correlation between secondary variables and primary variable to investigate the impact of secondary variables on the primary outcome
evaluated by descriptive analysis of the corresponding parameters
Measured: up to 12 weeks
Investigation of the drop out rate, especially impact of therapy break-off
evaltuated by number of drop outs due to therapy break-off
Measured: up to 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2022
- Study start19 Feb 2019
- Primary completion3 Nov 2021
- Study completion31 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obstructive Sleep ApneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- National, monocentric, prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial with 2 arms. Arm 1: Control group - Standard Care (SC) Arm 2: Intervention group - Standard Care (SC) + digital patient support (DPS) tool
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Facharztzentrum Sonneberg-Coburg uBAG
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heinen und Löwenstein GmbH & Co. KG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Franke, Dr.med., Principal investigator, Facharztzentrum Sonneberg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05440279
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2947
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Antic NA, Catcheside P, Buchan C, Hensley M, Naughton MT, Rowland S, Williamson B, Windler S, McEvoy RD. The effect of CPAP in normalizing daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and neurocognitive function in patients with moderate to severe OSA. Sleep. 2011 Jan 1;34(1):111-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.1.111.
PubMed 21203366Budhiraja R, Parthasarathy S, Drake CL, Roth T, Sharief I, Budhiraja P, Saunders V, Hudgel DW. Early CPAP use identifies subsequent adherence to CPAP therapy. Sleep. 2007 Mar;30(3):320-4.
PubMed 17425228Hwang D, Chang JW, Benjafield AV, Crocker ME, Kelly C, Becker KA, Kim JB, Woodrum RR, Liang J, Derose SF. Effect of Telemedicine Education and Telemonitoring on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence. The Tele-OSA Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 1;197(1):117-126. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0582OC.
PubMed 28858567Kushida CA, Littner MR, Hirshkowitz M, Morgenthaler TI, Alessi CA, Bailey D, Boehlecke B, Brown TM, Coleman J Jr, Friedman L, Kapen S, Kapur VK, Kramer M, Lee-Chiong T, Owens J, Pancer JP, Swick TJ, Wise MS; American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep. 2006 Mar;29(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.3.375.
PubMed 16553024Lewis KE, Seale L, Bartle IE, Watkins AJ, Ebden P. Early predictors of CPAP use for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2004 Feb 1;27(1):134-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.1.134.
PubMed 14998250Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE. A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Dec;15(6):343-56. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PubMed 21652236Shoib, S., Malik, J. A., Masoodi, S. R., & Rashid, A. (2018). Screening for comorbidities in obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(1), VC01-VC03. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/27635.11071
Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Bloxham T, George CF, Greenberg H, Kader G, Mahowald M, Younger J, Pack AI. Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning. Sleep. 2007 Jun;30(6):711-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.6.711.
PubMed 17580592Duran J, Esnaola S, Rubio R, Iztueta A. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and related clinical features in a population-based sample of subjects aged 30 to 70 yr. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):685-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2005065.
PubMed 11254524Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 1;177(9):1006-14. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws342. Epub 2013 Apr 14.
PubMed 23589584Franke C, Piezonna F, Schafer R, Grimm A, Loris LM, Schwaibold M. Effect of a digital patient motivation and support tool on CPAP/APAP adherence and daytime sleepiness: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2023 Aug 17;22(1):49-63. doi: 10.1007/s41105-023-00479-9. eCollection 2024 Jan.
PubMed 38469583
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of an Early Combination of Automated Electronic and Telemedical Support on the Therapeutic Results of CPAP and APAP Patients and as a Supplement to (Tele-) Medical Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05440279
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2947
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Adherence, Treatment
- Keywords
- Interventional, randomized, adherence, continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP, telehealth, obstructive sleep apnea, digital patient support
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Facharztzentrum Sonneberg-Coburg uBAGUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Heinen und Löwenstein GmbH & Co. KG
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a type of sleep-related breathing disorders that is characterized by a sleep-related constriction (obstruction) of the upper airways. The treatment with continuous application of positive airway pressure (CPAP) via respiratory mask forms the therapeutical standard of OSA. The autoCPAP (automatic positive airway pressure: APAP) therapy is an additional treatment option for patients with more unstable conditions (e.g. due to sleep position) which is characterized by a dynamic adaption of the applied airway pressure according to patients therapeutical needs. Device usage time and therapy adherence are crucial for treatment success.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of a digital patient support (DPS) tool, complementary to standard care on continuous and automatic positive airway pressure (CPAP, APAP) adherence and daytime sleepiness after 12 weeks in patients diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
All patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30 per hour are prospectively included and randomized to receive standard care (SC) or standard care with personalized DPS via prisma APP prototype version (SC+DPS). In both arms, initiation of therapy and standardized therapy control after 12 weeks is carried out identically. Patients in the SC+DPS arm received additionally automated feedback on their therapy and motivational messages, as well as therapy recommendations.
