AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticCARENCT05345405

Clinical Trial of a Supporter-Targeted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Recent Sexual Assault Survivors

A study testing Dyadic CARE and Supporter-Only CARE in people with Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic and Helping Behavior, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Communication and Recovery Enhancement (CARE) is a 2-session early intervention for survivors of recent sexual assault and their supporters that aims to improve supporters' ability to respond effectively. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 years and older
What is being tested?
Dyadic CARE and Supporter-Only CARE
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 May 2022to 4 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 14+ years
  • Can speak/read English or Spanish
  • Have access to a Zoom-capable device
  • Screened for eligibility within 10 weeks of sexual assault, defined as any unwanted, distressing sexual contact (e.g., unwanted touching, coerced sexual activity, rape)
  • Able to attend first study session within 2 weeks of screening
  • Elevated PTSD symptoms at screening as operationalized by a Primary Care PTSD Screen score of 2/5 or above
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Able to identify an eligible supporter
  • Have a way to receive survey links and complete surveys privately (i.e., without potential device or account access by the supporter)
  • Age 14+ years
  • Can speak/read English or Spanish
  • Have access to a Zoom-capable device
  • Able to attend first study session within 2 weeks of survivor's screening
  • Are in contact with the survivor at least once a week
  • In the opinion of the survivor, are able to make an independent decision about whether or not to participate in the study
  • Have a way to receive survey links and complete surveys privately (i.e., without potential device or account access by the survivor)

Who cannot join

  • Active psychosis
  • Active suicidal intent
  • Perpetrated the sexual assault
  • Engaged in severe past-year violence or abuse (as defined by the survivor) against the survivor
  • The survivor has not told the supporter about the sexual assault at the time of screening and was not already planning to tell the supporter
  • In the opinion of the survivor, relational conflict exists between the survivor and supporter that potentially could be exacerbated by program participation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Washington School of Medicine

    Seattle, Washington, 98195-7238

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving Social Support Quality Among Survivors Seeking Acute Post-Rape Care: Testing a Supporter-Targeted Intervention

Communication and Recovery Enhancement (CARE) is a 2-session early intervention for survivors of recent sexual assault and their supporters that aims to improve supporters' ability to respond effectively. The goal of this pilot trial is to understand the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of two versions of CARE: a version in which survivors and supporters attend both sessions together (dyadic CARE) and a version in which supporters attend sessions alone (supporter-only CARE). Survivors aged 14+ with elevated posttraumatic stress symptoms will enroll with a supporter of their choosing. Dyads will be randomized to dyadic CARE, supporter-only CARE, or waitlist control, and will complete self-report assessments at baseline, post-session-1, and follow-ups (1, 2, and 3 months post-baseline). Results will be used to inform future changes to CARE and determine whether a fully-powered randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Being tested
Dyadic CARE, Supporter-Only CARE
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Helping Behavior, Help-Seeking Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dyadic CAREBehavioural

    Dyadic CARE involves two telehealth sessions with a clinician, the survivor, and a supporter of the survivor's choice. Session content uses cognitive-behavioral strategies (e.g., encouraging non-avoidance) to encourage communication and improve supporters' responses in trauma-related conversations. Between sessions, both the survivor and the supporter are instructed to review session content and have guided discussions with the assistance of a workbook.

  • Supporter-Only CAREBehavioural

    Supporter-only CARE involves two telehealth sessions with a clinician and a supporter of the survivor's choice, without the survivor present. Session content uses cognitive-behavioral strategies (e.g., encouraging non-avoidance) to encourage communication and improve supporters' responses in trauma-related conversations. Between sessions, both the survivor and the supporter are instructed to review session content and have guided discussions with the assistance of a workbook.

