AzTrials
AzTrials

Bipolar DisorderPhase 2NCT05328297

A Study of JNJ-55308942 in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-55308942 in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium at 44 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-55308942 compared to placebo on symptoms of depression in participants with bipolar disorder (BD) in a major depressive episode (MDE) at Week 6. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Bipolar Disorder
What is being tested?
JNJ-55308942
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
116 participants
Where
44 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
3 Jun 2022to 17 May 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a primary diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition) (DSM-5) diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) (Type I or II) without current psychotic features, as confirmed by the mini international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI)
  • Medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, and vital signs performed at screening. Any abnormalities must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population. This determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator
  • Have a body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 35.0 kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2) inclusive (BMI = weight/height^2)
  • A woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [beta-hCG]) at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test before the first dose of study intervention

Who cannot join

  • Currently meets the DSM-5 criteria for Manic Episode (ME) on the MINI
  • Received transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), any transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) and/or deep brain stimulation (DBS) within 6 weeks prior to randomization
  • History of moderate to severe cannabis misuse according to DSM-5 criteria within 6 months before screening
  • History of malignancy within 5 years before screening (exceptions are squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or malignancy that in the opinion of the investigator is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence)

Trial locations and contacts

44 sites in 4 countries.

44 sites in 4 countries

United States18 sites
  • The University of Texas at Austin Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School

    Austin, Texas, 78712-1873

  • Northwest Clinical Research Center

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Center for Emotional Fitness

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08002

  • Case Western Reserve School of Medicine

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • The Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • North Texas Clinical Trials

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77054

  • UAB Huntsville Regional Medical Campus

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Indiana University

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Synergy East

    Lemon Grove, California, 91945

  • Preferred Research Partners

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211

  • Suburban Research Associates

    Media, Pennsylvania, 19063

  • Clinical NeuroScience Solutions Inc

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions

    Orlando, Florida, 23801

  • Richard H. Weisler, MD & Associates

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609-9148

  • Psychiatric Medicine Associates LLC

    Skokie, Illinois, 60076

  • Collaborative NeuroScience Network

    Torrance, California, 90504

Other trials in United States

Poland14 sites
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Bialymstoku Klinika Psychiatrii

    Bialystok, 15 272

  • PROMENTE Sp. z o.o.

    Bydgoszcz, 85-133

  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI House sp z o o

    Gdansk, 80 546

  • Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Piotr Zalitacz

    Gorlice, 30073

  • Centrum Medyczne Care Clinic Katowice

    Katowice, 40-568

  • Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska Kinga Bobinska

    Lodz, 90-009

  • Filip Rybakowski Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska

    Poznan, 60 744

  • Centrum Medyczne HCP Sp. z o.o. Osrodek Badan Klinicznych

    Poznan, 61-485

  • Samodzielny Publiczny Zespol Lecznictwa Psychiatrycznego w Siemianowicach Slaskich

    Siemianowice Śląskie, 41-100

  • Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Agnieszka Remlinger Molenda

    Suchy Las, 62-002

  • Szpital Nowowiejski Osrodek Badan Klinicznych

    Warsaw, 00-774

  • Instytut Psychiatrii I Neurologii

    Warsaw, 02957

  • Przychodnia Lekarsko-Psychologiczna Persona

    Wroclaw, 50-227

  • Ginemedica Sp. z o.o.

    Wroclaw, 50-414

Other trials in Poland

Spain10 sites
  • Hosp. Del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Institucion Hosp Hestia Palau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hosp Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal

    Madrid, 28034

  • Centro Salud Mental La Eria

    Oviedo, 33013

  • Clinica Univ. de Navarra

    Pamplona, 31008

  • Hosp. El Bierzo

    Ponferrada, 24404

  • Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

  • Hosp. Alvaro Cunqueiro

    Vigo, 36213

  • Hosp. Psiquiatrico Alava

    Vitoria-Gasteiz, 1006

Other trials in Spain

Canada2 sites
  • Chatham-Kent Clinical Trials Research Centre

    Chatham, Ontario, N7L 1C1

  • The Medical Arts Health Research Group

    West Vancouver, British Columbia, V7T 1C5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Stratified, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of JNJ-55308942 in Bipolar Depression

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-55308942 compared to placebo on symptoms of depression in participants with bipolar disorder (BD) in a major depressive episode (MDE) at Week 6.

