Venous ThrombosesNCT05409976
The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent IVC Study
A study testing GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent in people with Venous Thromboses and Venous Disease, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 17 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease, Venous Leg Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 136 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Oct 2022to 9 May 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Preoperative Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is at least 18 years of age.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations as well as any required medication or compression regimen.
- Patient is able to provide informed consent.
- One of the following: Clinical severity class of CEAP 'C' classification ≥3 or rVCSS pain score ≥2.
- Intention to treat the target areas with only the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent.
- Estimated life expectancy ≥1 year.
- Patient is ambulatory (use of assistive walking device such as a cane or walker is acceptable).
- Patient has adequate inflow to the target lesion(s), per investigator/sub-investigator discretion, involving at least a patent femoral or deep femoral vein.
Preoperative Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is a pregnant or breastfeeding woman, a woman planning to become pregnant through the 12-month visit, or a woman who is unwilling to practice an acceptable method of preventing pregnancy through the 12-month visit.
- Patient has clinically significant (e.g., symptoms of chest pain, hemoptysis, dyspnea, hypoxia, etc.) pulmonary embolism (confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography) at the time of enrollment.
- Patient has a known uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or active coagulopathy meeting the following definitions: uncorrected INR>2 (not as a result of warfarin or DOAC therapy), OR platelet count <50,000 or >1,000,000 cells/mm3, OR white blood cell count <3,000 or >12,500 cells/mm3.
- Patient has impaired renal function (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2) or is currently on dialysis.
- Patient has uncorrected hemoglobin of <9 g/dL.
- Patient has known history of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or patients with hypercoagulable states that are unwilling to take anticoagulant medications on a long-term basis.
- Patient has known homozygous inherited coagulation defect or Protein C/S deficiency.
- Patient has a planned surgical intervention (other than pre-stenting procedures such as thrombolysis or thrombectomy) within 30 days prior to or within 30 days after the planned study procedure.
- Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this treatment, in the opinion of the investigator/sub-investigator. Observational studies are permitted.
- Patient has had a previous major (i.e., above the ankle) amputation of the target lower limb.
- Patient has known sensitivity to device materials or contraindication to antiplatelets, thrombolytics, anticoagulants (including patients with known prior instances of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2)), or iodinated contrast.
- Patient has had prior stenting or grafts in the target vessels.
- Patient has a known or suspected active systemic infection at the time of the index procedure. Patients with a chronic infection (e.g., HIV, hepatitis C) that is well controlled under their current treatment regimen may be eligible.
- Patient has known history of intravenous drug abuse within one year of treatment.
- Patient has significant peripheral arterial disease (chronic Rutherford Type 2 or greater, acute Rutherford Type IIa or greater).
- Patient has a BMI >40.
- Patient is actively undergoing or plans to begin cancer treatment.
Intraoperative Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of non-malignant obstruction of the inferior vena cava defined as occlusion or at least 50% reduction in target vessel lumen as measured by procedural IVUS and venogram, with or without non-malignant obstruction of the common femoral vein, external iliac vein, and/or common iliac vein.
- Patient can accommodate an appropriately sized GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent as per reference vessel diameter (see IFU), as determined by intraoperative IVUS post pre-dilation.
- Patient must have appropriate access vessels to accommodate the delivery sheath for the selected device size.
- Patient has adequate landing zones free from significant disease requiring treatment within the native vessels beyond the proximal and distal margins of the lesion.
- Patient has adequate inflow to the target lesion(s), per investigator/sub-investigator discretion, involving at least a patent femoral or deep femoral vein.
- Lesion can be traversed with a guidewire.
- Disease involves the inferior vena cava and may include iliofemoral segments with intent to stent all affected iliofemoral and caval segments.
- Patient does not have significant (i.e., >20% residual thrombosis) acute thrombus within the target stent area at the time of investigational device placement. Patients with acute thrombus within the target stent area must have thrombus successfully treated prior to investigational device placement. Successful thrombus treatment is defined as reestablishment of antegrade flow with ≤20% residual thrombosis as confirmed by IVUS and venogram, AND freedom from bleeding, vascular injury, or hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. After successful thrombus treatment, investigational device placement can occur within the same procedure.