Study groups in NCT05345405
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dyadic CAREActive comparatorParticipants will receive dyadic CARE following baseline and will complete self-report assessments at post-session-1, Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3.
Receives: Behavioral: Dyadic CARE
Supporter-Only CAREActive comparatorParticipants will receive supporter-only CARE following baseline and will complete self-report assessments at post-session-1, Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3.
Receives: Behavioral: Supporter-Only CARE
Waitlist ControlNo interventionAfter completing baseline, participants will be invited to schedule a CARE session in 3 months (i.e., after the completion of all study assessments). The version of CARE received at that point will be selected by the survivor. Participants will complete self-report assessments at post-session-1, Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survivor Satisfaction With Intervention at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Client Satisfaction Scale, completed by survivor. Range: 8 to 32; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Supporter Satisfaction With Intervention at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Client Satisfaction Scale, completed by supporter. Range: 8 to 32; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Change in Survivor Knowledge at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on a knowledge questionnaire reflecting CARE concepts, completed by the survivor. Range: 8 to 40; higher scores indicate more knowledge about CARE concepts.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month

  4. Change in Supporter Knowledge at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on a knowledge questionnaire reflecting CARE concepts, completed by the supporter. Range: 9 to 45; higher scores indicate more knowledge about CARE concepts.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month

  5. Change in Survivor Confusion About Help-seeking Behavior at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on 4-item measure created for this study, completed by survivor. Range: 4 to 20; higher scores indicate greater confusion.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month

  6. Change in Supporter Confusion About Helping Behavior at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Confusion subscale of the Impact on Friends scale, completed by supporter. Range: 6 to 30; higher scores indicate greater confusion about helping behavior.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month

  7. Survivor Disclosure Frequency to Supporter at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Single item representing frequency of disclosures to supporter in past month, completed by survivor, adapted from the Early Intervention Clinic Disclosure scale. Survivor will input a numerical response representing number of disclosures. Higher scores indicate more frequent disclosure.

    Measured: 1 month

  8. Supporter Overt Hostile Reactions to Disclosure at 1 Month Post-baseline (Informant Report)

    Sum score on Turning Against subscale of the Social Reactions Questionnaire - Shortened, completed by survivor in reference to supporter's reactions in past month. Range: 0 to 24; higher scores indicate more frequent hostile negative reactions.

    Measured: 1 month

  9. Supporter Subtly Unsupportive Reactions to Disclosure at 1 Month Post-baseline (Informant Report)

    Sum score on Unsupportive Acknowledgment subscale of the Social Reactions Questionnaire - Shortened, completed by survivor in reference to supporter's reactions in past month. Range: 0 to 24; higher scores indicate more frequent subtly unsupportive reactions.

    Measured: 1 month

  10. Change in Supporter Responsiveness at 1 Month Post-baseline (Informant Report)

    Sum score on the Responsiveness subscale of the Perceived Responsiveness and Insensitivity scale, completed by survivor in reference to past month. Range: 0 to 40; higher scores indicate greater responsiveness.

    Measured: Baseline & 1 month

  11. Change in Survivor PTSD Symptom Severity at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5), completed by survivor in reference to past month. Range: 0-80; higher scores indicate greater severity of PTSD symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  12. Survivor Provisional PTSD Diagnostic Status at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Provisional PTSD diagnostic status based on PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5), completed by survivor in reference to past month. Survivors will be considered to have a provisional diagnosis if the following items are rated as 2 = "Moderately" or higher: one Criterion B item (questions 1-5), one Criterion C item (questions 6-7), two Criterion D items (questions 8-14), and two Criterion E items (questions 15-20).

    Measured: 3 months

  13. Change in Survivor Stress at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Stress subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by survivor in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater stress.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  14. Change in Supporter Stress at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Stress subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by supporter in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater stress.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  15. Change in Survivor Perceived Relationship Quality at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Relationship Assessment Scale, completed by survivor. Range: 7 to 35; higher scores indicate greater relationship quality.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  16. Change in Supporter Perceived Relationship Quality at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Relationship Assessment Scale, completed by supporter. Range: 7 to 35; higher scores indicate greater relationship quality.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Survivor Willingness to Participate in Criminal Justice Process at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score score on measure created for this study, completed by survivor. Range: 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater willingness.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Survivor Participation in Criminal Justice Process at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Mean score on measure created for this study, completed by survivor. Range: 0 to 1; higher scores indicate greater participation.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Change in Survivor Depression at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Depression subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by survivor in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater depression.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  4. Change in Supporter Depression at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Depression subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by supporter in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater depression.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  5. Change in Survivor Anxiety at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Anxiety subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by survivor in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  6. Change in Supporter Anxiety at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Anxiety subscale of the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), completed by supporter in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  7. Change in Survivor Role Impairment at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Work/School/Responsibility Impairment subscale of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS), completed by survivor in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 30; higher scores indicate more impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  8. Change in Survivor Social Impairment at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Social Impairment subscale of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS), completed by survivor in reference to past week. Range: 0 to 30; higher scores indicate more impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  9. Change in Survivor Flourishing at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Flourishing Index Measure, completed by survivor. Range: 0 to 120; higher scores indicate more flourishing.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  10. Change in Supporter Flourishing at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on Flourishing Index Measure, completed by supporter. Range: 0 to 120; higher scores indicate more flourishing.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  11. Survivor Distress Associated With Supporter Negative Reactions at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Mean score on ratings of distress associated endorsed items on Negative Reactions subscale of the Social Reactions Questionnaire - Shortened, completed by survivor in reference to supporter's reactions to survivor in past month. Range: 0 to 3; higher scores indicate more distress.

