Lateral EpicondylitisNCT05334953
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Ultrasound and Phonophoresis Treatments in Lateral Epicondylitis
A study testing ESWT, Phonophoresis and Ultrasound in people with Lateral Epicondylitis, run by Bezmialem Vakif University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study; to determine the effectiveness of ESWT, ultrasound and phonophoresis treatments on pain, grip strength, functionality and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to determine the superiority of the treatments to each other. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- What is being tested?
- ESWT, Phonophoresis and Ultrasound
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2022to 6 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18-65 years
- Pain on the lateral side of the elbow for at least 4 weeks
- Tenderness over the lateral epicondyle
- Positive in at least two of the lateral epicondylitis spesific tests (Cozen test, Maudley test and Mills test)
Who cannot join
- Be younger than 18
- Having had ESWT treatment in the elbow area before
- History of injection, surgery, physical therapy in the elbow area in the last 3 months
- Previous elbow surgery
- History of radius/ulna fracture
- A history of cervical and shoulder problems
Show all 14Show fewer
- having bilateral symptoms
- concomitant medial epicondylitis
- Malignancy
- Pregnancy
- Systemic rheumatologic disease or systemic infection
- inserted cardiac pacemaker
- presence of coagulation disorders
- Cognitive disfunction
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Ultrasound and Phonophoresis Treatments in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study; to determine the effectiveness of ESWT, ultrasound and phonophoresis treatments on pain, grip strength, functionality and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to determine the superiority of the treatments to each other.
Read the detailed description
Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of elbow lateral pain in adults. Pain that occurs in LE and radiates to the humerus and forearm is characteristic of this disease. The main complaints being pain and decreased grip strength, both of which may affect activities of daily living. The patient's complaints regress with rest,but but can increase again during daily activities such as grasping, repetitive hand movements, holding door handles, turning keys, lifting heavy loads. Diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is largely based on clinical history and examination. Conservative treatment is the first line treatment. Generally, %90 of patients with LE benefit from conservative and medical treatment, and only a few need surgery. These treatment methods include many options such as activity modification, topical and oral NSAIDs, splinting, stretching and strengthening exercises, various injections, prolotherapy and electrotherapy modalities. Laser, TENS, ultrasound, phonophoresis, iontophoresis and ESWT are electrotherapeutic agents that can be used in therapy to relieve pain and promote healing. Research on physical treatments for LE has not yet proven superiority of one specific approach.
Although many studies have been done for ESWT, ultrasound and phonophoresis, there is not any study that compares these three modalities.In addition, there ara fewer studies about measuring the effect of these treatment methods which contain control groups. In this study, our aim is to investigate the efficacy of ESWT, ultrasound therapy and phonophoresis methods used in the treatment of LE and to compare the efficacy of these three treatments against each other and control group.
- Conditions
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- Being tested
- ESWT, Phonophoresis, Ultrasound, Control group
- Keywords
- lateral epicondylitis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ultrasound, phonophoresis
- Medical subject headings
- Tennis Elbow
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ESWTDevice
Group 1 (n = 17) will be given two times a week, total 5 sessions of ESWT + home exercise program
Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises
PhonophoresisDevice
Group 2 ( n=17) will be given five times a week total 10 sessions of diclofenac phonophoresis + home exercise program
Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises
UltrasoundDevice
Group 3 (n=17) will be given five times a week total 10 sessions of ultrasound therapy+ home exercise program
Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises
Control groupOther
Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: ESWT(Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy) | Experimental | Group 1 (n = 17) will be given two times a week, total 5 sessions of ESWT + home exercise program Receives: Device: ESWT |
| Phonophoresis | Experimental | Group 2 ( n=17) will be given five times a week, total 10 sessions of diclofenac phonophoresis + home exercise program Receives: Device: Phonophoresis |
| Ultrasound therapy | Experimental | Group 2 (n=17) will be given five times a week, total 10 sessions of ultrasound therapy+ home exercise program Receives: Device: Ultrasound |
| Control goup | Other | Group 4 ( n=17) will be given home exercise program Receives: Other: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale
The self-evaluation of pain severity during rest, activity,night and with palpation was calculated using a 10-cm VAS scale
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scales
The PRTEE is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability in patients with lateral epicondylitis
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire score
The Quick DASH is an 11-item measure of the magnitude of disability and symptoms specific to the upper extremity. The first 6 items measure the degree of difficulty in performing various physical activities because of a shoulder, arm, and hand problem, and the other 5 items related to quality of sleeping, social activities, and daily activities, and the intensity of pain and numbness
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Roles and Maudsley Score
The Roles and Maudsley score was used to evaluate pain and activity limitation as classified in four categories: 1 point = excellent, 2 points = good, 3 points = fair and 4 points = poor.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score
This is a self-reported questionnaire covering 20 items in eight domains related to measuring difficulty in performing activities of daily living: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Grip Strength score
Grip strength of the affected upper extremity was calculated using a Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Jun 2022
- Primary completion15 Sep 2022
- Study completion6 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lateral EpicondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bezmialem Vakif UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Okan Küçükakkaş, Doç, Study director, okan4494@yahoo.comElif Uğurlu, MD, Principal investigator, elifdemirbag92qgmail.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05334953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 71306642-050.05.04
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yalvac B, Mesci N, Geler Kulcu D, Yurdakul OV. Comparison of ultrasound and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lateral epicondylosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Sep;52(5):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
PubMed 30497658Bayram K, Yesil H, Dogan E. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. North Clin Istanb. 2014 Aug 3;1(1):33-38. doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.77487. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 28058299Stasinopoulos D, Johnson MI. Cyriax physiotherapy for tennis elbow/lateral epicondylitis. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):675-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013573.