- Patient does not have an inferior vena cava filter present within the target stent area at the time of investigational device placement. Patients with an inferior vena cava filter present within the target stent area must have the filter successfully removed prior to investigational device placement. Successful removal is defined as removal of the main body of the filter and intra-luminal fragments such that there is minimal risk to luminal integrity per investigator/sub-investigator discretion AND freedom from bleeding, vascular injury, or hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. After successful filter removal, investigational device placement can occur within the same procedure.
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 7 countries.
17 sites in 7 countries
United States8 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Atrium Health-Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Northwestern
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Sentara
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Germany2 sites
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Alexianer Klinikum Hochsauerland GmbH
Arnsberg, 59759
United Kingdom2 sites
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
St Thomas' Hospital
London, SE1 7EH
Ireland1 site
University College Hospital GALWAY /Clinical Research Facility Galway
Galway, Connacht, H91 YR71
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent for Treatment of Symptomatic Inferior Vena Cava Obstruction With or Without Combined Iliofemoral Obstruction
This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction in adult patients.
Read the detailed description
A maximum of 35 clinical investigative sites across the U.S., Europe, Australia, and New Zealand will participate in this study. One hundred and eleven subjects are intended to be implanted with the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) in this study, with a limit of 22 treated subjects per site and a minimum of 45 patients treated within the United States. Subjects will be evaluated through hospital discharge and return for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment.
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease, Venous Leg Ulcer, Venous Stasis, Venous Ulcer, Venous Stenosis
- Being tested
- GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent
- Keywords
- VIAFORT, Vein Stent, Venous Thrombosis, Venous Stenosis, Gore, Venous occlusion, VIABAHN FORTEGRA, FORTEGRA, Venous Disease, Deep Venous Insufficiency, Deep venous, DVT Treatment, Venous Stent, Venous insufficiency treatment options, Venous disease treatment Options
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis, Varicose Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GORE® VIAFORT Vascular StentDevice
Treatment of symptomatic IVC obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction with the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent | Experimental | GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent Receives: Device: GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Initial Subject Analysis Population: Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From the Composite Endpoint of Effectiveness and Safety Events
Composite primary endpoint consisting of freedom from the following:
- Loss of primary patency through 12-month follow-up
- Stent embolization through 12-month follow-up
- Device- or procedure-related death through 30 days
- Clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days
- Device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention
- Device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days
Measured: 12 months
Global Analysis Population: Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From the Composite Endpoint of Effectiveness and Safety Events
Composite primary endpoint consisting of freedom from the following:
- Loss of primary patency through 12-month follow-up
- Stent embolization through 12-month follow-up
- Device- or procedure-related death through 30 days
- Clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days
- Device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention
- Device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
Number of Subjects With Primary Patency as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Number of subjects with freedom from both:
- stent occlusion due to restenosis or thrombosis as confirmed with imaging, and
- clinically driven target lesion revascularization as confirmed with imaging and adverse events
Measured: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Secondary Patency as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Number of subjects with freedom from permanent loss of blood flow through the device, regardless of reintervention.
Measured: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Number of subjects with repeat endovascular procedures (e.g., PTA, stenting, thrombectomy/thrombolysis) to restore flow, performed within the margins of the investigational devices due to ≥50% restenosis of the target lesion as measured via imaging AND the failure to improve or recurrence of venous origin leg pain or venous edema related to the target lesion present at baseline, or the onset of new symptoms including venous origin pain and venous edema related to the target lesion.
Measured: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Device Fracture as Confirmed With Imaging
Number of subjects with device fracture as confirmed with imaging.
Measured: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Stent Embolization as Confirmed With Imaging
Number of subjects with stent embolization as confirmed with imaging.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Death
Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related death.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Pulmonary Embolism as Confirmed With Imaging and Adverse Events
Number of subjects with clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Vascular Injury as Confirmed With Adverse Events
Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Major Bleeding Events as Confirmed With Adverse Events
Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days.
Measured: 30 days
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS)
Change in Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Note: The rVCSS scale ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores reflecting worse symptoms.
Measured: 60 months
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Pain
Change in Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Pain Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Note: The rVCSS Pain scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores reflecting worse pain.
Measured: 60 months
Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) VEINES-QOL/Sym
Change in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Measured: 60 months
Villalta
Change in Villalta Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Measured: 60 months
5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Change in 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Measured: 60 months
Technical Success
Number of subjects with successful delivery and deployment of the stent to the intended location, and removal of delivery system.
