AzTrials
AzTrials

Plantar WartNCT05324904

Intralesional Vitamin D3 Versus Intralesional Acyclovir in Treatment of Plantar Warts

A study testing Vitamin D and acyclovir in people with Plantar Wart, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional acyclovir versus intralesional vitamin D3 in the treatment of plantar warts Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Plantar Wart
What is being tested?
Vitamin D and acyclovir
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Oct 2022to Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants of both sex with plantar warts will be included in the study

Who cannot join

  • - Children < 12 years.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Receiving any treatment for warts within 1 month before the study.
  • Systemic antiviral medication.
  • Previous history of vitamin D or acyclovir hypersensitivity.
  • Vitamin D supplementation.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Concurrent other skin disorders.
  • Immunosuppressive disorders or receiving immunosuppressive drugs.
  • Receiving drugs that may alter vitamin D level including prednisone, orlistat, phenytoin and thiazide diuretics.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Assuit University

    Asyut

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional acyclovir versus intralesional vitamin D3 in the treatment of plantar warts

Read the detailed description

Introduction Warts are common epidermal growths caused by various strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) affecting all age groups. They have an unsightly appearance and are mostly asymptomatic but sometimes may be painful as in the case of palmoplantar warts . Plantar warts is a clinical variant that occur on sole of the foot, most frequently over pressure points .

It is estimated that 40% of population is infected with HPV, and in 7% to 12%, a wart develops . Plantar warts exhibit an annual incidence of 14% in the general population . Sixty-five percent to 78% of cutaneous warts have been shown to regress within 2 years . In persons older than 12 years, the rate of spontaneous regression significantly decreases .

Variable therapeutic options are available for treating warts, with none considered a gold standard. Primary treatments include topical salicylic acid, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, cryotherapy, excision, electrocautry and laser vaporization .

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble steroid prohormone that has wide range of biological actions e.g. inhibition of cellular proliferation, induction of terminal differentiation, and inhibition of angiogenesis. It also stimulates macrophages and cathelicidin production . Recently, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intralesional vitamin D in treatment of warts, as well as recalcitrant lesions, with clearance rates of 72.5%-90% .

Acyclovir is a synthetic purine nucleoside analogue with activity against some viruses as herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus. Acyclovir uses viral thymidine kinase to convert to its active form, acyclovir triphosphate. Through this mechanism of utilizing viral thymidine kinase, acyclovir specifically targets viral DNA preventing its replication in the host.

Previously, few studies and case reports documented the clearance of warts, some were unresponsive to prior treatment, with both topical and oral use of acyclovir .

A recent study has evaluated the efficacy of intralesional acyclovir versus intralesional saline in treatment of warts and reported complete clearance rate of 52.6% and a partial response of 16.7% for acyclovir with a statistically significant difference from saline (0% complete clearance) .

Conditions
Plantar Wart
Being tested
Vitamin D, acyclovir

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin DDrug

    • Vitamin D
    • The aqueous solution of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) will be used ampoule 200,000 IU/2 ML,
    • Using a 27-gauge syringe with the bevel facing upward, a maximum of 0.6 ml (60,000 IU) of vitamin D3 solution will be slowly injected into the base of the largest plantar wart (large warts > 10 mm need multiple injections at different sites)
    • Treatment sessions will be performed at 3-week intervals for a maximum of 4 sessions
  • acyclovirDrug

    -Acyclovir

    • Acyclovir vial (Zovirax® vial, 250mg, ) will be diluted with 3.5 ml saline to get approximately 70 mg /ml solution.
    • After sterilization of the skin, a 27-gauge syringe with the bevel facing upward will be inserted into the base of the largest plantar wart to slowly inject the solution
    • Treatment sessions will be performed at 2-week intervals for maximum of 5 sessions
Study groups in NCT05324904
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
group 1Active comparatorthis group will be intralesionaly injected with vitamin D3
Receives: Drug: Vitamin D
group 2Active comparatorthis group will be intralesionally injected with acyclovir
Receives: Drug: acyclovir

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. complete healing rate

    Main outcome variable is the complete healing rate among planter warts patients treated with intralesional vitamin D3 compared to those by Intralesional acyclovir

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2022
  2. Study startOct 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05324904
Sponsor's protocol ID
vitamin D3, acyclovir in warts
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
18 Mar 2022
Last updated
13 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vitamin D and acyclovir in people with Plantar Wart, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact maha m mostafa, MD (+201158597040 ext. a, mahamostafaali@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

complete healing rate (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in