Detailed description
Clinical Picture From the epidemiological view obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common type of sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD). OSA is characterized by a sleep-related constriction (obstruction) of the upper airways that in adulthood is often caused by a neuromuscular related impairment of the pharyngeal tone. OSA is linked to many negative health consequences and is associated with a large number of comorbidities.
General treatment As a rule SRBD are treated with appropriate therapy devices that transmit positive airway pressure (PAP) via respiratory masks. In the case of the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) therapeutical standard is formed by application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). CPAP therapy devices provide a stable positive airway pressure during sleep to prevent the upper airway obstructions. The determination of the essential airway pressure that keeps airways open takes place within the therapy setting night in the sleep laboratory under polysomnographic monitoring. Patients with more unstable pressure needs, e.g. based on position shifts during the night, also qualify for an autoCPAP (APAP) therapy. APAP therapy devices adapt the applied airway pressure dynamically within defined ranges according to patients' therapeutical needs. Therapy success is essentially defined by average device usage time and patients' long-term therapy adherence which in term is affected by a broad variety of factors. The identification of these factors therefore lead to the development of different treatment strategies to improve patients' therapy adherence.
Usual therapeutical process Patients with suspected OSA are surveyed according to their symptomatology and receive a sleep medical examination under polygraphical or polysomnographical observation. During the sleep medical examination numerous cardiorespiratory and somnological signals are recorded and evaluated.
As far as the evaluation of the recorded signals leads to the diagnosis of OSA and no indications for another type of PAP therapy are present, the adjustment to CPAP or APAP therapy under polysomnographical observation takes place immediately after diagnosis.
Following this, patients receive an appropriate adjusted CPAP- or APAP therapy device and get introduced in it´s handling to continue therapy by themselves in their home environment.
As part of the nightly home therapy, patients are expected to use the device according to the physicians advice. During the home therapy phase, the device is recording specific data to subsequently allow to draw conclusions about the therapeutic process and the therapy quality. In case of difficulties with therapy and dependent on their causes, patients are admonished to contact the sleep laboratory (regarding general problems with therapy) or the provider (regarding problems with the respiratory mask or device settings).
After a period of about 12 weeks, patients again appear in person in the sleep laboratory as part of the general therapy control. During the therapy control, the home usage data recorded by the therapy device are printed in reportform and the interventions which were implemented between first therapy setting and the therapy control are evaluated.
Finally, the medicating physician evaluates the therapy success within a conversation with the patients. In case of an inadequate outcome, therapy settings may have to be optimized.
Rationale of the study Literature shows that the first days of home therapy are crucial for long-term therapy adherence and that telemetrical support through automatic feedback can have a positive effect on therapy adherence.
However, there is a lack of experience how the effect on therapy outcomes caused by more individualized, automatic feedbacks combined with an appropriate supply of information and motivation over a longer period can be assessed.
This study is intended to investigate if therapy outcomes of CPAP and APAP patients can be further improved by an early intervention in the form of a combination of telemetric and electronic support.
Description of the applied medical device The applied medical device are the CE certified medical devices prismaSOFT/ prismaSMART (Type WM090TD) made by Löwenstein Medical Techology GmbH und Co. KG Hamburg. The applied accessories (especially breathing tubes, masks, humidifier, modems) are CE certified, too.
Devices of the WM090TD type are pressure-controlled, non-invasive, non-lifesupporting therapy devices or treating sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs) using a mask. The devices are used on persons weighing 30 kg or more. CPAP mode can be used on persons aged 3 years upwards. The device may only be used on a physician's instructions. (auto)CPAP mode provides positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnea in patients who breathe spontaneously.
