AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT05378724

Effectiveness of Hospital Fit on Physical Activity of Hospitalised Patients

A study testing Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the Netherlands in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Oncology, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment on average time spent walking per day in patients hospitalised at the Medical Oncology or Cardiology Departments of the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Radboud… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the Netherlands
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
2 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 31 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Over 18 years old.
  • Receiving physiotherapy at the Medical Oncology Department or the Cardiology Department at the MUMC+ or Radboudumc.
  • Enough understanding of the Dutch language.
  • Owning a smartphone (operating system: at least iOS 13.0 or Android 8.0).
  • Able to use a smartphone app.
  • Able to walk independently 2 weeks before admission, as scored on the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC >3).
  • Employed as physiotherapist, nurse or physician (assistant) at the Medical Oncology Department or the Cardiology Department.
  • Working at the MUMC+ or Radboudumc for at least one month.

Who cannot join

  • A contraindication to walking (as reported by a medical specialist in the electronic medical record).
  • A contraindication to wearing an activity monitor, fixed by a hypoallergenic plaster at the upper leg (such as active bilateral upper leg infection, severe oedema or bilateral transfemoral amputation).
  • Admitted for cancers of the head and neck (i.e., cancer in the oral cavity, throat (pharynx), voice box (larynx), paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity, salivary glands).
  • Admitted with cardiac arrhythmia and hemodynamic instability requiring medication over 48 hours (i.e., beta blockers or noradrenaline) or invasive treatment (i.e., pacemaker or defibrillator implementation).
  • Mentally incapacitated subjects as reported by healthcare professionals in the medical record. When any doubt arises, the patient will be excluded.
  • Impaired cognition (delirium / dementia) as reported in the medical record by a healthcare professional. When any doubt arises, the patient will be excluded.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Unable to participate in the informed consent procedure or unable to provide written informed consent.
  • A life expectancy shorter than 3 months as mentioned by the medical specialist in the medical record.
  • Previous participation in this study.
  • No participation in care for patients at the Medical oncology Department or Cardiology Department during the intervention phase (e.g., absence or research employment).

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Netherlands2 sites
  • MaastrichtUMC

    Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX

  • Radboudumc

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 EZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Hospital Fit on Physical Activity of Hospitalised Patients: a Stepped-wedge Cluster-randomised Clinical Trial and Process Evaluation

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment on average time spent walking per day in patients hospitalised at the Medical Oncology or Cardiology Departments of the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc) compared to patients who received physiotherapy before implementation of Hospital Fit. Secondary: to investigate the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment on average time spent standing per day, average time spent lying/sitting per day, average number of transitions per day and the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance scale (mILAS) scores in hospitalised patients. Besides, the reach, efficacy, adoption, and implementation of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment will be investigated from the perspective of both patients and healthcare professionals.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Physical inactivity is a major, underrecognised problem in patients during their hospital stay. Patients spend between 87 and 100% of their time lying or sitting. This physical inactivity has been associated with adverse outcomes such as functional decline, increased length of hospital stay and mortality. Digital health tools could be valuable to prevent negative effects of inactivity. Hospital Fit is a promising app-based intervention to stimulate physical activity by 1) continuous physical activity monitoring, 2) personalised goalsetting, 3) providing patients insight in their functional recovery, 4) providing patients tailored exercise programs, 5) informing patients about benefits of physical activity, and 6) reminding patients to use Hospital Fit 7) linking the data to the electronic medical record, making it available for other healthcare professionals.

Objectives: Primary: to investigate the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment on average time spent walking per day in patients hospitalised at the Medical Oncology or Cardiology Departments of the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc) compared to patients who received physiotherapy before implementation of Hospital Fit. Secondary: 1) to investigate the effectiveness of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment on average time spent standing per day, average time spent lying/sitting per day, average number of transitions per day and the Modified Iowa Level of Assistance scale (mILAS) scores in hospitalised patients; and 2) to investigate the reach, efficacy, adoption, and implementation of using Hospital Fit as part of the physiotherapy treatment from the perspective of both patients and healthcare professionals.

Study design: A prospective, multi-centre, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of Hospital Fit. Additionally a process evaluation will be performed using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews in patients and focus-group interviews in healthcare professionals.

Study population: In total 180 patients hospitalised at the Medical Oncology Department or Cardiology Departments at the MUMC+ or Radboudumc will be included to study the effectiveness. The process evaluation will be performed in the intervention group using a questionnaire in all 90 patients, semi-structured interviews in 24 purposefully selected patients (or less if data saturation is reached), and focus group interviews in 24 healthcare professionals (i.e., physiotherapists, nurses, and physicians (assistants).