Measured: Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Lesion Success
Number of subjects with evidence of ≤50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure as measured by IVUS or venogram.
Measured: Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Procedural Success
Number of subjects with lesion success and the absence of major adverse events (i.e., stent embolization, device- or procedure-related death, clinically significant pulmonary embolism, device- or procedure-related vascular injury requiring surgical or endovascular intervention, and device- or procedure-related major bleeding) prior to discharge.
Measured: Index procedure through hospital discharge (discharge estimated as up to 30 days post-treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2022
- Study start25 Oct 2022
- Primary completion9 May 2026
- Study completion9 May 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Venous ThrombosesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by W.L.Gore & AssociatesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kush Desai, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern UniversityStephen Black, MD, FRCS (Ed), FEBVS, Principal investigator, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05409976
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VNS 21-05
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 17 May 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent for Treatment of Symptomatic Inferior Vena Cava Obstruction With or Without Combined Iliofemoral Obstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05409976
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VNS 21-05
- Conditions
- Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease, Venous Leg Ulcer, Venous Stasis, Venous Ulcer, Venous Stenosis
- Keywords
- VIAFORT, Vein Stent, Venous Thrombosis, Venous Stenosis, Gore, Venous occlusion, VIABAHN FORTEGRA, FORTEGRA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & AssociatesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Apr 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction in adult patients.
Detailed description
A maximum of 35 clinical investigative sites across the U.S., Europe, Australia, and New Zealand will participate in this study. One hundred and eleven subjects are intended to be implanted with the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) in this study, with a limit of 22 treated subjects per site and a minimum of 45 patients treated within the United States. Subjects will be evaluated through hospital discharge and return for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent | Experimental | Device: GORE® VIAFORT Vascular StentGORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® VIAFORT Vascular StentTreatment of symptomatic IVC obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction with the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent. | Device | GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent |
Primary outcome
Initial Subject Analysis Population: Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From the Composite Endpoint of Effectiveness and Safety Events
Time frame: 12 months
Composite primary endpoint consisting of freedom from the following: * Loss of primary patency through 12-month follow-up * Stent embolization through 12-month follow-up * Device- or procedure-related death through 30 days * Clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days * Device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention * Device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days
Global Analysis Population: Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From the Composite Endpoint of Effectiveness and Safety Events
Time frame: 12 months
Composite primary endpoint consisting of freedom from the following: * Loss of primary patency through 12-month follow-up * Stent embolization through 12-month follow-up * Device- or procedure-related death through 30 days * Clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days * Device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention * Device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days
17 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects With Primary Patency as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Time frame: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Secondary Patency as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Time frame: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization as Confirmed by Imaging and Adverse Events
Time frame: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Device Fracture as Confirmed With Imaging
Time frame: 60 months
Number of Subjects With Stent Embolization as Confirmed With Imaging
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Death
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Pulmonary Embolism as Confirmed With Imaging and Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Vascular Injury as Confirmed With Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Subjects With Device- or Procedure-related Major Bleeding Events as Confirmed With Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS)
Time frame: 60 months
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Pain
Time frame: 60 months
Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) VEINES-QOL/Sym
Time frame: 60 months
Villalta
Time frame: 60 months
5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: 60 months
Technical Success
Time frame: Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Lesion Success
Time frame: Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Procedural Success
Time frame: Index procedure through hospital discharge (discharge estimated as up to 30 days post-treatment)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Venous Thromboses
RecruitingObservational study
National Eye Institute Biorepository for Retinal Diseases
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Post-Approval Study
Venous Thromboses, Venous Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Danang Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Registry
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis, Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Iopidine to Decrease Intraocular Pressure Rise After Injections
Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The ReCAna for Lower ExtremIty Venous OBstructions and In-StEnt Restenosis Registry
Chronic Venous Disease, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kush Desai, MD principal investigator
Northwestern University
Stephen Black, MD, FRCS (Ed), FEBVS principal investigator
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
17 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent in people with Venous Thromboses and Venous Disease, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 17 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Australia and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Initial Subject Analysis Population: Percentage of Subjects With Freedom From the Composite Endpoint of Effectiveness and Safety Events (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2026.