Pigmented Villonodular SynovitisPhase 2NCT05349643
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With TGCT
A Phase 2 study testing AMB-05X in people with Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis and TGCT, run by AmMax Bio, Inc. at 6 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, TGCT, Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
- What is being tested?
- AMB-05X
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Jan 2023to 3 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject ≥ 18 years
- TGCT with only 1 joint involvement
- Symptomatic Measurable disease of at least 1 cm based on RECIST v1.1
- Stable prescription of analgesic regimen
- Agrees to follow contraception guidelines
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test
- Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function
Who cannot join
- Prior investigational drug use within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives of Baseline
- Previous use of therapeutics targeting CSF1 or CSF1R or oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors within 3 months prior to Baseline
- History of extensive or reconstructive surgery on the affected joint
- Active cancer (either currently or within 3 mo before Baseline) that requires/required therapy (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy)
- Metastatic or malignant transformation of TGCT
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Known active tuberculosis
- Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious illness, uncontrolled infection, or a medical or psychiatric history
- Women who are breastfeeding
- A screening Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) ≥ 470 ms
- MRI contraindications (e.g., pacemaker, loose metallic implants)
- History of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the study drug
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within 3 months before baseline
- Any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or clinically significant laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation/treatment or interfere with interpretation of study results and, in the Investigator's opinion, make the subject inappropriate for this study
- Subjects who, in the Investigator's opinion, should not participate in the study for any reason, including if there is a question about their ability to comply with study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 3 countries.
6 sites in 3 countries
United States3 sites
AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Australia2 sites
AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
Camperdown
AmMax Bio, Clinical Site
Woolloongabba
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Adaptive, Dose-Ranging Study With Long-Term Extension to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intra Articular AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
Read the detailed description
AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension which will enroll up to 48 adult subjects with tenosynovial giant cell tumor for intra-articular doses over a 24-week dosing period (Part 1) with a Part 2 open-label extension of 6 treatment and/or observational cycles of 12 weeks each followed by 12 weeks of follow-up.
- Being tested
- AMB-05X
- Keywords
- Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, TGCT, PVNS
- Medical subject headings
- Synovitis, Pigmented Villonodular, Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AMB-05XBiological
A fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgG2) directed against c-fms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AMB-05X | Experimental | Subjects will receive an injection of AMB-05X once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (for 6 treatments total). Based on ongoing review of the available safety, PK, PD, and efficacy data, the Sponsor may either increase or decrease the dose. Receives: Biological: AMB-05X |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate - Part 1
Proportion of subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate [ORR]) by central radiology review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Treatment-emergent adverse events
Frequency and severity of reported treatment-emergent adverse events
Measured: Part 1 Week 24 and Part 2 Week 72
Secondary outcomes (38)
Objective Response Rate
Proportion of subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate [ORR]) by central radiology review per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Objective Response Rate (AMB-051-01 subjects)
Proportion of re-treated subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate [ORR]) by central radiology review per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1
Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall response (OR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1
Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall response (OR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)
Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall tumor response (OR) per the tumor volume score
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)
Proportion of subjects who achieve an overall tumor response (OR) per the tumor volume score
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Median duration of response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1
Median duration of response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Median duration of response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Median duration of response per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by tumor volume score
Median duration of response per tumor volume score (TVS)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by tumor volume score
Median duration of response per tumor volume score (TVS)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time to response (TTR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Measured: Part 1 week 24
Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time to response (TTR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response per tumor volume score
Time to response (TTR) per tumor volume score (TVS)
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Time to Response per tumor volume score
Time to response (TTR) per tumor volume score (TVS)
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)
Mean change in joint range of motion (ROM) will be assessed by qualified assessors. Measurements will be recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest (worst) relative value will be identified; only this plane will be used for evaluating change in ROM subsequently.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)
Mean change in joint range of motion (ROM) will be assessed by qualified assessors. Measurements will be recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest (worst) relative value will be identified; only this plane will be used for evaluating change in ROM subsequently.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a 10-question patient reported outcome instrument used to assess physical functioning based on use of the upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) and on instrumental activities of daily living. Five questions address the degree to which subject's health limits activities; subjects select responses ranging from 1-cannot do to 5 - not at all. Five additional questions address the degree to which the subject is able to perform certain physical activities, and subjects select a response to each question that ranges from 1 ("cannot do") to 5 ("without any difficulty"). Raw scores are summarized, score range is 10 to 50.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a 10-question patient reported outcome instrument used to assess physical functioning based on use of the upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) and on instrumental activities of daily living. Five questions address the degree to which subject's health limits activities; subjects select responses ranging from 1-cannot do to 5 - not at all. Five additional questions address the degree to which the subject is able to perform certain physical activities, and subjects select a response to each question that ranges from 1 ("cannot do") to 5 ("without any difficulty"). Raw scores are summarized, score range is 10 to 50.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score
The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness within the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicate worst stiffness.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score
The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness within the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine). Higher scores indicate worst stiffness.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10= "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a subject's pain and the impact of this pain on the subject's daily functioning. The subject is asked to rate their worst, least, average, and current pain intensity, list current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, and rate the degree that pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a scale from 0 ="no pain" to 10="pain as bad as you can imagine".