Being tested
JNJ-55308942, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Bipolar Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-55308942Drug

    JNJ-55308942 capsules will be administered orally.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo capsules will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT05328297
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
JNJ-55308942ExperimentalParticipants will receive a JNJ-55308942 capsule once daily for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-55308942
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive a matching placebo capsule once daily for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score up to Week 6

    Change from baseline in MADRS total score up to Week 6 were reported. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to antidepressant (AD) treatment. The MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. The MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Change From Baseline in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Total Score up to Week 6

    Change from baseline in SHAPS total score up to Week 6 were reported. The SHAPS was a reliable, valid, and unidimensional instrument used to assess hedonic capacity in adults with Major Depressive Disorder. It is a 14-item, self-report tool with a completion time below 5 minutes. Each of the items had a set of 4 response categories: 1 = definitely agree/strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = disagree, and 4 = strongly disagree. The SHAPS total score was the sum of the 14 item scores, which ranged from 14 to 56. A higher SHAPS total score indicated higher levels of current anhedonia. Negative changes in the SHAPS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  2. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score up to Week 6 (Genetic Subgroup Analysis)

    Genetic subgroup analysis included participants with bipolar depression and who were with P2RX7 Gain of Function single nucleotide polymorphism (P2RX7 GoF SNP) mutation genotype: heterozygous or homozygous. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. The MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. The MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  3. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score up to Week 6 (Diagnosis Subgroup Analysis)

    Change from baseline in MADRS total score up to Week 6 (Diagnosis Subgroup Analysis) were reported. Diagnosis subgroup analysis included participants with bipolar type 1 or II. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. The MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. The MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  4. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score up to Week 6 (Biomarker Subgroup Analysis)

    Biomarker subgroup analysis included specific (3-Marker Model [3MM]) biomarker profile: Yes or No. 3MM biomarker profile was defined as serum C-reactive protein >3 mg/Liter(L) and soluble interleukin-6 receptor >25 micrograms(mcg)/L or tumor necrosis factor >4 nanograms(ng)/L at baseline. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Scale consist of 10 items each of which was scored from 0(item not present or normal) to 6(severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. MADRS total score was sum of scores from individual question items, ranged from 0 to 60,with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Clinically Important Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Vital signs parameters included pulse rate (abnormally low [AL]: <50 beats per minute [bpm] and with >15 bpm decrease from baseline and abnormally high [AH]: >100 bpm and with >15 bpm increase from baseline), Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (AL: <90 millimeters of mercury [mmHg] and with >20 mmHg decrease from baseline and AH: >180 mmHg and with >20 mmHg increase from baseline), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (AL: <50 mmHg and with >15 mmHg decrease from baseline and AH: >105 mmHg and with >15 mmHg increase from baseline) , temperature (AL:<35.5 and AH:>37.5 degree Celsius [C]), respiratory rate (AH :>20 breaths per minute), and weight (AL: decrease from baseline >7% and AH: increase from baseline >7%). Weight was planned to analyzed at Weeks 6 and 8 only. Treatment-emergent concluded if postbaseline value was above/below upper/lower limit and baseline value was below/above the upper/lower limit.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  6. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values in Male Hormone: Inhibin B

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory values in male hormone (Inhibin B) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  7. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values in Male Hormone: Luteinizing Hormone

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory values in male hormone (luteinizing hormone) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  8. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values in Male Hormone: Prolactin

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory values in male hormone (prolactin) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  9. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values in Male Hormones: Sex Hormone Binding Globulin, Testosterone (Free), Testosterone (High Sensitivity), and Testosterone (Low Sensitivity)

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory values in male hormones (sex hormone binding globulin, testosterone [free], testosterone [high sensitivity], and testosterone [low sensitivity]) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  10. Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry

    Number of participants with abnormal laboratory values: serum chemistry were reported. It included: aspartate aminotransferase (high), alanine aminotransferase (high), bilirubin (high/low), and alkaline phosphatase (high/low). Only categories with data were reported.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  11. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values: hematology were reported.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values: Urinalysis

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory values: urinalysis were reported.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  13. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Number of participants with TEAEs were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participants who administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A TEAE defined as an AE that occurred at or after the first dose administration up to day of the last dose plus 30 days.

    Measured: Day 1 (Week 0) up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 11 weeks)

  14. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

    Number of participants with treatment-emergent abnormalities in ECGs were reported. It included ECG mean heart rate (abnormally low [AL]: <50 and abnormally high [AH]: >100 beats per minute [bpm]), PR Interval (AL: <120 and AH: >200 milliseconds [msec]), QRS Duration (AL: <60 and AH: >120 msec), and QT Interval (AL: <200 and AH: >500 msec). A treatment-emergent abnormalities in ECGs are defined as those abnormalities that occurred at or after the first dose administration.