PubMed 15562158Weber C, Thai V, Neuheuser K, Groover K, Christ O. Efficacy of physical therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 25;16:223. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0665-4.
PubMed 26303397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Ultrasound and Phonophoresis Treatments in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05334953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 71306642-050.05.04
- Conditions
- Lateral Epicondylitis
- Keywords
- lateral epicondylitis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ultrasound, phonophoresis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study; to determine the effectiveness of ESWT, ultrasound and phonophoresis treatments on pain, grip strength, functionality and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to determine the superiority of the treatments to each other.
Detailed description
Lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of elbow lateral pain in adults. Pain that occurs in LE and radiates to the humerus and forearm is characteristic of this disease. The main complaints being pain and decreased grip strength, both of which may affect activities of daily living. The patient's complaints regress with rest,but but can increase again during daily activities such as grasping, repetitive hand movements, holding door handles, turning keys, lifting heavy loads. Diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is largely based on clinical history and examination. Conservative treatment is the first line treatment. Generally, %90 of patients with LE benefit from conservative and medical treatment, and only a few need surgery. These treatment methods include many options such as activity modification, topical and oral NSAIDs, splinting, stretching and strengthening exercises, various injections, prolotherapy and electrotherapy modalities. Laser, TENS, ultrasound, phonophoresis, iontophoresis and ESWT are electrotherapeutic agents that can be used in therapy to relieve pain and promote healing. Research on physical treatments for LE has not yet proven superiority of one specific approach.
Although many studies have been done for ESWT, ultrasound and phonophoresis, there is not any study that compares these three modalities.In addition, there ara fewer studies about measuring the effect of these treatment methods which contain control groups. In this study, our aim is to investigate the efficacy of ESWT, ultrasound therapy and phonophoresis methods used in the treatment of LE and to compare the efficacy of these three treatments against each other and control group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: ESWT(Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy) | Experimental | Device: ESWTGroup 1 (n = 17) will be given two times a week, total 5 sessions of ESWT + home exercise program |
| Phonophoresis | Experimental | Device: PhonophoresisGroup 2 ( n=17) will be given five times a week, total 10 sessions of diclofenac phonophoresis + home exercise program |
| Ultrasound therapy | Experimental | Device: UltrasoundGroup 2 (n=17) will be given five times a week, total 10 sessions of ultrasound therapy+ home exercise program |
| Control goup | Other | Other: Control groupGroup 4 ( n=17) will be given home exercise program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged between 18-65 years
- Pain on the lateral side of the elbow for at least 4 weeks
- Tenderness over the lateral epicondyle
- Positive in at least two of the lateral epicondylitis spesific tests (Cozen test, Maudley test and Mills test)
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Be younger than 18
- Having had ESWT treatment in the elbow area before
- History of injection, surgery, physical therapy in the elbow area in the last 3 months
- Previous elbow surgery
- History of radius/ulna fracture
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ESWTGroup 1 (n = 17) will be given two times a week, total 5 sessions of ESWT + home exercise program Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises | Device | Experimental: ESWT(Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy) |
| PhonophoresisGroup 2 ( n=17) will be given five times a week total 10 sessions of diclofenac phonophoresis + home exercise program Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises | Device | Phonophoresis |
| UltrasoundGroup 3 (n=17) will be given five times a week total 10 sessions of ultrasound therapy+ home exercise program Other: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises | Device | Ultrasound therapy |
| Control groupOther: Home Workout Program Patients will be given eccentric exercises and stretching exercises | Other | Control goup |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
The self-evaluation of pain severity during rest, activity,night and with palpation was calculated using a 10-cm VAS scale
5 secondary outcomes
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scales
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire score
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Roles and Maudsley Score
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Grip Strength score
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30497658Yalvac B, Mesci N, Geler Kulcu D, Yurdakul OV. Comparison of ultrasound and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lateral epicondylosis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Sep;52(5):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 28058299Bayram K, Yesil H, Dogan E. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. North Clin Istanb. 2014 Aug 3;1(1):33-38. doi: 10.14744/nci.2014.77487. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 15562158Stasinopoulos D, Johnson MI. Cyriax physiotherapy for tennis elbow/lateral epicondylitis. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):675-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013573.
- Background: PubMed 26303397Weber C, Thai V, Neuheuser K, Groover K, Christ O. Efficacy of physical therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 25;16:223. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0665-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Cutaneous Nerve of the Forearm Epicondylar Branch Block on Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis (PCNF-BrEpi)
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Outcomes of Tennis Elbow
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Tenoxicam and Corticosteroid Injections for Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Okan Küçükakkaş, Doç study director
okan4494@yahoo.com
Elif Uğurlu, MD principal investigator
elifdemirbag92qgmail.com
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ESWT, Phonophoresis and Ultrasound in people with Lateral Epicondylitis, run by Bezmialem Vakif University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month after treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05334953, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2023.