AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular HolesNCT05396209

To Evaluate the Therapeutic Efficacy of Hydrated Amniotic Membrane in Promoting Closure of Refractory Macular Holes.

A study testing Hydrated Amniotic Membrane Plug, ILM filling and Conventional ILM peeling in people with Macular Holes, run by Oriental Neurosurgery Evidence-Based-Study Team at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare anatomic and functional results, and to evaluate postoperatively the healing process in 3 different techniques for the closure of the refractory macular holes (MH). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Macular Holes
What is being tested?
Hydrated Amniotic Membrane Plug, ILM filling and Conventional ILM peeling
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 15 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • idiopathic macular hole was defined as macular hole diameter (with no history of secondary macular hole) larger than 800μm in minimum linear diameter ;
  • Patients with an idiopathic macular hole submitted to pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling treatment without closing it and macular hole diameter larger than 200μm.
  • Patients who meet any of 1/2 and signed informed consent can be included. Note: if both eyes of the subject meet the inclusion criteria, the investigator decides which eye should be included.

Who cannot join

  • idiopathic macular hole diameter less than 800μm in minimum linear diameter;
  • Macular hole caused by trauma and laser;
  • Macular holes secondary to another vitreoretinal diseases;
  • Macular hole of pathological myopia (axial length ≥26.0mm and diopter ≥6.00D,posterior scleral staphyloma,the atrophic choroid and retina with scleral exposure);
  • Known to be allergic to amniotic membrane.
  • Patients with any of the following eye diseases:
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients with other ocular disease (diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, uveitis, ocular tumors, etc);
  • Macular hole of other causes (secondary);
  • History of vitreoretinal surgery for a condition other than the idiopathic macular hole (retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage);
  • Patients with any of the following eye conditions:
  • Using systemic drugs that are toxic for the optic nerve or retina (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen, ethambutol, etc);
  • Patients with ocular surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300052

    Qihua Wang, MD, 86-10-18601180961, wqha01696@btch.edu.cn

    Hua Yan, MD, PhD, 86-22-60817010, zyyyanhua@tmu.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Case Control Clinical Trials to Compare the Healing Process of Refractory Macular Hole With Different Surgical Techniques

To compare anatomic and functional results, and to evaluate postoperatively the healing process in 3 different techniques for the closure of the refractory macular holes (MH).

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Hydrated Amniotic Membrane in promoting closure of refractory macular holes.

The Hydrated Amniotic Membrane has been used in some cases as an adjunct in the macular holes closure and as a substrate for cell growth and improvement of visual acuity. Hydrated Amniotic Membrane is supposed to promote epithelialization and have anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory properties.

In the present study, the patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized and undergo pars plana vitrectomy surgery with peeling of the ILM and a fragment of the ILM itself or an amniotic membrane plug will be put in place.

The patients included in the study will undergo a complete eye examination, including corrected Visual Acuity measurement (BCVA), performing the Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and/or microperimetry, multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in the pre-operative. Patients will undergo surgery after complementary exams and adequate pre-anesthetic evaluation.

Patients will be evaluated on the 1st and 7th postoperative days and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The patient will undergo a complete eye examination and postoperative follow-up as described above, and during visits on the 1st and 7th day, and in the 1st, 3th and 6th month of the postoperative period, BCVA and OCT will be performed and/or the microperimetry, multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) will be performed in the 1st, 3th and 6th postoperative month for evaluation and monitoring of anatomical and functional responses, respectively.

Conditions
Macular Holes
Being tested
Hydrated Amniotic Membrane Plug, ILM filling, Conventional ILM peeling
Medical subject headings
Retinal Perforations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hydrated Amniotic Membrane PlugProcedure or surgery

    Using Hydrated Amniotic Membrane plug with vitrectomy to try to close refractory macular hole

  • ILM fillingProcedure or surgery

    The ILM filling technique - Rossi et al show that ILM filling technique was more efficacious in closing full-thickness macular holes larger than 630μm, in which the free ILM after peeling is plug into the area of the macular hole

  • Conventional ILM peelingProcedure or surgery

    Peeling with complete removal of the internal limiting membrane within the vascular arch

Study groups in NCT05396209
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hydrated Amniotic Membrane PlugActive comparatorPatients suffering from refractory macular holes as documented by spectral-domain OCT will undergo pars plan vitrectomy with Hydrated Amniotic Membrane insertion into the macular hole.
Receives: Procedure: Hydrated Amniotic Membrane Plug
ILM fillingActive comparatorThe ILM filling technique, in which free ILM is plug into the macular hole area
Receives: Procedure: ILM filling
Conventional ILM peelingActive comparatorPeeling with complete removal of the internal limiting membrane within the vascular arch
Receives: Procedure: Conventional ILM peeling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Anatomic closure

    Rate of anatomic macular hole closure in the OCT at month 6

    Measured: Month 6 post operative

  2. Reconstruction of the foveal layered retinal structure change

    Change in the reconstruction of the foveal layered retinal structure by OCT at 1, 3, and 6 months

    Measured: Month 1, 3, 6 post-operative

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. amniotic membrane dislocation

    conform amniotic membrane dislocation in the OCT and/or binocular indirect ophthalmoscope at day 1 and 7

    Measured: DAY 1,7 post operative

  2. BCVA change

    change in the BCVA at Preoperative,1, 3, and 6 months

    Measured: Time Frame: Preoperative,Month 1, 3, 6 post operative

  3. Retinal capillary plexus density change

    change in the retinal capillary plexus density with OCT-A at Preoperative,1, 3, and 6 months

    Measured: Preoperative,Month 1, 3, 6 post operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05396209
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMMH2022
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
24 May 2022
Last updated
31 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hydrated Amniotic Membrane Plug, ILM filling and Conventional ILM peeling in people with Macular Holes, run by Oriental Neurosurgery Evidence-Based-Study Team at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Qihua Wang, MD (86-10-18601180961, wqha01696@btch.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Anatomic closure (time frame: Month 6 post operative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in