AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health IssueNCT05429619

Evaluating Implementation and Impact of PeerOnCall, a Mobile Health Approach to Peer Support for Canadian Public Safety Personnel

An observational study of Mental Health Issue and Mental Stress, run by McMaster University at 3 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective cohort study design will be implemented across four sectors and multiple organizations sites to evaluate implementation and impact of the apps. Pre/post impact data will be collected over a six-month implementation period to assess whether the apps lead to increased Public Safety Personnel outreach to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
PeerOnCall
How many people
950 participants
Where
3 sitesCanada
Study dates
2 May 2023to 1 Apr 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Individuals employed by participating Public Safety Organizations (fire services, paramedic services, emergency communications, correctional services).

Who may be able to join

  • Public Safety Personnel working in fire services, paramedic services, emergency communications and correctional services
  • Employed (full or part-time) by the participating organizations
  • Agree to download the PeerOnCall app on their mobile phone (Android or Apple)

Who cannot join

  • Not able to access the app on their mobile health device

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Canada3 sites
  • Western University

    London, Ontario, N6A 3K7

  • Memorial University of Newfoundland

    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

  • Wilfrid Laurier University

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Advancing Peer Support Programming to Address PTSD and Trauma Among Canadian Public Safety Personnel and Veterans

A prospective cohort study design will be implemented across four sectors and multiple organizations sites to evaluate implementation and impact of the apps. Pre/post impact data will be collected over a six-month implementation period to assess whether the apps lead to increased Public Safety Personnel outreach to peer support (primary outcome), and to increased mental health literacy, and decreased mental distress (secondary outcomes). Recruitment will take place at three levels; 1) organizations (including knowledge users/organization champions), 2) peer support providers, and 3) public safety personnel employed within each participating organization. Sources of implementation and impact data for the six-month trial will include: 1) app utilization data, 2) knowledge user/organization champion interviews, 3) surveys with public safety personnel, 4) focus groups with peer support providers, and 5) implementation costs. Analysis will focus on both implementation and effectiveness to address the research questions related to the impact of the apps, as well as how the process and context of implementation shapes effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

PeerOnCall was developed to support frontline PSP and includes features such as anonymous calling or messaging to a choice of peer support providers, access to self-screening tools, a personal wellness toolbox, and "tips to cope" resources. PeerOnCall Support is designed for peer support providers to provide a secure, private platform for providing support to peers who reach out via text or telephone through the PeerOnCall app.

This study will explicitly scale implementation and evaluation of these apps in the context of day-to-day work within a range of PSP organizations across four different service sectors (corrections, emergency communicators, fire services and paramedic services).

The implementation period for the app is six-months. Prior to the end of the six-month implementation period, the sector lead will meet with each organization to review app utilization data and to discuss options for continued usage of the app within the organization.

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will inform exploration, not only of whether the apps 'work', but also about how the apps are adopted, and the individual and organizational forces that shape adoption.

The study will deploy the apps to a purposive sample of approximately 24 organizations across four sectors: 1) correctional workers; 2) emergency communicators (e.g., 911 call takers, dispatchers); 3) fire services; and 4) paramedic services. All participating organizations must have an established internal peer support service (with procedures for vetting, training, and ongoing support of the peer support providers), an organization champion who will liaise between the research team and employees, and support from leadership to participate in the study. The process of recruitment will be facilitated by sector leads and knowledge users who have extensive networks within the sectors. The number of organizations recruited across each sector will be different, recognizing differences in how services are provided, and the need for understanding breadth versus depth of implementation in key stakeholder groups.

Within each sector, key knowledge users (at the sector level) and organization champions (at the organization level) will be recruited. The sector-level knowledge users will provide insights into general considerations for implementation and evaluation. In the participating organizations, one or two "champions" will be recruited who will be responsible for organization onboarding, including customizing content, securing participation of in-house peer support providers, and sharing information with co-workers via formal and informal communication channels.

