AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Progressive AphasiaNCT05368350

Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Using Non-invasive Brain Stimulation

A study testing high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in people with Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech, run by The University of Texas at Dallas at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to test whether low level electric stimulation, called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), on the part of the brain (i.e., pre-supplementary motor area and left inferior frontal gyrus) thought to aid in memory will improve speech and language difficulties in patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
What is being tested?
high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 16 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 to 85 years of age
  • A formal diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (nonfluent/agrammatic, semantic, logopenic variants or mixed) and/or progressive apraxia of speech
  • Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent. Medical information/history, as well as mental status exam and diagnosis provided by referring physician will determine whether or not a caregiver is required to be involved during this process.

Who cannot join

  • Has an implanted device, such as a pacemaker, metallic cranial implant, or a neurostimulator
  • Skull defects
  • Pregnant
  • A significant history of arrhythmia or epileptic seizures.
  • Not a native English speaker
  • Currently receiving speech-language intervention
  • Unable to communicated verbally

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of Texas at Dallas

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech With High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HDtDCS-PPA/PAOS)

The purpose of the study is to test whether low level electric stimulation, called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), on the part of the brain (i.e., pre-supplementary motor area and left inferior frontal gyrus) thought to aid in memory will improve speech and language difficulties in patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS). The primary outcome measures are neuropsychological assessments of speech and language functions, and the secondary measures are neuropsychological assessments of other cognitive abilities and electroencephalography (EEG) measures.

Read the detailed description

This pilot study has one treatment arm with open-label treatment and will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to pre-supplementary motor area or left inferior frontal gyrus for 20 minutes over 10 sessions. There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.

All patients with a clinical diagnosis of PPA or PAOS will be assigned to either one of the two open-label arms to receive active tDCS. Primary outcome speech and language measures, secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures, and pre-screening assessments for study medical history and contraindications for treatment will be collected prior to the treatment (i.e., baseline).

Primary outcome speech and language functions measures and secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures will be collected after treatment session 10 and following treatment competition (i.e., 8-week).

Being tested
high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)
Medical subject headings
Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Apraxias

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)Device

    Other Names:

    tDCS

    1 milliamp tDCS High definition tDCS High definition transcranial direct current stimulator, Neuroelectrics Starstim tES, SN E20200930-10 Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with (1) Pre-SMA stimulation arm -- anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns or (2) LIFG stimulation arm -- at electrode F7 (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes T7, FP1, AF3, and FC5 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds.

Study groups in NCT05368350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Pre-SMA tDCS treatmentExperimentalThis open-label treatment will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to pre-supplementary motor area for 20 minutes over 10 sessions. There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
Receives: Device: high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)
Active LIFG tDCS treatmentExperimentalThis open-label treatment will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to left inferior frontal gyrus for 20 minutes over 10 sessions. There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
Receives: Device: high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Controlled Oral Word Association Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on the Control Word Association Test

    Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., \& Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  2. Category Fluency

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Category Fluency

    Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., \& Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  3. The Boston Naming Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Boston Naming Test (accuracy and speech latency)

    Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., \& Weintraub, S., (1983). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Lea \& Febiger: Philadelphia.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  4. Spontaneous speech (content and fluency) of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Spontaneous speech (content and fluency) of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised

    Kertesz, Andrew. ( 1982). The Western aphasia battery. New York :Grune \& Stratton.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  5. The Apraxia battery for Adults - 2 (ABA - 2)

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on characteristics of articulation of the the Apraxia battery for Adults - 2

    Dabul, B. L. (2000). Apraxia Battery for Adults (ABA-2) (2nd edn). Austin, TX: ProEd.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The Trail Making Test (Part A & B)

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Trail Making Test (Part A \& B)

    Reitan, R.M., (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept. Motor Skill., 8, 271-276.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  2. The Digit Span Forward & Backward

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Span Forward \& Backward

    Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  3. The Digit Symbol Substitution Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Symbol Substitution Test

    Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  4. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised

    Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., \& Brandt, J. (1998). The Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of interform and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 43-55.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

  5. The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

    Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

    Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encepholopathy. Problems.]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 215- 285.

    Measured: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05368350
Sponsor's protocol ID
UTD IRB: 24-595
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
5 May 2022
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Dugas CS, Chiang HS, Devora P, Lucas-Mendoza K, Abasi C, Adhikari A, Nguyen T, Frolov A, Kelley BJ, LoBue C, Mudar RA, Hart J Jr. High-definition brain stimulation targeting separate regions leads to differential word retrieval outcomes in patients with primary progressive aphasia: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2025 Sep 17;16:1630103. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630103. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 41041680

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in people with Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech, run by The University of Texas at Dallas at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05368350, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in