Devices of the WM090TD type are used in clinical facilities and in the domestic environment. In the domestic environment, the devices also ac-company the owner on trips away.
The application of the device as part of this study takes place according to it´s intended use and within it´s indication range.
Procedure and interventions
If an OSA was diagnosed, patients will be asked for study participation and get informed about the rationale of the study. In case of patients informed consent they will be randomized to one of two groups (Standard Care = control group vs. Standard Care + Digital Patient Support Tool = intervention group).
At baseline, all patients receive an education session with a respiratory therapist about OSA and its consequences, proper use and maintenance of the CPAP device and mask, and therapy and study expectations. All patients are provided with a fixed or auto CPAP device (prismaSMART/ prismaSOFT, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG), a heated humidifier (prismaAQUA, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG) if needed, and a fitting interface. The initiation of therapy with anamnesis, diagnosis night, titration night, education, etc., as well as standardized therapy control after 12 weeks is carried out identically in standard care (SC) and in standard care with personalized digital support via prototype of prisma APP (SC+DPS) group and according to clinical routine.
At the beginning and with completion of the study every participant is surveyed about his daytime sleepiness applying the standardized questionnaire "Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)".
With completion of the study, each patient furthermore assesses his satisfaction with the CPAP therapy in general and with focus on therapy instructions and support. For this purpose, they rate 8 questions on a scale of 0-4, with a 4 being the best rating (0: strongly disagree, 1: barely disagree, 2: partly agree, 3: mostly agree, 4: strongly agree).
The intervention (SC+DPS) group receives electronic therapy support in addition to standard care. The electronic therapy support consists of:
- Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire),
- electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy and subjective therapy success,
- possibility to set personal adherence goals every week,
- links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories,
- provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- National, monocentric, prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial with 2 arms. Arm 1: Control group - Standard Care (SC) Arm 2: Intervention group - Standard Care (SC) + digital patient support (DPS) tool
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Care (SC) | No intervention | –Treatment in the control group takes place as standard care that includes an education session with a respiratory therapist about OSA and its consequences, proper use and maintenance of the CPAP device and mask, and therapy and study expectations, provision with a fixed or auto CPAP device (prismaSMART/ prismaSOFT, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG), a heated humidifier (prismaAQUA, Löwenstein Medical Technology GmbH \& Co. KG) if needed, and a fitting interface, the initiation of therapy with anamnesis, diagnosis night, titration night, education, etc., as well as standardized therapy control after 12 weeks. |
| Standard Care (SC) + digital patient support (DPS) tool | Active comparator | Device: digital patient supportTreatment in the intervention group takes place as standard care (please see description of arm 1 - control group) and electronic therapy support in addition. The electronic therapy support consists of: 1. Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire), 2. electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy, personal adherence goals and subjective therapy success, 3. possibility to set personal adherence goals every week, 4. links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories, 5. provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age 18-80 years
- CPAP-naïve
- confirmed severe OSA (AHI >30/h), diagnosis based on polysomnography (PSG) (MiniScreen PRO with Software MiniscreenViewer, Dr. Fenyves \& Gut, Rangendingen, Germany)
- written informed consent to participate in the study, including a data protection statement.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- presence of a contraindication to PAP therapy
- participation in another study influencing automated electronic support
- lack of possibility to receive emails or use electronic means of communication
- lack of patient consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| digital patient supportIntervention takes place through a regular electronic therapy support in addition to standard care that is defined as follows: Emails to patients with personalized, automated feedback on their therapy (derived from device data received via modem or data entered by the patient via electronic questionnaire), 1. electronic questionnaires (web-based) on possible problems during therapy and subjective therapy success, 2. possibility to set personal adherence goals every week, 3. links to explanations and videos on therapy and the handling of therapy equipment and accessories, 4. provision of data for the trial center in the event of contact by the patient, as well as for routine therapy monitoring. | Device | Standard Care (SC) + digital patient support (DPS) tool |
Primary outcome
Daytime sleepiness (ESS Score)
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks (Diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Significant change in daytime sleepiness of CPAP/ APAP patients with standard care plus support of a digital patient support (DPS) tool versus patients with standard care without support of a digital patient support (DPS) tool from baseline at therapy control after 12 weeks
9 secondary outcomes
Therapy adherence
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Therapy efficacy
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
type and frequency of usage of device comfort features
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
satisfaction with therapy and care according to standardized survey
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Investigation of progress of therapy adherence, therapy efficacy and side effects in the intervention group
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Investigation of frequency of usage of the DPS (Digital Patient Support) tool in the intervention group
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Investigation of type of usage of the DPS (Digital Patient Support) tool in the intervention group
Time frame: Within 12 weeks (period between diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)
Correlation between secondary variables and primary variable to investigate the impact of secondary variables on the primary outcome
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Investigation of the drop out rate, especially impact of therapy break-off
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2022.
