Quality of LifeNCT05438134
Enhancing Resilience in Senior Community Residents
A study testing SMART-3RP Group Intervention in people with Quality of Life and Stress, Psychological, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This randomized waitlist-controlled trial tests the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resiliency Training Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP), a mind-body intervention, to enhance resilience and flourishing among residents in continuing care retirement communities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological
- What is being tested?
- SMART-3RP Group Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 288 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jun 2022to 5 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Resident of an Erickson Senior Living community
- Currently residing in an Erickson Senior Living apartment home
- Sufficient English language skills to participate in study procedures
Who cannot join
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Unable or unwilling to participate in in-person group sessions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Enhancing Resilience in Senior Living Community Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized waitlist-controlled trial tests the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resiliency Training Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP), a mind-body intervention, to enhance resilience and flourishing among residents in continuing care retirement communities. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the SMART-3RP group will report greater increases in resilience and flourishing relative to participants in the control group.
Read the detailed description
This randomized control trial tests the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resiliency Training Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP) to improve resilience and flourishing among older adults residing in continuing care retirement communities relative to a wait-list control group. At enrollment, participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group using computer generated 1:1 blocked randomization stratified by community site. The intervention group will receive the SMART-3RP program immediately upon enrollment; the wait-list control group will be invited to receive the SMART-3RP program after the final survey time point. An estimate of 360 participants will be recruited from up to nine geographically diverse Erickson Senior Living communities.
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological
- Being tested
- SMART-3RP Group Intervention
- Keywords
- Resiliency, Flourishing, Coping Skills, Stress Reduction, Healthy Aging
- Medical subject headings
- Stress, Psychological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SMART-3RP Group InterventionBehavioural
Nine 1.5 hour group sessions focusing on developing:
- An understanding of stress physiology and the physiology of the relaxation response;
- A regular practice of eliciting the relaxation response; and
- Cognitive behavioral and positive psychology/resilience skills.
Participants receive a copy of the SMART-3RP session manual and audio recorded guided meditations for independent relaxation practice. Participants are encouraged to practice eliciting the relaxation response daily throughout the study, using the audio recordings or other mind body techniques. Participants will use a practice log to track their practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SMART-3RP Group Intervention | Experimental | Residents will participate in 9 structured weekly group sessions which incorporates stress management and relaxation training upon enrollment. Receives: Behavioral: SMART-3RP Group Intervention |
| Waitlist Control Group Intervention | Active comparator | Residents will participate in 9 structured weekly group sessions which incorporates stress management and relaxation training after the final survey time point. Receives: Behavioral: SMART-3RP Group Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Resilience: Current Experiences Scale (CES)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in resilience between study groups (CES score range 0-115), with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Flourishing: Flourishing Measure (FM)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in flourishing between study groups (FM score range 0-10), with higher scores indicating greater flourishing.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Psychological distress: Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in psychological distress between study groups (PHQ4 score range 0-12), with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Social isolation: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Social Isolation (PROMIS-SI)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in social isolation between study groups (PROMIS-SI score range 4-20), with higher scores indicating greater isolation.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Physical symptoms: Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in physical symptom burden between study groups (CMSAS score range 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Coping self-efficacy: Measure of Current Status - Part A (MOCS-A)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in coping self-efficacy between study groups (MOCS-A score range 0-52), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Community well-being: Community Well Being Survey (CWB)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in community well-being between study groups (CWB range 0-10), with higher scores indicating greater community well-being.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Positive affect: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Positive Subscale (PANAS-POS)
We will investigate longitudinal differences in positive affect between study groups (PANAS-POS range 10-50), with higher scores indicating greater positive affect.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2022
- Study start24 Jun 2022
- Primary completion5 Apr 2023
- Study completion5 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Quality of LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lara Traeger, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Lara Traeger, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05438134
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021A019096
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Sep 27;153(18):2093-101.
PubMed 8379800UN Dept of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Population ageing and development: ten years after Madrid. Population Facts. 2012;No. 2012/4.
Park ER, Traeger L, Vranceanu AM, Scult M, Lerner JA, Benson H, Denninger J, Fricchione GL. The development of a patient-centered program based on the relaxation response: the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP). Psychosomatics. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.09.001. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PubMed 23352048VanderWeele TJ. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8148-8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
PubMed 28705870Park ER, Perez GK, Millstein RA, Luberto CM, Traeger L, Proszynski J, Chad-Friedman E, Kuhlthau KA. A Virtual Resiliency Intervention Promoting Resiliency for Parents of Children with Learning and Attentional Disabilities: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Matern Child Health J. 2020 Jan;24(1):39-53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02815-3.
PubMed 31650412Gonzalez A, Shim M, Mahaffey B, Vranceanu AM, Reffi A, Park ER. The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP) in Patients with Headache and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Data. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Feb;20(1):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
PubMed 29773354Vranceanu AM, Riklin E, Merker VL, Macklin EA, Park ER, Plotkin SR. Mind-body therapy via videoconferencing in patients with neurofibromatosis: An RCT. Neurology. 2016 Aug 23;87(8):806-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003005. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
PubMed 27449066Stahl JE, Dossett ML, LaJoie AS, Denninger JW, Mehta DH, Goldman R, Fricchione GL, Benson H. Relaxation Response and Resiliency Training and Its Effect on Healthcare Resource Utilization. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140212. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26461184Scult M, Haime V, Jacquart J, Takahashi J, Moscowitz B, Webster A, Denninger JW, Mehta DH. A healthy aging program for older adults: effects on self-efficacy and morale. Adv Mind Body Med. 2015 Winter;29(1):26-33.
PubMed 25607120Nasreddine, Z. (2019). Montreal Cognitive Assessment FAQ, Can the MoCA be administered remotely? Retrieved from https://www.mocatest.org/faq/
Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709.