Peer support providers within each organization will be recruited to provide services through the app. All trained peer providers within each organization will be invited to participate. Information meetings will be held in each organization for the peer supporters regarding the PeerOnCall Support app. The orientation will ensure that the peer supporteres are aware of how to use the app and the protocols for responding to PSP who reach out for support, including those who may be in crisis.

All eligible employees within each organization will be invited to participate in the research via established communication channels within the organization (e.g., recruitment posters distributed via email, social media etc.), and information meetings held in the organization in the month prior to distributing access to the PeerOnCall app. After orientation within the organization, employees will be provided with an organization code to access the PeerOnCall app once it has been downloaded from the Google Play or Apple store. Employees can choose whether to download the app and they are able to use the app without engaging in the baseline and follow-up surveys.

To ensure adequate power for evaluating impact of the app, sample size estimates were based on the primary outcome of interest: the frequency of outreach to peer support through the app (count of the number of times contact was initiated by PeerOnCall users via phone and/or text). The sample size was calculated using a one-sided Poisson test since the frequency of outreach via the app can only increase from no outreach at baseline. Assuming 90% power, a significance level of 0.025 for a one-sided test, a hypothesized rate of 0.2 (20% increase in rates of outreach) and alternative hypothesis rate of 0.1 (thus a difference of 0.1), 161 participants will be required. Considering an estimated 20% drop out rate, 202 participants will be needed.

Aggregate data collected will include participant adoptions rates across each organization (e.g., the number of times the app was downloaded) as well as aggregate data on how often the app was used, average durations of use, the number of times different features were accessed, and the number and duration of contacts with peer supporters.

Knowledge user/Organization Champion Interviews will be conducted at baseline, three-months and six-months after app implementation begins at each participating organization to explore the context for implementation. Interview questions will be congruent with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. These data will be used to identify facilitators and barriers to app use and inform interpretation of the adoption rates and outcome data both within and across participating organizations.

To track immediate feedback about the peer support service, a 'pop-up' feedback survey is presented to users within the application following each peer support encounter asking for a rating of their level of distress before and after the interaction using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale. There is also an option to provide comments about the encounter. Data from the feedback surveys will help understand the immediate impact of peer support on level of distress.

To evaluate user impact over time, employees in each organization will be invited to complete baseline, three-month, and six-month follow-up surveys via a link to complete a survey.

Focus groups will be scheduled at three-months and six months after the implementation period with PeerOnCall Support peer support providers to explore their experiences with providing peer support through the app. Three sets of focus groups will be conducted within each sector with six to eight participants in each group.

Data regarding implementation costs within each organization will include: the organization champion's time invested on onboarding and communication, administrative time for uploading users and responding to requests, and metrics regarding peer support service provision. The cost of server hosting, troubleshooting, and regular upgrades to the apps will also be tracked across sites.

Implementation within each organization will be tracked via descriptive data regarding adoption rates (proportion of employees who download \& use the app), and usage rates over time, including the number of times users reach out for peer support via phone/text, and the number of repeated calls.

To evaluate effectiveness, analysis of the pre/post survey data will examine the change in scores across the dataset in dimensions of mental health literacy, levels of mental distress (standardized assessments of anxiety, depression, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and frequency of outreach behaviors in seeking mental health support. Multiple hierarchical linear regression analyses will be conducted to examine differences in effectiveness based on gender, service, and job tenure.

Effectiveness of the peer support service will also be evaluated by comparing change scores in level of distress before and after each peer support encounter via the in-app surveys.

Identification of barriers and facilitators to adoption of the technology and peer support service will occur through qualitative content analysis of the interview transcripts with the organizational champions and focus groups with the peer supporters. The CFIR framework will guide the analysis process considering organization internal and external forces, as well as how communication strategies influence implementation, and consistency in providing the peer support service.

All the data from the evaluation process will be reviewed to generate recommendations for optimizing uptake and impact of the app across different types of organizations.

