Femoral FractureNCT05410587
Fracture Monitor - Femur
A study testing Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III) in people with Femoral Fracture, run by AO Innovation Translation Center at 4 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Thirty-seven patients diagnosed with femoral fracture to be treated with a compatible plate will be enrolled for this multicenter prospective interventional study. The Fracture Monitor T1 will be attached to the locking plate during osteosynthesis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Femoral Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 3 Oct 2023to Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Closed growth plates at time of injury
- Femoral fracture requiring osteosynthesis and treated with one of the following plates:
- DePuy Synthes LCP® 4.5/5, Broad
- DePuy Synthes LCP® 4.5/5, Broad Curved
- DePuy Synthes LCP® Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0
Show all 33Show fewer
- DePuy Synthes VA-LCP® Condylar Plate 4.5/5.0
- DePuy Synthes LCP® Distal Femur
- DePuy Synthes LCP® Proximal Femoral Plate 4.5/5.0
- DePuy Synthes LCP® Proximal Femur Hook Plate
- 41medical AG, Biphasic Plate DF
- ASA score 1-3
- Full weight-bearing capacity prior to the injury
- The patient is foreseen to be capable of postoperative weight bearing of at least 15 kg
- Willingness to undergo an additional surgery to remove the Fracture Monitor T1 if its removal is not done together with the fixation plate within two years according to standard of care
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Preoperative exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant fractures in the contralateral leg
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
- Implanted electromagnetic bone stimulators
- Pregnancy (determined by pregnancy test)
- Prisoner
- Known history of substance abuse (eg, recreational drugs and alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessments
- Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present clinical investigation
- Intraoperative exclusion criteria:
- Use of compression lag screw across fracture fragment
- Compression osteosynthesis
- Precontouring of implant at the area of the attachment of Fracture Monitor T1
- Double-plating technique
- Soft-tissue coverage > 6 cm above the data logger
- Concurrent use of intramedullary nail
- Patients foreseen to require magnetic resonance imaging scanning at any part of the body or shockwave therapy at the proximity of the Fracture Monitor T1
- Fracture Monitor T1 not functional according to the instruction for use (IFU, section 24, A) and no functional replacement implant available
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Aleksandra Vidakovic contact
Germany4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg
Tim Pohlemann
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster
Michael Raschke
- Recruiting
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Tübingen
Tübingen
Benedikt Braun
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm
Konrad Schütze
About this study
Official title: Prospective First in Human Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety of the Fracture Monitor T1 in Patients with Femur Fractures Treated with a Locking Compression Plate
Thirty-seven patients diagnosed with femoral fracture to be treated with a compatible plate will be enrolled for this multicenter prospective interventional study. The Fracture Monitor T1 will be attached to the locking plate during osteosynthesis. Prior to discharge, it will be connected to an app installed either on the patients' smartphone or on the smartphone provided by the sponsor. The device will continuously collect and process data, which can automatically be downloaded via Bluetooth through the smartphone app and transferred in encrypted form to a dedicated cloud server. The smartphones will be equipped with a basic app version with rudimentary user interface that has no data visualization function. During the rehabilitation phase, data collected by the device will not be accessible to the surgeon nor the patient to ensure that no therapeutic decision will be made based on the acquired data. Every patient is treated as per standard of care.
The primary objective of the study is to collect safety information of the Fracture Monitor T1. The secondary objectives are to collect information on device performance, device handling, and usability.
Read more
All adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) will be recorded during the study. These will be reviewed and evaluated for their potential relationship to the device.
All patients will be followed up for 6 months after the surgery according to the local standard of care. Given that the removal of the Fracture Monitor T1 may occur beyond 6 months, a safety follow-up will take place at the time point when the Fracture Monitor T1 is removed as per the instructions for use if it has not been removed within the 6 months.
The results will be compiled into a clinical evaluation report to be submitted as part of the technical documentation for the conformity assessment procedure.
- Conditions
- Femoral Fracture
- Being tested
- Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III)
- Keywords
- Fracture fixation, internal, Femur, Fracture healing
- Medical subject headings
- Femoral Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III)Device
Femoral fracture fixation (bridge plating aiming at secondary bone healing) using a locking plate with an attached investigational Fracture Monitor T1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture Monitor T1 (implantable device class III) | Other | Not described Receives: Device: Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of ADEs
To evaluate the safety, (ie the incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs), of the investigational device Fracture Monitor T1 in femoral fracture patients)
Measured: 6 months postsurgery
Secondary outcomes (22)
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/bone healing
Relationship between relative implant load and bone healing status
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/weight bearing
Relationship between relative implant load and prescribed weight bearing
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Function Index for Trauma(FIX-IT)
Relationship between relative implant load and Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) score FIX-IT: max 12 points - 0 worse/12 best
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Patient reported outcomes
Relationship between relative implant load and Patient reported outcomes: pain, EuroQol 5- dimension (EQ-5D) EQ-5D health states can be summarised using a 5-digit code or represented by a single summary number (index value) which reflects how good or bad a health state is according to the preferences of the general population of a country/region.
