Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyNCT05414968
A Novel Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathy
A study testing Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and Vibration in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Auburn University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of the proposed work is to develop non-pharmacological interventions for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), to improve quality of life of individuals with diabetes, and reduce the prevalence of opiate prescription, sensation loss, falls, and deaths caused by DPN. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and Vibration
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2023to 1 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 5 years
- lab histories that verify participant's control or lack of blood sugars dating back for a period of 1-5 years
Who cannot join
- other diseases or impairments that could affect results (vascular disease verified from medical history
- ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.9 or less
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Auburn University
Auburn, Alabama, 36849
Chad G Rose, PhD, 334-844-3401, chadgrose@auburn.edu
About this study
The objective of the proposed work is to develop non-pharmacological interventions for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), to improve quality of life of individuals with diabetes, and reduce the prevalence of opiate prescription, sensation loss, falls, and deaths caused by DPN. To this end, the proposed study will investigate and determine the feasibility of the non-pharmacological intervention device. The feasibility study involves 16 participants, split evenly between pre-neuropathic diabetic and neuropathic diabetic participants. During the study, each group will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total. Feasibility will be determined by change in pain assessed before and after intervention.
Read the detailed description
To address a gap in DPN treatments, we propose a pragmatic approach towards the development of mechanistically justified therapies to treat DPN. Specifically, we seek to explore undertested non-pharmacological approaches to DPN management through a pilot study establishing safety and feasibility as quantified by biomechanical and sensory-perception changes.
The innovation central to this approach is in the multifactorial combination of pressure, heat, and vibration stimuli to improve foot sensation by 1) reducing edema in the foot and leg via improved venous return and lymphatic return, 2) improving arterial flow both in large, small, and micro-vascular vessels, 3) stimulating endothelial mechanisms like the increase of nitrous oxide that increases microvascular health through alternating compressive pressures from the foot to the thigh, and 4) stimulating nerves through vibration to facilitate nerve repair. This approach has the potential to address an unmet need in DPN, namely, interventions that can address underlying causes of neuropathy. To this end, the proposed research has two specific aims: 1) the construction of a device capable of applying pressure, heat, and vibration to the entire lower extremity for treatment of neuropathy and 2) validation of safety and feasibility of the non-pharmacological intervention device.
At the beginning of the study, foot sensation and blood flow baseline measures will be taken with the foot sensation diagnostic tool and phase-contrast MRI with a foot/ankle coil (Siemens Foot/Ankle 16) at the Auburn University MRI Research Center, respectively. The foot sensation diagnostic tool has undergone testing with over 100 participants with diabetes, and has shown the ability to establish the threshold sensitivity of the sole of the foot from 0.5 to 10 grams force, an order of magnitude more accurate than the standard clinical monofilament-based measure used to establish foot sensitivity and diagnose DPN. The phase-contrast MRI is a highly accurate measure of blood flow, which we will use to validate the mechanistic hypothesis of the proposed non-pharmacological intervention. The phase-contrast MRI does not require the use of contrast-enhancing dyes, and will therefore exclude fewer diabetic participants than contrast-enhanced MRI scans.
During the study, each participant will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total, in a similar manner to IPC studies. At the end of each session, pain will be assessed on scales such as the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) to establish the safety of the proposed intervention. Feasibility will be determined of time to set up, put on, and take off the device. Pre-study baseline measurements of foot sensation via the assessment tool will be compared to post-study measurements to establish any beneficial effect and provide variance for a power analysis to guide the design of future studies. We hypothesize that non-neuropathic diabetic participants may have subclinical neuropathic symptoms which cannot be measured by standard clinical tools but can be measured by the diagnostic device, which may identify the potential for the device to have preventative as well as treatment applications.