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.1 Pain Interference Short Form 8a, is an 8 question instrument used to evaluate how much a subject's pain interferes with daily functioning. Subjects rate the degree to which pain interfered with their daily activity over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 to 5 (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Very much"). Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v1.1 Pain Interference Short Form 8a, is an 8 question instrument used to evaluate how much a subject's pain interferes with daily functioning. Subjects rate the degree to which pain interfered with their daily activity over the past 7 days on a scale of 1 to 5 (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Very much"). Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the following scales that are based on the PGIC: PGIC Physical Functioning scale (ranging from 1 "Not at all," to 5 "Extremely" and rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale (ranging from 1 "Very much improved" to 7 "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater restrictions.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the following scales that are based on the PGIC: PGIC Physical Functioning scale (ranging from 1, "Not at all," to 5, "Extremely" and rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale (ranging from 1 "Very much improved" to 7 "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater restrictions.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the PGIC to rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale, ranging from 1, "Very much improved" to 7, "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater TGCT-related levels of stiffness.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), also known as Subject Global Impression. For this study, subjects will rate how much their TGCT has restricted their ability to perform everyday tasks, using the PGIC to rate their change in stiffness using the PGIC Stiffness scale, ranging from 1, "Very much improved" to 7, "Very much worse". Higher scores indicate greater TGCT-related levels of stiffness.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score
The Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an item in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) that assesses a subject's "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The 11-point NRS for this item ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"). Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score
The Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an item in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) that assesses a subject's "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The 11-point NRS for this item ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("pain as bad as you can imagine"). Higher scores indicate greater levels of pain.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely used quality of life instrument that includes questions in each of 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The choices include 5 levels of severity for each domain followed by a general health visual analogue scale (VAS). This instrument is a self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 5-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems" through "extreme problems". Higher scores indicate a lower quality of life.
Measured: Part 1 Week 24
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a widely used quality of life instrument that includes questions in each of 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The choices include 5 levels of severity for each domain followed by a general health visual analogue scale (VAS). This instrument is a self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 5-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems" through "extreme problems". Higher scores indicate a lower quality of life.
Measured: Part 2 Week 72
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2022
- Study start26 Jan 2023
- Primary completion3 Jun 2024
- Study completion3 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pigmented Villonodular SynovitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AmMax Bio, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dorothy Nguyen, MD, Study chair, AmMax Bio
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05349643
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMB-051-07
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Open-Label, Adaptive, Dose-Ranging Study With Long-Term Extension to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intra Articular AMB-05X Injections in Subjects With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05349643
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMB-051-07
- Keywords
- Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, TGCT, PVNS
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmMax Bio, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 26 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor
Detailed description
AMB-051-07 is an open-label, adaptive, dose-ranging study with long-term extension which will enroll up to 48 adult subjects with tenosynovial giant cell tumor for intra-articular doses over a 24-week dosing period (Part 1) with a Part 2 open-label extension of 6 treatment and/or observational cycles of 12 weeks each followed by 12 weeks of follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AMB-05X | Experimental | Biological: AMB-05XSubjects will receive an injection of AMB-05X once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (for 6 treatments total). Based on ongoing review of the available safety, PK, PD, and efficacy data, the Sponsor may either increase or decrease the dose. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject ≥ 18 years
- TGCT with only 1 joint involvement
- Symptomatic Measurable disease of at least 1 cm based on RECIST v1.1
- Stable prescription of analgesic regimen
- Agrees to follow contraception guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Prior investigational drug use within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives of Baseline
- Previous use of therapeutics targeting CSF1 or CSF1R or oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors within 3 months prior to Baseline
- History of extensive or reconstructive surgery on the affected joint
- Active cancer (either currently or within 3 mo before Baseline) that requires/required therapy (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy)
- Metastatic or malignant transformation of TGCT
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AMB-05XA fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin (IgG2) directed against c-fms | Biological | AMB-05X |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate - Part 1
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Proportion of subjects who achieve an OR (objective response rate [ORR]) by central radiology review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Treatment-emergent adverse events
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24 and Part 2 Week 72
Frequency and severity of reported treatment-emergent adverse events
38 secondary outcomes
Objective Response Rate
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Objective Response Rate (AMB-051-01 subjects)
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Tumor response based on tumor volume score (TVS)
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Duration of Response by tumor volume score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Duration of Response by tumor volume score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Time to Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 1 week 24
Time to Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Time to Response per tumor volume score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Time to Response per tumor volume score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in joint range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Decrease of at least 30% in mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from Baseline
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in Physical Functioning for capacity to perform everyday tasks
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change in tenosynovial giant cell tumor-related stiffness score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
Mean change from Baseline in Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale score
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment
Time frame: Part 1 Week 24
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Health Assessment
Time frame: Part 2 Week 72
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
Recruiting
Synovial Tissue as a Biomarker in the Management of Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
Synovitis Villonodular
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase I Trial of TURALIO(R) (Pexidartinib, PLX3397) in Children and Young Adults With Refractory Leukemias and Refractory Solid Tumors Including Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Associated Plexiform Neurofibromas (PN) and Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor ...
Neurofibroma, Plexiform, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of Pimicotinib in Japanese Participants With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) (J-MANEUVER)
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of DCC-3014 to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics in Subjects With TGCT
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
NRSTS2021, A Risk Adapted Study Evaluating Maintenance Pazopanib, Limited Margin, Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Selinexor in Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma (NRSTS)
Adipocytic Neoplasm, Liposarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dorothy Nguyen, MD study chair
AmMax Bio
6 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing AMB-05X in people with Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis and TGCT, run by AmMax Bio, Inc. at 6 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States, Australia, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate - Part 1 (time frame: Part 1 Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2024.