PubMed 8532986Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
PubMed 15189396Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A Stage Model of Behavioral Therapies Research: Getting Started and Moving on From Stage I. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2001;8(2):133-142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.8.2.133
Shih WJ, Ohman-Strickland PA, Lin Y. Analysis of pilot and early phase studies with small sample sizes. Stat Med. 2004 Jun 30;23(12):1827-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.1807.
PubMed 15195318Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PubMed 26092476
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhancing Resilience in Senior Living Community Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05438134
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021A019096
- Conditions
- Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological
- Keywords
- Resiliency, Flourishing, Coping Skills, Stress Reduction, Healthy Aging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized waitlist-controlled trial tests the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resiliency Training Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP), a mind-body intervention, to enhance resilience and flourishing among residents in continuing care retirement communities. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the SMART-3RP group will report greater increases in resilience and flourishing relative to participants in the control group.
Detailed description
This randomized control trial tests the efficacy of the Stress Management and Resiliency Training Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (SMART-3RP) to improve resilience and flourishing among older adults residing in continuing care retirement communities relative to a wait-list control group. At enrollment, participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group using computer generated 1:1 blocked randomization stratified by community site. The intervention group will receive the SMART-3RP program immediately upon enrollment; the wait-list control group will be invited to receive the SMART-3RP program after the final survey time point. An estimate of 360 participants will be recruited from up to nine geographically diverse Erickson Senior Living communities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SMART-3RP Group Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: SMART-3RP Group InterventionResidents will participate in 9 structured weekly group sessions which incorporates stress management and relaxation training upon enrollment. |
| Waitlist Control Group Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: SMART-3RP Group InterventionResidents will participate in 9 structured weekly group sessions which incorporates stress management and relaxation training after the final survey time point. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Resident of an Erickson Senior Living community
- Currently residing in an Erickson Senior Living apartment home
- Sufficient English language skills to participate in study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Unable or unwilling to participate in in-person group sessions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SMART-3RP Group InterventionNine 1.5 hour group sessions focusing on developing: 1. An understanding of stress physiology and the physiology of the relaxation response; 2. A regular practice of eliciting the relaxation response; and 3. Cognitive behavioral and positive psychology/resilience skills. Participants receive a copy of the SMART-3RP session manual and audio recorded guided meditations for independent relaxation practice. Participants are encouraged to practice eliciting the relaxation response daily throughout the study, using the audio recordings or other mind body techniques. Participants will use a practice log to track their practice. | Behavioural | SMART-3RP Group Intervention, Waitlist Control Group Intervention |
Primary outcome
Resilience: Current Experiences Scale (CES)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
We will investigate longitudinal differences in resilience between study groups (CES score range 0-115), with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Flourishing: Flourishing Measure (FM)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
We will investigate longitudinal differences in flourishing between study groups (FM score range 0-10), with higher scores indicating greater flourishing.
6 secondary outcomes
Psychological distress: Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ4)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Social isolation: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Social Isolation (PROMIS-SI)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Physical symptoms: Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Coping self-efficacy: Measure of Current Status - Part A (MOCS-A)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Community well-being: Community Well Being Survey (CWB)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Positive affect: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Positive Subscale (PANAS-POS)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 8379800McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Sep 27;153(18):2093-101.
- BackgroundUN Dept of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Population ageing and development: ten years after Madrid. Population Facts. 2012;No. 2012/4.
- Background: PubMed 23352048Park ER, Traeger L, Vranceanu AM, Scult M, Lerner JA, Benson H, Denninger J, Fricchione GL. The development of a patient-centered program based on the relaxation response: the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP). Psychosomatics. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.09.001. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 28705870VanderWeele TJ. On the promotion of human flourishing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8148-8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 31650412Park ER, Perez GK, Millstein RA, Luberto CM, Traeger L, Proszynski J, Chad-Friedman E, Kuhlthau KA. A Virtual Resiliency Intervention Promoting Resiliency for Parents of Children with Learning and Attentional Disabilities: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Matern Child Health J. 2020 Jan;24(1):39-53. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02815-3.
- Background: PubMed 29773354Gonzalez A, Shim M, Mahaffey B, Vranceanu AM, Reffi A, Park ER. The Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP) in Patients with Headache and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Data. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Feb;20(1):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 27449066Vranceanu AM, Riklin E, Merker VL, Macklin EA, Park ER, Plotkin SR. Mind-body therapy via videoconferencing in patients with neurofibromatosis: An RCT. Neurology. 2016 Aug 23;87(8):806-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003005. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
- Background: PubMed 26461184Stahl JE, Dossett ML, LaJoie AS, Denninger JW, Mehta DH, Goldman R, Fricchione GL, Benson H. Relaxation Response and Resiliency Training and Its Effect on Healthcare Resource Utilization. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0140212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140212. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25607120Scult M, Haime V, Jacquart J, Takahashi J, Moscowitz B, Webster A, Denninger JW, Mehta DH. A healthy aging program for older adults: effects on self-efficacy and morale. Adv Mind Body Med. 2015 Winter;29(1):26-33.
- BackgroundNasreddine, Z. (2019). Montreal Cognitive Assessment FAQ, Can the MoCA be administered remotely? Retrieved from https://www.mocatest.org/faq/
- Background: PubMed 8532986Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709.
- Background: PubMed 15189396Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
Related trials for Quality of Life
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Study of a Support Program for Quality of Life in Chinese Cancer Patients and Survivors
Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Alberta Cancer Exercise Dose in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lara Traeger, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SMART-3RP Group Intervention in people with Quality of Life and Stress, Psychological, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Resilience: Current Experiences Scale (CES) (time frame: Up to 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05438134, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2023.