Sample Size Justification: A sample size of 16 subjects (8 with non-neuropathic diabetic and 8 with neuropathic diabetic participants) achieves 80% power to detect an effect size as measured in the change in pain scores of 0.55 using a paired t-test with a one tailed Type I error rate of 0.10. Examination of each subgroup will also be conducted. A sample size of 8 subjects achieves 80% power to detect an effect size as measured in the change in pain scores of 0.8 using a paired t-test with a one tailed Type I error rate of 0.10. Therefore, this small study will have statistical power to observe medium to large changes in pain rating (or foot sensation or blood flow). However, it must be noted that achieving statistical significance is not the primary objective of a pilot study. The primary objective is to demonstrate feasibility of the trial by initiating a small version of the trail, identifying areas requiring refinement, and collecting preliminary data provides preliminary evidence of intended effect.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- Being tested
- Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and Vibration
- Keywords
- nonpharmacological intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and VibrationDevice
The innovation central to this approach is in the multifactorial combination of pressure, heat, and vibration stimuli to improve foot sensation. The heat stimuli will be provided with commercially available heating elements. The pressure stimuli will be provided via pneumatic garment. Lastly, the vibrotactile stimuli will be provided with commercially available vibrotactile motors. The non-pharmacological DPN device will be able to safely and consistently control temperature to 100-105°F within 1°F, control pressure to 50 mmHg within 5 mmHg at 0.25 Hz, and provide 5 distinguishable vibrational stimuli to 5 zones on the leg and foot.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot Feasibility Arm | Experimental | Each participant will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total. At the end of each session, pain will be assessed on scales such as the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) to establish the safety and feasibility of the proposed intervention. Receives: Device: Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and Vibration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline Pain Assessment
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
Measured: immediately after each session (up to 30 minutes)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2022
- Study start22 Mar 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- 16 participants will be recruited (8 pre-neuropathic, 8 neuropathic) to evaluate device feasibility through 10 sessions spread over 14 days.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Auburn University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chad Rose, Auburn University
- Investigators
- Chad G Rose, PhD, Principal investigator, Auburn University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05414968
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-114
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: If requested, final, de-identified research data will be made available for sharing to qualified parties by the PI's, so long as such a request does not compromise intellectual property interests, interfere with publication, invade subject privacy, betray confidentiality, or precede data curation. All logs will be anonymized before storage.
Publications
Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):651-71. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651.
PubMed 12006694Feldman EL, Nave KA, Jensen TS, Bennett DLH. New Horizons in Diabetic Neuropathy: Mechanisms, Bioenergetics, and Pain. Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1296-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.005.
PubMed 28334605Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Galloway KT, Polomano RC, McDuffie M, Kwon N, Gallagher RM. Preliminary validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a military population. Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):110-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23137169
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05414968
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22-114
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
- Keywords
- nonpharmacological intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Auburn UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the proposed work is to develop non-pharmacological interventions for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), to improve quality of life of individuals with diabetes, and reduce the prevalence of opiate prescription, sensation loss, falls, and deaths caused by DPN. To this end, the proposed study will investigate and determine the feasibility of the non-pharmacological intervention device. The feasibility study involves 16 participants, split evenly between pre-neuropathic diabetic and neuropathic diabetic participants. During the study, each group will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total. Feasibility will be determined by change in pain assessed before and after intervention.
Detailed description
To address a gap in DPN treatments, we propose a pragmatic approach towards the development of mechanistically justified therapies to treat DPN. Specifically, we seek to explore undertested non-pharmacological approaches to DPN management through a pilot study establishing safety and feasibility as quantified by biomechanical and sensory-perception changes.
The innovation central to this approach is in the multifactorial combination of pressure, heat, and vibration stimuli to improve foot sensation by 1) reducing edema in the foot and leg via improved venous return and lymphatic return, 2) improving arterial flow both in large, small, and micro-vascular vessels, 3) stimulating endothelial mechanisms like the increase of nitrous oxide that increases microvascular health through alternating compressive pressures from the foot to the thigh, and 4) stimulating nerves through vibration to facilitate nerve repair. This approach has the potential to address an unmet need in DPN, namely, interventions that can address underlying causes of neuropathy. To this end, the proposed research has two specific aims: 1) the construction of a device capable of applying pressure, heat, and vibration to the entire lower extremity for treatment of neuropathy and 2) validation of safety and feasibility of the non-pharmacological intervention device.
At the beginning of the study, foot sensation and blood flow baseline measures will be taken with the foot sensation diagnostic tool and phase-contrast MRI with a foot/ankle coil (Siemens Foot/Ankle 16) at the Auburn University MRI Research Center, respectively. The foot sensation diagnostic tool has undergone testing with over 100 participants with diabetes, and has shown the ability to establish the threshold sensitivity of the sole of the foot from 0.5 to 10 grams force, an order of magnitude more accurate than the standard clinical monofilament-based measure used to establish foot sensitivity and diagnose DPN. The phase-contrast MRI is a highly accurate measure of blood flow, which we will use to validate the mechanistic hypothesis of the proposed non-pharmacological intervention. The phase-contrast MRI does not require the use of contrast-enhancing dyes, and will therefore exclude fewer diabetic participants than contrast-enhanced MRI scans.