- Background: PubMed 21203366Antic NA, Catcheside P, Buchan C, Hensley M, Naughton MT, Rowland S, Williamson B, Windler S, McEvoy RD. The effect of CPAP in normalizing daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and neurocognitive function in patients with moderate to severe OSA. Sleep. 2011 Jan 1;34(1):111-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.1.111.
- Background: PubMed 17425228Budhiraja R, Parthasarathy S, Drake CL, Roth T, Sharief I, Budhiraja P, Saunders V, Hudgel DW. Early CPAP use identifies subsequent adherence to CPAP therapy. Sleep. 2007 Mar;30(3):320-4.
- Background: PubMed 28858567Hwang D, Chang JW, Benjafield AV, Crocker ME, Kelly C, Becker KA, Kim JB, Woodrum RR, Liang J, Derose SF. Effect of Telemedicine Education and Telemonitoring on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence. The Tele-OSA Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 1;197(1):117-126. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0582OC.
- Background: PubMed 16553024Kushida CA, Littner MR, Hirshkowitz M, Morgenthaler TI, Alessi CA, Bailey D, Boehlecke B, Brown TM, Coleman J Jr, Friedman L, Kapen S, Kapur VK, Kramer M, Lee-Chiong T, Owens J, Pancer JP, Swick TJ, Wise MS; American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep. 2006 Mar;29(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.3.375.
- Background: PubMed 14998250Lewis KE, Seale L, Bartle IE, Watkins AJ, Ebden P. Early predictors of CPAP use for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2004 Feb 1;27(1):134-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.1.134.
- Background: PubMed 21652236Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE. A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Dec;15(6):343-56. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- BackgroundShoib, S., Malik, J. A., Masoodi, S. R., & Rashid, A. (2018). Screening for comorbidities in obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(1), VC01-VC03. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/27635.11071
- Background: PubMed 17580592Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Bloxham T, George CF, Greenberg H, Kader G, Mahowald M, Younger J, Pack AI. Relationship between hours of CPAP use and achieving normal levels of sleepiness and daily functioning. Sleep. 2007 Jun;30(6):711-9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.6.711.
- Background: PubMed 11254524Duran J, Esnaola S, Rubio R, Iztueta A. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and related clinical features in a population-based sample of subjects aged 30 to 70 yr. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):685-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2005065.
- Background: PubMed 23589584Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 1;177(9):1006-14. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws342. Epub 2013 Apr 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38469583Franke C, Piezonna F, Schafer R, Grimm A, Loris LM, Schwaibold M. Effect of a digital patient motivation and support tool on CPAP/APAP adherence and daytime sleepiness: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2023 Aug 17;22(1):49-63. doi: 10.1007/s41105-023-00479-9. eCollection 2024 Jan.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model Using Peripheral Oxygen Saturation and Ballistocardiography Signals for Predicting Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Supplemental Oxygen for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Adults With Chronic Opioid Use.
Sleep-disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Recruiting
Nightly Wearable Monitoring During Home-Based Submental Electrical Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 1/2
DRonabinol Treatment of OSA
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Franke, Dr.med. principal investigator
Facharztzentrum Sonneberg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing digital patient support in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Adherence, Treatment, run by Facharztzentrum Sonneberg-Coburg uBAG at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Daytime sleepiness (ESS Score) (time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks (Diagnosis/ baseline to therapy control)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05440279, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2022.