Intervention: Physical activity will be measured in all patients with an accelerometer until discharge with a maximum of nine days. The control group will receive usual care physiotherapy (n=90), while the intervention group will use Hospital Fit additionally (n=90).

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome parameter: average time spent walking per day (min). Secondary outcome parameters: average time spent standing and lying/sitting per day (min.), average number of transitions from lying/sitting to standing/walking per day, and mILAS score per day. Outcome parameters process evaluation: participation; representation; perceived efficacy; use of app; use of different functionalities; barriers and facilitators to Hospital Fit use; and expected maintenance.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The burden and risks on patients are minimal. The control group will receive usual care physiotherapy and will wear an accelerometer. The intervention group will use Hospital Fit additionally. Wearing a small accelerometer and using Hospital Fit should not be a burden to patients. The only burden is the time it takes to prepare subjects (install app, explain study). No invasive interventions will take place. Anticipated benefits of Hospital Fit use include improved physical activity, therewith reducing the negative effects associated with low physical activity.

Being tested
Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the Netherlands
Keywords
Physical activity, eHealth, Accelerometer, Hospitalization, Effectiveness, Process evaluation
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases, Neoplasms, Patient Participation, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the NetherlandsDevice

    Hospital Fit consists of a smartphone app combined to the MOX accelerometer. Hospital Fit provides patients and physiotherapists direct feedback on patients' physical activity behavior. Individual goals regarding the number of minutes per day spent walking can be set by the therapist. Hospital Fit also gives patients insight into their own recovery process. During every treament, the physiotherapist will evaluate the extent of functional recovery. In addition, Hospital Fit will give physiotherapists the option of creating a patient-specific exercise program supported by videos. During every treatment session, the patient and physiotherapist will evaluate (and if necessary adapt) the amount of activity performed since the previous treatment, the extent of functional recovery and the exercise program.

Study groups in NCT05378724
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupNo interventionAll subjects eligible for inclusion in this study will receive usual care physiotherapy treatment. The number of treatment sessions and content of physiotherapy treatment sessions will depend on the diagnosis and needs of the individual patient. This study will not interfere with the content of the usual care physiotherapy treatment. Usual care physiotherapy sessions wil take approximately 20-30 minutes per session. They receive no additional intervention and will not use Hospital Fit as part of their physiotherapy treatment. The patients in the control group will receive an activity monitor to collect data about their physical activity levels. However, patients and their healthcare professionals will not receive feedback on patients' physical activity levels.
Intervention groupExperimentalPatients in the intervention group will receive usual care physiotherapy and us Hospital Fit additionally. At the end of the last physiotherapy treatment session before discharge, or after a maximum of nine days of study inclusion (whichever comes first), the physiotherapist will remove the activity monitor and data collection will end.
Receives: Device: Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the Netherlands

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average time spent walking per day (minutes).

    Total number of minutes walking divided by the total number of valid measurement days in the period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

    Measured: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Average time spent standing per day (minutes).

    Total number of minutes standing divided by the total number of valid measurement days in the period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

    Measured: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

  2. Average time spent lying/sitting per day (minutes).

    Total number of minutes lying/sitting divided by the total number of valid measurement days in the period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

    Measured: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

  3. Average number of transitions per day from a sedentary position (lying or sitting) to an active position (standing or walking).

    Total number of transitions divided by the total number of valid measurement days in the period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

    Measured: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

  4. Modified Iowa Level of Assistance scale (mILAS) scores per day.

    The 5-item Modified Lowa Level of Assistance Scale (mILAS) assesses the ability of patients to perform 5 activities of daily living and rates the amount of assistance and type of walking aid needed. Each item has a 7-point rating scale (0-6 points), resulting in total scores ranging between 0-30 points. Higher scores indicate that a patient needs more assistance.

    Measured: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
A prospective, multi-center, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of Hospital Fit. Additionally, a process evaluation will be performed using semi-structured interviews and questionnaires in patients and focus-group interviews in healthcare professionals.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05378724
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
8 Apr 2022
Last updated
18 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: We do not intent to make IPD available to other researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hospital Fit 2.0, HFITAPP0, release 05, Maastricht Instruments B.V., the Netherlands in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Oncology, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average time spent walking per day (minutes). (time frame: Period between inclusion and discharge, with a maximum of nine days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in