Being tested
PeerOnCall
Keywords
peer support, mobile health
Medical subject headings
Stress, Psychological, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PeerOnCallOther

    Also called PeerOnCall Support

    A mobile health peer-to-peer support platform that consists of two inter-connected apps: PeerOnCall and PeerOnCall Support. The apps were co-designed by and for the public safety community in Canada, with customized content for correctional workers, emergency communicators, firefighters, paramedics and police.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accessing peer support via phone or text via the PeerOnCall app (Frequency count)

    Number of times PeerOnCall users within an organization create a connection with peer support providers via the app platform (Software analytics)

    Measured: Monthly intervals from 1 to 6 months.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change in Mental Health Literacy (6 items, 7-point Likert scale rating)

    Rating using a 7-point Likert scale of perceived improvement in dimensions of mental health literacy (Promote mental health, knowledge of how to identify and address mental health issues in self and others, how to identify relevant resources). Range 7-42 with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived literacy.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Changes in symptoms of anxiety (GAD-7 screening tool)

    The Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale is a 7-item tool to evaluate anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks (4-point Likert scale ratings). Scores ranges from 0-21 with a score of 10 or more indicative of potential generalized anxiety disorder.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  3. Change in symptoms of depression (PHQ-9 screening tool)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a 9-item screening tool for depression. Scores range from 0-27, with a score of 10 or more indicative of major depression.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  4. Change in symptoms of trauma (PTSD Checklist, PCL-5 short version)

    The short version of the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) is a four-item PTSD screening checklist exploring responses to a stressful experience in terms of symptoms over the past month. Scores range from 0-16 with higher scores indicating more severe impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  5. Change in help-seeking behaviour

    Rating of how likely to reach out for support related to four different types of support (In-person peer support, app-based peer support, professional support, and employee assistance program). Ratings on a 5-point scale from not at all likely to extremely likely.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  6. Perceived value of the app

    Questions about perceived impact adapted from the Mobile Rating Application Rating Scale (MARS) asks users to rate (on a 5-point Likert scale) the perceived value of the app on 7 items (Awareness of the importance of addressing mental health, reaching out for help and impact on mental health, perceived support, and ability to cope at work).

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

  7. Change in perceived level of stress

    Rating of current level of stress on a 7-point Likert scale from very low to very high.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  8. Change in perceptions of workplace psychological health and safety climate

    Rating of psychological health and safety climate in the workplace on a 7-point Likert scale from toxic to excellent.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  9. Change in current mental health challenges

    Rating of current mental health challenges on a 100-point Visual Analogue scale from ill to healthy.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

  10. Impact on work

    Questions about the number of hours users were scheduled/expected to work and the number of hours of work users missed because of the way they were feeling over the past 2 weeks.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2022
  2. Study start2 May 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
950 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05429619
Sponsor's protocol ID
14731
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
19 Jun 2022
Last updated
15 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: May share aggregate utilisation data without personal identifiers.

Publications

  • Zuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, Keane TM, Marx BP, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):790-800. doi: 10.1002/da.22942. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

    PubMed 31356709
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PubMed 16717171
  • Ramkissoon A, Smith P, Oudyk J. Dissecting the effect of workplace exposures on workers' rating of psychological health and safety. Am J Ind Med. 2019 May;62(5):412-421. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22964. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

    PubMed 30916413
  • Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Mar-Apr;39:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

    PubMed 26719105
  • Plouffe RA, Nazarov A, Forchuk CA, Gargala D, Deda E, Le T, Bourret-Gheysen J, Jackson B, Soares V, Hosseiny F, Smith P, Roth M, MacDougall AG, Marlborough M, Jetly R, Heber A, Albuquerque J, Lanius R, Balderson K, Dupuis G, Mehta V, Richardson JD. Impacts of morally distressing experiences on the mental health of Canadian health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 10;12(1):1984667. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1984667. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34777712
  • Pavolini E, Kuhlmann E, Agartan TI, Burau V, Mannion R, Speed E. Healthcare governance, professions and populism: Is there a relationship? An explorative comparison of five European countries. Health Policy. 2018 Oct;122(10):1140-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