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Modified Radiographic union score for tibia(mRUST)
Relationship between relative implant load and mRUST score. mRUST: The mRUST score ranges from 4-16 as the four cortices assessed in two orthogonal planes have a score range from 1 to 4 (1: absent callus - 4 callus remodeled)
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Curve drop
Analyses of the loading curve drop based on:
-Time to curve drop
Measured: 6 months
Clinical performance: Difference curve drop/soc x-ray
Analyses of the loading curve drop based on:
- Difference in the timing between drop in the loading curve (50%) and standard-of-care x-ray
Measured: 6 months
Other safety parameters: AEs
- Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Measured: 6 months
Other safety parameters: DD
- Incidence of device deficiencies within 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Average minimum sensor strain per loading event
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Daily active time of implant (patient activity triggers recording of implant)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Number of daily activations (implant switches from idle to recording)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- User calibration range (patient-specific calibration on stiffness of fixation construct)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Data down and upload frequency
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Number of Bluetooth adverts
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Bluetooth signal strength (dBm)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Bluetooth connection time (s)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Battery voltage after each month
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Power consumption (device lifetime)
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Internal device temperature
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Initialization and daily system test results
Measured: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
- Internal clock accuracy
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2022
- Study start3 Oct 2023
- Primary completionOct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Femoral FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Multicenter prospective interventional clinical investigation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AO Innovation Translation Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Benedikt Braun, Principal investigator, University Hospital Tuebingen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05410587
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FM_AO_001
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Braun BJ, Raschke MJ, Schutze K, Pohlemann T, Joeris A, Ernst M. Prospective first-in-human clinical investigation to evaluate the safety of the fracture monitor T1 in patients with femur fractures treated with a locking compression plate: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e102749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102749.
PubMed 40744509
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective First in Human Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety of the Fracture Monitor T1 in Patients with Femur Fractures Treated with a Locking Compression Plate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05410587
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FM_AO_001
- Conditions
- Femoral Fracture
- Keywords
- Fracture fixation, internal, Femur, Fracture healing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- AO Innovation Translation CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Thirty-seven patients diagnosed with femoral fracture to be treated with a compatible plate will be enrolled for this multicenter prospective interventional study. The Fracture Monitor T1 will be attached to the locking plate during osteosynthesis. Prior to discharge, it will be connected to an app installed either on the patients' smartphone or on the smartphone provided by the sponsor. The device will continuously collect and process data, which can automatically be downloaded via Bluetooth through the smartphone app and transferred in encrypted form to a dedicated cloud server. The smartphones will be equipped with a basic app version with rudimentary user interface that has no data visualization function. During the rehabilitation phase, data collected by the device will not be accessible to the surgeon nor the patient to ensure that no therapeutic decision will be made based on the acquired data. Every patient is treated as per standard of care.
The primary objective of the study is to collect safety information of the Fracture Monitor T1. The secondary objectives are to collect information on device performance, device handling, and usability.
All adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) will be recorded during the study. These will be reviewed and evaluated for their potential relationship to the device.
All patients will be followed up for 6 months after the surgery according to the local standard of care. Given that the removal of the Fracture Monitor T1 may occur beyond 6 months, a safety follow-up will take place at the time point when the Fracture Monitor T1 is removed as per the instructions for use if it has not been removed within the 6 months.
The results will be compiled into a clinical evaluation report to be submitted as part of the technical documentation for the conformity assessment procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Multicenter prospective interventional clinical investigation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture Monitor T1 (implantable device class III) | Other | Device: Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Closed growth plates at time of injury
- Femoral fracture requiring osteosynthesis and treated with one of the following plates:
- ASA score 1-3
- Full weight-bearing capacity prior to the injury
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III)Femoral fracture fixation (bridge plating aiming at secondary bone healing) using a locking plate with an attached investigational Fracture Monitor T1. | Device | Fracture Monitor T1 (implantable device class III) |
Primary outcome
Incidence of ADEs
Time frame: 6 months postsurgery
To evaluate the safety, (ie the incidence of adverse device effects (ADEs), of the investigational device Fracture Monitor T1 in femoral fracture patients)
22 secondary outcomes
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/bone healing
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/weight bearing
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Function Index for Trauma(FIX-IT)
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Patient reported outcomes
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Relationship - implant load/Modified Radiographic union score for tibia(mRUST)
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Curve drop
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical performance: Difference curve drop/soc x-ray
Time frame: 6 months
Other safety parameters: AEs
Time frame: 6 months
Other safety parameters: DD
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Technical performance in a clinical setup
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40744509Braun BJ, Raschke MJ, Schutze K, Pohlemann T, Joeris A, Ernst M. Prospective first-in-human clinical investigation to evaluate the safety of the fracture monitor T1 in patients with femur fractures treated with a locking compression plate: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e102749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102749.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Femoral Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block Plus Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Femoral Neck Fracture Surgery
Femoral Neck Fractures, Nerve Block
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium-Titanium Hybrid Intramedullary Nail System For Long Bone Fractures
Tibial Fracture, Femoral Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
GRACE II (General Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Experience With AGN1 LOEP)
Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Aleksandra Vidakovic contact
Benedikt Braun principal investigator
University Hospital Tuebingen
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fracture Monitor (implantable device class III) in people with Femoral Fracture, run by AO Innovation Translation Center at 4 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 33 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Viola Grünenfelder (+41 79 696 33 97, viola.gruenenfelder@aofoundation.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of ADEs (time frame: 6 months postsurgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05410587, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2025.