    Measured: 1 month

  12. Supporter Positive Reactions to Disclosure at 1 Month Post-baseline (Informant Report)

    Sum score on Positive Reactions subscale of the Social Reactions Questionnaire - Shortened, completed by survivor in reference to supporter's reactions in past month. Range: 0 to 16; higher scores indicate more frequent positive reactions.

    Measured: 1 month

  13. Change in Survivor Typical Alcohol Consumption (Quantity) at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of typical drinks per week in past month reported by survivor on the Daily Drinking Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  14. Change in Survivor Typical Alcohol Consumption (Frequency) at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of typical drinking days per week in past month reported by survivor on the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Range: 0 to 7.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  15. Change in Survivor Typical Alcohol Consumption (Hours) at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of typical drinking hours per week in past month reported by survivor on the Daily Drinking Questionnaire.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  16. Supporter Perceived Helping Ineffectiveness at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Confusion subscale of the Impact on Friends measure, completed by supporter in reference to the past month. Range: 6 to 30; higher scores indicate greater perceived ineffectiveness.

    Measured: 1 month

  17. Supporter Distress in Helping at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Emotional Distress subscale of the Impact on Friends measure, completed by supporter in reference to the past month. Range: 24 to 120; higher scores indicate greater distress.

    Measured: 1 month

  18. Supporter Accommodation of Survivor PTSD Symptoms at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Sum score on the Significant Others' Responses to Trauma Scale (SORTS), completed by supporter in reference to the past month. Range: 0 to 112; higher scores indicate greater accommodation.

    Measured: 1 month

  19. Change in Survivor Cannabis Use Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of cannabis use in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  20. Change in Survivor Prescription Opioid Misuse Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of prescription opioid use not as prescribed in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  21. Change in Survivor Non-prescription Opioid Use Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of non-prescription opioid use in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  22. Change in Survivor Prescription Amphetamine Misuse Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of prescription amphetamine use not as prescribed in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  23. Change in Survivor Methamphetamine Use Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of methamphetamine use in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  24. Change in Survivor Cigarette Use Frequency at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of days of cigarette use in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor. Range: 0 to 14.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

  25. Change in Survivor Cigarette Use Quantity at 3 Months Post-baseline (Self Report)

    Number of cigarettes smoked in a typical day in past 2 weeks, as reported by survivor.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2022
  2. Study start18 May 2022
  3. Primary completion4 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion4 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
128 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05345405
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00011982
Acronym
CARE
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
6 Apr 2022
Last updated
8 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be archived in the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. No direct or indirect identifiers will ever be included in the archived dataset. We will submit study instruments and data collection forms, project reports describing our methods, and Institutional Review Board documentation (including copies of consent forms). A syntax file will include (1) recoding of reverse-scored items; (2) calculation of scale scores; (3) addition of a filter variable indicating any cases not included in any final analyses and the corresponding reason for exclusion; and (5) variable and value labels. Technical documentation for the dataset will include variable codebooks with full study instruments and citations, naming conventions, missing value designations, value labels, known data anomalies, and a data user guide.

Publications

  • Dworkin ER, Ruzek JI, Cordova MJ, Fitzpatrick S, Merchant L, Stewart T, Santos JP, Mohr J, Bedard-Gilligan M. Supporter-focused early intervention for recent sexual assault survivors: Study protocol for a pilot randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106848. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106848. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

    PubMed 35817294

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dyadic CARE and Supporter-Only CARE in people with Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic and Helping Behavior, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survivor Satisfaction With Intervention at 1 Month Post-baseline (Self Report) (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 16 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05345405, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in