    PubMed 30219372
  • Norman M, Ricciardelli R. Operational and organisational stressors in community correctional work: Insights from probation and parole officers in Ontario, Canada. Probat J. 2022 Mar;69(1):86-106. doi: 10.1177/0264550520984253. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

    PubMed 35340787
  • Moll SE, Patten S, Stuart H, MacDermid JC, Kirsh B. Beyond Silence: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial Exploring the Impact of Workplace Mental Health Literacy Training with Healthcare Employees. Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;63(12):826-833. doi: 10.1177/0706743718766051. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

    PubMed 29673271
  • Moll S, Zanhour M, Patten SB, Stuart H, MacDermid J. Evaluating Mental Health Literacy in the Workplace: Development and Psychometric Properties of a Vignette-Based Tool. J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9695-0.

    PubMed 28120136
  • Levis B, Sun Y, He C, Wu Y, Krishnan A, Bhandari PM, Neupane D, Imran M, Brehaut E, Negeri Z, Fischer FH, Benedetti A, Thombs BD; Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration; Che L, Levis A, Riehm K, Saadat N, Azar M, Rice D, Boruff J, Kloda L, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis J, McMillan D, Patten S, Shrier I, Ziegelstein R, Moore A, Akena D, Amtmann D, Arroll B, Ayalon L, Baradaran H, Beraldi A, Bernstein C, Bhana A, Bombardier C, Buji RI, Butterworth P, Carter G, Chagas M, Chan J, Chan LF, Chibanda D, Cholera R, Clover K, Conway A, Conwell Y, Daray F, de Man-van Ginkel J, Delgadillo J, Diez-Quevedo C, Fann J, Field S, Fisher J, Fung D, Garman E, Gelaye B, Gholizadeh L, Gibson L, Goodyear-Smith F, Green E, Greeno C, Hall B, Hampel P, Hantsoo L, Haroz E, Harter M, Hegerl U, Hides L, Hobfoll S, Honikman S, Hudson M, Hyphantis T, Inagaki M, Ismail K, Jeon HJ, Jette N, Khamseh M, Kiely K, Kohler S, Kohrt B, Kwan Y, Lamers F, Asuncion Lara M, Levin-Aspenson H, Lino V, Liu SI, Lotrakul M, Loureiro S, Lowe B, Luitel N, Lund C, Marrie RA, Marsh L, Marx B, McGuire A, Mohd Sidik S, Munhoz T, Muramatsu K, Nakku J, Navarrete L, Osorio F, Patel V, Pence B, Persoons P, Petersen I, Picardi A, Pugh S, Quinn T, Rancans E, Rathod S, Reuter K, Roch S, Rooney A, Rowe H, Santos I, Schram M, Shaaban J, Shinn E, Sidebottom A, Simning A, Spangenberg L, Stafford L, Sung S, Suzuki K, Swartz R, Tan PLL, Taylor-Rowan M, Tran T, Turner A, van der Feltz-Cornelis C, van Heyningen T, van Weert H, Wagner L, Li Wang J, White J, Winkley K, Wynter K, Yamada M, Zhi Zeng Q, Zhang Y. Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2290-2300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6504.

    PubMed 32515813
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PubMed 11556941
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613.

    PubMed 19996233
  • King DK, Shoup JA, Raebel MA, Anderson CB, Wagner NM, Ritzwoller DP, Bender BG. Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks: A Qualitative Study. Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;8:59. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00059. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32195217
  • Keith RE, Crosson JC, O'Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7.

    PubMed 28187747
  • Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):227-39. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.

    PubMed 16004657

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mental Health Issue and Mental Stress, run by McMaster University at 3 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accessing peer support via phone or text via the PeerOnCall app (Frequency count) (time frame: Monthly intervals from 1 to 6 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05429619, which also lists 35 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in