    Measured: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 (Follow-up/Early Withdrawal)

  15. Change From Baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score

    Change from baseline in YMRS total score were reported. The YMRS was designed to measure the severity of manic symptoms, to gauge the effect of treatment on mania severity, and to detect a return of manic symptoms (for example relapse or recurrence). YMRS had 11 items : 4 items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) were graded on a scale of 0 to 8 and the remaining 7 items (elevated mood, increased motor activity, sexual interest, sleep, language-thought disorder, appearance, and insight) were graded on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated greater symptom severity. Responses were summed to yield YMRS total score ranged from 0 to 60 , with higher scores reflecting greater severity of mania.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  16. Number of Participants Who Reported Suicidal Ideation (SI) or Suicidal Behavior (SB) Using With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score

    C-SSRS is a clinician-rated instrument that reports severity of both suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior (SB). SI categories: 1 (wish to be dead), 2 (nonspecific active suicidal thoughts), 3 (active suicidal ideation with any methods [not plan] without intent to act), 4 (active SI with some intent to act, without specific plan), and 5 (active SI with specific plan and intent). SB categories: 6 (preparatory acts or behavior), 7 (aborted attempt), 8 (interrupted attempt), 9 (actual attempt), and 10 (suicide). An additional category for non-suicide: non-suicidal self-injurious behavior. SI/SB was indicated by a "yes" answer to any of the listed categories. Score of 0 (no SI or SB) was assigned. Maximum score of 1 to 10 was assigned if suicidal ideation or behavior was present. Scoring was grouped into 3 categories: No SI/SB (0), SI (score 1 to 5), and SB (score 6 to 10), with higher scores indicating more severe ideation/behavior.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 8

  17. Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) Score

    Change from baseline in CGI-S score were reported. The CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S is a 7-point global assessment scale that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of mental illness exhibited by a participant, and rated on a scale of 1 to 7: 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7=among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worsening. Negative change in CGI-S score indicate improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  18. Plasma Concentrations of JNJ-55308942

    Plasma concentrations of JNJ-55308942 were reported.

    Measured: Predose, 1.5 hours and 4 hours post-dose on Week 0 (Day 1), Weeks 1 (Day 8), 2 (Day 15), 4 (Day 29), and 6 (Day 43)

  19. Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (APS) T-Scores

    Change from baseline in PROMIS score - ability to participate in social roles and activities T-Scores were reported. The PROMIS - APS item bank assessed the perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. The item bank did not use a time frame (for example, over the past seven days) when assessing the APS. The Short Form 4a included 4 items that represent this concept. Each question had 5 response options ranging in value from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better social function. The total raw score for the short form was calculated by summing the values of the response to each question, so for the 4-item form, the lowest possible raw score was 4; the highest possible raw score was 20. The total raw score was converted to a T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate better social function.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  20. Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score

    Change from baseline in PHQ-9 total score were reported. PHQ-9 is 9-item, self-report scale assessed depressive symptoms. Each item was rated on 4-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half days, 3=nearly every day. The participant's item responses were summed to provide PHQ-9 total score (range of 0 to 27) with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  21. Change From Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) Total Score

    Change from baseline in GAD-7 total score were reported. GAD-7 is a brief and validated 7-item self-reported questionnaire for assessment of overall GAD. Participants responded to each item using a 4-point scale with response categories of 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day, with a higher score representing a more severe condition. Item responses were summed to yield GAD-7 total score which ranged of 0 to 21, where higher scores indicated more anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 2, 4, and 6

  22. Number of Participants Who Achieved Response at Week 6

    Number of participants who achieved response at Week 6 were reported. Response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=)50% improvement in MADRS total score from baseline. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. The MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. The MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: Week 6

  23. Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission at Week 6

    Number of participants who achieved remission at Week 6 were reported. Remission was defined as MADRS total score <=12. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. The MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. The MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: Week 6

  24. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score up to Week 6 (Subgroup of Participants With Messenger Ribonucleic Acid [mRNA] Transcript Levels)

    Change from baseline in MADRS total score up to Week 6 (subgroup of participants with mRNA transcript levels) was planned to be reported. Subgroup included participants with mRNA transcript levels at baseline that exceeded the medium level for both P2RX7 and IL-1-beta. MADRS was a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detect changes due to AD treatment. MADRS evaluated reported sadness, apparent sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. The scale consisted of 10 items, each of which was scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms),with higher score indicating a more severe condition. MADRS total score was the sum of scores from individual question items and it ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicated more severe conditions. Negative change in MADRS total score indicated improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

  25. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score up to Week 6 (Concomitant Medication Subgroup Analysis)

    Change from baseline in MADRS total score up to Week 6 (concomitant medication subgroup analysis) was reported. Concomitant medication subgroup analysis included subjects with BD not taking any mood stabilizer or antipsychotic, taking a mood stabilizer alone, taking antipsychotic alone, and taking a combination of mood stabilizer and an antipsychotic. MADRS measures depression severity, detects changes due to AD treatment. It consists of 10 items (evaluate apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, suicidal thoughts), scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed to total possible score of 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate more severe conditions. Negative change in score indicates improvement.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2022
  2. Study start3 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion17 May 2024
  4. Study completion17 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05328297
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR109116
Other IDs
2021-004790-31, 55308942BIP2001
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
11 Apr 2022
Last updated
11 Jul 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-55308942 in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium at 44 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 44 sites in United States, Poland, Spain, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score up to Week 6 (time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in