AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurologic DisorderNCT05313295

Physical Therapy Treatment on Children and Adolescents With Neurological Pathologies

A study testing Home-based physiotherapy and Usual Physiotherapy in people with Neurologic Disorder and Duchenne, run by Universidad de Almeria at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the positive effects of a home-based physical therapy intervention added to the usual physical therapy programs performed in children with neurological pathologies that induce sensorimotor impairments that affect their quality of life and the importance of the implications of their families in their… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Neurologic Disorder, Duchenne, Pediatric Disorder
What is being tested?
Home-based physiotherapy and Usual Physiotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 10 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Parents agree to include their children on the study
  • Affiliated to the Duchenne Parents Project Association (Spain)
  • Between 3-18 years old

Who cannot join

  • Other pathological conditions
  • Parents refuse the participation on the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • María del Mar Sánchez-Joya

    Almería, 04120

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effects of the Physical Therapy Treatment on Children and Adolescents With Chronic and Neurological Pathologies Affecting Their Sensorimotor Abilities.

To evaluate the positive effects of a home-based physical therapy intervention added to the usual physical therapy programs performed in children with neurological pathologies that induce sensorimotor impairments that affect their quality of life and the importance of the implications of their families in their treatment.

Being tested
Home-based physiotherapy, Usual Physiotherapy
Keywords
Childhood, Neurologic disorder, Duchenne
Medical subject headings
Nervous System Diseases, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Home-based physiotherapyOther

    Manual Therapy, passive and active mobilizations, stretching, respiratory techniques

  • Usual PhysiotherapyOther

    Usual care provided for the management of neurological disorders in children

Study groups in NCT05313295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Home-based PhysiotherapyExperimentalTwo days a week of physical therapy (mobilizations, manual therapy, stretching, respiratory techniques) + 3 hours extra of home-based physiotherapy (stretching, active mobilizations)
Receives: Other: Home-based physiotherapy
Usual physiotherapyActive comparatorTwo days a week of physical therapy (mobilizations, manual therapy, stretching, respiratory techniques)
Receives: Other: Usual Physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Motor Function Measure

    Measurement scale for motor function applied to neuromuscular diseases (MFM): It was created in France in order to perform a better evaluation of global motor function in patients with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD), both for ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients. It has two versions, MFM 20 for children under 6 years of age and MFM 32 for children over 6 years of age. The scale considers three dimensions: (D1) standing station and transfers; (D2) axial and proximal motor skills and (D3) distal motor skills. The sum of the three results in a global percentage that provides an updated overview of the patient's functional diagnosis. (Trundell et al., 2020)

    Measured: One Year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Brooke Upper Extremity Scale

    It is a scale of levels from 1 to 5 for the motor functional classification of the upper limbs. (Brooke et al., 1989) It is graded according to the motor ability of the child evaluated in the following categories: (1) bring the arms towards the ceiling (2) raises arms above head but bends elbows (3) cannot raise hands above head, but can bring glass of water to mouth (4) holds pen or picks up coin and ( 5) It does not have any useful function with the hand. The lower the score, the better the upper extremity motor function. (Mayhew et al., 2013) In addition, this scale is frequently used in the DMD population and its intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is .99 .(Lue et al., 2006)

    Measured: One Year

  2. Vignos Scale

    It is a functional classification that scores from 1 to 10, where the highest number represents the most intense progressive condition of DMD reflected in the patient's ambulation. The possible categories are: (1) walks and climbs stairs without assistance (2) walks and climbs stairs with assistance or handrails (3) walks and climbs stairs slowly with the assistance of handrails (4) walks without assistance and gets up from a chair but does not climb stairs (5) walks without assistance but cannot get up from a chair or climb stairs (6) walks only with the aid of long orthoses (7) walks with long orthoses but needs help to maintain balance (8) stands upright with orthoses but unable to walk or with assistance, (9) in a wheelchair and (10) confined to bed.(Fernandes et al., 2014; Martini et al., 2015)

    Measured: One Year

  3. Timed Up and Go Test

    Determines the patient's risk of falling. The test is performed under a stopwatch, asking the patient to get up from a chair (with or without support), stand up, walk 3 meters, turn around and come back to sit on the chair again. If the patient takes more than 20 seconds to perform, they have a high risk of falling; and between 10 and 20 seconds will indicate fragility. (Alkan et al., 2017)

    Measured: One Year

  4. Six Minutes Walk Distance

    It consists of quantifying in meters the distance traveled in 6 minutes by the patient. The more meters walked, the less impairment.(Mcdonald et al., 2013) Individualized periodic assessment of 6 Minutes Walking Distance (6MWD) is the most widely accepted primary clinical endpoint in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) clinical trials(Goemans et al., 2016); and provides a better prognosis than those based solely on age. After analyzing its test-retest reliability in DMD, its ICC is 0.92. (Mcdonald et al., 2013)

    Measured: One Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion10 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05313295
Sponsor's protocol ID
FiNeuro
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
27 Feb 2022
Last updated
23 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Publications

  • Alemdaroglu I, Karaduman A, Yilmaz OT, Topaloglu H. Different types of upper extremity exercise training in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: effects on functional performance, strength, endurance, and ambulation. Muscle Nerve. 2015 May;51(5):697-705. doi: 10.1002/mus.24451. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

    PubMed 25196721
  • Alkan H, Mutlu A, Firat T, Bulut N, Karaduman AA, Yilmaz OT. Effects of functional level on balance in children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Jul;21(4):635-638. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

    PubMed 28259452
  • Hind D, Parkin J, Whitworth V, Rex S, Young T, Hampson L, Sheehan J, Maguire C, Cantrill H, Scott E, Epps H, Main M, Geary M, McMurchie H, Pallant L, Woods D, Freeman J, Lee E, Eagle M, Willis T, Muntoni F, Baxter P. Aquatic therapy for children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial and mixed-methods process evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(27):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta21270.

    PubMed 28627356
  • Goemans N, Vanden Hauwe M, Signorovitch J, Swallow E, Song J; Collaborative Trajectory Analysis Project (cTAP). Individualized Prediction of Changes in 6-Minute Walk Distance for Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0164684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164684. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27737016
  • Jansen M, van Alfen N, Geurts AC, de Groot IJ. Assisted bicycle training delays functional deterioration in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the randomized controlled trial "no use is disuse". Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(9):816-27. doi: 10.1177/1545968313496326. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

    PubMed 23884013

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Home-based physiotherapy and Usual Physiotherapy in people with Neurologic Disorder and Duchenne, run by Universidad de Almeria at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Motor Function Measure (time frame: One Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05313295, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in