During the study, each participant will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total, in a similar manner to IPC studies. At the end of each session, pain will be assessed on scales such as the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) to establish the safety of the proposed intervention. Feasibility will be determined of time to set up, put on, and take off the device. Pre-study baseline measurements of foot sensation via the assessment tool will be compared to post-study measurements to establish any beneficial effect and provide variance for a power analysis to guide the design of future studies. We hypothesize that non-neuropathic diabetic participants may have subclinical neuropathic symptoms which cannot be measured by standard clinical tools but can be measured by the diagnostic device, which may identify the potential for the device to have preventative as well as treatment applications.
Sample Size Justification: A sample size of 16 subjects (8 with non-neuropathic diabetic and 8 with neuropathic diabetic participants) achieves 80% power to detect an effect size as measured in the change in pain scores of 0.55 using a paired t-test with a one tailed Type I error rate of 0.10. Examination of each subgroup will also be conducted. A sample size of 8 subjects achieves 80% power to detect an effect size as measured in the change in pain scores of 0.8 using a paired t-test with a one tailed Type I error rate of 0.10. Therefore, this small study will have statistical power to observe medium to large changes in pain rating (or foot sensation or blood flow). However, it must be noted that achieving statistical significance is not the primary objective of a pilot study. The primary objective is to demonstrate feasibility of the trial by initiating a small version of the trail, identifying areas requiring refinement, and collecting preliminary data provides preliminary evidence of intended effect.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- 16 participants will be recruited (8 pre-neuropathic, 8 neuropathic) to evaluate device feasibility through 10 sessions spread over 14 days.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot Feasibility Arm | Experimental | Device: Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and VibrationEach participant will receive the same 45-minute intervention on 10 days spread over no more than 14 days total. At the end of each session, pain will be assessed on scales such as the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) to establish the safety and feasibility of the proposed intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 5 years
- lab histories that verify participant's control or lack of blood sugars dating back for a period of 1-5 years
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- other diseases or impairments that could affect results (vascular disease verified from medical history
- ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.9 or less
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and VibrationThe innovation central to this approach is in the multifactorial combination of pressure, heat, and vibration stimuli to improve foot sensation. The heat stimuli will be provided with commercially available heating elements. The pressure stimuli will be provided via pneumatic garment. Lastly, the vibrotactile stimuli will be provided with commercially available vibrotactile motors. The non-pharmacological DPN device will be able to safely and consistently control temperature to 100-105°F within 1°F, control pressure to 50 mmHg within 5 mmHg at 0.25 Hz, and provide 5 distinguishable vibrational stimuli to 5 zones on the leg and foot. | Device | Pilot Feasibility Arm |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline Pain Assessment
Time frame: immediately after each session (up to 30 minutes)
Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 12006694Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):651-71. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma11651.
- Background: PubMed 28334605Feldman EL, Nave KA, Jensen TS, Bennett DLH. New Horizons in Diabetic Neuropathy: Mechanisms, Bioenergetics, and Pain. Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1296-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.005.
- Background: PubMed 23137169Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Galloway KT, Polomano RC, McDuffie M, Kwon N, Gallagher RM. Preliminary validation of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) in a military population. Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):110-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01516.x. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. If requested, final, de-identified research data will be made available for sharing to qualified parties by the PI's, so long as such a request does not compromise intellectual property interests, interfere with publication, invade subject privacy, betray confidentiality, or precede data curation. All logs will be anonymized before storage.
Related trials for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Sensory Reweighting And Proprioceptive Facilitation Training On Balance And Fall Risk In Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Not yet recruiting
Adaptive Gamified Sensory Training on Sensory Function and Limb-Specific Functional Performance in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chad G Rose, PhD principal investigator
Auburn University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Non-pharmacological Heat, Pressure, and Vibration in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, run by Auburn University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chad G Rose, PhD (8655672205, chadgrose@auburn.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline Pain Assessment (time frame: immediately after each session (up to 30 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05414968, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2023.